McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99
SC-300 Sample 1 SC-300 Sample 2 SC-300 Sample 3 SC-300 Sample 4 SC-300 Sample 5 SC-300 Sample 6 SC-300 Sample 7 SC-300 Sample 8 SC-300 Sample 9 SC-300 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 24

Question 230

The owner wants independent acceptance evidence after the team chose: Apply a sign-in risk Conditional Access policy with the intended risk threshold and grant/block response. It was meant to solve: An organization wants to block high-sign-in-risk attempts while preserving lower-risk authentication for normal users. Which result demonstrates success?

  1. New sign-ins fail after containment and the risk record documents the subsequent investigation
  2. A simulated qualifying high-risk sign-in is challenged or blocked, while a low-risk control login is not
  3. The high-risk password user completes the protected MFA-backed password-change flow and hybrid writeback where required; a passwordless identity follows the supported reauthentication/session-revocation path
  4. The remediation evidence is present and the final risk action reflects the completed password change

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. A simulated qualifying high-risk sign-in is challenged or blocked, while a low-risk control login is not. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if blocking sign-in or take appropriate account action succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A simulated qualifying high-risk sign-in is challenged or blocked, while a low-risk control login is not.

C:

Even if using the supported user-risk Require risk remediation Conditional Access control succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A simulated qualifying high-risk sign-in is challenged or blocked, while a low-risk control login is not.

D:

Even if inspecting risk history succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A simulated qualifying high-risk sign-in is challenged or blocked, while a low-risk control login is not.

Question 231

The deployment owner asks why this identity requirement failed: An organization wants to block high-sign-in-risk attempts while preserving lower-risk authentication for normal users. The test shows: High-risk sign-in events do not match the risk-based control although user risk reports remain low. Which fault is the best diagnosis?

  1. The policy uses user risk instead of sign-in risk as its triggering condition
  2. The report reads only the user's current risk label without historical detection records
  3. The tenant configured only sign-in-risk controls or the risky user lacks the registered strong authentication and hybrid password-writeback prerequisites
  4. The policy became enforced before eligible employees registered a usable challenge method

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. The policy uses user risk instead of sign-in risk as its triggering condition. This fault explains the observed failure: High-risk sign-in events do not match the risk-based control although user risk reports remain low. The intended configuration would instead be: Apply a sign-in risk Conditional Access policy with the intended risk threshold and grant/block response.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The report reads only the user's current risk label without historical detection records. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The policy uses user risk instead of sign-in risk as its triggering condition. The corrective action is: Apply a sign-in risk Conditional Access policy with the intended risk threshold and grant/block response.

C:

The tenant configured only sign-in-risk controls or the risky user lacks the registered strong authentication and hybrid password-writeback prerequisites. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The policy uses user risk instead of sign-in risk as its triggering condition. The corrective action is: Apply a sign-in risk Conditional Access policy with the intended risk threshold and grant/block response.

D:

The policy became enforced before eligible employees registered a usable challenge method. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The policy uses user risk instead of sign-in risk as its triggering condition. The corrective action is: Apply a sign-in risk Conditional Access policy with the intended risk threshold and grant/block response.

Question 232

Select the most appropriate first configuration decision for this scenario: A security team needs a self-remediation path for users with high accumulated identity risk, not just risky individual logins.

  1. Assign the relevant least-privilege Microsoft Entra identity protection/security role and test supported remediation rights
  2. Use the supported user-risk Require risk remediation Conditional Access control; require the automatically selected authentication strength and every-time sign-in, and validate secure password change or passwordless session revocation as applicable
  3. Use the sign-in risk details and Conditional Access evaluation to investigate the detection and apply the targeted policy response
  4. Apply a sign-in risk Conditional Access policy with the intended risk threshold and grant/block response

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct implementation. Use the supported user-risk Require risk remediation Conditional Access control; require the automatically selected authentication strength and every-time sign-in, and validate secure password change or passwordless session revocation as applicable. It meets the stated requirement: A security team needs a self-remediation path for users with high accumulated identity risk, not just risky individual logins. Acceptance evidence is: The high-risk password user completes the protected MFA-backed password-change flow and hybrid writeback where required; a passwordless identity follows the supported reauthentication/session-revocation path.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The assigned role has risk-reader access only but lacks the necessary remediation permission. That condition is not the problem here: The tenant configured only sign-in-risk controls or the risky user lacks the registered strong authentication and hybrid password-writeback prerequisites. The targeted implementation is: Use the supported user-risk Require risk remediation Conditional Access control; require the automatically selected authentication strength and every-time sign-in, and validate secure password change or passwordless session revocation as applicable.

C:

The response changes unrelated tenant-wide MFA settings rather than addressing the specific risk event. That condition is not the problem here: The tenant configured only sign-in-risk controls or the risky user lacks the registered strong authentication and hybrid password-writeback prerequisites. The targeted implementation is: Use the supported user-risk Require risk remediation Conditional Access control; require the automatically selected authentication strength and every-time sign-in, and validate secure password change or passwordless session revocation as applicable.

D:

The policy uses user risk instead of sign-in risk as its triggering condition. That condition is not the problem here: The tenant configured only sign-in-risk controls or the risky user lacks the registered strong authentication and hybrid password-writeback prerequisites. The targeted implementation is: Use the supported user-risk Require risk remediation Conditional Access control; require the automatically selected authentication strength and every-time sign-in, and validate secure password change or passwordless session revocation as applicable.

Question 233

An operational review checks whether the change “Use the supported user-risk Require risk remediation Conditional Access control; require the automatically selected authentication strength and every-time sign-in, and validate secure password change or passwordless session revocation as applicable” meets this need: A security team needs a self-remediation path for users with high accumulated identity risk, not just risky individual logins. Which finding supports acceptance?

  1. New sign-ins fail after containment and the risk record documents the subsequent investigation
  2. The high-risk password user completes the protected MFA-backed password-change flow and hybrid writeback where required; a passwordless identity follows the supported reauthentication/session-revocation path
  3. The remediation evidence is present and the final risk action reflects the completed password change
  4. Investigators can reconstruct when risk arose, changed and was remediated using event timestamps

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. The high-risk password user completes the protected MFA-backed password-change flow and hybrid writeback where required; a passwordless identity follows the supported reauthentication/session-revocation path. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if blocking sign-in or take appropriate account action succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The high-risk password user completes the protected MFA-backed password-change flow and hybrid writeback where required; a passwordless identity follows the supported reauthentication/session-revocation path.

C:

Even if inspecting risk history succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The high-risk password user completes the protected MFA-backed password-change flow and hybrid writeback where required; a passwordless identity follows the supported reauthentication/session-revocation path.

D:

Even if reviewing the user's risk history succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The high-risk password user completes the protected MFA-backed password-change flow and hybrid writeback where required; a passwordless identity follows the supported reauthentication/session-revocation path.

Question 234

The deployment was intended to satisfy: A security team needs a self-remediation path for users with high accumulated identity risk, not just risky individual logins. During testing, this happened: A user labeled high user risk continues access without entering the planned password-change flow. Which configuration defect best explains the failure?

  1. The tenant configured only sign-in-risk controls or the risky user lacks the registered strong authentication and hybrid password-writeback prerequisites
  2. The assigned role has risk-reader access only but lacks the necessary remediation permission
  3. The policy became enforced before eligible employees registered a usable challenge method
  4. The policy uses user risk instead of sign-in risk as its triggering condition

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. The tenant configured only sign-in-risk controls or the risky user lacks the registered strong authentication and hybrid password-writeback prerequisites. This fault explains the observed failure: A user labeled high user risk continues access without entering the planned password-change flow. The intended configuration would instead be: Use the supported user-risk Require risk remediation Conditional Access control; require the automatically selected authentication strength and every-time sign-in, and validate secure password change or passwordless session revocation as applicable.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The assigned role has risk-reader access only but lacks the necessary remediation permission. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The tenant configured only sign-in-risk controls or the risky user lacks the registered strong authentication and hybrid password-writeback prerequisites. The corrective action is: Use the supported user-risk Require risk remediation Conditional Access control; require the automatically selected authentication strength and every-time sign-in, and validate secure password change or passwordless session revocation as applicable.

C:

The policy became enforced before eligible employees registered a usable challenge method. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The tenant configured only sign-in-risk controls or the risky user lacks the registered strong authentication and hybrid password-writeback prerequisites. The corrective action is: Use the supported user-risk Require risk remediation Conditional Access control; require the automatically selected authentication strength and every-time sign-in, and validate secure password change or passwordless session revocation as applicable.

D:

The policy uses user risk instead of sign-in risk as its triggering condition. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The tenant configured only sign-in-risk controls or the risky user lacks the registered strong authentication and hybrid password-writeback prerequisites. The corrective action is: Use the supported user-risk Require risk remediation Conditional Access control; require the automatically selected authentication strength and every-time sign-in, and validate secure password change or passwordless session revocation as applicable.

Question 235

The security architect is given this constraint: An analyst investigates unfamiliar-travel detections but must avoid treating every risky event as proof of credential compromise. Which technical approach meets it without relying on unrelated controls?

  1. Configure the supported Microsoft Entra diagnostic log export for identity risk-related datasets to the intended destination
  2. Use the supported user-risk Require risk remediation Conditional Access control; require the automatically selected authentication strength and every-time sign-in, and validate secure password change or passwordless session revocation as applicable
  3. Review risk detections, correlated sign-in context and user evidence before marking confirmed compromise or safe
  4. Block sign-in or take appropriate account action and revoke sessions; only then review/resolve the user's risk state as justified

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct implementation. Review risk detections, correlated sign-in context and user evidence before marking confirmed compromise or safe. It meets the stated requirement: An analyst investigates unfamiliar-travel detections but must avoid treating every risky event as proof of credential compromise. Acceptance evidence is: The analyst records a defensible user-risk decision tied to the underlying detection and investigation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Required risk data categories weren't included in the diagnostic setting. That condition is not the problem here: An automatically raised risk detection is marked Confirm compromised without corroborating context. The targeted implementation is: Review risk detections, correlated sign-in context and user evidence before marking confirmed compromise or safe.

B:

The tenant configured only sign-in-risk controls or the risky user lacks the registered strong authentication and hybrid password-writeback prerequisites. That condition is not the problem here: An automatically raised risk detection is marked Confirm compromised without corroborating context. The targeted implementation is: Review risk detections, correlated sign-in context and user evidence before marking confirmed compromise or safe.

D:

Risk was dismissed administratively without disabling the compromised credentials. That condition is not the problem here: An automatically raised risk detection is marked Confirm compromised without corroborating context. The targeted implementation is: Review risk detections, correlated sign-in context and user evidence before marking confirmed compromise or safe.

Question 236

After a deployment under this requirement — An analyst investigates unfamiliar-travel detections but must avoid treating every risky event as proof of credential compromise — administrators claim the following solution is in place: Review risk detections, correlated sign-in context and user evidence before marking confirmed compromise or safe. Which pilot finding supports that claim?

  1. New sign-ins fail after containment and the risk record documents the subsequent investigation
  2. The analyst records a defensible user-risk decision tied to the underlying detection and investigation
  3. The high-risk password user completes the protected MFA-backed password-change flow and hybrid writeback where required; a passwordless identity follows the supported reauthentication/session-revocation path
  4. The identified risky event remains visible with its source context and the policy makes the intended challenge/block decision

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. The analyst records a defensible user-risk decision tied to the underlying detection and investigation. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if blocking sign-in or take appropriate account action succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The analyst records a defensible user-risk decision tied to the underlying detection and investigation.

C:

Even if using the supported user-risk Require risk remediation Conditional Access control succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The analyst records a defensible user-risk decision tied to the underlying detection and investigation.

D:

Even if using the sign-in risk details succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The analyst records a defensible user-risk decision tied to the underlying detection and investigation.

Question 237

An engineer troubleshoots an identity solution for: An analyst investigates unfamiliar-travel detections but must avoid treating every risky event as proof of credential compromise. The pilot result is: The audit record declares compromise even though the login matched an authorized travel itinerary. What is the most likely relevant fault?

  1. The reset happened outside the required secure remediation flow and did not satisfy risk policy conditions
  2. A broad risk-policy exclusion disabled protection for real external users rather than isolating the approved test environment
  3. Risk was dismissed administratively without disabling the compromised credentials
  4. An automatically raised risk detection is marked Confirm compromised without corroborating context

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct diagnosis. An automatically raised risk detection is marked Confirm compromised without corroborating context. This fault explains the observed failure: The audit record declares compromise even though the login matched an authorized travel itinerary. The intended configuration would instead be: Review risk detections, correlated sign-in context and user evidence before marking confirmed compromise or safe.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The reset happened outside the required secure remediation flow and did not satisfy risk policy conditions. The reported symptom instead has this cause: An automatically raised risk detection is marked Confirm compromised without corroborating context. The corrective action is: Review risk detections, correlated sign-in context and user evidence before marking confirmed compromise or safe.

B:

A broad risk-policy exclusion disabled protection for real external users rather than isolating the approved test environment. The reported symptom instead has this cause: An automatically raised risk detection is marked Confirm compromised without corroborating context. The corrective action is: Review risk detections, correlated sign-in context and user evidence before marking confirmed compromise or safe.

C:

Risk was dismissed administratively without disabling the compromised credentials. The reported symptom instead has this cause: An automatically raised risk detection is marked Confirm compromised without corroborating context. The corrective action is: Review risk detections, correlated sign-in context and user evidence before marking confirmed compromise or safe.

Question 238

Which implementation fits the following specific identity problem? A tenant must register employees for multifactor methods before enforcing a stricter sign-in risk policy.

  1. Run a scoped MFA registration campaign and verify usable methods for intended users before activating enforcement
  2. Investigate the known test-network false positives using the actual detections and a narrowly scoped validated policy exception, without assuming a named location alone removes all identity risk
  3. Use the sign-in risk details and Conditional Access evaluation to investigate the detection and apply the targeted policy response
  4. Apply a sign-in risk Conditional Access policy with the intended risk threshold and grant/block response

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct implementation. Run a scoped MFA registration campaign and verify usable methods for intended users before activating enforcement. It meets the stated requirement: A tenant must register employees for multifactor methods before enforcing a stricter sign-in risk policy. Acceptance evidence is: Pilot users register approved methods and can satisfy the later risk policy; excluded accounts are unaffected.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A broad risk-policy exclusion disabled protection for real external users rather than isolating the approved test environment. That condition is not the problem here: The policy became enforced before eligible employees registered a usable challenge method. The targeted implementation is: Run a scoped MFA registration campaign and verify usable methods for intended users before activating enforcement.

C:

The response changes unrelated tenant-wide MFA settings rather than addressing the specific risk event. That condition is not the problem here: The policy became enforced before eligible employees registered a usable challenge method. The targeted implementation is: Run a scoped MFA registration campaign and verify usable methods for intended users before activating enforcement.

D:

The policy uses user risk instead of sign-in risk as its triggering condition. That condition is not the problem here: The policy became enforced before eligible employees registered a usable challenge method. The targeted implementation is: Run a scoped MFA registration campaign and verify usable methods for intended users before activating enforcement.

Question 239

The team implemented the following change: Run a scoped MFA registration campaign and verify usable methods for intended users before activating enforcement. The acceptance requirement was: A tenant must register employees for multifactor methods before enforcing a stricter sign-in risk policy. Which observed outcome most directly proves the change works?

  1. The remediation evidence is present and the final risk action reflects the completed password change
  2. Pilot users register approved methods and can satisfy the later risk policy; excluded accounts are unaffected
  3. The identified risky event remains visible with its source context and the policy makes the intended challenge/block decision
  4. A simulated qualifying high-risk sign-in is challenged or blocked, while a low-risk control login is not

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. Pilot users register approved methods and can satisfy the later risk policy; excluded accounts are unaffected. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if inspecting risk history succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Pilot users register approved methods and can satisfy the later risk policy; excluded accounts are unaffected.

C:

Even if using the sign-in risk details succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Pilot users register approved methods and can satisfy the later risk policy; excluded accounts are unaffected.

D:

Even if applying a sign-in risk Conditional Access policy with the intended risk threshold succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Pilot users register approved methods and can satisfy the later risk policy; excluded accounts are unaffected.

Question 240

A change appears correct at a glance, but the requirement is still unmet: A tenant must register employees for multifactor methods before enforcing a stricter sign-in risk policy. The key observed symptom is: Legitimate users are blocked at the risk challenge because no allowed authentication method is enrolled. Which cause should be investigated first?

  1. A broad risk-policy exclusion disabled protection for real external users rather than isolating the approved test environment
  2. The policy uses user risk instead of sign-in risk as its triggering condition
  3. The policy became enforced before eligible employees registered a usable challenge method
  4. The tenant configured only sign-in-risk controls or the risky user lacks the registered strong authentication and hybrid password-writeback prerequisites

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. The policy became enforced before eligible employees registered a usable challenge method. This fault explains the observed failure: Legitimate users are blocked at the risk challenge because no allowed authentication method is enrolled. The intended configuration would instead be: Run a scoped MFA registration campaign and verify usable methods for intended users before activating enforcement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A broad risk-policy exclusion disabled protection for real external users rather than isolating the approved test environment. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The policy became enforced before eligible employees registered a usable challenge method. The corrective action is: Run a scoped MFA registration campaign and verify usable methods for intended users before activating enforcement.

B:

The policy uses user risk instead of sign-in risk as its triggering condition. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The policy became enforced before eligible employees registered a usable challenge method. The corrective action is: Run a scoped MFA registration campaign and verify usable methods for intended users before activating enforcement.

D:

The tenant configured only sign-in-risk controls or the risky user lacks the registered strong authentication and hybrid password-writeback prerequisites. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The policy became enforced before eligible employees registered a usable challenge method. The corrective action is: Run a scoped MFA registration campaign and verify usable methods for intended users before activating enforcement.