McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-410 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-410

Exam Name Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Enterprise

Cisco 300-410 Bundle $25.00
300-410 Sample 1 300-410 Sample 2 300-410 Sample 3 300-410 Sample 4 300-410 Sample 5 300-410 Sample 6 300-410 Sample 7 300-410 Sample 8 300-410 Sample 9 300-410 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-410 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-410 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-410 Questions & Answers

    498 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-410 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-410 Video Course

    300-410 Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    300-410 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-410 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) exam.

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) (300-410) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    498 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-410 Video Course

    Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-410 Practice Test 33

Question 320

At the Southridge banking office, an IPv4 ACL on R-SRG-EDGE1 allows two explicit applications, but an otherwise legitimate management source loses connectivity after the ACL is applied. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. Loose uRPF checks that a source route exists, not that the packet came on the best reverse-path interface.
  2. Packets that do not match an ACL permit statement are denied by the implicit final rule.
  3. A standard IPv4 ACL matches source addresses, so placement can affect more destinations than intended.
  4. Wildcard bits determine which address positions are ignored, and the current value does not represent the intended network.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The evidence at the Southridge banking office supports this condition: Packets that do not match an ACL permit statement are denied by the implicit final rule. The associated fix is: Add a narrowly scoped permit for the authorized source and service above the implicit deny.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That diagnosis belongs to urpf loose versus strict source check, while the observation at the Southridge banking office points to ipv4 acl implicit deny.

C:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: A standard IPv4 ACL matches source addresses, so placement can affect more destinations than intended. The reported symptom at the Southridge banking office instead concerns ipv4 acl implicit deny.

D:

That diagnosis belongs to ipv4 wildcard mask matching, while the observation at the Southridge banking office points to ipv4 acl implicit deny.

Question 321

At the Westlake utility network, a standard IPv4 ACL intended to limit access to one destination is blocking the same source subnet's unrelated traffic on another network. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The time-based ACL entry is inactive at the time packets arrive despite matching source and destination criteria.
  2. Loose uRPF checks that a source route exists, not that the packet came on the best reverse-path interface.
  3. A standard IPv4 ACL matches source addresses, so placement can affect more destinations than intended.
  4. Packets that do not match an ACL permit statement are denied by the implicit final rule.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The evidence at the Westlake utility network supports this condition: A standard IPv4 ACL matches source addresses, so placement can affect more destinations than intended. The associated fix is: Place the source-only standard ACL close to the intended destination or use an appropriate extended ACL.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: The time-based ACL entry is inactive at the time packets arrive despite matching source and destination criteria. The reported symptom at the Westlake utility network instead concerns standard acl source-only matching.

B:

That diagnosis belongs to urpf loose versus strict source check, while the observation at the Westlake utility network points to standard acl source-only matching.

D:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: Packets that do not match an ACL permit statement are denied by the implicit final rule. The reported symptom at the Westlake utility network instead concerns standard acl source-only matching.

Question 322

At the Pinecrest freight terminal, a standard IPv4 ACL intended to limit access to one destination is blocking the same source subnet's unrelated traffic on another network. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The time-based ACL entry is inactive at the time packets arrive despite matching source and destination criteria.
  2. A standard IPv4 ACL matches source addresses, so placement can affect more destinations than intended.
  3. Loose uRPF checks that a source route exists, not that the packet came on the best reverse-path interface.
  4. The ACL attachment direction or interface does not intersect the targeted packet flow.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A standard IPv4 ACL matches source addresses, so placement can affect more destinations than intended. That explains the specific symptom at the Pinecrest freight terminal. A direct corrective action is: Place the source-only standard ACL close to the intended destination or use an appropriate extended ACL.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The observation at the Pinecrest freight terminal does not point to time-based acl inactive schedule; it points to a different condition. A standard IPv4 ACL matches source addresses, so placement can affect more destinations than intended.

C:

That diagnosis belongs to urpf loose versus strict source check, while the observation at the Pinecrest freight terminal points to standard acl source-only matching.

D:

The observation at the Pinecrest freight terminal does not point to extended acl inbound/outbound orientation; it points to a different condition. A standard IPv4 ACL matches source addresses, so placement can affect more destinations than intended.

Question 323

At the Cedarfield retail branch, R-CED-BR1 has an extended ACL with the intended source and destination criteria, but the undesired packets still pass because the ACL is applied outbound on an unrelated interface. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. Strict uRPF rejects packets whose incoming interface is not the router's reverse best path toward the source.
  2. The time-based ACL entry is inactive at the time packets arrive despite matching source and destination criteria.
  3. The ACL attachment direction or interface does not intersect the targeted packet flow.
  4. The IPv6 access-classification policy is not attached to the traffic ingress path being protected.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The ACL attachment direction or interface does not intersect the targeted packet flow. That explains the specific symptom at the Cedarfield retail branch. A direct corrective action is: Attach the ACL in the correct direction on the interface that actually sees the traffic.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That diagnosis belongs to urpf strict in asymmetric topology, while the observation at the Cedarfield retail branch points to extended acl inbound/outbound orientation.

B:

The observation at the Cedarfield retail branch does not point to time-based acl inactive schedule; it points to a different condition. The ACL attachment direction or interface does not intersect the targeted packet flow.

D:

That diagnosis belongs to ipv6 acl interface direction, while the observation at the Cedarfield retail branch points to extended acl inbound/outbound orientation.

Question 324

At the Bluewater clinical network, R-BLU-PE1 has an extended ACL with the intended source and destination criteria, but the undesired packets still pass because the ACL is applied outbound on an unrelated interface. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The IPv6 access-classification policy is not attached to the traffic ingress path being protected.
  2. The ACL attachment direction or interface does not intersect the targeted packet flow.
  3. Loose uRPF checks that a source route exists, not that the packet came on the best reverse-path interface.
  4. Packets that do not match an ACL permit statement are denied by the implicit final rule.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This diagnosis fits the symptoms at the Bluewater clinical network. The ACL attachment direction or interface does not intersect the targeted packet flow. The remedial action is: Attach the ACL in the correct direction on the interface that actually sees the traffic.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: The IPv6 access-classification policy is not attached to the traffic ingress path being protected. The reported symptom at the Bluewater clinical network instead concerns extended acl inbound/outbound orientation.

C:

The observation at the Bluewater clinical network does not point to urpf loose versus strict source check; it points to a different condition. The ACL attachment direction or interface does not intersect the targeted packet flow.

D:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: Packets that do not match an ACL permit statement are denied by the implicit final rule. The reported symptom at the Bluewater clinical network instead concerns extended acl inbound/outbound orientation.

Question 325

At the Harborview media campus, an ACL on R-HAR-DIST1 meant to cover 10.127.0.0/16 uses a wildcard mask that unintentionally matches only part of the permitted source range. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. Packets that do not match an ACL permit statement are denied by the implicit final rule.
  2. A standard IPv4 ACL matches source addresses, so placement can affect more destinations than intended.
  3. Wildcard bits determine which address positions are ignored, and the current value does not represent the intended network.
  4. Strict uRPF rejects packets whose incoming interface is not the router's reverse best path toward the source.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This diagnosis fits the symptoms at the Harborview media campus. Wildcard bits determine which address positions are ignored, and the current value does not represent the intended network. The remedial action is: Recalculate the wildcard mask to match precisely the intended IPv4 address block.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The observation at the Harborview media campus does not point to ipv4 acl implicit deny; it points to a different condition. Wildcard bits determine which address positions are ignored, and the current value does not represent the intended network.

B:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: A standard IPv4 ACL matches source addresses, so placement can affect more destinations than intended. The reported symptom at the Harborview media campus instead concerns ipv4 wildcard mask matching.

D:

The observation at the Harborview media campus does not point to urpf strict in asymmetric topology; it points to a different condition. Wildcard bits determine which address positions are ignored, and the current value does not represent the intended network.

Question 326

At the Ironwood training campus, an ACL on R-IRN-RT1 meant to cover 10.248.0.0/16 uses a wildcard mask that unintentionally matches only part of the permitted source range. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. Wildcard bits determine which address positions are ignored, and the current value does not represent the intended network.
  2. Strict uRPF rejects packets whose incoming interface is not the router's reverse best path toward the source.
  3. The IPv6 access-classification policy is not attached to the traffic ingress path being protected.
  4. Packets that do not match an ACL permit statement are denied by the implicit final rule.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This diagnosis fits the symptoms at the Ironwood training campus. Wildcard bits determine which address positions are ignored, and the current value does not represent the intended network. The remedial action is: Recalculate the wildcard mask to match precisely the intended IPv4 address block.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The observation at the Ironwood training campus does not point to urpf strict in asymmetric topology; it points to a different condition. Wildcard bits determine which address positions are ignored, and the current value does not represent the intended network.

C:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: The IPv6 access-classification policy is not attached to the traffic ingress path being protected. The reported symptom at the Ironwood training campus instead concerns ipv4 wildcard mask matching.

D:

That diagnosis belongs to ipv4 acl implicit deny, while the observation at the Ironwood training campus points to ipv4 wildcard mask matching.

Question 327

At the Hillcrest research lab, a time-range ACL should permit contractor access during the approved maintenance window, but legitimate traffic remains denied despite a matching IP rule. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The IPv6 access-classification policy is not attached to the traffic ingress path being protected.
  2. The ACL attachment direction or interface does not intersect the targeted packet flow.
  3. A standard IPv4 ACL matches source addresses, so placement can affect more destinations than intended.
  4. The time-based ACL entry is inactive at the time packets arrive despite matching source and destination criteria.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The time-based ACL entry is inactive at the time packets arrive despite matching source and destination criteria. That explains the specific symptom at the Hillcrest research lab. A direct corrective action is: Correct the time-range definition and the device time reference used by the ACL.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: The IPv6 access-classification policy is not attached to the traffic ingress path being protected. The reported symptom at the Hillcrest research lab instead concerns time-based acl inactive schedule.

B:

That diagnosis belongs to extended acl inbound/outbound orientation, while the observation at the Hillcrest research lab points to time-based acl inactive schedule.

C:

The observation at the Hillcrest research lab does not point to standard acl source-only matching; it points to a different condition. The time-based ACL entry is inactive at the time packets arrive despite matching source and destination criteria.

Question 328

At the Northport logistics site, a time-range ACL should permit contractor access during the approved maintenance window, but legitimate traffic remains denied despite a matching IP rule. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The time-based ACL entry is inactive at the time packets arrive despite matching source and destination criteria.
  2. Packets that do not match an ACL permit statement are denied by the implicit final rule.
  3. The IPv6 access-classification policy is not attached to the traffic ingress path being protected.
  4. Wildcard bits determine which address positions are ignored, and the current value does not represent the intended network.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The evidence at the Northport logistics site supports this condition: The time-based ACL entry is inactive at the time packets arrive despite matching source and destination criteria. The associated fix is: Correct the time-range definition and the device time reference used by the ACL.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: Packets that do not match an ACL permit statement are denied by the implicit final rule. The reported symptom at the Northport logistics site instead concerns time-based acl inactive schedule.

C:

That diagnosis belongs to ipv6 acl interface direction, while the observation at the Northport logistics site points to time-based acl inactive schedule.

D:

The observation at the Northport logistics site does not point to ipv4 wildcard mask matching; it points to a different condition. The time-based ACL entry is inactive at the time packets arrive despite matching source and destination criteria.

Question 329

At the Elmfield engineering office, an IPv6 traffic filter is configured to block unsolicited management connections but traffic still reaches R-ELM-EDGE1 over the IPv6-facing ingress link. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. Strict uRPF rejects packets whose incoming interface is not the router's reverse best path toward the source.
  2. The IPv6 access-classification policy is not attached to the traffic ingress path being protected.
  3. Loose uRPF checks that a source route exists, not that the packet came on the best reverse-path interface.
  4. The time-based ACL entry is inactive at the time packets arrive despite matching source and destination criteria.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The evidence at the Elmfield engineering office supports this condition: The IPv6 access-classification policy is not attached to the traffic ingress path being protected. The associated fix is: Apply the IPv6 ACL to the correct routed interface and incoming direction.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That diagnosis belongs to urpf strict in asymmetric topology, while the observation at the Elmfield engineering office points to ipv6 acl interface direction.

C:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: Loose uRPF checks that a source route exists, not that the packet came on the best reverse-path interface. The reported symptom at the Elmfield engineering office instead concerns ipv6 acl interface direction.

D:

That diagnosis belongs to time-based acl inactive schedule, while the observation at the Elmfield engineering office points to ipv6 acl interface direction.

Question 330

At the Granite manufacturing plant, an IPv6 traffic filter is configured to block unsolicited management connections but traffic still reaches R-GRA-PE1 over the IPv6-facing ingress link. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The time-based ACL entry is inactive at the time packets arrive despite matching source and destination criteria.
  2. Packets that do not match an ACL permit statement are denied by the implicit final rule.
  3. Loose uRPF checks that a source route exists, not that the packet came on the best reverse-path interface.
  4. The IPv6 access-classification policy is not attached to the traffic ingress path being protected.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The IPv6 access-classification policy is not attached to the traffic ingress path being protected. That explains the specific symptom at the Granite manufacturing plant. A direct corrective action is: Apply the IPv6 ACL to the correct routed interface and incoming direction.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: The time-based ACL entry is inactive at the time packets arrive despite matching source and destination criteria. The reported symptom at the Granite manufacturing plant instead concerns ipv6 acl interface direction.

B:

That diagnosis belongs to ipv4 acl implicit deny, while the observation at the Granite manufacturing plant points to ipv6 acl interface direction.

C:

The observation at the Granite manufacturing plant does not point to urpf loose versus strict source check; it points to a different condition. The IPv6 access-classification policy is not attached to the traffic ingress path being protected.