McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-410 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-410

Exam Name Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Enterprise

Cisco 300-410 Bundle $25.00
300-410 Sample 1 300-410 Sample 2 300-410 Sample 3 300-410 Sample 4 300-410 Sample 5 300-410 Sample 6 300-410 Sample 7 300-410 Sample 8 300-410 Sample 9 300-410 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-410 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-410 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-410 Questions & Answers

    498 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-410 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-410 Video Course

    300-410 Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    300-410 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-410 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) exam.

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) (300-410) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    498 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-410 Video Course

    Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-410 Practice Test 53

Question 520

At the Southridge banking office, an IPv4 ACL on R-SRG-EDGE1 allows two explicit applications, but an otherwise legitimate management source loses connectivity after the ACL is applied. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The authorized management flow passes while test traffic outside the approved policy remains blocked.
  2. The permit takes effect only during the intended window according to a synchronized clock.
  3. Only the designated destination is restricted while unrelated paths from the same source remain usable.
  4. Counters increment on the matching deny entry and the disallowed application flow is blocked.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Southridge banking office has been corrected. The authorized management flow passes while test traffic outside the approved policy remains blocked.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This validates an unrelated control at the Southridge banking office: The permit takes effect only during the intended window according to a synchronized clock. It would not demonstrate correction of ipv4 acl implicit deny.

C:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. Only the designated destination is restricted while unrelated paths from the same source remain usable. It would not establish the required outcome for ipv4 acl implicit deny at the Southridge banking office.

D:

The result addresses extended acl inbound/outbound orientation, not the observed fault at the Southridge banking office. The decisive outcome is different: The authorized management flow passes while test traffic outside the approved policy remains blocked.

Question 521

At the Westlake utility network, a standard IPv4 ACL intended to limit access to one destination is blocking the same source subnet's unrelated traffic on another network. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. Tests distinguish unreachable spoofed sources from reachable sources arriving over alternate paths.
  2. Only the designated destination is restricted while unrelated paths from the same source remain usable.
  3. Addresses inside the approved range match while adjacent unauthorized ranges do not.
  4. The permit takes effect only during the intended window according to a synchronized clock.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Westlake utility network has been corrected. Only the designated destination is restricted while unrelated paths from the same source remain usable.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. Tests distinguish unreachable spoofed sources from reachable sources arriving over alternate paths. It would not establish the required outcome for standard acl source-only matching at the Westlake utility network.

C:

This validates an unrelated control at the Westlake utility network: Addresses inside the approved range match while adjacent unauthorized ranges do not. It would not demonstrate correction of standard acl source-only matching.

D:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The permit takes effect only during the intended window according to a synchronized clock. It would not establish the required outcome for standard acl source-only matching at the Westlake utility network.

Question 522

At the Pinecrest freight terminal, a standard IPv4 ACL intended to limit access to one destination is blocking the same source subnet's unrelated traffic on another network. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. Addresses inside the approved range match while adjacent unauthorized ranges do not.
  2. Only the designated destination is restricted while unrelated paths from the same source remain usable.
  3. Counters increment on the matching deny entry and the disallowed application flow is blocked.
  4. The permit takes effect only during the intended window according to a synchronized clock.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A meaningful acceptance check at the Pinecrest freight terminal should verify the actual forwarding or control-plane outcome. Only the designated destination is restricted while unrelated paths from the same source remain usable.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This validates an unrelated control at the Pinecrest freight terminal: Addresses inside the approved range match while adjacent unauthorized ranges do not. It would not demonstrate correction of standard acl source-only matching.

C:

The result addresses extended acl inbound/outbound orientation, not the observed fault at the Pinecrest freight terminal. The decisive outcome is different: Only the designated destination is restricted while unrelated paths from the same source remain usable.

D:

This validates an unrelated control at the Pinecrest freight terminal: The permit takes effect only during the intended window according to a synchronized clock. It would not demonstrate correction of standard acl source-only matching.

Question 523

At the Cedarfield retail branch, R-CED-BR1 has an extended ACL with the intended source and destination criteria, but the undesired packets still pass because the ACL is applied outbound on an unrelated interface. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. Counters increment on the matching deny entry and the disallowed application flow is blocked.
  2. Addresses inside the approved range match while adjacent unauthorized ranges do not.
  3. The authorized management flow passes while test traffic outside the approved policy remains blocked.
  4. Authorized IPv6 management sources reach the device and disallowed attempts increment deny counters.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Cedarfield retail branch has been corrected. Counters increment on the matching deny entry and the disallowed application flow is blocked.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This validates an unrelated control at the Cedarfield retail branch: Addresses inside the approved range match while adjacent unauthorized ranges do not. It would not demonstrate correction of extended acl inbound/outbound orientation.

C:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The authorized management flow passes while test traffic outside the approved policy remains blocked. It would not establish the required outcome for extended acl inbound/outbound orientation at the Cedarfield retail branch.

D:

The result addresses ipv6 acl interface direction, not the observed fault at the Cedarfield retail branch. The decisive outcome is different: Counters increment on the matching deny entry and the disallowed application flow is blocked.

Question 524

At the Bluewater clinical network, R-BLU-PE1 has an extended ACL with the intended source and destination criteria, but the undesired packets still pass because the ACL is applied outbound on an unrelated interface. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. Authorized IPv6 management sources reach the device and disallowed attempts increment deny counters.
  2. Counters increment on the matching deny entry and the disallowed application flow is blocked.
  3. Legitimate asymmetric traffic passes under the approved anti-spoofing design while forged sources remain filtered.
  4. Only the designated destination is restricted while unrelated paths from the same source remain usable.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Bluewater clinical network has been corrected. Counters increment on the matching deny entry and the disallowed application flow is blocked.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. Authorized IPv6 management sources reach the device and disallowed attempts increment deny counters. It would not establish the required outcome for extended acl inbound/outbound orientation at the Bluewater clinical network.

C:

This validates an unrelated control at the Bluewater clinical network: Legitimate asymmetric traffic passes under the approved anti-spoofing design while forged sources remain filtered. It would not demonstrate correction of extended acl inbound/outbound orientation.

D:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. Only the designated destination is restricted while unrelated paths from the same source remain usable. It would not establish the required outcome for extended acl inbound/outbound orientation at the Bluewater clinical network.

Question 525

At the Harborview media campus, an ACL on R-HAR-DIST1 meant to cover 10.127.0.0/16 uses a wildcard mask that unintentionally matches only part of the permitted source range. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The authorized management flow passes while test traffic outside the approved policy remains blocked.
  2. Tests distinguish unreachable spoofed sources from reachable sources arriving over alternate paths.
  3. Addresses inside the approved range match while adjacent unauthorized ranges do not.
  4. Only the designated destination is restricted while unrelated paths from the same source remain usable.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Harborview media campus has been corrected. Addresses inside the approved range match while adjacent unauthorized ranges do not.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This validates an unrelated control at the Harborview media campus: The authorized management flow passes while test traffic outside the approved policy remains blocked. It would not demonstrate correction of ipv4 wildcard mask matching.

B:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. Tests distinguish unreachable spoofed sources from reachable sources arriving over alternate paths. It would not establish the required outcome for ipv4 wildcard mask matching at the Harborview media campus.

D:

This validates an unrelated control at the Harborview media campus: Only the designated destination is restricted while unrelated paths from the same source remain usable. It would not demonstrate correction of ipv4 wildcard mask matching.

Question 526

At the Ironwood training campus, an ACL on R-IRN-RT1 meant to cover 10.248.0.0/16 uses a wildcard mask that unintentionally matches only part of the permitted source range. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. Addresses inside the approved range match while adjacent unauthorized ranges do not.
  2. Tests distinguish unreachable spoofed sources from reachable sources arriving over alternate paths.
  3. The authorized management flow passes while test traffic outside the approved policy remains blocked.
  4. Legitimate asymmetric traffic passes under the approved anti-spoofing design while forged sources remain filtered.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Ironwood training campus has been corrected. Addresses inside the approved range match while adjacent unauthorized ranges do not.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This validates an unrelated control at the Ironwood training campus: Tests distinguish unreachable spoofed sources from reachable sources arriving over alternate paths. It would not demonstrate correction of ipv4 wildcard mask matching.

C:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The authorized management flow passes while test traffic outside the approved policy remains blocked. It would not establish the required outcome for ipv4 wildcard mask matching at the Ironwood training campus.

D:

The result addresses urpf strict in asymmetric topology, not the observed fault at the Ironwood training campus. The decisive outcome is different: Addresses inside the approved range match while adjacent unauthorized ranges do not.

Question 527

At the Hillcrest research lab, a time-range ACL should permit contractor access during the approved maintenance window, but legitimate traffic remains denied despite a matching IP rule. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. Tests distinguish unreachable spoofed sources from reachable sources arriving over alternate paths.
  2. Authorized IPv6 management sources reach the device and disallowed attempts increment deny counters.
  3. Addresses inside the approved range match while adjacent unauthorized ranges do not.
  4. The permit takes effect only during the intended window according to a synchronized clock.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A meaningful acceptance check at the Hillcrest research lab should verify the actual forwarding or control-plane outcome. The permit takes effect only during the intended window according to a synchronized clock.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. Tests distinguish unreachable spoofed sources from reachable sources arriving over alternate paths. It would not establish the required outcome for time-based acl inactive schedule at the Hillcrest research lab.

B:

The result addresses ipv6 acl interface direction, not the observed fault at the Hillcrest research lab. The decisive outcome is different: The permit takes effect only during the intended window according to a synchronized clock.

C:

This validates an unrelated control at the Hillcrest research lab: Addresses inside the approved range match while adjacent unauthorized ranges do not. It would not demonstrate correction of time-based acl inactive schedule.

Question 528

At the Northport logistics site, a time-range ACL should permit contractor access during the approved maintenance window, but legitimate traffic remains denied despite a matching IP rule. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. Authorized IPv6 management sources reach the device and disallowed attempts increment deny counters.
  2. The permit takes effect only during the intended window according to a synchronized clock.
  3. Legitimate asymmetric traffic passes under the approved anti-spoofing design while forged sources remain filtered.
  4. Tests distinguish unreachable spoofed sources from reachable sources arriving over alternate paths.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A meaningful acceptance check at the Northport logistics site should verify the actual forwarding or control-plane outcome. The permit takes effect only during the intended window according to a synchronized clock.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This validates an unrelated control at the Northport logistics site: Authorized IPv6 management sources reach the device and disallowed attempts increment deny counters. It would not demonstrate correction of time-based acl inactive schedule.

C:

The result addresses urpf strict in asymmetric topology, not the observed fault at the Northport logistics site. The decisive outcome is different: The permit takes effect only during the intended window according to a synchronized clock.

D:

This validates an unrelated control at the Northport logistics site: Tests distinguish unreachable spoofed sources from reachable sources arriving over alternate paths. It would not demonstrate correction of time-based acl inactive schedule.

Question 529

At the Elmfield engineering office, an IPv6 traffic filter is configured to block unsolicited management connections but traffic still reaches R-ELM-EDGE1 over the IPv6-facing ingress link. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. Tests distinguish unreachable spoofed sources from reachable sources arriving over alternate paths.
  2. Counters increment on the matching deny entry and the disallowed application flow is blocked.
  3. Authorized IPv6 management sources reach the device and disallowed attempts increment deny counters.
  4. Only the designated destination is restricted while unrelated paths from the same source remain usable.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

A meaningful acceptance check at the Elmfield engineering office should verify the actual forwarding or control-plane outcome. Authorized IPv6 management sources reach the device and disallowed attempts increment deny counters.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The result addresses urpf loose versus strict source check, not the observed fault at the Elmfield engineering office. The decisive outcome is different: Authorized IPv6 management sources reach the device and disallowed attempts increment deny counters.

B:

This validates an unrelated control at the Elmfield engineering office: Counters increment on the matching deny entry and the disallowed application flow is blocked. It would not demonstrate correction of ipv6 acl interface direction.

D:

The result addresses standard acl source-only matching, not the observed fault at the Elmfield engineering office. The decisive outcome is different: Authorized IPv6 management sources reach the device and disallowed attempts increment deny counters.

Question 530

At the Granite manufacturing plant, an IPv6 traffic filter is configured to block unsolicited management connections but traffic still reaches R-GRA-PE1 over the IPv6-facing ingress link. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. Addresses inside the approved range match while adjacent unauthorized ranges do not.
  2. Counters increment on the matching deny entry and the disallowed application flow is blocked.
  3. Authorized IPv6 management sources reach the device and disallowed attempts increment deny counters.
  4. Legitimate asymmetric traffic passes under the approved anti-spoofing design while forged sources remain filtered.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This tests the exact behavior that was failing at the Granite manufacturing plant. Authorized IPv6 management sources reach the device and disallowed attempts increment deny counters. The change supporting that outcome is: Apply the IPv6 ACL to the correct routed interface and incoming direction.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. Addresses inside the approved range match while adjacent unauthorized ranges do not. It would not establish the required outcome for ipv6 acl interface direction at the Granite manufacturing plant.

B:

The result addresses extended acl inbound/outbound orientation, not the observed fault at the Granite manufacturing plant. The decisive outcome is different: Authorized IPv6 management sources reach the device and disallowed attempts increment deny counters.

D:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. Legitimate asymmetric traffic passes under the approved anti-spoofing design while forged sources remain filtered. It would not establish the required outcome for ipv6 acl interface direction at the Granite manufacturing plant.