McAfee Secure

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle $23.86

100% Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course is developed by Amazon Professionals to help you pass the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.
  • Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 1066-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 65

Question 640

For the enterprise requirement "A Lambda-backed API team wants to expose only ten percent of traffic to a new function revision before promoting it", the team implemented this change: Publish a Lambda version and configure weighted alias routing with deployment alarms. Which observation should be required before the change is approved?

  1. Failed security or smoke tests prevent production deployment while passing builds can be promoted
  2. A newly added target account receives the intended stack instances while an excluded OU does not
  3. The alias sends the intended approximate percentage to the canary version and reverts after a simulated alarm
  4. Storage-class distribution follows observed access and availability constraints without extensive manual classification

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Lambda aliases support weighted traffic between published versions with monitored promotion. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A Lambda-backed API team wants to expose only ten percent of traffic to a new function revision before promoting it.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Failed security or smoke tests prevent production deployment while passing builds can be promoted. However, this does not establish the required outcome: the alias sends the intended approximate percentage to the canary version and reverts after a simulated alarm.

B:

A newly added target account receives the intended stack instances while an excluded OU does not. However, this does not establish the required outcome: the alias sends the intended approximate percentage to the canary version and reverts after a simulated alarm.

D:

Storage-class distribution follows observed access and availability constraints without extensive manual classification. However, this does not establish the required outcome: the alias sends the intended approximate percentage to the canary version and reverts after a simulated alarm.

Question 641

An enterprise architecture team faces this design requirement: Six VPCs in three accounts need private east-west connectivity without an O(N²) peering mesh. Which architecture decision best meets that precise requirement?

  1. Enable S3 Cross-Region Replication with correct versioning, role permissions and ownership controls
  2. Deploy Route 53 Resolver inbound endpoints and configure corporate conditional DNS forwarding for the private zone
  3. Attach the VPCs to one centrally governed Transit Gateway and propagate approved attachment routes
  4. Configure redundant site-to-site VPN tunnels as the tested backup to the Direct Connect path

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Transit Gateway supplies centralized transitive VPC connectivity when attachment route tables and security policies are configured. The required architecture outcome is: Six VPCs in three accounts need private east-west connectivity without an O(N²) peering mesh. Validate this choice by checking that Approved application subnets reach each other through Transit Gateway routes and unauthorized segments remain isolated.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Only source-region S3 versioning is enabled, but no replication rule or role exists. The specific problem here is that separate point-to-point VPC peering connections lack transitive routing and are difficult to govern at scale.

B:

On-premises DNS has no forwarding path into the VPC's Route 53 Resolver. The specific problem here is that separate point-to-point VPC peering connections lack transitive routing and are difficult to govern at scale.

D:

There is no independently functioning VPN path when private connectivity goes down. The specific problem here is that separate point-to-point VPC peering connections lack transitive routing and are difficult to govern at scale.

Question 642

For the enterprise requirement "A product releases the same service to two Regions and must require a compliance approval before the second Region goes live", the team implemented this change: Use CodePipeline stages with independent regional deploy actions and a manual approval gate before the restricted stage. Which test result proves this architecture satisfies its stated constraint?

  1. Identical input configurations yield reviewed deployment changes and detectable drift rather than ad hoc resources
  2. The first Region deploys, the second Region waits for approval, and rejection prevents restricted rollout
  3. A newly added target account receives the intended stack instances while an excluded OU does not
  4. An unauthorized attempt to delete a protected recovery point is denied before retention expires

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Multi-Region pipelines can enforce explicit promotion and approval boundaries. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A product releases the same service to two Regions and must require a compliance approval before the second Region goes live.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Identical input configurations yield reviewed deployment changes and detectable drift rather than ad hoc resources. However, this does not establish the required outcome: the first Region deploys, the second Region waits for approval, and rejection prevents restricted rollout.

C:

A newly added target account receives the intended stack instances while an excluded OU does not. However, this does not establish the required outcome: the first Region deploys, the second Region waits for approval, and rejection prevents restricted rollout.

D:

An unauthorized attempt to delete a protected recovery point is denied before retention expires. However, this does not establish the required outcome: the first Region deploys, the second Region waits for approval, and rejection prevents restricted rollout.

Question 643

For the enterprise requirement "Order processing must survive transient database outages without permanently losing accepted incoming work", the team implemented this change: Place an SQS queue between submission and processing, with appropriately scaled consumers and DLQ policy. What observed result would demonstrate successful delivery of the requested capability?

  1. Accepted messages remain durable during database downtime and are eventually processed when consumers recover
  2. The selected time window can be replayed to the target bus without inventing events that were never archived
  3. New vended accounts inherit required landing-zone logging, identity and governance baselines
  4. Draining all nodes in one zone still leaves enough healthy replicas serving traffic from others

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Durable queues decouple intake availability from downstream processing failures. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: Order processing must survive transient database outages without permanently losing accepted incoming work.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The selected time window can be replayed to the target bus without inventing events that were never archived. However, this does not establish the required outcome: accepted messages remain durable during database downtime and are eventually processed when consumers recover.

C:

New vended accounts inherit required landing-zone logging, identity and governance baselines. However, this does not establish the required outcome: accepted messages remain durable during database downtime and are eventually processed when consumers recover.

D:

Draining all nodes in one zone still leaves enough healthy replicas serving traffic from others. However, this does not establish the required outcome: accepted messages remain durable during database downtime and are eventually processed when consumers recover.

Question 644

For the enterprise requirement "A service currently stores a database password in deployment environment text and needs managed rotation without code updates", the team implemented this change: Move the secret to AWS Secrets Manager and adopt controlled retrieval and rotation integration. Which outcome is the most meaningful acceptance test?

  1. Origin request count and cacheable transferred bytes fall without serving stale protected content
  2. A rotation completes, the application authenticates with the new value, and old credentials are not exposed
  3. The authorized role decrypts the designated ciphertext while an unrelated role remains denied
  4. CloudFront retrieves approved objects while direct anonymous S3 URLs are rejected

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Secrets Manager can store and rotate secrets with applications retrieving current authorized values. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A service currently stores a database password in deployment environment text and needs managed rotation without code updates.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Origin request count and cacheable transferred bytes fall without serving stale protected content. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a rotation completes, the application authenticates with the new value, and old credentials are not exposed.

C:

The authorized role decrypts the designated ciphertext while an unrelated role remains denied. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a rotation completes, the application authenticates with the new value, and old credentials are not exposed.

D:

CloudFront retrieves approved objects while direct anonymous S3 URLs are rejected. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a rotation completes, the application authenticates with the new value, and old credentials are not exposed.

Question 645

An architecture review recommends this solution: Move the schedule to EventBridge Scheduler with an appropriately scoped Lambda or supported task target. The motivating situation is: An application runs a small cron job on a permanently running EC2 server, which spends most time idle. Why is this architecture appropriate for the described workload?

  1. Mainframe migrations need purpose-built assessment and conversion or replatform planning
  2. Domain-aligned service boundaries require APIs and deliberate data ownership separation
  3. Managed scheduling can invoke short-lived compute without operating a permanent cron host
  4. Managed workflow orchestration makes retries, errors and compensation explicit

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Move the schedule to EventBridge Scheduler with an appropriately scoped Lambda or supported task target. The expected supporting evidence is: The job executes at its configured schedule while no dedicated idle EC2 host is required.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Mainframe batch and transaction semantics were treated as if they were ordinary Linux workloads. The stated evidence instead indicates: The only purpose of a 24/7 server is occasional timer-based work.

B:

Shared data and internal method calls prevent independent deployment and scale. The stated evidence instead indicates: The only purpose of a 24/7 server is occasional timer-based work.

D:

Workflow state and failure recovery are hidden in fragile custom imperative scripts. The stated evidence instead indicates: The only purpose of a 24/7 server is occasional timer-based work.

Question 646

For the enterprise requirement "Two Regions must retain independently encrypted object replicas to meet recovery requirements during a source Region failure", the team implemented this change: Configure S3 replication rules with correct versioning and KMS permissions for destination encrypted objects. What would most directly validate the implementation?

  1. A simulated interruption causes bounded rework and lowers total compute cost without losing final results
  2. A regional drill scales warm standby to full capacity within the stated recovery time and data tolerance
  3. An unauthorized attempt to delete a protected recovery point is denied before retention expires
  4. Eligible new source objects replicate with appropriate destination encryption and remain readable during source outage

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. S3 encrypted object replication needs versioning and appropriate replication-role KMS authorization. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: Two Regions must retain independently encrypted object replicas to meet recovery requirements during a source Region failure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A simulated interruption causes bounded rework and lowers total compute cost without losing final results. However, this does not establish the required outcome: eligible new source objects replicate with appropriate destination encryption and remain readable during source outage.

B:

A regional drill scales warm standby to full capacity within the stated recovery time and data tolerance. However, this does not establish the required outcome: eligible new source objects replicate with appropriate destination encryption and remain readable during source outage.

C:

An unauthorized attempt to delete a protected recovery point is denied before retention expires. However, this does not establish the required outcome: eligible new source objects replicate with appropriate destination encryption and remain readable during source outage.

Question 647

An enterprise architecture team faces this design requirement: A Kinesis stream has adequate shard write capacity but multiple consumers compete for read throughput and fall behind. Which proposed change addresses the stated constraint most directly?

  1. Evaluate on-demand capacity or auto scaling where appropriate and check hot partition keys
  2. Review RI utilization, supported reservation sharing and regional family coverage before buying more
  3. Use compatible enhanced networking drivers and appropriately sized instance network bandwidth
  4. Use enhanced fan-out for supported registered consumers or otherwise allocate read capacity explicitly

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Kinesis enhanced fan-out provides dedicated consumer read throughput within service limits. The required architecture outcome is: A Kinesis stream has adequate shard write capacity but multiple consumers compete for read throughput and fall behind. Validate this choice by checking that Each registered consumer receives an independent read-throughput path and lag falls during peak events.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Capacity planning ignores demand spikes or hot keys that concentrate requests. The specific problem here is that shared per-shard read throughput is divided among too many polling consumers.

B:

Teams purchase more RIs independently without measuring existing shared coverage. The specific problem here is that shared per-shard read throughput is divided among too many polling consumers.

C:

Unsupported drivers or unsuitable instance networking features cap throughput. The specific problem here is that shared per-shard read throughput is divided among too many polling consumers.

Question 648

An architecture review recommends this solution: Deploy Route 53 Resolver inbound endpoints and configure corporate conditional DNS forwarding for the private zone. The motivating situation is: On-premises servers must resolve names in a private Route 53 hosted zone without exposing those records publicly. Which consideration makes this solution preferable to the original approach?

  1. AWS Control Tower provides managed landing-zone governance and standardized account provisioning
  2. Stateful network inspection requires symmetric paths through the selected inspection appliance
  3. Inbound Resolver endpoints enable hybrid clients to ask VPC-associated private-zone DNS questions
  4. AWS PrivateLink exposes a selected service to consumers without full network-to-network reachability

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Deploy Route 53 Resolver inbound endpoints and configure corporate conditional DNS forwarding for the private zone. The expected supporting evidence is: Queries from on-premises resolvers return the expected private-zone records through inbound endpoint addresses.

Incorrect Answers

A:

New accounts are assembled by ad hoc scripts with inconsistent security baselines. The stated evidence instead indicates: On-premises DNS has no forwarding path into the VPC's Route 53 Resolver.

B:

The inspection design allows forward and return packets to use different stateful inspection appliances. The stated evidence instead indicates: On-premises DNS has no forwarding path into the VPC's Route 53 Resolver.

D:

A broad VPC peering link was used where a service-scoped private access path was needed. The stated evidence instead indicates: On-premises DNS has no forwarding path into the VPC's Route 53 Resolver.

Question 649

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: A legacy data center lacks a trustworthy inventory of server CPU, memory, installed processes and network connections. Requirement B: An estate of supported Linux and Windows VMs must rehost to EC2 with minimal application modification and short cutovers. Choose TWO actions that directly address these separate problems.

  1. Classify applications through a defined 7 Rs migration assessment with business value, risk and retirement criteria
  2. Extract suitable endpoints to API Gateway and Lambda with explicit authentication, throttling and timeout controls
  3. Use AWS Application Migration Service for compatible server replication, test launches and cutover orchestration
  4. Use AWS Transform discovery and assessment, or a supported inventory tool, to measure server characteristics and network dependency data
  5. Use AWS Schema Conversion Tool or appropriate supported schema conversion assessment, then AWS DMS for data

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: An estate of supported Linux and Windows VMs must rehost to EC2 with minimal application modification and short cutovers. AWS MGN supports continuous server replication and orchestrated rehosting validation. A direct acceptance check is: Replicated servers boot in AWS test VPCs with verified application functionality before cutover.

D:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: A legacy data center lacks a trustworthy inventory of server CPU, memory, installed processes and network connections. Application discovery captures real workload characteristics needed for migration planning. A direct acceptance check is: Captured workload attributes reveal which servers can be rehosted together and which need further assessment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets a different technical need: Executives request one default migration method for every workload regardless of technical debt or value. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. The 7 Rs decision framework matches migration strategy to application context; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

B:

This action targets a different technical need: An internal monolithic API has independently scalable request handlers and low idle traffic. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Serverless APIs can separate scaling from continuously provisioned application servers; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

E:

This action targets a different technical need: A SQL Server estate must migrate to Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL despite vendor-specific T-SQL constructs. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Heterogeneous database migrations require explicit schema and application compatibility work; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 650

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: Hundreds of virtual machines require orchestrated recovery into AWS after a primary on-premises site failure. Requirement B: Network administrators must manage a shared subnet centrally while application accounts place their own resources in it. Select TWO actions, one for each independently scoped requirement.

  1. Use AWS Backup cross-account copies into a protected backup account with isolated restore permissions
  2. Deploy an AWS Control Tower landing zone and Account Factory-based governance with planned organizational units
  3. Enable VPC subnet sharing through AWS RAM for eligible accounts in the same organization
  4. Use AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery with supported source replication and recovery drills
  5. Introduce a centrally managed translation or proxy layer with nonoverlapping service endpoints rather than directly peering overlapping networks

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: Network administrators must manage a shared subnet centrally while application accounts place their own resources in it. VPC sharing separates network ownership from application resource ownership. A direct acceptance check is: Participant-owned permitted resources deploy into the shared subnet while networking account retains network ownership.

D:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: Hundreds of virtual machines require orchestrated recovery into AWS after a primary on-premises site failure. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports block-level replication and automated recovery launches. A direct acceptance check is: A drilled failover boots recoverable instances and meets tested recovery objectives and dependency order.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets a different technical need: Financial backups must survive destruction of the primary application account by a compromised administrator. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Cross-account backup isolation reduces the effect of compromise of an application account; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

B:

This action targets a different technical need: A startup expects to grow from five accounts to 100 and needs baseline account vending and preventive guardrails. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. AWS Control Tower provides managed landing-zone governance and standardized account provisioning; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

E:

This action targets a different technical need: Two acquired subsidiaries have overlapping RFC1918 VPC CIDRs but must exchange traffic with a shared integration endpoint. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Overlapping address spaces require translation or service-level isolation rather than simple routed peering; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.