McAfee Secure

Exam Code: FCP_FGT_AD-7.6

Exam Name: FCP - FortiGate 7.6 Administrator

Certification Provider: Fortinet

Corresponding Certification: NSE4

Fortinet FCP_FGT_AD-7.6 Questions & Answers

Study with Up-To-Date REAL Exam Questions and Answers from the ACTUAL Test

128 Questions & Answers with Testing Engine

"FCP - FortiGate 7.6 Administrator Exam", also known as FCP_FGT_AD-7.6 exam, is a Fortinet certification exam.

Pass your tests with the always up-to-date FCP_FGT_AD-7.6 Exam Engine. Your FCP_FGT_AD-7.6 training materials keep you at the head of the pack!

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Was: $137.49
Now: $124.99

Fortinet FCP_FGT_AD-7.6 Practice Test 107

Question 1060

At Northbridge Manufacturing, the FortiGate 7.6 security administration team encounters the following authorized operational case: IKE phase one succeeds but no child SA forms because local and remote protected subnet selectors do not intersect. They need a defensible FortiOS configuration, diagnosis, validation or prevention decision. Which recurring review is most relevant to the same root risk?

  1. Maintain an IPsec topology and site-pair access matrix
  2. Record VPN tunnel type before reusing policy templates
  3. Reconcile selectors whenever a protected subnet is added
  4. Include VPN transport ports in ISP firewall change tests

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Reconcile selectors whenever a protected subnet is added. This recurring practice addresses ipsec phase-two selector overlap because child SA negotiation can fail when requested traffic selectors do not agree. It reinforces the supported change to align the intended phase-two traffic selectors with the authorized site networks on both ends rather than relying on an unrelated periodic audit.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Maintain an IPsec topology and site-pair access matrix reduces recurrence of meshed vpn topology policy, rather than the observed ipsec phase-two selector overlap issue. The relevant preventive control for Northbridge Manufacturing is: Reconcile selectors whenever a protected subnet is added. This distinction matters because child SA negotiation can fail when requested traffic selectors do not agree.

B:

Record VPN tunnel type before reusing policy templates reduces recurrence of policy-based versus route-based vpn, rather than the observed ipsec phase-two selector overlap issue. The relevant preventive control for Northbridge Manufacturing is: Reconcile selectors whenever a protected subnet is added. This distinction matters because child SA negotiation can fail when requested traffic selectors do not agree.

D:

Include VPN transport ports in ISP firewall change tests reduces recurrence of ike transport port restriction, rather than the observed ipsec phase-two selector overlap issue. The relevant preventive control for Northbridge Manufacturing is: Reconcile selectors whenever a protected subnet is added. This distinction matters because child SA negotiation can fail when requested traffic selectors do not agree.

Question 1061

At Northbridge Media Group, the FortiGate 7.6 security administration team encounters the following authorized operational case: a previously healthy VPN disconnects at regular rekey intervals after one peer is configured with incompatible negotiation behavior. They need a defensible FortiOS configuration, diagnosis, validation or prevention decision. Which FortiOS 7.6 administration action best addresses this incident?

  1. Review and adapt the generated tunnel settings through supported manual configuration as required
  2. Set suitable route distances or SD-WAN preferences for the intended tunnel priority
  3. Review supported IKE and child SA rekey proposals, lifetimes and negotiation logs
  4. Review child-SA selectors, tunnel routes and interface firewall policies in the correct sequence

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Review supported IKE and child SA rekey proposals, lifetimes and negotiation logs. This targets ipsec security association lifetime: scheduled SA renewal can expose incompatible settings even if initial establishment succeeded. After applying the change, verify that multiple controlled rekey cycles complete while approved sessions remain reachable. The Northbridge Media Group case requires these specific FortiOS 7.6 conditions, not an unrelated permit or platform change.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Review and adapt the generated tunnel settings through supported manual configuration as required is a relevant remedy for a DIFFERENT problem—ipsec wizard versus manual tunnel control—when a technician expects FortiGate's VPN wizard template to work unchanged with a peer that uses uncommon selectors and authentication settings. In this Northbridge Media Group case that is not the failing component. Here the correct intervention is to review supported IKE and child SA rekey proposals, lifetimes and negotiation logs because scheduled SA renewal can expose incompatible settings even if initial establishment succeeded.

B:

Set suitable route distances or SD-WAN preferences for the intended tunnel priority is a relevant remedy for a DIFFERENT problem—tunnel route distance to backup—when a primary and backup VPN are operational but branch traffic always chooses the backup even when primary is healthy. In this Northbridge Media Group case that is not the failing component. Here the correct intervention is to review supported IKE and child SA rekey proposals, lifetimes and negotiation logs because scheduled SA renewal can expose incompatible settings even if initial establishment succeeded.

D:

Review child-SA selectors, tunnel routes and interface firewall policies in the correct sequence is a relevant remedy for a DIFFERENT problem—phase-one up but no payload traffic—when both peers show an established IKE SA yet applications fail because no relevant phase-two or firewall policy state exists. In this Northbridge Media Group case that is not the failing component. Here the correct intervention is to review supported IKE and child SA rekey proposals, lifetimes and negotiation logs because scheduled SA renewal can expose incompatible settings even if initial establishment succeeded.

Question 1062

At Northbridge Media Group, the FortiGate 7.6 security administration team encounters the following authorized operational case: a previously healthy VPN disconnects at regular rekey intervals after one peer is configured with incompatible negotiation behavior. They need a defensible FortiOS configuration, diagnosis, validation or prevention decision. What is the primary mechanism responsible for the reported result?

  1. Wizard defaults are starting templates and cannot encode every third-party peer requirement
  2. Route selection chooses based on active route preference, not a tunnel's name or creation date
  3. IKE control-channel establishment is not equivalent to permitted encrypted application forwarding
  4. Scheduled SA renewal can expose incompatible settings even if initial establishment succeeded

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Scheduled SA renewal can expose incompatible settings even if initial establishment succeeded. The mechanism is relevant because the stated ipsec security association lifetime incident concerns the actual selected path, policy, identity or inspection state. The appropriate response is to review supported IKE and child SA rekey proposals, lifetimes and negotiation logs; verify it through this observed condition: multiple controlled rekey cycles complete while approved sessions remain reachable.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Wizard defaults are starting templates and cannot encode every third-party peer requirement explains a different situation, ipsec wizard versus manual tunnel control, where a technician expects FortiGate's VPN wizard template to work unchanged with a peer that uses uncommon selectors and authentication settings. It does not account for the specific observed ipsec security association lifetime condition at Northbridge Media Group. The decisive mechanism here is: Scheduled SA renewal can expose incompatible settings even if initial establishment succeeded.

B:

Route selection chooses based on active route preference, not a tunnel's name or creation date explains a different situation, tunnel route distance to backup, where a primary and backup VPN are operational but branch traffic always chooses the backup even when primary is healthy. It does not account for the specific observed ipsec security association lifetime condition at Northbridge Media Group. The decisive mechanism here is: Scheduled SA renewal can expose incompatible settings even if initial establishment succeeded.

C:

IKE control-channel establishment is not equivalent to permitted encrypted application forwarding explains a different situation, phase-one up but no payload traffic, where both peers show an established IKE SA yet applications fail because no relevant phase-two or firewall policy state exists. It does not account for the specific observed ipsec security association lifetime condition at Northbridge Media Group. The decisive mechanism here is: Scheduled SA renewal can expose incompatible settings even if initial establishment succeeded.

Question 1063

At Northbridge Media Group, the FortiGate 7.6 security administration team encounters the following authorized operational case: a previously healthy VPN disconnects at regular rekey intervals after one peer is configured with incompatible negotiation behavior. They need a defensible FortiOS configuration, diagnosis, validation or prevention decision. Which validation result would demonstrate that the specified incident has been resolved?

  1. Multiple controlled rekey cycles complete while approved sessions remain reachable
  2. The finished tunnel matches the peer's approved phase-one and phase-two parameters
  3. The healthy primary carries ordinary traffic and an authorized fault selects backup
  4. A controlled private application flow establishes its child SA and traverses the required permit

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Multiple controlled rekey cycles complete while approved sessions remain reachable. This directly tests the corrective decision to review supported IKE and child SA rekey proposals, lifetimes and negotiation logs. It is a meaningful acceptance check because scheduled SA renewal can expose incompatible settings even if initial establishment succeeded. Unrelated service availability alone would not confirm this FortiGate policy or path.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The finished tunnel matches the peer's approved phase-one and phase-two parameters would validate the separate control ipsec wizard versus manual tunnel control, not the fault reported for Northbridge Media Group. To confirm this correction, the team instead needs: Multiple controlled rekey cycles complete while approved sessions remain reachable. That is the observable check related to ipsec security association lifetime.

C:

The healthy primary carries ordinary traffic and an authorized fault selects backup would validate the separate control tunnel route distance to backup, not the fault reported for Northbridge Media Group. To confirm this correction, the team instead needs: Multiple controlled rekey cycles complete while approved sessions remain reachable. That is the observable check related to ipsec security association lifetime.

D:

A controlled private application flow establishes its child SA and traverses the required permit would validate the separate control phase-one up but no payload traffic, not the fault reported for Northbridge Media Group. To confirm this correction, the team instead needs: Multiple controlled rekey cycles complete while approved sessions remain reachable. That is the observable check related to ipsec security association lifetime.

Question 1064

At Northbridge Media Group, the FortiGate 7.6 security administration team encounters the following authorized operational case: a previously healthy VPN disconnects at regular rekey intervals after one peer is configured with incompatible negotiation behavior. They need a defensible FortiOS configuration, diagnosis, validation or prevention decision. Which operational practice would most effectively prevent this specific fault?

  1. Test rekey behavior during peer software changes
  2. Archive negotiated settings after wizard-driven deployment
  3. Check route precedence when rekeying or recreating tunnels
  4. Use stepwise IKE, phase-two, route and policy diagnostics

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Test rekey behavior during peer software changes. This recurring practice addresses ipsec security association lifetime because scheduled SA renewal can expose incompatible settings even if initial establishment succeeded. It reinforces the supported change to review supported IKE and child SA rekey proposals, lifetimes and negotiation logs rather than relying on an unrelated periodic audit.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Archive negotiated settings after wizard-driven deployment reduces recurrence of ipsec wizard versus manual tunnel control, rather than the observed ipsec security association lifetime issue. The relevant preventive control for Northbridge Media Group is: Test rekey behavior during peer software changes. This distinction matters because scheduled SA renewal can expose incompatible settings even if initial establishment succeeded.

C:

Check route precedence when rekeying or recreating tunnels reduces recurrence of tunnel route distance to backup, rather than the observed ipsec security association lifetime issue. The relevant preventive control for Northbridge Media Group is: Test rekey behavior during peer software changes. This distinction matters because scheduled SA renewal can expose incompatible settings even if initial establishment succeeded.

D:

Use stepwise IKE, phase-two, route and policy diagnostics reduces recurrence of phase-one up but no payload traffic, rather than the observed ipsec security association lifetime issue. The relevant preventive control for Northbridge Media Group is: Test rekey behavior during peer software changes. This distinction matters because scheduled SA renewal can expose incompatible settings even if initial establishment succeeded.

Question 1065

At Northbridge Research Institute, the FortiGate 7.6 security administration team encounters the following authorized operational case: a branch FortiGate behind an upstream NAT can reach web services but IPsec negotiation fails on NAT-protected transport. They need a defensible FortiOS configuration, diagnosis, validation or prevention decision. What is the most appropriate first configuration correction for this case?

  1. Configure a supported dynamic or dialup IPsec peer with authenticated identity requirements
  2. Enable and verify supported IPsec NAT traversal and required UDP 500 or 4500 reachability
  3. Exempt the approved IPsec policy path from unrelated source NAT or use precise central NAT rules
  4. Use supported peer FQDN or dialup selection with authenticated identity and current DNS behavior

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Enable and verify supported IPsec NAT traversal and required UDP 500 or 4500 reachability. This targets nat traversal for ipsec: nAT between peers can prevent ordinary ESP transport without supported encapsulation. After applying the change, verify that iKE and encrypted traffic succeed through the mapped upstream address. The Northbridge Research Institute case requires these specific FortiOS 7.6 conditions, not an unrelated permit or platform change.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure a supported dynamic or dialup IPsec peer with authenticated identity requirements is a relevant remedy for a DIFFERENT problem—dynamic dialup ipsec peer—when a small remote site has a changing public IP and the central FortiGate rejects it because the tunnel expects one fixed remote address. In this Northbridge Research Institute case that is not the failing component. Here the correct intervention is to enable and verify supported IPsec NAT traversal and required UDP 500 or 4500 reachability because nAT between peers can prevent ordinary ESP transport without supported encapsulation.

C:

Exempt the approved IPsec policy path from unrelated source NAT or use precise central NAT rules is a relevant remedy for a DIFFERENT problem—vpn tunnel firewall nat exemption—when remote peers expect original office subnet addresses but the FortiGate applies an internet source NAT rule to VPN traffic. In this Northbridge Research Institute case that is not the failing component. Here the correct intervention is to enable and verify supported IPsec NAT traversal and required UDP 500 or 4500 reachability because nAT between peers can prevent ordinary ESP transport without supported encapsulation.

D:

Use supported peer FQDN or dialup selection with authenticated identity and current DNS behavior is a relevant remedy for a DIFFERENT problem—ipsec endpoint fqdn dynamic dns—when a branch peer changes public IP frequently and the central FortiGate has a static peer address pointing to last week's gateway. In this Northbridge Research Institute case that is not the failing component. Here the correct intervention is to enable and verify supported IPsec NAT traversal and required UDP 500 or 4500 reachability because nAT between peers can prevent ordinary ESP transport without supported encapsulation.

Question 1066

At Northbridge Research Institute, the FortiGate 7.6 security administration team encounters the following authorized operational case: a branch FortiGate behind an upstream NAT can reach web services but IPsec negotiation fails on NAT-protected transport. They need a defensible FortiOS configuration, diagnosis, validation or prevention decision. Which diagnosis best distinguishes this case from other FortiOS problems?

  1. A static peer-address match cannot follow an internet address that changes after each reconnect
  2. NAT between peers can prevent ordinary ESP transport without supported encapsulation
  3. An overbroad SNAT can rewrite protected selectors and break remote routing or security rules
  4. Fixed gateway addressing becomes stale when remote public connections are dynamically reassigned

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

NAT between peers can prevent ordinary ESP transport without supported encapsulation. The mechanism is relevant because the stated nat traversal for ipsec incident concerns the actual selected path, policy, identity or inspection state. The appropriate response is to enable and verify supported IPsec NAT traversal and required UDP 500 or 4500 reachability; verify it through this observed condition: iKE and encrypted traffic succeed through the mapped upstream address.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A static peer-address match cannot follow an internet address that changes after each reconnect explains a different situation, dynamic dialup ipsec peer, where a small remote site has a changing public IP and the central FortiGate rejects it because the tunnel expects one fixed remote address. It does not account for the specific observed nat traversal for ipsec condition at Northbridge Research Institute. The decisive mechanism here is: NAT between peers can prevent ordinary ESP transport without supported encapsulation.

C:

An overbroad SNAT can rewrite protected selectors and break remote routing or security rules explains a different situation, vpn tunnel firewall nat exemption, where remote peers expect original office subnet addresses but the FortiGate applies an internet source NAT rule to VPN traffic. It does not account for the specific observed nat traversal for ipsec condition at Northbridge Research Institute. The decisive mechanism here is: NAT between peers can prevent ordinary ESP transport without supported encapsulation.

D:

Fixed gateway addressing becomes stale when remote public connections are dynamically reassigned explains a different situation, ipsec endpoint fqdn dynamic dns, where a branch peer changes public IP frequently and the central FortiGate has a static peer address pointing to last week's gateway. It does not account for the specific observed nat traversal for ipsec condition at Northbridge Research Institute. The decisive mechanism here is: NAT between peers can prevent ordinary ESP transport without supported encapsulation.

Question 1067

At Northbridge Research Institute, the FortiGate 7.6 security administration team encounters the following authorized operational case: a branch FortiGate behind an upstream NAT can reach web services but IPsec negotiation fails on NAT-protected transport. They need a defensible FortiOS configuration, diagnosis, validation or prevention decision. Which controlled test outcome best proves that the required feature now works?

  1. IKE and encrypted traffic succeed through the mapped upstream address
  2. The authenticated remote site establishes from its new IP while an unknown peer is rejected
  3. Remote packet capture sees the expected original office source addresses
  4. After an ISP address change the authorized peer reconnects and passes protected traffic

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

IKE and encrypted traffic succeed through the mapped upstream address. This directly tests the corrective decision to enable and verify supported IPsec NAT traversal and required UDP 500 or 4500 reachability. It is a meaningful acceptance check because nAT between peers can prevent ordinary ESP transport without supported encapsulation. Unrelated service availability alone would not confirm this FortiGate policy or path.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The authenticated remote site establishes from its new IP while an unknown peer is rejected would validate the separate control dynamic dialup ipsec peer, not the fault reported for Northbridge Research Institute. To confirm this correction, the team instead needs: IKE and encrypted traffic succeed through the mapped upstream address. That is the observable check related to nat traversal for ipsec.

C:

Remote packet capture sees the expected original office source addresses would validate the separate control vpn tunnel firewall nat exemption, not the fault reported for Northbridge Research Institute. To confirm this correction, the team instead needs: IKE and encrypted traffic succeed through the mapped upstream address. That is the observable check related to nat traversal for ipsec.

D:

After an ISP address change the authorized peer reconnects and passes protected traffic would validate the separate control ipsec endpoint fqdn dynamic dns, not the fault reported for Northbridge Research Institute. To confirm this correction, the team instead needs: IKE and encrypted traffic succeed through the mapped upstream address. That is the observable check related to nat traversal for ipsec.

Question 1068

At Northbridge Research Institute, the FortiGate 7.6 security administration team encounters the following authorized operational case: a branch FortiGate behind an upstream NAT can reach web services but IPsec negotiation fails on NAT-protected transport. They need a defensible FortiOS configuration, diagnosis, validation or prevention decision. What continuing control matches this firewall administration scenario?

  1. Monitor dialup peer identities rather than relying on source IP alone
  2. Test NAT behavior independently for tunnel and public internet rules
  3. Monitor peer name resolution and dynamic-DNS update health
  4. Check NAT traversal after ISP gateway replacements

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Check NAT traversal after ISP gateway replacements. This recurring practice addresses nat traversal for ipsec because nAT between peers can prevent ordinary ESP transport without supported encapsulation. It reinforces the supported change to enable and verify supported IPsec NAT traversal and required UDP 500 or 4500 reachability rather than relying on an unrelated periodic audit.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Monitor dialup peer identities rather than relying on source IP alone reduces recurrence of dynamic dialup ipsec peer, rather than the observed nat traversal for ipsec issue. The relevant preventive control for Northbridge Research Institute is: Check NAT traversal after ISP gateway replacements. This distinction matters because nAT between peers can prevent ordinary ESP transport without supported encapsulation.

B:

Test NAT behavior independently for tunnel and public internet rules reduces recurrence of vpn tunnel firewall nat exemption, rather than the observed nat traversal for ipsec issue. The relevant preventive control for Northbridge Research Institute is: Check NAT traversal after ISP gateway replacements. This distinction matters because nAT between peers can prevent ordinary ESP transport without supported encapsulation.

C:

Monitor peer name resolution and dynamic-DNS update health reduces recurrence of ipsec endpoint fqdn dynamic dns, rather than the observed nat traversal for ipsec issue. The relevant preventive control for Northbridge Research Institute is: Check NAT traversal after ISP gateway replacements. This distinction matters because nAT between peers can prevent ordinary ESP transport without supported encapsulation.

Question 1069

At Northbridge Regional Hospital, the FortiGate 7.6 security administration team encounters the following authorized operational case: a tunnel appears established long after the remote FortiGate loses power and routing keeps sending sessions to the dead path. They need a defensible FortiOS configuration, diagnosis, validation or prevention decision. Which supported FortiGate response most directly resolves the stated requirement?

  1. Set the intended local IKE identifier and matching remote peer verification on both sides
  2. Create the appropriately limited reverse-direction tunnel firewall policy where business authorization permits
  3. Configure supported dead peer detection and path failover for the tunnel
  4. Correlate scoped packet sniffer, IKE diagnostic and phase-two status for an approved test flow

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Configure supported dead peer detection and path failover for the tunnel. This targets dead peer detection failover: old IPsec state can persist briefly unless the peer's liveliness is checked and failed paths withdrawn. After applying the change, verify that a supervised peer outage is detected and new sessions use the approved alternative route. The Northbridge Regional Hospital case requires these specific FortiOS 7.6 conditions, not an unrelated permit or platform change.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Set the intended local IKE identifier and matching remote peer verification on both sides is a relevant remedy for a DIFFERENT problem—ike local identifier mismatch—when an upstream NAT hides the initiating FortiGate's public address and the responder expects an IKE identity different from the presented local ID. In this Northbridge Regional Hospital case that is not the failing component. Here the correct intervention is to configure supported dead peer detection and path failover for the tunnel because old IPsec state can persist briefly unless the peer's liveliness is checked and failed paths withdrawn.

B:

Create the appropriately limited reverse-direction tunnel firewall policy where business authorization permits is a relevant remedy for a DIFFERENT problem—ipsec tunnel policy return direction—when the head office reaches a remote file server but the remote office cannot initiate sessions toward the head-office database. In this Northbridge Regional Hospital case that is not the failing component. Here the correct intervention is to configure supported dead peer detection and path failover for the tunnel because old IPsec state can persist briefly unless the peer's liveliness is checked and failed paths withdrawn.

D:

Correlate scoped packet sniffer, IKE diagnostic and phase-two status for an approved test flow is a relevant remedy for a DIFFERENT problem—ipsec logs versus packet sniffer—when the VPN appears idle and operations guesses phase-two failure without checking whether any LAN packets enter the firewall. In this Northbridge Regional Hospital case that is not the failing component. Here the correct intervention is to configure supported dead peer detection and path failover for the tunnel because old IPsec state can persist briefly unless the peer's liveliness is checked and failed paths withdrawn.

Question 1070

At Northbridge Regional Hospital, the FortiGate 7.6 security administration team encounters the following authorized operational case: a tunnel appears established long after the remote FortiGate loses power and routing keeps sending sessions to the dead path. They need a defensible FortiOS configuration, diagnosis, validation or prevention decision. What root condition most directly explains the described FortiGate symptom?

  1. IKE identity checks can fail even when packets reach the correct remote public endpoint
  2. An accepting outbound policy does not necessarily create permission for independently initiated inbound flows
  3. No application traffic or wrong routing can look like an idle VPN without implying failed cryptographic negotiation
  4. Old IPsec state can persist briefly unless the peer's liveliness is checked and failed paths withdrawn

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Old IPsec state can persist briefly unless the peer's liveliness is checked and failed paths withdrawn. The mechanism is relevant because the stated dead peer detection failover incident concerns the actual selected path, policy, identity or inspection state. The appropriate response is to configure supported dead peer detection and path failover for the tunnel; verify it through this observed condition: a supervised peer outage is detected and new sessions use the approved alternative route.

Incorrect Answers

A:

IKE identity checks can fail even when packets reach the correct remote public endpoint explains a different situation, ike local identifier mismatch, where an upstream NAT hides the initiating FortiGate's public address and the responder expects an IKE identity different from the presented local ID. It does not account for the specific observed dead peer detection failover condition at Northbridge Regional Hospital. The decisive mechanism here is: Old IPsec state can persist briefly unless the peer's liveliness is checked and failed paths withdrawn.

B:

An accepting outbound policy does not necessarily create permission for independently initiated inbound flows explains a different situation, ipsec tunnel policy return direction, where the head office reaches a remote file server but the remote office cannot initiate sessions toward the head-office database. It does not account for the specific observed dead peer detection failover condition at Northbridge Regional Hospital. The decisive mechanism here is: Old IPsec state can persist briefly unless the peer's liveliness is checked and failed paths withdrawn.

C:

No application traffic or wrong routing can look like an idle VPN without implying failed cryptographic negotiation explains a different situation, ipsec logs versus packet sniffer, where the VPN appears idle and operations guesses phase-two failure without checking whether any LAN packets enter the firewall. It does not account for the specific observed dead peer detection failover condition at Northbridge Regional Hospital. The decisive mechanism here is: Old IPsec state can persist briefly unless the peer's liveliness is checked and failed paths withdrawn.

FCP - FortiGate 7.6 Administrator (FCP_FGT_AD-7.6) Practice Tests