McAfee Secure

HP HPE7-A01 Bundle

Exam Code: HPE7-A01

Exam Name HPE Network Campus Access Professional

Certification Provider: HP

Corresponding Certification: HPE Aruba Networking Certified Professional - Campus Access

HP HPE7-A01 Bundle $19.99
HPE7-A01 Sample 1 HPE7-A01 Sample 2 HPE7-A01 Sample 3 HPE7-A01 Sample 4 HPE7-A01 Sample 5 HPE7-A01 Sample 6 HPE7-A01 Sample 7 HPE7-A01 Sample 8 HPE7-A01 Sample 9 HPE7-A01 Sample 10

100% HP HPE7-A01 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real HPE7-A01 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    HPE7-A01 Questions & Answers

    161 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual HPE7-A01 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • Study Guide

    HPE7-A01 Study Guide

    1264 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 1264-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace HPE7-A01 exam.

HPE Network Campus Access Professional (HPE7-A01) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $154.98
Bundle Price: $134.99

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    161 Questions

    $124.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1264 PDF Pages

    $29.99

HP HPE7-A01 Practice Test 111

Question 1100

A warehouse deployment needs accurate client location, but APs were installed with no stable coordinate or floor map assignment. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Use approved antenna gain and transmit power settings per model and regulatory region.
  2. Validate channel width against density and spectrum occupancy at each event venue.
  3. Maintain AP placement metadata and a verified floor plan before using location analytics.
  4. Audit AP coordinates after moves, renovations and device replacements.

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

This is the corrective intervention because client localization depends on accurate reference positions and RF geometry. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

D:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action fits a different incident: a retail site uses multiple AP models but a uniform antenna-gain configuration that overstretches permitted EIRP in some areas. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

B:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when a stadium's WLAN uses 80 MHz channels everywhere, producing excessive overlapping BSSs during a sold-out event. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1101

An engineer disables protected management frames to support one old handheld despite a WLAN security requirement that mandates PMF. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Move the legacy device to an approved separate compatible service or replace it while keeping mandatory PMF on the protected WLAN.
  2. Maintain exception expiry dates for devices lacking required WPA capabilities.
  3. Provide approved compatible security service or a planned device upgrade, without falsely claiming WPA3 support on legacy devices.
  4. Test voice service with actual supported client devices.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This is the corrective intervention because legacy-client limitations conflict with the security policy for management-frame protection. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

B:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

C:

This action fits a different incident: a campus is migrating staff to WPA3-Enterprise but several devices only support WPA2-Enterprise. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

D:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when a VoIP design attempts to solve poor call quality solely by raising AP power while clients still transmit at weak power levels. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1102

A large office wants better distribution of capable clients between 2.4 and 5 GHz but all steer to 2.4 after a new RF policy. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Remove the SSID from all unintended broadcast profiles and validate the permitted networks.
  2. Tune supported band-preference or steering settings based on client capabilities and coverage evidence.
  3. Rotate shared credentials and audit identity-to-role mappings.
  4. Validate band steering after large RF-policy changes.

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

This is the corrective intervention because the new selection policy fails to guide dual-band clients to the desired 5 GHz capacity. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

D:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action fits a different incident: a security team wants to disable a previously unused SSID but the site still broadcasts it through a second WLAN profile. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

C:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when a lab SSID uses a pre-shared password and the organization needs different access per shared IoT device type. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1103

A campus core has a default route toward a failed WAN link, while the healthy standby WAN is not preferred. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Withdraw the obsolete static route or correct its administrative distance based on the cutover plan.
  2. Require provider-supplied ASN verification before peer activation.
  3. Configure monitored failover or route tracking so the backup next hop becomes active when the primary path fails.
  4. Rehearse route failover with gateway and remote reachability checks.

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

This is the corrective intervention because the active default route remains installed despite a nonforwarding primary path. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

D:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action fits a different incident: a WAN cutover leaves a static route pointing to an old gateway while the current routing protocol advertises a new next hop. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

B:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when a campus BGP peering to an ISP remains Idle because the local neighbor remote-AS setting is incorrect. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1104

A distribution switch cannot reach an application subnet because its static route references an incorrect next-hop IP. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Replace the wrong next hop with a reachable gateway validated against the routed adjacency.
  2. Narrow the route policy match to the approved source, destination and traffic classification.
  3. Review static next-hop reachability after topology changes.
  4. Record passive and active OSPF interfaces in the routing design.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This is the corrective intervention because the forwarding table sends application packets toward a nonexistent or wrong neighbor. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

C:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This action fits a different incident: a campus uses policy-based routing to force a selected application through a service appliance, but a catch-all policy inadvertently redirects user DNS traffic too. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

D:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when two Aruba CX routers run OSPF on a point-to-point uplink but show no neighbor because one interface is passive. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1105

An OSPF adjacency remains in ExStart after a new routed uplink is installed with conflicting MTU settings. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Adjust the inbound route policy narrowly to permit intended prefixes.
  2. Align the supported MTU across the OSPF link and then rebuild adjacency if required.
  3. Test source and destination route visibility from both ends.
  4. Include MTU symmetry checks in routed-link provisioning.

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

This is the corrective intervention because OSPF database exchange can fail when peers disagree on interface MTU. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

D:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action fits a different incident: a BGP peer is Established but upstream routes are not accepted due to a prefix filter that rejects the approved campus CIDR. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

C:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when a device sends packets to a remote IPv6 network, but return traffic fails because the remote router lacks the source-prefix route. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1106

Two Aruba CX routers run OSPF on a point-to-point uplink but show no neighbor because one interface is passive. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Adjust the inbound route policy narrowly to permit intended prefixes.
  2. Enable OSPF neighbor formation on the intended routed uplink while keeping user-facing interfaces appropriately passive.
  3. Allocate router IDs from a controlled unique registry.
  4. Record passive and active OSPF interfaces in the routing design.

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

This is the corrective intervention because a passive OSPF interface advertises its network but does not send hello packets to form a neighbor. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

D:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action fits a different incident: a BGP peer is Established but upstream routes are not accepted due to a prefix filter that rejects the approved campus CIDR. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

C:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when an OSPF domain has duplicate router IDs after a lab switch image is cloned into production. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1107

An OSPF domain has duplicate router IDs after a lab switch image is cloned into production. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Assign a unique router ID to the added device and reestablish correct adjacencies.
  2. Replace the wrong next hop with a reachable gateway validated against the routed adjacency.
  3. Allocate router IDs from a controlled unique registry.
  4. Log prefix-filter changes and validate intended route inventories.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This is the corrective intervention because OSPF uses router IDs to distinguish routing speakers; duplication can corrupt peer state. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

C:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This action fits a different incident: a distribution switch cannot reach an application subnet because its static route references an incorrect next-hop IP. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

D:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when an OSPF router has a healthy adjacency but a destination prefix is missing after someone configured a restrictive inbound route filter. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1108

An OSPF multi-area design attaches a remote area directly to another remote area without an approved backbone connection or virtual-link design. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Filter unauthorized default-route redistribution while allowing intended connected service routes.
  2. Restore appropriate area 0 connectivity or use a carefully justified supported backbone extension.
  3. Standardize routing timers within approved network segments.
  4. Validate area topology before routing changes or new site turnup.

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

This is the corrective intervention because standard OSPF multi-area routing relies on backbone connectivity for inter-area propagation. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

D:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action fits a different incident: a campus OSPF redistribution policy accidentally injects a default route from a disconnected guest gateway into the internal core. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

C:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when a data center's OSPF router and campus peer have matching area IDs but fail adjacency because their hello/dead timers differ. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1109

A campus routes guest and employee traffic in separate VRFs but a technician adds a guest static route only to the employee VRF. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Install the route or approved controlled route leak in the correct guest VRF.
  2. Document per-VRF ownership of routes and permitted route leaking.
  3. Review the effective routing filter and allow the explicitly intended prefix.
  4. Require both route and policy validation for new application flows.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This is the corrective intervention because each VRF has an independent forwarding table and unrelated routes are not automatically shared. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

B:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

C:

This action fits a different incident: an OSPF router has a healthy adjacency but a destination prefix is missing after someone configured a restrictive inbound route filter. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

D:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when an ACL allows a remote application subnet, yet a client cannot access it because the SVI has no route to that destination. It does not specifically prevent this problem.

Question 1110

A policy requires restricted services in a management VRF to reach a shared NTP system but forbids broad connectivity to the production user VRF. Which TWO coordinated steps provide the immediate correction and a sensible ongoing safeguard? Select two.

  1. Configure monitored failover or route tracking so the backup next hop becomes active when the primary path fails.
  2. Require provider-supplied ASN verification before peer activation.
  3. Implement a narrow supported service reachability or controlled route-leak policy for the NTP destination.
  4. Review VRF leak prefix filters with every shared-service addition.

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

This is the corrective intervention because VRF separation blocks required shared services unless an explicit controlled path exists. Confirm its effect using the specified operational recovery check.

D:

This adds the continuing safeguard so the corrected failure does not recur after the original intervention.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action fits a different incident: a campus core has a default route toward a failed WAN link, while the healthy standby WAN is not preferred. It is not the targeted repair for this case.

B:

That safeguard would suit a different situation, such as when a campus BGP peering to an ISP remains Idle because the local neighbor remote-AS setting is incorrect. It does not specifically prevent this problem.