Question 490
A team equates a Savings Plan with buying one fixed EC2 host and expects physical tenancy guarantees. Which observation would BEST demonstrate the chosen approach meets the need?
Explanation
Correct Answer
The purchasing plan independently addresses price coverage and any host licensing need. This result is directly relevant because A Savings Plan is a pricing agreement, not a guarantee of a specific physical server. The underlying AWS decision is: Separate spend-commitment discounts from Dedicated Host placement controls. The ongoing safeguard is: Review contract type and tenancy requirements as separate decisions.
Incorrect Answers
Dedicated Hosts provide physical server placement controls for eligible licensing requirements. In this question, however, a Savings Plan is a pricing agreement, not a guarantee of a specific physical server. The answer that meets the requirement is: The purchasing plan independently addresses price coverage and any host licensing need.
Spot capacity can lower compute cost but may be reclaimed when AWS needs it. In this question, however, a Savings Plan is a pricing agreement, not a guarantee of a specific physical server. The answer that meets the requirement is: The purchasing plan independently addresses price coverage and any host licensing need.
Eligible RI benefits may be applied across linked accounts subject to sharing and matching rules. In this question, however, a Savings Plan is a pricing agreement, not a guarantee of a specific physical server. The answer that meets the requirement is: The purchasing plan independently addresses price coverage and any host licensing need.