Question 580
At Harborview Manufacturing, the FortiGate 7.6 security administration team encounters the following authorized operational case: a support engineer disables all SSL certificate checks to accommodate one malformed vendor chain. They need a defensible FortiOS configuration, diagnosis, validation or prevention decision. Which recurring review is most relevant to the same root risk?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Expire emergency certificate exceptions and require vendor remediation. This recurring practice addresses certificate validation versus bypass because global invalid-certificate bypass removes protection for unrelated TLS destinations. It reinforces the supported change to fix the vendor certificate or apply a targeted temporary exception while retaining general validation rather than relying on an unrelated periodic audit.
Incorrect Answers
Document the encrypted metadata limits of each URL rule reduces recurrence of url path versus certificate inspection, rather than the observed certificate validation versus bypass issue. The relevant preventive control for Harborview Manufacturing is: Expire emergency certificate exceptions and require vendor remediation. This distinction matters because global invalid-certificate bypass removes protection for unrelated TLS destinations.
Review specific and general URL entries for overlap reduces recurrence of static url filter allow versus block order, rather than the observed certificate validation versus bypass issue. The relevant preventive control for Harborview Manufacturing is: Expire emergency certificate exceptions and require vendor remediation. This distinction matters because global invalid-certificate bypass removes protection for unrelated TLS destinations.
Retain web-filter logs with relevant category and rule fields reduces recurrence of web-filter log category evidence, rather than the observed certificate validation versus bypass issue. The relevant preventive control for Harborview Manufacturing is: Expire emergency certificate exceptions and require vendor remediation. This distinction matters because global invalid-certificate bypass removes protection for unrelated TLS destinations.