McAfee Secure

HP HPE7-A01 Bundle

Exam Code: HPE7-A01

Exam Name HPE Network Campus Access Professional

Certification Provider: HP

Corresponding Certification: HPE Aruba Networking Certified Professional - Campus Access

HP HPE7-A01 Bundle $19.99

100% HP HPE7-A01 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real HPE7-A01 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    HPE7-A01 Questions & Answers

    161 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual HPE7-A01 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • Study Guide

    HPE7-A01 Study Guide

    1264 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 1264-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace HPE7-A01 exam.

HPE Network Campus Access Professional (HPE7-A01) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $154.98
Bundle Price: $134.99

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    161 Questions

    $124.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1264 PDF Pages

    $29.99

HP HPE7-A01 Practice Test 104

Question 1030

A switch receives BPDUs on an access edge configured with BPDU protection and disables the port. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Remove the unauthorized downstream switch or convert the port to an appropriately protected infrastructure role.
  2. Restore the designed ISL data path and validate VSX state while retaining independent keepalive connectivity.
  3. Verify stack cable topology during rack acceptance.
  4. Keep BPDU protection enabled on ordinary user ports and document exceptions.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This is the corrective intervention because the edge protection is responding to an unexpected bridge on a user-facing port. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

D:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This action fits a different incident: a VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the team assumes the remaining keepalive alone carries user traffic between peers. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

C:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when a VSF stack has members connected in a line, so one intermember cable failure isolates the last unit. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1031

A dual-homed server loses access after one LAG member fails because the remaining link has a mismatched VLAN allow list. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Make VLAN membership consistent across all members of the intended logical aggregation.
  2. Align software versions through the vendor-supported stack upgrade and member compatibility process.
  3. Document root bridge ownership per VLAN or instance in resilience plans.
  4. Audit logical-LAG VLAN state rather than independently drifting member configurations.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This is the corrective intervention because the surviving member forwards only a subset of the VLANs required by the server. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

D:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This action fits a different incident: a stack's standby control member cannot take over after a failover drill because the new member has incompatible firmware. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

C:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when two redundant switches disagree about the device that should be the STP root for a campus distribution VLAN. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1032

A site uses a single access-switch uplink to two cores with static routes and expects automatic gateway failover when the first core fails. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Deploy an approved first-hop redundancy or active-gateway design and validate upstream path failover.
  2. Align OSPF area membership and compatible neighbor parameters on the affected link.
  3. Record expected bridge roots, blocked ports and convergence times.
  4. Test gateway and routed uplink failure scenarios before production.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This is the corrective intervention because a fixed next hop does not itself provide gateway availability after its core fails. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

D:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This action fits a different incident: a redundant OSPF network has two uplinks, but one interface's routing adjacency never forms because its area ID is wrong. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

C:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when a distribution ring loses a link and traffic remains blocked despite alternate Layer 2 connectivity. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1033

A VSF stack has members connected in a line, so one intermember cable failure isolates the last unit. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Close the designed resilient stacking topology or add the supported alternate intermember link.
  2. Restore the designed ISL data path and validate VSX state while retaining independent keepalive connectivity.
  3. Enable approved edge loop prevention and alert on broadcast rate spikes.
  4. Verify stack cable topology during rack acceptance.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This is the corrective intervention because a linear stacking topology leaves a single path to the last member. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

D:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This action fits a different incident: a VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the team assumes the remaining keepalive alone carries user traffic between peers. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

C:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when an access switch experiences a broadcast storm after a user connects two LAN ports with a patch cable. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1034

A campus uses VRRP on an SVI but hosts keep targeting a physical gateway address rather than the shared virtual address. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Align software versions through the vendor-supported stack upgrade and member compatibility process.
  2. Configure client DHCP gateway or static settings to reference the VRRP virtual IP.
  3. Standardize virtual gateway addresses in subnet design documentation.
  4. Monitor both ISL and keepalive on separate failure domains.

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

This is the corrective intervention because hosts pointing to a physical router address cannot benefit from VRRP gateway movement. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

C:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action fits a different incident: a stack's standby control member cannot take over after a failover drill because the new member has incompatible firmware. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

D:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when a VSX pair loses its inter-switch link and the team assumes the remaining keepalive alone carries user traffic between peers. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1035

A redundant OSPF network has two uplinks, but one interface's routing adjacency never forms because its area ID is wrong. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Configure supported environmental telemetry for redundant power modules and test notification delivery.
  2. Standardize virtual gateway addresses in subnet design documentation.
  3. Align OSPF area membership and compatible neighbor parameters on the affected link.
  4. Compare OSPF parameters whenever a redundant routed link is added.

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

This is the corrective intervention because OSPF peers in different areas cannot establish a normal shared-segment adjacency. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

D:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action fits a different incident: a core switch keeps forwarding after a power supply is removed, but a maintenance exercise shows no power fault alarm reaches operations. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

B:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when a campus uses VRRP on an SVI but hosts keep targeting a physical gateway address rather than the shared virtual address. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1036

A core switch keeps forwarding after a power supply is removed, but a maintenance exercise shows no power fault alarm reaches operations. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Configure supported environmental telemetry for redundant power modules and test notification delivery.
  2. Include power-module monitoring and replacement plans in resilience runbooks.
  3. Remove the unauthorized downstream switch or convert the port to an appropriately protected infrastructure role.
  4. Keep BPDU protection enabled on ordinary user ports and document exceptions.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This is the corrective intervention because redundant hardware can mask a failure unless power-supply status is monitored. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

B:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

C:

This action fits a different incident: a switch receives BPDUs on an access edge configured with BPDU protection and disables the port. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

D:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when a switch receives BPDUs on an access edge configured with BPDU protection and disables the port. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1037

A VSX peer restarts for an upgrade and port-channel traffic drops because the downstream LACP timeout is too strict for the expected convergence. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Use supported LACP and VSX recovery timers matched to the failover design and verify them in staged maintenance.
  2. Align software versions through the vendor-supported stack upgrade and member compatibility process.
  3. Record VSX and downstream LAG partner identities during deployment.
  4. Retest convergence after timer or software upgrades rather than assume defaults.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This is the corrective intervention because the downstream aggregator declares the shared peer unavailable before the intended recovery completes. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

D:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This action fits a different incident: a stack's standby control member cannot take over after a failover drill because the new member has incompatible firmware. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

C:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when an edge switch's LACP bundle connects to two independent devices that are not configured as a VSX or equivalent multichassis domain. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1038

An access switch experiences a broadcast storm after a user connects two LAN ports with a patch cable. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Remove the loop and enforce appropriate edge loop protection or spanning-tree safeguards.
  2. Enable approved edge loop prevention and alert on broadcast rate spikes.
  3. Configure client DHCP gateway or static settings to reference the VRRP virtual IP.
  4. Document root bridge ownership per VLAN or instance in resilience plans.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This is the corrective intervention because a physical Layer 2 loop can repeatedly replicate flooded frames and saturate the segment. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

B:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

C:

This action fits a different incident: a campus uses VRRP on an SVI but hosts keep targeting a physical gateway address rather than the shared virtual address. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

D:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when two redundant switches disagree about the device that should be the STP root for a campus distribution VLAN. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1039

Two redundant switches disagree about the device that should be the STP root for a campus distribution VLAN. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Set and verify the intended spanning-tree root priority on the designated distribution devices.
  2. Document root bridge ownership per VLAN or instance in resilience plans.
  3. Configure client DHCP gateway or static settings to reference the VRRP virtual IP.
  4. Include power-module monitoring and replacement plans in resilience runbooks.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This is the corrective intervention because an unintended bridge root can steer traffic into a fragile or suboptimal topology. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

B:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

C:

This action fits a different incident: a campus uses VRRP on an SVI but hosts keep targeting a physical gateway address rather than the shared virtual address. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

D:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when a core switch keeps forwarding after a power supply is removed, but a maintenance exercise shows no power fault alarm reaches operations. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1040

A stack's standby control member cannot take over after a failover drill because the new member has incompatible firmware. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Align software versions through the vendor-supported stack upgrade and member compatibility process.
  2. Align OSPF area membership and compatible neighbor parameters on the affected link.
  3. Require member version checks before adding a replacement or upgrading the stack.
  4. Document root bridge ownership per VLAN or instance in resilience plans.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This is the corrective intervention because control-member version mismatch prevents stable participation in the intended logical stack. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

C:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This action fits a different incident: a redundant OSPF network has two uplinks, but one interface's routing adjacency never forms because its area ID is wrong. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

D:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when two redundant switches disagree about the device that should be the STP root for a campus distribution VLAN. It does not specifically prevent this problem.