Question 430
An enterprise needs a business-continuity option for a regional natural disaster. Which evidence BEST validates the recommended AWS choice?
Explanation
Correct Answer
A documented regional failover exercise meets recovery time and recovery point objectives. This result is directly relevant because Separate Regions offer distinct geographic failure domains beyond one Region's AZs. The underlying AWS decision is: Consider an appropriate multi-Region disaster-recovery approach for the business RTO and RPO. The ongoing safeguard is: Rehearse recovery and verify data replication rather than equating backups with instant failover.
Incorrect Answers
AWS global infrastructure avoids having to construct every local facility before launching services. In this question, however, separate Regions offer distinct geographic failure domains beyond one Region's AZs. The answer that meets the requirement is: A documented regional failover exercise meets recovery time and recovery point objectives.
AWS APIs enable repeatable delivery without duplicating physical build procedures at every site. In this question, however, separate Regions offer distinct geographic failure domains beyond one Region's AZs. The answer that meets the requirement is: A documented regional failover exercise meets recovery time and recovery point objectives.
Cloud elasticity supports short peaks without year-round full-capacity infrastructure. In this question, however, separate Regions offer distinct geographic failure domains beyond one Region's AZs. The answer that meets the requirement is: A documented regional failover exercise meets recovery time and recovery point objectives.