McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-410 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-410

Exam Name Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Enterprise

Cisco 300-410 Bundle $25.00
300-410 Sample 1 300-410 Sample 2 300-410 Sample 3 300-410 Sample 4 300-410 Sample 5 300-410 Sample 6 300-410 Sample 7 300-410 Sample 8 300-410 Sample 9 300-410 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-410 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-410 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-410 Questions & Answers

    498 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-410 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-410 Video Course

    300-410 Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    300-410 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-410 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) exam.

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) (300-410) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    498 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-410 Video Course

    Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-410 Practice Test 5

Question 40

At the Northport logistics site, an alternate EIGRP route is feasible but has a higher metric and is not installed alongside the primary path as desired. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Evaluate the reported-distance-less-than-feasible-distance condition before treating a backup as feasible.
  2. Remove passive-interface status from the legitimate EIGRP transit port, keeping host-only interfaces passive.
  3. Assess the interface delay contribution to the EIGRP composite metric and set it deliberately.
  4. Configure EIGRP variance within the feasible-path and feasible-distance limitations for unequal-cost load balancing.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

At the Northport logistics site, the evidence points to a concrete mechanism rather than a generic outage. Default EIGRP forwarding does not use the desired unequal-cost feasible alternate without appropriate variance. Configure EIGRP variance within the feasible-path and feasible-distance limitations for unequal-cost load balancing. Confirm it by checking that the routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That change targets eigrp feasible successor inequality, not the reported eigrp variance traffic sharing fault at the Northport logistics site. Default EIGRP forwarding does not use the desired unequal-cost feasible alternate without appropriate variance.

B:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: Passive-interface suppresses routing-neighbor discovery where an EIGRP adjacency is required. The stated evidence at the Northport logistics site instead concerns eigrp variance traffic sharing.

C:

This could help where eigrp delay in composite metric is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Northport logistics site. Default EIGRP forwarding does not use the desired unequal-cost feasible alternate without appropriate variance.

Question 41

At the Elmfield engineering office, engineers change a link's configured delay and the EIGRP best path to the Midtown engineering center shifts despite unchanged line bandwidth. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Configure matching EIGRP autonomous-system values for the participating adjacency.
  2. Assess the interface delay contribution to the EIGRP composite metric and set it deliberately.
  3. Configure appropriate EIGRP stub behavior on the leaf spoke and verify permitted route advertisements.
  4. Evaluate the reported-distance-less-than-feasible-distance condition before treating a backup as feasible.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

At the Elmfield engineering office, the evidence points to a concrete mechanism rather than a generic outage. The EIGRP route metric reflects interface delay as well as bandwidth under standard metric settings. Assess the interface delay contribution to the EIGRP composite metric and set it deliberately. Confirm it by checking that the selected successor and displayed metric match the planned delay policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This could help where eigrp as mismatch is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Elmfield engineering office. The EIGRP route metric reflects interface delay as well as bandwidth under standard metric settings.

C:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: The leaf is participating in a query domain larger than its topology role requires. The stated evidence at the Elmfield engineering office instead concerns eigrp delay in composite metric.

D:

This could help where eigrp feasible successor inequality is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Elmfield engineering office. The EIGRP route metric reflects interface delay as well as bandwidth under standard metric settings.

Question 42

At the Granite manufacturing plant, engineers change a link's configured delay and the EIGRP best path to the Meridian corporate campus shifts despite unchanged line bandwidth. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Configure matching EIGRP autonomous-system values for the participating adjacency.
  2. Make the EIGRP authentication mode and key configuration consistent on both ends.
  3. Configure EIGRP variance within the feasible-path and feasible-distance limitations for unequal-cost load balancing.
  4. Assess the interface delay contribution to the EIGRP composite metric and set it deliberately.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The fault at the Granite manufacturing plant has a specific cause. The EIGRP route metric reflects interface delay as well as bandwidth under standard metric settings. Assess the interface delay contribution to the EIGRP composite metric and set it deliberately. Confirm success against this result: The selected successor and displayed metric match the planned delay policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: EIGRP peers in different AS configurations will not establish the intended neighbor relationship. The stated evidence at the Granite manufacturing plant instead concerns eigrp delay in composite metric.

B:

This could help where eigrp authentication mismatch is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Granite manufacturing plant. The EIGRP route metric reflects interface delay as well as bandwidth under standard metric settings.

C:

That change targets eigrp variance traffic sharing, not the reported eigrp delay in composite metric fault at the Granite manufacturing plant. The EIGRP route metric reflects interface delay as well as bandwidth under standard metric settings.

Question 43

At the Aspen agricultural office, R-ASP-WAN1 and R-VAL-WAN2 share a working IPv4 subnet, yet OSPF adjacency fails; one interface is area 0 and the other area 10. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Set compatible OSPF network types appropriate to the actual transit medium on both ends.
  2. Verify NSSA type-7 origination and the ABR translation behavior for the external prefix.
  3. Evaluate OSPF path type precedence before comparing costs between intra-area and inter-area candidates.
  4. Configure the two ends of the intended OSPF adjacency in the same area.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

At the Aspen agricultural office, the evidence points to a concrete mechanism rather than a generic outage. OSPF neighbor packets describe incompatible area membership for a common link. Configure the two ends of the intended OSPF adjacency in the same area. Confirm it by checking that the interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That change targets ospf dr network-type mismatch, not the reported ospf area mismatch fault at the Aspen agricultural office. OSPF neighbor packets describe incompatible area membership for a common link.

B:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: NSSA external routes use type-7 LSAs internally and depend on translation for normal areas. The stated evidence at the Aspen agricultural office instead concerns ospf area mismatch.

C:

This could help where ospf intra-area route preference is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Aspen agricultural office. OSPF neighbor packets describe incompatible area membership for a common link.

Question 44

At the Oakbridge insurance office, R-OAK-EDGE1 and R-MOU-EDGE2 share a working IPv4 subnet, yet OSPF adjacency fails; one interface is area 0 and the other area 10. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Set compatible OSPF network types appropriate to the actual transit medium on both ends.
  2. Correct the interface MTU mismatch rather than bypassing the OSPF database-description check.
  3. Align OSPF authentication type, algorithm and matching credentials across the shared link.
  4. Configure the two ends of the intended OSPF adjacency in the same area.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Configure the two ends of the intended OSPF adjacency in the same area. That directly addresses the documented condition at the Oakbridge insurance office: OSPF neighbor packets describe incompatible area membership for a common link. Confirmation should show that the interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This could help where ospf dr network-type mismatch is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Oakbridge insurance office. OSPF neighbor packets describe incompatible area membership for a common link.

B:

That change targets ospf mtu exstart, not the reported ospf area mismatch fault at the Oakbridge insurance office. OSPF neighbor packets describe incompatible area membership for a common link.

C:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: Authentication settings on the OSPF peers no longer match, so received protocol packets are rejected. The stated evidence at the Oakbridge insurance office instead concerns ospf area mismatch.

Question 45

At the Redwood medical campus, OSPF neighbors on the transit link repeatedly fail to reach Full state after one router's authentication key was rotated. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Set compatible OSPF network types appropriate to the actual transit medium on both ends.
  2. Rework the backbone connection or place the OSPF virtual link over an eligible non-stub transit area.
  3. Make OSPF stub-area attributes consistent for the peers sharing the area.
  4. Align OSPF authentication type, algorithm and matching credentials across the shared link.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The fault at the Redwood medical campus has a specific cause. Authentication settings on the OSPF peers no longer match, so received protocol packets are rejected. Align OSPF authentication type, algorithm and matching credentials across the shared link. Confirm success against this result: The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: Different OSPF network-type expectations lead to inconsistent adjacency and DR behavior. The stated evidence at the Redwood medical campus instead concerns ospf authentication mismatch.

B:

This could help where ospf virtual link transit area is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Redwood medical campus. Authentication settings on the OSPF peers no longer match, so received protocol packets are rejected.

C:

That change targets ospf stub area options mismatch, not the reported ospf authentication mismatch fault at the Redwood medical campus. Authentication settings on the OSPF peers no longer match, so received protocol packets are rejected.

Question 46

At the Cedarbrook hospital, OSPF neighbors on the transit link repeatedly fail to reach Full state after one router's authentication key was rotated. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Verify NSSA type-7 origination and the ABR translation behavior for the external prefix.
  2. Correct the interface MTU mismatch rather than bypassing the OSPF database-description check.
  3. Rework the backbone connection or place the OSPF virtual link over an eligible non-stub transit area.
  4. Align OSPF authentication type, algorithm and matching credentials across the shared link.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

At the Cedarbrook hospital, the evidence points to a concrete mechanism rather than a generic outage. Authentication settings on the OSPF peers no longer match, so received protocol packets are rejected. Align OSPF authentication type, algorithm and matching credentials across the shared link. Confirm it by checking that the OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That change targets ospf nssa external routes, not the reported ospf authentication mismatch fault at the Cedarbrook hospital. Authentication settings on the OSPF peers no longer match, so received protocol packets are rejected.

B:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: Incompatible interface MTU values can prevent successful OSPF database-description exchange. The stated evidence at the Cedarbrook hospital instead concerns ospf authentication mismatch.

C:

This could help where ospf virtual link transit area is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Cedarbrook hospital. Authentication settings on the OSPF peers no longer match, so received protocol packets are rejected.

Question 47

At the Bayview university campus, R-BAY-DIST1 and R-ALB-DIST2 see each other's OSPF hellos, but the neighbor stalls in ExStart after an interface MTU change. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Correct the interface MTU mismatch rather than bypassing the OSPF database-description check.
  2. Evaluate OSPF path type precedence before comparing costs between intra-area and inter-area candidates.
  3. Align OSPF authentication type, algorithm and matching credentials across the shared link.
  4. Verify NSSA type-7 origination and the ABR translation behavior for the external prefix.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct the interface MTU mismatch rather than bypassing the OSPF database-description check. That directly addresses the documented condition at the Bayview university campus: Incompatible interface MTU values can prevent successful OSPF database-description exchange. Confirmation should show that the neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That change targets ospf intra-area route preference, not the reported ospf mtu exstart fault at the Bayview university campus. Incompatible interface MTU values can prevent successful OSPF database-description exchange.

C:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: Authentication settings on the OSPF peers no longer match, so received protocol packets are rejected. The stated evidence at the Bayview university campus instead concerns ospf mtu exstart.

D:

This could help where ospf nssa external routes is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Bayview university campus. Incompatible interface MTU values can prevent successful OSPF database-description exchange.

Question 48

At the Clearwater library district, R-CLW-EDGE1 and R-WES-RT2 see each other's OSPF hellos, but the neighbor stalls in ExStart after an interface MTU change. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Evaluate OSPF path type precedence before comparing costs between intra-area and inter-area candidates.
  2. Rework the backbone connection or place the OSPF virtual link over an eligible non-stub transit area.
  3. Correct the interface MTU mismatch rather than bypassing the OSPF database-description check.
  4. Verify NSSA type-7 origination and the ABR translation behavior for the external prefix.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

At the Clearwater library district, the evidence points to a concrete mechanism rather than a generic outage. Incompatible interface MTU values can prevent successful OSPF database-description exchange. Correct the interface MTU mismatch rather than bypassing the OSPF database-description check. Confirm it by checking that the neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: OSPF prefers intra-area routes to inter-area routes for the same prefix even when cost figures differ. The stated evidence at the Clearwater library district instead concerns ospf mtu exstart.

B:

This could help where ospf virtual link transit area is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Clearwater library district. Incompatible interface MTU values can prevent successful OSPF database-description exchange.

D:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: NSSA external routes use type-7 LSAs internally and depend on translation for normal areas. The stated evidence at the Clearwater library district instead concerns ospf mtu exstart.

Question 49

At the Highland government office, a point-to-point circuit is modeled as broadcast on one OSPF side and point-to-point on the other, producing inconsistent neighbor behavior. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Configure the two ends of the intended OSPF adjacency in the same area.
  2. Set compatible OSPF network types appropriate to the actual transit medium on both ends.
  3. Rework the backbone connection or place the OSPF virtual link over an eligible non-stub transit area.
  4. Evaluate OSPF path type precedence before comparing costs between intra-area and inter-area candidates.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The fault at the Highland government office has a specific cause. Different OSPF network-type expectations lead to inconsistent adjacency and DR behavior. Set compatible OSPF network types appropriate to the actual transit medium on both ends. Confirm success against this result: Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That change targets ospf area mismatch, not the reported ospf dr network-type mismatch fault at the Highland government office. Different OSPF network-type expectations lead to inconsistent adjacency and DR behavior.

C:

This could help where ospf virtual link transit area is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Highland government office. Different OSPF network-type expectations lead to inconsistent adjacency and DR behavior.

D:

That change targets ospf intra-area route preference, not the reported ospf dr network-type mismatch fault at the Highland government office. Different OSPF network-type expectations lead to inconsistent adjacency and DR behavior.

Question 50

At the Foothill municipal site, a point-to-point circuit is modeled as broadcast on one OSPF side and point-to-point on the other, producing inconsistent neighbor behavior. Which operational change most directly addresses the fault described?

  1. Configure the two ends of the intended OSPF adjacency in the same area.
  2. Set compatible OSPF network types appropriate to the actual transit medium on both ends.
  3. Correct the interface MTU mismatch rather than bypassing the OSPF database-description check.
  4. Make OSPF stub-area attributes consistent for the peers sharing the area.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

At the Foothill municipal site, the evidence points to a concrete mechanism rather than a generic outage. Different OSPF network-type expectations lead to inconsistent adjacency and DR behavior. Set compatible OSPF network types appropriate to the actual transit medium on both ends. Confirm it by checking that both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This could help where ospf area mismatch is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Foothill municipal site. Different OSPF network-type expectations lead to inconsistent adjacency and DR behavior.

C:

This is appropriate for a different routing or network-control issue: Incompatible interface MTU values can prevent successful OSPF database-description exchange. The stated evidence at the Foothill municipal site instead concerns ospf dr network-type mismatch.

D:

This could help where ospf stub area options mismatch is the issue, but not for the evidence reported at the Foothill municipal site. Different OSPF network-type expectations lead to inconsistent adjacency and DR behavior.