Question 420
At Fairmont Manufacturing, the FortiGate 7.6 security administration team encounters the following authorized operational case: an internal-to-branch VPN flow unexpectedly exits with an internet SNAT address and the remote peer denies the traffic. They need a defensible FortiOS configuration, diagnosis, validation or prevention decision. Which recurring review is most relevant to the same root risk?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Test NAT exemptions when general internet rules are broadened. This recurring practice addresses selective nat exemption for vpn because an overly broad source NAT policy can change encrypted traffic addresses outside the VPN selectors. It reinforces the supported change to ensure the VPN policy and central or per-policy NAT selection preserve the agreed private source address rather than relying on an unrelated periodic audit.
Incorrect Answers
Review directory group object changes during identity maintenance reduces recurrence of ldap group distinguished name, rather than the observed selective nat exemption for vpn issue. The relevant preventive control for Fairmont Manufacturing is: Test NAT exemptions when general internet rules are broadened. This distinction matters because an overly broad source NAT policy can change encrypted traffic addresses outside the VPN selectors.
Monitor passive identity freshness and fallback methods reduces recurrence of passive sso versus captive portal, rather than the observed selective nat exemption for vpn issue. The relevant preventive control for Fairmont Manufacturing is: Test NAT exemptions when general internet rules are broadened. This distinction matters because an overly broad source NAT policy can change encrypted traffic addresses outside the VPN selectors.
Test nested membership after LDAP schema or server changes reduces recurrence of ldap nested group handling, rather than the observed selective nat exemption for vpn issue. The relevant preventive control for Fairmont Manufacturing is: Test NAT exemptions when general internet rules are broadened. This distinction matters because an overly broad source NAT policy can change encrypted traffic addresses outside the VPN selectors.