McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-410 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-410

Exam Name Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Enterprise

Cisco 300-410 Bundle $25.00
300-410 Sample 1 300-410 Sample 2 300-410 Sample 3 300-410 Sample 4 300-410 Sample 5 300-410 Sample 6 300-410 Sample 7 300-410 Sample 8 300-410 Sample 9 300-410 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-410 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-410 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-410 Questions & Answers

    498 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-410 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-410 Video Course

    300-410 Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    300-410 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-410 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) exam.

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) (300-410) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    498 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-410 Video Course

    Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-410 Practice Test 27

Question 260

At the Harborview media campus, R-HAR-DIST1 must peer by eBGP with a reachable loopback on R-INL-DIST2 multiple routed hops away; TCP never reaches Established using default TTL behavior. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The current inbound BGP policy fails to constrain accepted advertisements to contracted prefixes.
  2. BGP local preference is examined before AS-path length, and the present attributes favor the wrong exit.
  3. The default eBGP directly connected peer assumptions do not support this multiple-hop session.
  4. The iBGP-learned path retains a next hop that the receiving router cannot resolve.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The default eBGP directly connected peer assumptions do not support this multiple-hop session. That explains the specific symptom at the Harborview media campus. A direct corrective action is: Configure eBGP multihop and reliable loopback reachability for the non-direct peer as appropriate.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That diagnosis belongs to bgp inbound prefix filtering, while the observation at the Harborview media campus points to ebgp non-direct neighbor multihop.

B:

The observation at the Harborview media campus does not point to bgp local preference path policy; it points to a different condition. The default eBGP directly connected peer assumptions do not support this multiple-hop session.

D:

That diagnosis belongs to ibgp next-hop reachability, while the observation at the Harborview media campus points to ebgp non-direct neighbor multihop.

Question 261

At the Northport logistics site, R-NOR-WAN1 learns a customer prefix through iBGP, but cannot install it because the advertised external next hop is not reachable inside the AS. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. A normal iBGP speaker does not re-advertise routes learned from one iBGP peer to another.
  2. Cisco BGP weight affects path selection only on the local router and is not propagated to peers.
  3. BGP local preference is examined before AS-path length, and the present attributes favor the wrong exit.
  4. The iBGP-learned path retains a next hop that the receiving router cannot resolve.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The iBGP-learned path retains a next hop that the receiving router cannot resolve. That explains the specific symptom at the Northport logistics site. A direct corrective action is: Provide an IGP route to the external next hop or use an appropriate next-hop-self policy on the advertising iBGP router.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: A normal iBGP speaker does not re-advertise routes learned from one iBGP peer to another. The reported symptom at the Northport logistics site instead concerns ibgp next-hop reachability.

B:

That diagnosis belongs to bgp cisco weight local only, while the observation at the Northport logistics site points to ibgp next-hop reachability.

C:

The observation at the Northport logistics site does not point to bgp local preference path policy; it points to a different condition. The iBGP-learned path retains a next hop that the receiving router cannot resolve.

Question 262

At the Hillcrest research lab, R-HCR-RT1 learns a customer prefix through iBGP, but cannot install it because the advertised external next hop is not reachable inside the AS. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. Cisco BGP weight affects path selection only on the local router and is not propagated to peers.
  2. The iBGP-learned path retains a next hop that the receiving router cannot resolve.
  3. BGP local preference is examined before AS-path length, and the present attributes favor the wrong exit.
  4. The current inbound BGP policy fails to constrain accepted advertisements to contracted prefixes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The iBGP-learned path retains a next hop that the receiving router cannot resolve. That explains the specific symptom at the Hillcrest research lab. A direct corrective action is: Provide an IGP route to the external next hop or use an appropriate next-hop-self policy on the advertising iBGP router.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The observation at the Hillcrest research lab does not point to bgp cisco weight local only; it points to a different condition. The iBGP-learned path retains a next hop that the receiving router cannot resolve.

C:

That diagnosis belongs to bgp local preference path policy, while the observation at the Hillcrest research lab points to ibgp next-hop reachability.

D:

The observation at the Hillcrest research lab does not point to bgp inbound prefix filtering; it points to a different condition. The iBGP-learned path retains a next hop that the receiving router cannot resolve.

Question 263

At the Granite manufacturing plant, two iBGP clients connected to a central router do not learn each other's routes because the central router is not configured as a route reflector. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. A normal iBGP speaker does not re-advertise routes learned from one iBGP peer to another.
  2. BGP local preference is examined before AS-path length, and the present attributes favor the wrong exit.
  3. The default eBGP directly connected peer assumptions do not support this multiple-hop session.
  4. The iBGP-learned path retains a next hop that the receiving router cannot resolve.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This diagnosis fits the symptoms at the Granite manufacturing plant. A normal iBGP speaker does not re-advertise routes learned from one iBGP peer to another. The remedial action is: Configure route-reflector-client relationships according to the iBGP topology design.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The observation at the Granite manufacturing plant does not point to bgp local preference path policy; it points to a different condition. A normal iBGP speaker does not re-advertise routes learned from one iBGP peer to another.

C:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: The default eBGP directly connected peer assumptions do not support this multiple-hop session. The reported symptom at the Granite manufacturing plant instead concerns ibgp route reflection.

D:

That diagnosis belongs to ibgp next-hop reachability, while the observation at the Granite manufacturing plant points to ibgp route reflection.

Question 264

At the Elmfield engineering office, two iBGP clients connected to a central router do not learn each other's routes because the central router is not configured as a route reflector. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The default eBGP directly connected peer assumptions do not support this multiple-hop session.
  2. A normal iBGP speaker does not re-advertise routes learned from one iBGP peer to another.
  3. The current inbound BGP policy fails to constrain accepted advertisements to contracted prefixes.
  4. Cisco BGP weight affects path selection only on the local router and is not propagated to peers.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This diagnosis fits the symptoms at the Elmfield engineering office. A normal iBGP speaker does not re-advertise routes learned from one iBGP peer to another. The remedial action is: Configure route-reflector-client relationships according to the iBGP topology design.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: The default eBGP directly connected peer assumptions do not support this multiple-hop session. The reported symptom at the Elmfield engineering office instead concerns ibgp route reflection.

C:

The observation at the Elmfield engineering office does not point to bgp inbound prefix filtering; it points to a different condition. A normal iBGP speaker does not re-advertise routes learned from one iBGP peer to another.

D:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: Cisco BGP weight affects path selection only on the local router and is not propagated to peers. The reported symptom at the Elmfield engineering office instead concerns ibgp route reflection.

Question 265

At the Oakbridge insurance office, two egress providers advertise the same prefix; one has a shorter AS path but the business wants all internal routers to prefer the other exit. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The default eBGP directly connected peer assumptions do not support this multiple-hop session.
  2. Cisco BGP weight affects path selection only on the local router and is not propagated to peers.
  3. BGP local preference is examined before AS-path length, and the present attributes favor the wrong exit.
  4. The iBGP-learned path retains a next hop that the receiving router cannot resolve.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This diagnosis fits the symptoms at the Oakbridge insurance office. BGP local preference is examined before AS-path length, and the present attributes favor the wrong exit. The remedial action is: Use a consistent BGP local-preference policy within the AS to favor the required exit.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The observation at the Oakbridge insurance office does not point to ebgp non-direct neighbor multihop; it points to a different condition. BGP local preference is examined before AS-path length, and the present attributes favor the wrong exit.

B:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: Cisco BGP weight affects path selection only on the local router and is not propagated to peers. The reported symptom at the Oakbridge insurance office instead concerns bgp local preference path policy.

D:

The observation at the Oakbridge insurance office does not point to ibgp next-hop reachability; it points to a different condition. BGP local preference is examined before AS-path length, and the present attributes favor the wrong exit.

Question 266

At the Aspen agricultural office, two egress providers advertise the same prefix; one has a shorter AS path but the business wants all internal routers to prefer the other exit. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. BGP local preference is examined before AS-path length, and the present attributes favor the wrong exit.
  2. A normal iBGP speaker does not re-advertise routes learned from one iBGP peer to another.
  3. The default eBGP directly connected peer assumptions do not support this multiple-hop session.
  4. Cisco BGP weight affects path selection only on the local router and is not propagated to peers.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This diagnosis fits the symptoms at the Aspen agricultural office. BGP local preference is examined before AS-path length, and the present attributes favor the wrong exit. The remedial action is: Use a consistent BGP local-preference policy within the AS to favor the required exit.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The observation at the Aspen agricultural office does not point to ibgp route reflection; it points to a different condition. BGP local preference is examined before AS-path length, and the present attributes favor the wrong exit.

C:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: The default eBGP directly connected peer assumptions do not support this multiple-hop session. The reported symptom at the Aspen agricultural office instead concerns bgp local preference path policy.

D:

That diagnosis belongs to bgp cisco weight local only, while the observation at the Aspen agricultural office points to bgp local preference path policy.

Question 267

At the Cedarbrook hospital, an engineer sets a Cisco BGP weight on R-CDR-WAN1 and expects that value to change exit selection on every other router in the AS. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. A normal iBGP speaker does not re-advertise routes learned from one iBGP peer to another.
  2. The default eBGP directly connected peer assumptions do not support this multiple-hop session.
  3. Cisco BGP weight affects path selection only on the local router and is not propagated to peers.
  4. The iBGP-learned path retains a next hop that the receiving router cannot resolve.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The evidence at the Cedarbrook hospital supports this condition: Cisco BGP weight affects path selection only on the local router and is not propagated to peers. The associated fix is: Apply an appropriate AS-wide policy such as local preference rather than relying on router-local weight.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: A normal iBGP speaker does not re-advertise routes learned from one iBGP peer to another. The reported symptom at the Cedarbrook hospital instead concerns bgp cisco weight local only.

B:

That diagnosis belongs to ebgp non-direct neighbor multihop, while the observation at the Cedarbrook hospital points to bgp cisco weight local only.

D:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: The iBGP-learned path retains a next hop that the receiving router cannot resolve. The reported symptom at the Cedarbrook hospital instead concerns bgp cisco weight local only.

Question 268

At the Redwood medical campus, an engineer sets a Cisco BGP weight on R-RED-EDGE1 and expects that value to change exit selection on every other router in the AS. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. Cisco BGP weight affects path selection only on the local router and is not propagated to peers.
  2. The current inbound BGP policy fails to constrain accepted advertisements to contracted prefixes.
  3. A normal iBGP speaker does not re-advertise routes learned from one iBGP peer to another.
  4. BGP local preference is examined before AS-path length, and the present attributes favor the wrong exit.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The evidence at the Redwood medical campus supports this condition: Cisco BGP weight affects path selection only on the local router and is not propagated to peers. The associated fix is: Apply an appropriate AS-wide policy such as local preference rather than relying on router-local weight.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: The current inbound BGP policy fails to constrain accepted advertisements to contracted prefixes. The reported symptom at the Redwood medical campus instead concerns bgp cisco weight local only.

C:

That diagnosis belongs to ibgp route reflection, while the observation at the Redwood medical campus points to bgp cisco weight local only.

D:

The observation at the Redwood medical campus does not point to bgp local preference path policy; it points to a different condition. Cisco BGP weight affects path selection only on the local router and is not propagated to peers.

Question 269

At the Clearwater library district, an eBGP neighbor begins advertising unrelated routes and R-CLW-EDGE1 installs more prefixes than the agreed customer set. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The current inbound BGP policy fails to constrain accepted advertisements to contracted prefixes.
  2. The default eBGP directly connected peer assumptions do not support this multiple-hop session.
  3. A normal iBGP speaker does not re-advertise routes learned from one iBGP peer to another.
  4. The iBGP-learned path retains a next hop that the receiving router cannot resolve.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This diagnosis fits the symptoms at the Clearwater library district. The current inbound BGP policy fails to constrain accepted advertisements to contracted prefixes. The remedial action is: Attach an inbound BGP prefix filter that explicitly permits the authorized customer set and rejects the rest.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The observation at the Clearwater library district does not point to ebgp non-direct neighbor multihop; it points to a different condition. The current inbound BGP policy fails to constrain accepted advertisements to contracted prefixes.

C:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: A normal iBGP speaker does not re-advertise routes learned from one iBGP peer to another. The reported symptom at the Clearwater library district instead concerns bgp inbound prefix filtering.

D:

That diagnosis belongs to ibgp next-hop reachability, while the observation at the Clearwater library district points to bgp inbound prefix filtering.

Question 270

At the Bayview university campus, an eBGP neighbor begins advertising unrelated routes and R-BAY-DIST1 installs more prefixes than the agreed customer set. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The current inbound BGP policy fails to constrain accepted advertisements to contracted prefixes.
  2. Cisco BGP weight affects path selection only on the local router and is not propagated to peers.
  3. The default eBGP directly connected peer assumptions do not support this multiple-hop session.
  4. BGP local preference is examined before AS-path length, and the present attributes favor the wrong exit.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The current inbound BGP policy fails to constrain accepted advertisements to contracted prefixes. That explains the specific symptom at the Bayview university campus. A direct corrective action is: Attach an inbound BGP prefix filter that explicitly permits the authorized customer set and rejects the rest.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That diagnosis belongs to bgp cisco weight local only, while the observation at the Bayview university campus points to bgp inbound prefix filtering.

C:

The observation at the Bayview university campus does not point to ebgp non-direct neighbor multihop; it points to a different condition. The current inbound BGP policy fails to constrain accepted advertisements to contracted prefixes.

D:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: BGP local preference is examined before AS-path length, and the present attributes favor the wrong exit. The reported symptom at the Bayview university campus instead concerns bgp inbound prefix filtering.