McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-410 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-410

Exam Name Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Enterprise

Cisco 300-410 Bundle $25.00
300-410 Sample 1 300-410 Sample 2 300-410 Sample 3 300-410 Sample 4 300-410 Sample 5 300-410 Sample 6 300-410 Sample 7 300-410 Sample 8 300-410 Sample 9 300-410 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-410 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-410 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-410 Questions & Answers

    498 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-410 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-410 Video Course

    300-410 Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    300-410 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-410 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) exam.

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) (300-410) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    498 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-410 Video Course

    Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-410 Practice Test 20

Question 190

At the Cedarfield retail branch, R-CED-BR1 reports a failed IP SLA probe to a reachable service in a customer VRF because the probe originates from the global table. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Configure a mutually supported export protocol and record templates for the collector's parser.
  2. Use an IP SLA jitter operation appropriate to the traffic class rather than only binary reachability.
  3. Use Cisco Catalyst Center Assurance to correlate client or device health with path and connectivity observations.
  4. Set the IP SLA operation's source interface or VRF context to the intended customer routing table.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

At the Cedarfield retail branch, the evidence points to a concrete mechanism rather than a generic outage. The active probe uses the wrong routing context and cannot take the same path as customer traffic. Set the IP SLA operation's source interface or VRF context to the intended customer routing table. Confirm it by checking that the VRF-scoped probe reaches the target and its measurements reflect the customer path.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That change targets netflow v9 versus ipfix format, not the reported ip sla source interface in vrf fault at the Cedarfield retail branch. The active probe uses the wrong routing context and cannot take the same path as customer traffic.

B:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements. The stated evidence at the Cedarfield retail branch instead concerns ip sla source interface in vrf.

C:

This could help where catalyst center assurance path health is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Cedarfield retail branch. The active probe uses the wrong routing context and cannot take the same path as customer traffic.

Question 191

At the Ironwood training campus, the primary WAN next hop answers ARP but upstream connectivity is lost; a static route remains preferred because no service-level object tracks reachability. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Use Cisco Catalyst Center Assurance to correlate client or device health with path and connectivity observations.
  2. Attach the intended Flexible NetFlow flow monitor in the appropriate direction on the actual traffic interface.
  3. Tie the preferred route to a suitable IP SLA object and tracking policy with a valid backup route.
  4. Set the IP SLA operation's source interface or VRF context to the intended customer routing table.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The fault at the Ironwood training campus has a specific cause. The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable. Tie the preferred route to a suitable IP SLA object and tracking policy with a valid backup route. Confirm success against this result: A remote-path failure withdraws the preferred tracked route and recovery restores it.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This could help where catalyst center assurance path health is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Ironwood training campus. The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable.

B:

That change targets flexible netflow monitor attachment, not the reported ip sla object tracking backup routing fault at the Ironwood training campus. The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable.

D:

This could help where ip sla source interface in vrf is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Ironwood training campus. The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable.

Question 192

At the Harborview media campus, the primary WAN next hop answers ARP but upstream connectivity is lost; a static route remains preferred because no service-level object tracks reachability. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Set the IP SLA operation's source interface or VRF context to the intended customer routing table.
  2. Use Cisco Catalyst Center Assurance to correlate client or device health with path and connectivity observations.
  3. Configure a mutually supported export protocol and record templates for the collector's parser.
  4. Tie the preferred route to a suitable IP SLA object and tracking policy with a valid backup route.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The fault at the Harborview media campus has a specific cause. The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable. Tie the preferred route to a suitable IP SLA object and tracking policy with a valid backup route. Confirm success against this result: A remote-path failure withdraws the preferred tracked route and recovery restores it.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: The active probe uses the wrong routing context and cannot take the same path as customer traffic. The stated evidence at the Harborview media campus instead concerns ip sla object tracking backup routing.

B:

This could help where catalyst center assurance path health is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Harborview media campus. The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable.

C:

That change targets netflow v9 versus ipfix format, not the reported ip sla object tracking backup routing fault at the Harborview media campus. The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable.

Question 193

At the Northport logistics site, an application experiences variable one-way-delay characteristics, but an ICMP reachability probe reports success and obscures voice-quality problems. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Tie the preferred route to a suitable IP SLA object and tracking policy with a valid backup route.
  2. Configure a mutually supported export protocol and record templates for the collector's parser.
  3. Use an IP SLA jitter operation appropriate to the traffic class rather than only binary reachability.
  4. Use Cisco Catalyst Center Assurance to correlate client or device health with path and connectivity observations.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use an IP SLA jitter operation appropriate to the traffic class rather than only binary reachability. That directly addresses the documented condition at the Northport logistics site: A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements. Confirmation should show that measured jitter and packet loss track observed application quality under representative load.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That change targets ip sla object tracking backup routing, not the reported ip sla jitter versus simple ping fault at the Northport logistics site. A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements.

B:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling. The stated evidence at the Northport logistics site instead concerns ip sla jitter versus simple ping.

D:

That change targets catalyst center assurance path health, not the reported ip sla jitter versus simple ping fault at the Northport logistics site. A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements.

Question 194

At the Hillcrest research lab, an application experiences variable one-way-delay characteristics, but an ICMP reachability probe reports success and obscures voice-quality problems. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Configure a mutually supported export protocol and record templates for the collector's parser.
  2. Set the IP SLA operation's source interface or VRF context to the intended customer routing table.
  3. Attach the intended Flexible NetFlow flow monitor in the appropriate direction on the actual traffic interface.
  4. Use an IP SLA jitter operation appropriate to the traffic class rather than only binary reachability.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Use an IP SLA jitter operation appropriate to the traffic class rather than only binary reachability. That directly addresses the documented condition at the Hillcrest research lab: A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements. Confirmation should show that measured jitter and packet loss track observed application quality under representative load.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This could help where netflow v9 versus ipfix format is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Hillcrest research lab. A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements.

B:

That change targets ip sla source interface in vrf, not the reported ip sla jitter versus simple ping fault at the Hillcrest research lab. A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements.

C:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic. The stated evidence at the Hillcrest research lab instead concerns ip sla jitter versus simple ping.

Question 195

At the Granite manufacturing plant, a configured flow record and exporter on R-GRA-PE1 look correct, yet the collector sees no traffic samples from the WAN link. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Attach the intended Flexible NetFlow flow monitor in the appropriate direction on the actual traffic interface.
  2. Configure a mutually supported export protocol and record templates for the collector's parser.
  3. Set the IP SLA operation's source interface or VRF context to the intended customer routing table.
  4. Use Cisco Catalyst Center Assurance to correlate client or device health with path and connectivity observations.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The fault at the Granite manufacturing plant has a specific cause. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic. Attach the intended Flexible NetFlow flow monitor in the appropriate direction on the actual traffic interface. Confirm success against this result: The monitor cache collects flow records and the configured collector receives exported data.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This could help where netflow v9 versus ipfix format is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Granite manufacturing plant. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic.

C:

That change targets ip sla source interface in vrf, not the reported flexible netflow monitor attachment fault at the Granite manufacturing plant. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic.

D:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms. The stated evidence at the Granite manufacturing plant instead concerns flexible netflow monitor attachment.

Question 196

At the Elmfield engineering office, a configured flow record and exporter on R-ELM-EDGE1 look correct, yet the collector sees no traffic samples from the WAN link. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Attach the intended Flexible NetFlow flow monitor in the appropriate direction on the actual traffic interface.
  2. Tie the preferred route to a suitable IP SLA object and tracking policy with a valid backup route.
  3. Configure a mutually supported export protocol and record templates for the collector's parser.
  4. Use Cisco Catalyst Center Assurance to correlate client or device health with path and connectivity observations.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

At the Elmfield engineering office, the evidence points to a concrete mechanism rather than a generic outage. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic. Attach the intended Flexible NetFlow flow monitor in the appropriate direction on the actual traffic interface. Confirm it by checking that the monitor cache collects flow records and the configured collector receives exported data.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable. The stated evidence at the Elmfield engineering office instead concerns flexible netflow monitor attachment.

C:

This could help where netflow v9 versus ipfix format is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Elmfield engineering office. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic.

D:

That change targets catalyst center assurance path health, not the reported flexible netflow monitor attachment fault at the Elmfield engineering office. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic.

Question 197

At the Oakbridge insurance office, a collector expects IPFIX templates but R-OAK-EDGE1 is exporting records using a different NetFlow export version, causing parse errors. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Use an IP SLA jitter operation appropriate to the traffic class rather than only binary reachability.
  2. Configure a mutually supported export protocol and record templates for the collector's parser.
  3. Tie the preferred route to a suitable IP SLA object and tracking policy with a valid backup route.
  4. Attach the intended Flexible NetFlow flow monitor in the appropriate direction on the actual traffic interface.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

At the Oakbridge insurance office, the evidence points to a concrete mechanism rather than a generic outage. The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling. Configure a mutually supported export protocol and record templates for the collector's parser. Confirm it by checking that the collector decodes the intended IPFIX or v9 records with correct fields and timestamps.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This could help where ip sla jitter versus simple ping is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Oakbridge insurance office. The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling.

C:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable. The stated evidence at the Oakbridge insurance office instead concerns netflow v9 versus ipfix format.

D:

This could help where flexible netflow monitor attachment is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Oakbridge insurance office. The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling.

Question 198

At the Aspen agricultural office, a collector expects IPFIX templates but R-ASP-WAN1 is exporting records using a different NetFlow export version, causing parse errors. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Configure a mutually supported export protocol and record templates for the collector's parser.
  2. Attach the intended Flexible NetFlow flow monitor in the appropriate direction on the actual traffic interface.
  3. Set the IP SLA operation's source interface or VRF context to the intended customer routing table.
  4. Tie the preferred route to a suitable IP SLA object and tracking policy with a valid backup route.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The fault at the Aspen agricultural office has a specific cause. The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling. Configure a mutually supported export protocol and record templates for the collector's parser. Confirm success against this result: The collector decodes the intended IPFIX or v9 records with correct fields and timestamps.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This could help where flexible netflow monitor attachment is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Aspen agricultural office. The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling.

C:

That change targets ip sla source interface in vrf, not the reported netflow v9 versus ipfix format fault at the Aspen agricultural office. The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling.

D:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable. The stated evidence at the Aspen agricultural office instead concerns netflow v9 versus ipfix format.

Question 199

At the Cedarbrook hospital, users report unstable application connectivity and operations needs a correlated view of endpoint experience, device health and network path status instead of raw interface counters alone. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Use Cisco Catalyst Center Assurance to correlate client or device health with path and connectivity observations.
  2. Configure a mutually supported export protocol and record templates for the collector's parser.
  3. Use an IP SLA jitter operation appropriate to the traffic class rather than only binary reachability.
  4. Attach the intended Flexible NetFlow flow monitor in the appropriate direction on the actual traffic interface.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

At the Cedarbrook hospital, the evidence points to a concrete mechanism rather than a generic outage. Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms. Use Cisco Catalyst Center Assurance to correlate client or device health with path and connectivity observations. Confirm it by checking that assurance telemetry identifies the affected clients, devices and relevant degradation window for targeted remediation.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling. The stated evidence at the Cedarbrook hospital instead concerns catalyst center assurance path health.

C:

This could help where ip sla jitter versus simple ping is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Cedarbrook hospital. Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms.

D:

That change targets flexible netflow monitor attachment, not the reported catalyst center assurance path health fault at the Cedarbrook hospital. Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms.

Question 200

At the Redwood medical campus, users report unstable application connectivity and operations needs a correlated view of endpoint experience, device health and network path status instead of raw interface counters alone. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Set the IP SLA operation's source interface or VRF context to the intended customer routing table.
  2. Use Cisco Catalyst Center Assurance to correlate client or device health with path and connectivity observations.
  3. Tie the preferred route to a suitable IP SLA object and tracking policy with a valid backup route.
  4. Use an IP SLA jitter operation appropriate to the traffic class rather than only binary reachability.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

At the Redwood medical campus, the evidence points to a concrete mechanism rather than a generic outage. Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms. Use Cisco Catalyst Center Assurance to correlate client or device health with path and connectivity observations. Confirm it by checking that assurance telemetry identifies the affected clients, devices and relevant degradation window for targeted remediation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This could help where ip sla source interface in vrf is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Redwood medical campus. Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms.

C:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable. The stated evidence at the Redwood medical campus instead concerns catalyst center assurance path health.

D:

This could help where ip sla jitter versus simple ping is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Redwood medical campus. Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms.