McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99
SC-300 Sample 1 SC-300 Sample 2 SC-300 Sample 3 SC-300 Sample 4 SC-300 Sample 5 SC-300 Sample 6 SC-300 Sample 7 SC-300 Sample 8 SC-300 Sample 9 SC-300 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 13

Question 120

During post-change review of the requirement “A tenant chooses pass-through authentication because its security policy requires on-premises validation at sign-in,” an auditor observes: Authentication requests fail even though cloud directory users remain synchronized. Which root-cause finding would explain that symptom?

  1. The second forest's agent or provisioning configuration was never activated
  2. The connector service account lost permissions to read or replicate the required AD attributes
  3. All pass-through authentication agents are unavailable or unhealthy
  4. Monitoring agents or health service registration are not configured for the selected component

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. All pass-through authentication agents are unavailable or unhealthy. This fault explains the observed failure: Authentication requests fail even though cloud directory users remain synchronized. The intended configuration would instead be: Configure supported pass-through authentication agents with adequate redundancy and appropriate sign-in routing.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The second forest's agent or provisioning configuration was never activated. The reported symptom instead has this cause: All pass-through authentication agents are unavailable or unhealthy. The corrective action is: Configure supported pass-through authentication agents with adequate redundancy and appropriate sign-in routing.

B:

The connector service account lost permissions to read or replicate the required AD attributes. The reported symptom instead has this cause: All pass-through authentication agents are unavailable or unhealthy. The corrective action is: Configure supported pass-through authentication agents with adequate redundancy and appropriate sign-in routing.

D:

Monitoring agents or health service registration are not configured for the selected component. The reported symptom instead has this cause: All pass-through authentication agents are unavailable or unhealthy. The corrective action is: Configure supported pass-through authentication agents with adequate redundancy and appropriate sign-in routing.

Question 121

Select the most appropriate first configuration decision for this scenario: A customer has thousands of AD users but only selected OUs should be synchronized to its Microsoft Entra tenant.

  1. Configure Microsoft Entra seamless SSO with the required on-premises computer account/key and supported browser/device prerequisites
  2. Check Microsoft Entra Connect Sync health and connector export errors, then restore only the required directory permissions
  3. Review staging/export deletion thresholds and accidental-delete protection before approving large deletion exports
  4. Set OU-based filtering in the supported synchronization configuration and assess object deletion impact before enabling

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct implementation. Set OU-based filtering in the supported synchronization configuration and assess object deletion impact before enabling. It meets the stated requirement: A customer has thousands of AD users but only selected OUs should be synchronized to its Microsoft Entra tenant. Acceptance evidence is: An in-scope OU user synchronizes while an out-of-scope staging account does not.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The Seamless SSO domain computer account or browser intranet configuration is incomplete. That condition is not the problem here: An in-scope user is placed in an OU excluded by the connector's filtering settings. The targeted implementation is: Set OU-based filtering in the supported synchronization configuration and assess object deletion impact before enabling.

B:

The connector service account lost permissions to read or replicate the required AD attributes. That condition is not the problem here: An in-scope user is placed in an OU excluded by the connector's filtering settings. The targeted implementation is: Set OU-based filtering in the supported synchronization configuration and assess object deletion impact before enabling.

C:

Accidental-deletion safeguards were disabled or the deletion threshold was inappropriately raised. That condition is not the problem here: An in-scope user is placed in an OU excluded by the connector's filtering settings. The targeted implementation is: Set OU-based filtering in the supported synchronization configuration and assess object deletion impact before enabling.

Question 122

The owner wants independent acceptance evidence after the team chose: Set OU-based filtering in the supported synchronization configuration and assess object deletion impact before enabling. It was meant to solve: A customer has thousands of AD users but only selected OUs should be synchronized to its Microsoft Entra tenant. Which result demonstrates success?

  1. An in-scope OU user synchronizes while an out-of-scope staging account does not
  2. Only pilot users exhibit the new managed authentication behavior while other users continue via federation
  3. A synchronized cloud sign-in succeeds during the isolated AD outage under the expected authentication model
  4. An eligible hybrid employee completes SSPR using the supported web flow, and the new credential is written to the correct on-prem AD DS account after policy validation

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct acceptance check. An in-scope OU user synchronizes while an out-of-scope staging account does not. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Even if using staged rollout for supported authentication methods succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An in-scope OU user synchronizes while an out-of-scope staging account does not.

C:

Even if enabling password hash synchronization through the supported sync solution succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An in-scope OU user synchronizes while an out-of-scope staging account does not.

D:

Even if enabling Microsoft Entra SSPR password writeback in the correctly deployed Connect Sync or Cloud Sync configuration succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An in-scope OU user synchronizes while an out-of-scope staging account does not.

Question 123

A team must isolate a broken configuration. Goal: A customer has thousands of AD users but only selected OUs should be synchronized to its Microsoft Entra tenant. Symptom: The expected user is missing in Entra while other OUs sync successfully. Which hypothesis most precisely accounts for the observed result?

  1. The second forest's agent or provisioning configuration was never activated
  2. An in-scope user is placed in an OU excluded by the connector's filtering settings
  3. The tenant still routes authentication to pass-through agents or federation for the test user
  4. The connector service account lost permissions to read or replicate the required AD attributes

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct diagnosis. An in-scope user is placed in an OU excluded by the connector's filtering settings. This fault explains the observed failure: The expected user is missing in Entra while other OUs sync successfully. The intended configuration would instead be: Set OU-based filtering in the supported synchronization configuration and assess object deletion impact before enabling.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The second forest's agent or provisioning configuration was never activated. The reported symptom instead has this cause: An in-scope user is placed in an OU excluded by the connector's filtering settings. The corrective action is: Set OU-based filtering in the supported synchronization configuration and assess object deletion impact before enabling.

C:

The tenant still routes authentication to pass-through agents or federation for the test user. The reported symptom instead has this cause: An in-scope user is placed in an OU excluded by the connector's filtering settings. The corrective action is: Set OU-based filtering in the supported synchronization configuration and assess object deletion impact before enabling.

D:

The connector service account lost permissions to read or replicate the required AD attributes. The reported symptom instead has this cause: An in-scope user is placed in an OU excluded by the connector's filtering settings. The corrective action is: Set OU-based filtering in the supported synchronization configuration and assess object deletion impact before enabling.

Question 124

The security architect is given this constraint: A company uses lightweight cloud provisioning agents and requires separate AD forests to supply users to a tenant. Which technical approach meets it without relying on unrelated controls?

  1. Configure supported pass-through authentication agents with adequate redundancy and appropriate sign-in routing
  2. Use staged rollout for supported authentication methods and migrate selected pilot users before changing broader sign-in configuration
  3. Deploy Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync agents and configure separate supported provisioning configurations for each forest
  4. Use Microsoft Entra Connect Health and applicable agent health views or alerts for supported monitored components

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct implementation. Deploy Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync agents and configure separate supported provisioning configurations for each forest. It meets the stated requirement: A company uses lightweight cloud provisioning agents and requires separate AD forests to supply users to a tenant. Acceptance evidence is: A user from each intended forest provisions successfully and a deactivated configuration stops only its own scoped population.

Incorrect Answers

A:

All pass-through authentication agents are unavailable or unhealthy. That condition is not the problem here: The second forest's agent or provisioning configuration was never activated. The targeted implementation is: Deploy Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync agents and configure separate supported provisioning configurations for each forest.

B:

The pilot population was not included in staged rollout scope. That condition is not the problem here: The second forest's agent or provisioning configuration was never activated. The targeted implementation is: Deploy Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync agents and configure separate supported provisioning configurations for each forest.

D:

Monitoring agents or health service registration are not configured for the selected component. That condition is not the problem here: The second forest's agent or provisioning configuration was never activated. The targeted implementation is: Deploy Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync agents and configure separate supported provisioning configurations for each forest.

Question 125

An operational review checks whether the change “Deploy Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync agents and configure separate supported provisioning configurations for each forest” meets this need: A company uses lightweight cloud provisioning agents and requires separate AD forests to supply users to a tenant. Which finding supports acceptance?

  1. An in-scope OU user synchronizes while an out-of-scope staging account does not
  2. Active agents validate cloud sign-ins against AD DS, and one agent's loss does not remove service when peers remain
  3. The unexpected bulk deletion is blocked or reviewed before cloud objects disappear
  4. A user from each intended forest provisions successfully and a deactivated configuration stops only its own scoped population

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct acceptance check. A user from each intended forest provisions successfully and a deactivated configuration stops only its own scoped population. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if setting OU-based filtering in the supported synchronization configuration succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A user from each intended forest provisions successfully and a deactivated configuration stops only its own scoped population.

B:

Even if configuring supported pass-through authentication agents with adequate redundancy succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A user from each intended forest provisions successfully and a deactivated configuration stops only its own scoped population.

C:

Even if reviewing staging/export deletion thresholds succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A user from each intended forest provisions successfully and a deactivated configuration stops only its own scoped population.

Question 126

The deployment owner asks why this identity requirement failed: A company uses lightweight cloud provisioning agents and requires separate AD forests to supply users to a tenant. The test shows: One forest synchronizes normally but all accounts from the other remain absent. Which fault is the best diagnosis?

  1. The second forest's agent or provisioning configuration was never activated
  2. The tenant still routes authentication to pass-through agents or federation for the test user
  3. The pilot population was not included in staged rollout scope
  4. All pass-through authentication agents are unavailable or unhealthy

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. The second forest's agent or provisioning configuration was never activated. This fault explains the observed failure: One forest synchronizes normally but all accounts from the other remain absent. The intended configuration would instead be: Deploy Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync agents and configure separate supported provisioning configurations for each forest.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The tenant still routes authentication to pass-through agents or federation for the test user. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The second forest's agent or provisioning configuration was never activated. The corrective action is: Deploy Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync agents and configure separate supported provisioning configurations for each forest.

C:

The pilot population was not included in staged rollout scope. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The second forest's agent or provisioning configuration was never activated. The corrective action is: Deploy Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync agents and configure separate supported provisioning configurations for each forest.

D:

All pass-through authentication agents are unavailable or unhealthy. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The second forest's agent or provisioning configuration was never activated. The corrective action is: Deploy Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync agents and configure separate supported provisioning configurations for each forest.

Question 127

A change request covers two Microsoft Entra needs. Requirement A: A migration from AD FS needs gradual testing before all employees switch to managed cloud authentication. Requirement B: A business must detect unhealthy pass-through authentication agents before employee logins are affected. Select TWO actions, one for each requirement.

  1. Review sign-in usage and federation dependency information, test managed-auth migration with a pilot, then plan cutover
  2. Use staged rollout for supported authentication methods and migrate selected pilot users before changing broader sign-in configuration
  3. Configure Microsoft Entra seamless SSO with the required on-premises computer account/key and supported browser/device prerequisites
  4. Set OU-based filtering in the supported synchronization configuration and assess object deletion impact before enabling
  5. Use Microsoft Entra Connect Health and applicable agent health views or alerts for supported monitored components

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

Correct for task 1. Use staged rollout for supported authentication methods and migrate selected pilot users before changing broader sign-in configuration. This directly addresses the first requirement: A migration from AD FS needs gradual testing before all employees switch to managed cloud authentication. Verify it by checking: Only pilot users exhibit the new managed authentication behavior while other users continue via federation.

E:

Correct for task 2. Use Microsoft Entra Connect Health and applicable agent health views or alerts for supported monitored components. This addresses the independent second requirement: A business must detect unhealthy pass-through authentication agents before employee logins are affected. Verify it by checking: The alerting system identifies a deliberately stopped pilot agent and reports its affected role.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An active application still relies on a federation endpoint that was omitted from discovery. To satisfy task 1, use: Use staged rollout for supported authentication methods and migrate selected pilot users before changing broader sign-in configuration. For task 2, use: Use Microsoft Entra Connect Health and applicable agent health views or alerts for supported monitored components.

C:

The Seamless SSO domain computer account or browser intranet configuration is incomplete. To satisfy task 1, use: Use staged rollout for supported authentication methods and migrate selected pilot users before changing broader sign-in configuration. For task 2, use: Use Microsoft Entra Connect Health and applicable agent health views or alerts for supported monitored components.

D:

An in-scope user is placed in an OU excluded by the connector's filtering settings. To satisfy task 1, use: Use staged rollout for supported authentication methods and migrate selected pilot users before changing broader sign-in configuration. For task 2, use: Use Microsoft Entra Connect Health and applicable agent health views or alerts for supported monitored components.

Question 128

After a deployment under this requirement — A migration from AD FS needs gradual testing before all employees switch to managed cloud authentication — administrators claim the following solution is in place: Use staged rollout for supported authentication methods and migrate selected pilot users before changing broader sign-in configuration. Which pilot finding supports that claim?

  1. Logs show the pilot no longer requires the AD FS route while legacy exceptions remain accounted for
  2. Only pilot users exhibit the new managed authentication behavior while other users continue via federation
  3. The unexpected bulk deletion is blocked or reviewed before cloud objects disappear
  4. A synchronized cloud sign-in succeeds during the isolated AD outage under the expected authentication model

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. Only pilot users exhibit the new managed authentication behavior while other users continue via federation. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if reviewing sign-in usage succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Only pilot users exhibit the new managed authentication behavior while other users continue via federation.

C:

Even if reviewing staging/export deletion thresholds succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Only pilot users exhibit the new managed authentication behavior while other users continue via federation.

D:

Even if enabling password hash synchronization through the supported sync solution succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Only pilot users exhibit the new managed authentication behavior while other users continue via federation.

Question 129

The deployment was intended to satisfy: A migration from AD FS needs gradual testing before all employees switch to managed cloud authentication. During testing, this happened: A designated pilot user still routes through the old federation sign-in path. Which configuration defect best explains the failure?

  1. The pilot population was not included in staged rollout scope
  2. The tenant still routes authentication to pass-through agents or federation for the test user
  3. An active application still relies on a federation endpoint that was omitted from discovery
  4. An in-scope user is placed in an OU excluded by the connector's filtering settings

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. The pilot population was not included in staged rollout scope. This fault explains the observed failure: A designated pilot user still routes through the old federation sign-in path. The intended configuration would instead be: Use staged rollout for supported authentication methods and migrate selected pilot users before changing broader sign-in configuration.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The tenant still routes authentication to pass-through agents or federation for the test user. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The pilot population was not included in staged rollout scope. The corrective action is: Use staged rollout for supported authentication methods and migrate selected pilot users before changing broader sign-in configuration.

C:

An active application still relies on a federation endpoint that was omitted from discovery. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The pilot population was not included in staged rollout scope. The corrective action is: Use staged rollout for supported authentication methods and migrate selected pilot users before changing broader sign-in configuration.

D:

An in-scope user is placed in an OU excluded by the connector's filtering settings. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The pilot population was not included in staged rollout scope. The corrective action is: Use staged rollout for supported authentication methods and migrate selected pilot users before changing broader sign-in configuration.

Question 130

A change board will approve one identity configuration to satisfy: A hybrid identity admin needs simple single sign-on from joined corporate Windows devices when using supported cloud authentication. Which change should it approve?

  1. Enable password hash synchronization through the supported sync solution and test cloud authentication under controlled on-prem isolation
  2. Enable Microsoft Entra SSPR password writeback in the correctly deployed Connect Sync or Cloud Sync configuration and verify on-premises account permissions and eligible-user scope
  3. Deploy Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync agents and configure separate supported provisioning configurations for each forest
  4. Configure Microsoft Entra seamless SSO with the required on-premises computer account/key and supported browser/device prerequisites

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct implementation. Configure Microsoft Entra seamless SSO with the required on-premises computer account/key and supported browser/device prerequisites. It meets the stated requirement: A hybrid identity admin needs simple single sign-on from joined corporate Windows devices when using supported cloud authentication. Acceptance evidence is: A domain-connected approved workstation gets the expected streamlined sign-in and an external device still prompts normally.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The tenant still routes authentication to pass-through agents or federation for the test user. That condition is not the problem here: The Seamless SSO domain computer account or browser intranet configuration is incomplete. The targeted implementation is: Configure Microsoft Entra seamless SSO with the required on-premises computer account/key and supported browser/device prerequisites.

B:

Writeback is disabled in the active Connect Sync or Cloud Sync path, the user is out of scope, or required AD DS password-reset permissions are missing. That condition is not the problem here: The Seamless SSO domain computer account or browser intranet configuration is incomplete. The targeted implementation is: Configure Microsoft Entra seamless SSO with the required on-premises computer account/key and supported browser/device prerequisites.

C:

The second forest's agent or provisioning configuration was never activated. That condition is not the problem here: The Seamless SSO domain computer account or browser intranet configuration is incomplete. The targeted implementation is: Configure Microsoft Entra seamless SSO with the required on-premises computer account/key and supported browser/device prerequisites.