McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-410 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-410

Exam Name Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Enterprise

Cisco 300-410 Bundle $25.00

100% Cisco 300-410 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-410 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-410 Questions & Answers

    498 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-410 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-410 Video Course

    300-410 Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    300-410 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-410 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) exam.

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) (300-410) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    498 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-410 Video Course

    Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-410 Practice Test 40

Question 390

At the Cedarfield retail branch, R-CED-BR1 reports a failed IP SLA probe to a reachable service in a customer VRF because the probe originates from the global table. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms.
  2. The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable.
  3. The active probe uses the wrong routing context and cannot take the same path as customer traffic.
  4. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The evidence at the Cedarfield retail branch supports this condition: The active probe uses the wrong routing context and cannot take the same path as customer traffic. The associated fix is: Set the IP SLA operation's source interface or VRF context to the intended customer routing table.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms. The reported symptom at the Cedarfield retail branch instead concerns ip sla source interface in vrf.

B:

That diagnosis belongs to ip sla object tracking backup routing, while the observation at the Cedarfield retail branch points to ip sla source interface in vrf.

D:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic. The reported symptom at the Cedarfield retail branch instead concerns ip sla source interface in vrf.

Question 391

At the Ironwood training campus, the primary WAN next hop answers ARP but upstream connectivity is lost; a static route remains preferred because no service-level object tracks reachability. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling.
  2. A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements.
  3. The active probe uses the wrong routing context and cannot take the same path as customer traffic.
  4. The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The evidence at the Ironwood training campus supports this condition: The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable. The associated fix is: Tie the preferred route to a suitable IP SLA object and tracking policy with a valid backup route.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The observation at the Ironwood training campus does not point to netflow v9 versus ipfix format; it points to a different condition. The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable.

B:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements. The reported symptom at the Ironwood training campus instead concerns ip sla object tracking backup routing.

C:

That diagnosis belongs to ip sla source interface in vrf, while the observation at the Ironwood training campus points to ip sla object tracking backup routing.

Question 392

At the Harborview media campus, the primary WAN next hop answers ARP but upstream connectivity is lost; a static route remains preferred because no service-level object tracks reachability. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable.
  2. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic.
  3. A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements.
  4. The active probe uses the wrong routing context and cannot take the same path as customer traffic.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This diagnosis fits the symptoms at the Harborview media campus. The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable. The remedial action is: Tie the preferred route to a suitable IP SLA object and tracking policy with a valid backup route.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The observation at the Harborview media campus does not point to flexible netflow monitor attachment; it points to a different condition. The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable.

C:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements. The reported symptom at the Harborview media campus instead concerns ip sla object tracking backup routing.

D:

That diagnosis belongs to ip sla source interface in vrf, while the observation at the Harborview media campus points to ip sla object tracking backup routing.

Question 393

At the Northport logistics site, an application experiences variable one-way-delay characteristics, but an ICMP reachability probe reports success and obscures voice-quality problems. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms.
  2. A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements.
  3. The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable.
  4. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This diagnosis fits the symptoms at the Northport logistics site. A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements. The remedial action is: Use an IP SLA jitter operation appropriate to the traffic class rather than only binary reachability.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms. The reported symptom at the Northport logistics site instead concerns ip sla jitter versus simple ping.

C:

The observation at the Northport logistics site does not point to ip sla object tracking backup routing; it points to a different condition. A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements.

D:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic. The reported symptom at the Northport logistics site instead concerns ip sla jitter versus simple ping.

Question 394

At the Hillcrest research lab, an application experiences variable one-way-delay characteristics, but an ICMP reachability probe reports success and obscures voice-quality problems. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements.
  2. Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms.
  3. The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling.
  4. The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The evidence at the Hillcrest research lab supports this condition: A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements. The associated fix is: Use an IP SLA jitter operation appropriate to the traffic class rather than only binary reachability.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms. The reported symptom at the Hillcrest research lab instead concerns ip sla jitter versus simple ping.

C:

That diagnosis belongs to netflow v9 versus ipfix format, while the observation at the Hillcrest research lab points to ip sla jitter versus simple ping.

D:

The observation at the Hillcrest research lab does not point to ip sla object tracking backup routing; it points to a different condition. A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements.

Question 395

At the Granite manufacturing plant, a configured flow record and exporter on R-GRA-PE1 look correct, yet the collector sees no traffic samples from the WAN link. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic.
  2. The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling.
  3. A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements.
  4. The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This diagnosis fits the symptoms at the Granite manufacturing plant. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic. The remedial action is: Attach the intended Flexible NetFlow flow monitor in the appropriate direction on the actual traffic interface.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The observation at the Granite manufacturing plant does not point to netflow v9 versus ipfix format; it points to a different condition. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic.

C:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements. The reported symptom at the Granite manufacturing plant instead concerns flexible netflow monitor attachment.

D:

That diagnosis belongs to ip sla object tracking backup routing, while the observation at the Granite manufacturing plant points to flexible netflow monitor attachment.

Question 396

At the Elmfield engineering office, a configured flow record and exporter on R-ELM-EDGE1 look correct, yet the collector sees no traffic samples from the WAN link. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling.
  2. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic.
  3. A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements.
  4. Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This diagnosis fits the symptoms at the Elmfield engineering office. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic. The remedial action is: Attach the intended Flexible NetFlow flow monitor in the appropriate direction on the actual traffic interface.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling. The reported symptom at the Elmfield engineering office instead concerns flexible netflow monitor attachment.

C:

The observation at the Elmfield engineering office does not point to ip sla jitter versus simple ping; it points to a different condition. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic.

D:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms. The reported symptom at the Elmfield engineering office instead concerns flexible netflow monitor attachment.

Question 397

At the Oakbridge insurance office, a collector expects IPFIX templates but R-OAK-EDGE1 is exporting records using a different NetFlow export version, causing parse errors. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic.
  2. The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling.
  3. The active probe uses the wrong routing context and cannot take the same path as customer traffic.
  4. The router considers the directly reachable gateway healthy even though the desired remote path is unavailable.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling. That explains the specific symptom at the Oakbridge insurance office. A direct corrective action is: Configure a mutually supported export protocol and record templates for the collector's parser.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The observation at the Oakbridge insurance office does not point to flexible netflow monitor attachment; it points to a different condition. The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling.

C:

That diagnosis belongs to ip sla source interface in vrf, while the observation at the Oakbridge insurance office points to netflow v9 versus ipfix format.

D:

The observation at the Oakbridge insurance office does not point to ip sla object tracking backup routing; it points to a different condition. The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling.

Question 398

At the Aspen agricultural office, a collector expects IPFIX templates but R-ASP-WAN1 is exporting records using a different NetFlow export version, causing parse errors. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic.
  2. The active probe uses the wrong routing context and cannot take the same path as customer traffic.
  3. The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling.
  4. A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling. That explains the specific symptom at the Aspen agricultural office. A direct corrective action is: Configure a mutually supported export protocol and record templates for the collector's parser.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That diagnosis belongs to flexible netflow monitor attachment, while the observation at the Aspen agricultural office points to netflow v9 versus ipfix format.

B:

The observation at the Aspen agricultural office does not point to ip sla source interface in vrf; it points to a different condition. The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling.

D:

That diagnosis belongs to ip sla jitter versus simple ping, while the observation at the Aspen agricultural office points to netflow v9 versus ipfix format.

Question 399

At the Cedarbrook hospital, users report unstable application connectivity and operations needs a correlated view of endpoint experience, device health and network path status instead of raw interface counters alone. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms.
  2. The flow record and exporter are configured but no active monitor captures the desired interface traffic.
  3. The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling.
  4. The active probe uses the wrong routing context and cannot take the same path as customer traffic.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms. That explains the specific symptom at the Cedarbrook hospital. A direct corrective action is: Use Cisco Catalyst Center Assurance to correlate client or device health with path and connectivity observations.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That diagnosis belongs to flexible netflow monitor attachment, while the observation at the Cedarbrook hospital points to catalyst center assurance path health.

C:

The observation at the Cedarbrook hospital does not point to netflow v9 versus ipfix format; it points to a different condition. Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms.

D:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: The active probe uses the wrong routing context and cannot take the same path as customer traffic. The reported symptom at the Cedarbrook hospital instead concerns catalyst center assurance path health.

Question 400

At the Redwood medical campus, users report unstable application connectivity and operations needs a correlated view of endpoint experience, device health and network path status instead of raw interface counters alone. Which underlying technical condition best accounts for this evidence?

  1. The active probe uses the wrong routing context and cannot take the same path as customer traffic.
  2. The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling.
  3. A successful echo test confirms reachability but does not capture the application's jitter requirements.
  4. Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The evidence at the Redwood medical campus supports this condition: Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms. The associated fix is: Use Cisco Catalyst Center Assurance to correlate client or device health with path and connectivity observations.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The observation at the Redwood medical campus does not point to ip sla source interface in vrf; it points to a different condition. Isolated interface statistics do not explain the combined endpoint, device and network symptoms.

B:

This diagnoses a different mechanism: The exporter and collector disagree on flow-record format or template handling. The reported symptom at the Redwood medical campus instead concerns catalyst center assurance path health.

C:

That diagnosis belongs to ip sla jitter versus simple ping, while the observation at the Redwood medical campus points to catalyst center assurance path health.