McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99
SC-300 Sample 1 SC-300 Sample 2 SC-300 Sample 3 SC-300 Sample 4 SC-300 Sample 5 SC-300 Sample 6 SC-300 Sample 7 SC-300 Sample 8 SC-300 Sample 9 SC-300 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 19

Question 180

An engineer troubleshoots an identity solution for: A tenant wants to replace persistent SMS usage by prompting eligible users to register Microsoft Authenticator over time. The pilot result is: Eligible employees never see the Authenticator registration prompt at interactive sign-in. What is the most likely relevant fault?

  1. The emergency account remains in the campaign's included population without the intended exclusion
  2. Only generic multifactor authentication is required, without a device-bound provider restriction where the policy requires one
  3. The authentication methods policy targets All users instead of the permitted staff population
  4. The registration campaign targets a different method or excludes the intended staff group

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct diagnosis. The registration campaign targets a different method or excludes the intended staff group. This fault explains the observed failure: Eligible employees never see the Authenticator registration prompt at interactive sign-in. The intended configuration would instead be: Configure an authentication methods registration campaign with correct eligibility and snooze behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The emergency account remains in the campaign's included population without the intended exclusion. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The registration campaign targets a different method or excludes the intended staff group. The corrective action is: Configure an authentication methods registration campaign with correct eligibility and snooze behavior.

B:

Only generic multifactor authentication is required, without a device-bound provider restriction where the policy requires one. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The registration campaign targets a different method or excludes the intended staff group. The corrective action is: Configure an authentication methods registration campaign with correct eligibility and snooze behavior.

C:

The authentication methods policy targets All users instead of the permitted staff population. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The registration campaign targets a different method or excludes the intended staff group. The corrective action is: Configure an authentication methods registration campaign with correct eligibility and snooze behavior.

Question 181

Which implementation fits the following specific identity problem? A smartcard-based employee moves to a certificate sign-in workflow and the security team needs to restrict weak certificate validation approaches.

  1. Enable SSPR for the selected users with two-method verification and required hybrid writeback configuration
  2. Configure Microsoft Entra certificate-based authentication with the trusted CA and supported username binding
  3. Set certificate authentication binding and authentication strength policies according to supported Entra CBA configuration
  4. Allow approved device-bound FIDO2 passkey providers or attested security-key models through the authentication-method policy and enforce an appropriate phishing-resistant Conditional Access strength

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct implementation. Set certificate authentication binding and authentication strength policies according to supported Entra CBA configuration. It meets the stated requirement: A smartcard-based employee moves to a certificate sign-in workflow and the security team needs to restrict weak certificate validation approaches. Acceptance evidence is: A mapped certificate with approved assurance authenticates; an unapproved mapping or certificate fails.

Incorrect Answers

A:

SSPR was enabled without the supported password writeback path to on-premises AD. That condition is not the problem here: The binding rule accepts a weak fallback identifier inconsistent with the tenant's mapping policy. The targeted implementation is: Set certificate authentication binding and authentication strength policies according to supported Entra CBA configuration.

B:

The sign-in certificate's issuer is not configured as trusted or its user binding does not resolve. That condition is not the problem here: The binding rule accepts a weak fallback identifier inconsistent with the tenant's mapping policy. The targeted implementation is: Set certificate authentication binding and authentication strength policies according to supported Entra CBA configuration.

D:

Only generic multifactor authentication is required, without a device-bound provider restriction where the policy requires one. That condition is not the problem here: The binding rule accepts a weak fallback identifier inconsistent with the tenant's mapping policy. The targeted implementation is: Set certificate authentication binding and authentication strength policies according to supported Entra CBA configuration.

Question 182

The team implemented the following change: Set certificate authentication binding and authentication strength policies according to supported Entra CBA configuration. The acceptance requirement was: A smartcard-based employee moves to a certificate sign-in workflow and the security team needs to restrict weak certificate validation approaches. Which observed outcome most directly proves the change works?

  1. A valid mapped user certificate authenticates and a mismatched or untrusted certificate is rejected
  2. A mapped certificate with approved assurance authenticates; an unapproved mapping or certificate fails
  3. Normal enrolled staff receive registration prompts; excluded emergency identities are not forced into the enrollment campaign
  4. The record identifies the successful passkey/strong method, not just a generic MFA-satisfied result

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. A mapped certificate with approved assurance authenticates; an unapproved mapping or certificate fails. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if configuring Microsoft Entra certificate-based authentication with the trusted CA succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A mapped certificate with approved assurance authenticates; an unapproved mapping or certificate fails.

C:

Even if scoping authentication method succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A mapped certificate with approved assurance authenticates; an unapproved mapping or certificate fails.

D:

Even if examining Microsoft Entra sign-in authentication details succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A mapped certificate with approved assurance authenticates; an unapproved mapping or certificate fails.

Question 183

A change appears correct at a glance, but the requirement is still unmet: A smartcard-based employee moves to a certificate sign-in workflow and the security team needs to restrict weak certificate validation approaches. The key observed symptom is: A certificate with an unapproved user binding unexpectedly signs in. Which cause should be investigated first?

  1. The registration campaign targets a different method or excludes the intended staff group
  2. The binding rule accepts a weak fallback identifier inconsistent with the tenant's mapping policy
  3. The sign-in certificate's issuer is not configured as trusted or its user binding does not resolve
  4. The emergency account remains in the campaign's included population without the intended exclusion

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct diagnosis. The binding rule accepts a weak fallback identifier inconsistent with the tenant's mapping policy. This fault explains the observed failure: A certificate with an unapproved user binding unexpectedly signs in. The intended configuration would instead be: Set certificate authentication binding and authentication strength policies according to supported Entra CBA configuration.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The registration campaign targets a different method or excludes the intended staff group. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The binding rule accepts a weak fallback identifier inconsistent with the tenant's mapping policy. The corrective action is: Set certificate authentication binding and authentication strength policies according to supported Entra CBA configuration.

C:

The sign-in certificate's issuer is not configured as trusted or its user binding does not resolve. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The binding rule accepts a weak fallback identifier inconsistent with the tenant's mapping policy. The corrective action is: Set certificate authentication binding and authentication strength policies according to supported Entra CBA configuration.

D:

The emergency account remains in the campaign's included population without the intended exclusion. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The binding rule accepts a weak fallback identifier inconsistent with the tenant's mapping policy. The corrective action is: Set certificate authentication binding and authentication strength policies according to supported Entra CBA configuration.

Question 184

A change board will approve one identity configuration to satisfy: Security governance needs ordinary users to register secure factors while preventing enrollment by a sensitive break-glass account in campaigns. Which change should it approve?

  1. Configure Microsoft Entra certificate-based authentication with the trusted CA and supported username binding
  2. Scope authentication method and registration campaign targets using correct include/exclude groups and keep emergency account access independent
  3. Configure an authentication methods registration campaign with correct eligibility and snooze behavior
  4. Issue a short-lived scoped Temporary Access Pass under the approved authentication-method policy, and complete device/passkey registration within ten minutes of a single-use TAP sign-in or use a suitably governed multiuse TAP

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct implementation. Scope authentication method and registration campaign targets using correct include/exclude groups and keep emergency account access independent. It meets the stated requirement: Security governance needs ordinary users to register secure factors while preventing enrollment by a sensitive break-glass account in campaigns. Acceptance evidence is: Normal enrolled staff receive registration prompts; excluded emergency identities are not forced into the enrollment campaign.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The sign-in certificate's issuer is not configured as trusted or its user binding does not resolve. That condition is not the problem here: The emergency account remains in the campaign's included population without the intended exclusion. The targeted implementation is: Scope authentication method and registration campaign targets using correct include/exclude groups and keep emergency account access independent.

C:

The registration campaign targets a different method or excludes the intended staff group. That condition is not the problem here: The emergency account remains in the campaign's included population without the intended exclusion. The targeted implementation is: Scope authentication method and registration campaign targets using correct include/exclude groups and keep emergency account access independent.

D:

The TAP is out of scope, consumed or expired, or the single-use TAP registration proceeds beyond its permitted authentication window. That condition is not the problem here: The emergency account remains in the campaign's included population without the intended exclusion. The targeted implementation is: Scope authentication method and registration campaign targets using correct include/exclude groups and keep emergency account access independent.

Question 185

An auditor must verify this deployment decision: Scope authentication method and registration campaign targets using correct include/exclude groups and keep emergency account access independent. Its purpose was: Security governance needs ordinary users to register secure factors while preventing enrollment by a sensitive break-glass account in campaigns. Which test result is the strongest evidence?

  1. Eligible users receive the enrollment prompt according to campaign settings while excluded accounts do not
  2. A targeted employee completes registered passkey onboarding in the permitted single-use TAP registration window, and a consumed or expired pass cannot be reused to start another session
  3. The record identifies the successful passkey/strong method, not just a generic MFA-satisfied result
  4. Normal enrolled staff receive registration prompts; excluded emergency identities are not forced into the enrollment campaign

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct acceptance check. Normal enrolled staff receive registration prompts; excluded emergency identities are not forced into the enrollment campaign. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if configuring an authentication methods registration campaign with correct eligibility succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Normal enrolled staff receive registration prompts; excluded emergency identities are not forced into the enrollment campaign.

B:

Even if issuing a short-lived scoped Temporary Access Pass under the approved authentication-method policy succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Normal enrolled staff receive registration prompts; excluded emergency identities are not forced into the enrollment campaign.

C:

Even if examining Microsoft Entra sign-in authentication details succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Normal enrolled staff receive registration prompts; excluded emergency identities are not forced into the enrollment campaign.

Question 186

The service desk escalates the following unsuccessful identity rollout. Requirement: Security governance needs ordinary users to register secure factors while preventing enrollment by a sensitive break-glass account in campaigns. Observed: Emergency account sign-in is interrupted by the normal-user registration rollout. Which underlying misconfiguration is most consistent?

  1. The binding rule accepts a weak fallback identifier inconsistent with the tenant's mapping policy
  2. The registration campaign targets a different method or excludes the intended staff group
  3. The TAP is out of scope, consumed or expired, or the single-use TAP registration proceeds beyond its permitted authentication window
  4. The emergency account remains in the campaign's included population without the intended exclusion

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct diagnosis. The emergency account remains in the campaign's included population without the intended exclusion. This fault explains the observed failure: Emergency account sign-in is interrupted by the normal-user registration rollout. The intended configuration would instead be: Scope authentication method and registration campaign targets using correct include/exclude groups and keep emergency account access independent.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The binding rule accepts a weak fallback identifier inconsistent with the tenant's mapping policy. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The emergency account remains in the campaign's included population without the intended exclusion. The corrective action is: Scope authentication method and registration campaign targets using correct include/exclude groups and keep emergency account access independent.

B:

The registration campaign targets a different method or excludes the intended staff group. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The emergency account remains in the campaign's included population without the intended exclusion. The corrective action is: Scope authentication method and registration campaign targets using correct include/exclude groups and keep emergency account access independent.

C:

The TAP is out of scope, consumed or expired, or the single-use TAP registration proceeds beyond its permitted authentication window. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The emergency account remains in the campaign's included population without the intended exclusion. The corrective action is: Scope authentication method and registration campaign targets using correct include/exclude groups and keep emergency account access independent.

Question 187

An identity engineer has two independent tasks. Task 1: After users adopt passkeys, administrators must identify which authentication method was actually used in sign-in events rather than assuming MFA from the result field. Task 2: Support agents should offer Microsoft Authenticator notifications only to a permitted population and not to service accounts. Which TWO configuration changes jointly meet both tasks?

  1. Scope the Authenticator method policy to the staff group and exclude workload/service identities as required
  2. Set certificate authentication binding and authentication strength policies according to supported Entra CBA configuration
  3. Plan Windows Hello for Business with the supported trust/deployment model, device policy, and user provisioning prerequisites
  4. Examine Microsoft Entra sign-in authentication details and method records for the pilot sign-in
  5. Enable SSPR for the selected users with two-method verification and required hybrid writeback configuration

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Correct for task 2. Scope the Authenticator method policy to the staff group and exclude workload/service identities as required. This addresses the independent second requirement: Support agents should offer Microsoft Authenticator notifications only to a permitted population and not to service accounts. Verify it by checking: An enrolled staff pilot can register and use Authenticator; an excluded test principal does not receive the method.

D:

Correct for task 1. Examine Microsoft Entra sign-in authentication details and method records for the pilot sign-in. This directly addresses the first requirement: After users adopt passkeys, administrators must identify which authentication method was actually used in sign-in events rather than assuming MFA from the result field. Verify it by checking: The record identifies the successful passkey/strong method, not just a generic MFA-satisfied result.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The binding rule accepts a weak fallback identifier inconsistent with the tenant's mapping policy. To satisfy task 1, use: Examine Microsoft Entra sign-in authentication details and method records for the pilot sign-in. For task 2, use: Scope the Authenticator method policy to the staff group and exclude workload/service identities as required.

C:

The device is not configured for the required Windows Hello for Business provisioning policy. To satisfy task 1, use: Examine Microsoft Entra sign-in authentication details and method records for the pilot sign-in. For task 2, use: Scope the Authenticator method policy to the staff group and exclude workload/service identities as required.

E:

SSPR was enabled without the supported password writeback path to on-premises AD. To satisfy task 1, use: Examine Microsoft Entra sign-in authentication details and method records for the pilot sign-in. For task 2, use: Scope the Authenticator method policy to the staff group and exclude workload/service identities as required.

Question 188

After configuring: Examine Microsoft Entra sign-in authentication details and method records for the pilot sign-in, an engineer performs a targeted pilot for this objective: After users adopt passkeys, administrators must identify which authentication method was actually used in sign-in events rather than assuming MFA from the result field. What result constitutes a pass?

  1. An approved device-bound passkey satisfies the target strength while SMS alone and a disallowed passkey provider fail the intended restriction
  2. A targeted employee completes registered passkey onboarding in the permitted single-use TAP registration window, and a consumed or expired pass cannot be reused to start another session
  3. Eligible users receive the enrollment prompt according to campaign settings while excluded accounts do not
  4. The record identifies the successful passkey/strong method, not just a generic MFA-satisfied result

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct acceptance check. The record identifies the successful passkey/strong method, not just a generic MFA-satisfied result. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if allowing approved device-bound FIDO2 passkey providers or attested security-key models through the authentication-method policy succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The record identifies the successful passkey/strong method, not just a generic MFA-satisfied result.

B:

Even if issuing a short-lived scoped Temporary Access Pass under the approved authentication-method policy succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The record identifies the successful passkey/strong method, not just a generic MFA-satisfied result.

C:

Even if configuring an authentication methods registration campaign with correct eligibility succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The record identifies the successful passkey/strong method, not just a generic MFA-satisfied result.

Question 189

During post-change review of the requirement “After users adopt passkeys, administrators must identify which authentication method was actually used in sign-in events rather than assuming MFA from the result field,” an auditor observes: The security report labels an SMS-backed login as passkey-based with no supporting method evidence. Which root-cause finding would explain that symptom?

  1. Only generic multifactor authentication is required, without a device-bound provider restriction where the policy requires one
  2. The device is not configured for the required Windows Hello for Business provisioning policy
  3. Investigators inspected only the top-level Conditional Access success field and not authentication details
  4. The registration campaign targets a different method or excludes the intended staff group

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. Investigators inspected only the top-level Conditional Access success field and not authentication details. This fault explains the observed failure: The security report labels an SMS-backed login as passkey-based with no supporting method evidence. The intended configuration would instead be: Examine Microsoft Entra sign-in authentication details and method records for the pilot sign-in.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Only generic multifactor authentication is required, without a device-bound provider restriction where the policy requires one. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Investigators inspected only the top-level Conditional Access success field and not authentication details. The corrective action is: Examine Microsoft Entra sign-in authentication details and method records for the pilot sign-in.

B:

The device is not configured for the required Windows Hello for Business provisioning policy. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Investigators inspected only the top-level Conditional Access success field and not authentication details. The corrective action is: Examine Microsoft Entra sign-in authentication details and method records for the pilot sign-in.

D:

The registration campaign targets a different method or excludes the intended staff group. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Investigators inspected only the top-level Conditional Access success field and not authentication details. The corrective action is: Examine Microsoft Entra sign-in authentication details and method records for the pilot sign-in.

Question 190

An identity engineer has two independent tasks. Task 1: A finance SaaS app must be available only after phishing-resistant authentication, while ordinary apps retain existing authentication requirements. Task 2: A company wants to prevent unmanaged browsers from downloading sensitive files while allowing browser viewing. Which TWO configuration changes jointly meet both tasks?

  1. Use authentication context on the protected resource and target a corresponding Conditional Access policy with the required controls
  2. Create a scoped Conditional Access policy for the finance application with a phishing-resistant authentication strength grant control
  3. Create a policy from a Microsoft-provided template, review each inclusion/exclusion/grant control, and pilot it in report-only mode
  4. Set the Conditional Access grant control operator to Require all selected controls for the scoped policy
  5. Use Conditional Access app-enforced restrictions for supported SharePoint Online/Exchange Online experiences or a compatible Defender for Cloud Apps Conditional Access App Control session policy, testing the actual unmanaged-browser route

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

Correct for task 1. Create a scoped Conditional Access policy for the finance application with a phishing-resistant authentication strength grant control. This directly addresses the first requirement: A finance SaaS app must be available only after phishing-resistant authentication, while ordinary apps retain existing authentication requirements. Verify it by checking: A finance-app sign-in with an approved strong credential succeeds and SMS-only sign-in is denied, while an unrelated app is unaffected.

E:

Correct for task 2. Use Conditional Access app-enforced restrictions for supported SharePoint Online/Exchange Online experiences or a compatible Defender for Cloud Apps Conditional Access App Control session policy, testing the actual unmanaged-browser route. This addresses the independent second requirement: A company wants to prevent unmanaged browsers from downloading sensitive files while allowing browser viewing. Verify it by checking: An unmanaged pilot browser can view an allowed supported document but the scoped download is blocked by the actual app-enforced or monitored session control.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The sensitive library was never tagged with the authentication context used by the policy. To satisfy task 1, use: Create a scoped Conditional Access policy for the finance application with a phishing-resistant authentication strength grant control. For task 2, use: Use Conditional Access app-enforced restrictions for supported SharePoint Online/Exchange Online experiences or a compatible Defender for Cloud Apps Conditional Access App Control session policy, testing the actual unmanaged-browser route.

C:

The template was enabled without checking who or what it includes and excludes. To satisfy task 1, use: Create a scoped Conditional Access policy for the finance application with a phishing-resistant authentication strength grant control. For task 2, use: Use Conditional Access app-enforced restrictions for supported SharePoint Online/Exchange Online experiences or a compatible Defender for Cloud Apps Conditional Access App Control session policy, testing the actual unmanaged-browser route.

D:

Grant controls use Require one of the selected controls instead of Require all. To satisfy task 1, use: Create a scoped Conditional Access policy for the finance application with a phishing-resistant authentication strength grant control. For task 2, use: Use Conditional Access app-enforced restrictions for supported SharePoint Online/Exchange Online experiences or a compatible Defender for Cloud Apps Conditional Access App Control session policy, testing the actual unmanaged-browser route.