McAfee Secure

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle $23.86
AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Sample 1 AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Sample 2 AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Sample 3 AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Sample 4 AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Sample 5 AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Sample 6 AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Sample 7 AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Sample 8 AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Sample 9 AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Sample 10

100% Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course is developed by Amazon Professionals to help you pass the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.
  • Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 1066-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 69

Question 680

An enterprise architecture team faces this design requirement: Several accounts have steady EC2 and Fargate spend and need a commitment that applies to qualifying compute usage flexibly. What should the solutions architect recommend?

  1. Export AWS Cost and Usage Reports to S3 and query them with Athena or a billing data analysis workflow
  2. Analyze commitments then purchase an appropriate Compute Savings Plan based on supported usage coverage
  3. Use AWS Cost Optimization Hub with supported account enrollment and recommendation aggregation
  4. Expose the provider through an endpoint service behind a Network Load Balancer and create consumer interface VPC endpoints

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Compute Savings Plans apply eligible usage discounts across supported services and configurations. The required architecture outcome is: Several accounts have steady EC2 and Fargate spend and need a commitment that applies to qualifying compute usage flexibly. Validate this choice by checking that Eligible compute charges reflect the planned commitment discount and remaining coverage is visible.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Summary monthly bills lack the resource-level usage detail needed for chargeback. The specific problem here is that on-demand usage was left wholly uncommitted despite predictable baseline compute consumption.

C:

Savings recommendations exist in separate consoles and are double counted in spreadsheets. The specific problem here is that on-demand usage was left wholly uncommitted despite predictable baseline compute consumption.

D:

A broad VPC peering link was used where a service-scoped private access path was needed. The specific problem here is that on-demand usage was left wholly uncommitted despite predictable baseline compute consumption.

Question 681

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: Service owners cannot separate API traffic incidents from infrastructure incidents across ten microservices. Requirement B: An engineer repeatedly leaves management ports publicly accessible despite a configuration guardrail document. Which TWO responses resolve the stated issues without substituting unrelated mechanisms?

  1. Use CloudWatch Database Insights to identify RDS database load by SQL statements and wait events before changing capacity
  2. Review IAM Access Advisor last-accessed information with supported CloudTrail evidence and workload ownership confirmation
  3. Gate a least-privilege Systems Manager Automation runbook with an aws:approve step and retain change approval and execution records
  4. Add AWS Config evaluation for the risky security-group condition with controlled notification and remediation
  5. Build CloudWatch operational dashboards with service-specific metrics, structured logging, and correlation identifiers

Explanation

Correct Answers

D:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: An engineer repeatedly leaves management ports publicly accessible despite a configuration guardrail document. AWS Config checks configuration changes against evaluable rules and supports managed remediation actions. A direct acceptance check is: A test ingress rule is flagged and corrected through the authorized remediation workflow.

E:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: Service owners cannot separate API traffic incidents from infrastructure incidents across ten microservices. Meaningful dashboards align telemetry with system service boundaries and indicators. A direct acceptance check is: An incident view identifies the affected service and response latency rather than just total fleet CPU.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action targets a different technical need: A transactional RDS instance becomes slow under concurrency and the team needs to distinguish SQL waits from CPU pressure. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Database performance diagnostics should identify the specific bottleneck before scaling; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

B:

This action targets a different technical need: A company wants to identify IAM permissions that have not been used recently before removing high-risk privileges. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Last-accessed data informs least-privilege reviews but does not prove a permission is universally unnecessary; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

C:

This action targets a different technical need: Production maintenance requires an explicit approval and tracked change record before automation updates EC2 systems. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Controlled automation separates approval from execution and preserves traceability; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 682

An architecture review recommends this solution: Create an AWS Budget with defined threshold notification recipients and appropriate budget filters. The motivating situation is: A department must be notified promptly when monthly spending exceeds its threshold. Which principle would a reviewer use to defend this design?

  1. AWS Budgets supports spend targets and notifications on actual or forecasted cost
  2. Architecture forecasts require explicit usage assumptions rather than extrapolation without design changes
  3. Consolidated billing can share eligible reservations across member accounts subject to sharing settings
  4. Overlapping address spaces require translation or service-level isolation rather than simple routed peering

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Create an AWS Budget with defined threshold notification recipients and appropriate budget filters. The expected supporting evidence is: A controlled threshold breach yields the expected forecast or actual spend notification.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Previous-month charges were presented as accurate forecasts for an expanded future footprint. The stated evidence instead indicates: The team relies exclusively on retrospective end-of-month billing statements.

C:

RI purchases are evaluated only in the purchasing account without considering shared billing treatment. The stated evidence instead indicates: The team relies exclusively on retrospective end-of-month billing statements.

D:

Overlapping network prefixes make ordinary VPC peering route selection ambiguous. The stated evidence instead indicates: The team relies exclusively on retrospective end-of-month billing statements.

Question 683

For the enterprise requirement "A noncritical archive service has a 24-hour RTO and may restore its configuration and data from protected backups", the team implemented this change: Implement a tested backup-and-restore disaster recovery pattern with documented recovery runbooks. What observed result would demonstrate successful delivery of the requested capability?

  1. A restore drill meets the 24-hour recovery target with verified data integrity and access
  2. Failure of one Region does not interrupt healthy remaining regional capacity under synthetic load
  3. Read latency and writer CPU improve under reporting load without routing writes to read replicas
  4. A drill scales the secondary stack from its minimal footprint within the agreed RTO

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Backup-and-restore DR suits longer RTO targets when restore execution is practiced. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A noncritical archive service has a 24-hour RTO and may restore its configuration and data from protected backups.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Failure of one Region does not interrupt healthy remaining regional capacity under synthetic load. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a restore drill meets the 24-hour recovery target with verified data integrity and access.

C:

Read latency and writer CPU improve under reporting load without routing writes to read replicas. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a restore drill meets the 24-hour recovery target with verified data integrity and access.

D:

A drill scales the secondary stack from its minimal footprint within the agreed RTO. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a restore drill meets the 24-hour recovery target with verified data integrity and access.

Question 684

A deployed environment still does not meet the original requirement: A customer database needs a near-real-time cross-Region read replica and an established disaster recovery promotion procedure. What explains why the stated requirement was not met?

  1. All service replicas were scheduled in one zone despite multi-AZ infrastructure
  2. A single-Region Aurora cluster lacks a suitable crossregional disaster recovery target
  3. The backup Region exists but DNS routing never changes after primary endpoint failure
  4. Individual Security Hub instances were not centrally delegated or aggregated

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is the technical design error aligned with the unmet requirement. Aurora Global Database supports low-latency crossregional replication with explicit recovery operations. The appropriate correction is: Adopt an Aurora Global Database topology where supported and rehearse cross-Region failover or switchover. The control should then be tested by verifying that Replica lag and promotion tests meet defined RPO and RTO targets during planned and simulated events.

Incorrect Answers

A:

All service replicas were scheduled in one zone despite multi-AZ infrastructure. The stated evidence instead indicates: A single-Region Aurora cluster lacks a suitable crossregional disaster recovery target.

C:

The backup Region exists but DNS routing never changes after primary endpoint failure. The stated evidence instead indicates: A single-Region Aurora cluster lacks a suitable crossregional disaster recovery target.

D:

Individual Security Hub instances were not centrally delegated or aggregated. The stated evidence instead indicates: A single-Region Aurora cluster lacks a suitable crossregional disaster recovery target.

Question 685

An enterprise architecture team faces this design requirement: The backup team reports high snapshot completion success but no one has recovered the database from those snapshots. Which action would resolve the problem without adding unrelated capabilities?

  1. Enable and test DynamoDB point-in-time recovery for the table and recovery runbook
  2. Configure readiness probes, deployment surge policy and graceful termination semantics
  3. Schedule automated and manual AWS Backup restore testing into an isolated validation environment
  4. Configure organization-wide GuardDuty administration with supported automatic enrollment and region strategy

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Recovery objectives require tested restore outcomes, not merely completed backups. The required architecture outcome is: The backup team reports high snapshot completion success but no one has recovered the database from those snapshots. Validate this choice by checking that Restored datasets pass consistency and application startup checks within the recovery target.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Standard short-lived backups cannot recover the exact chosen accidental-update point. The specific problem here is that snapshot creation is mistaken for proof the application can actually be restored.

B:

Kubernetes deployment treats process startup as adequate evidence of request readiness. The specific problem here is that snapshot creation is mistaken for proof the application can actually be restored.

D:

Threat detection remains inconsistently deployed across member accounts and Regions. The specific problem here is that snapshot creation is mistaken for proof the application can actually be restored.

Question 686

For the enterprise requirement "A company wants to identify IAM permissions that have not been used recently before removing high-risk privileges", the team implemented this change: Review IAM Access Advisor last-accessed information with supported CloudTrail evidence and workload ownership confirmation. What would most directly validate the implementation?

  1. Candidates for removal have verified inactivity context and revocation tests do not break approved workflows
  2. Logs identify blocked and counted requests by rule so false positives can be evaluated
  3. A test transaction shows the slow downstream dependency and request trace span timing
  4. Security Hub centrally displays eligible standardized findings with source context preserved

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Last-accessed data informs least-privilege reviews but does not prove a permission is universally unnecessary. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: A company wants to identify IAM permissions that have not been used recently before removing high-risk privileges.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Logs identify blocked and counted requests by rule so false positives can be evaluated. However, this does not establish the required outcome: candidates for removal have verified inactivity context and revocation tests do not break approved workflows.

C:

A test transaction shows the slow downstream dependency and request trace span timing. However, this does not establish the required outcome: candidates for removal have verified inactivity context and revocation tests do not break approved workflows.

D:

Security Hub centrally displays eligible standardized findings with source context preserved. However, this does not establish the required outcome: candidates for removal have verified inactivity context and revocation tests do not break approved workflows.

Question 687

For the enterprise requirement "Large fault-tolerant batch analytics jobs can be interrupted and resumed while the team pays full on-demand prices", the team implemented this change: Use EC2 Spot capacity with checkpointing and interruption-aware retry mechanisms. Which test result proves this architecture satisfies its stated constraint?

  1. Read latency and writer CPU improve under reporting load without routing writes to read replicas
  2. Worker count falls during light load and rises when queue age approaches the delivery deadline
  3. Objects transition after the configured age and can be restored within the business retrieval target
  4. A simulated interruption causes bounded rework and lowers total compute cost without losing final results

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Spot Instances optimize interruptible capacity costs when jobs tolerate reclaim events. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: Large fault-tolerant batch analytics jobs can be interrupted and resumed while the team pays full on-demand prices.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Read latency and writer CPU improve under reporting load without routing writes to read replicas. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a simulated interruption causes bounded rework and lowers total compute cost without losing final results.

B:

Worker count falls during light load and rises when queue age approaches the delivery deadline. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a simulated interruption causes bounded rework and lowers total compute cost without losing final results.

C:

Objects transition after the configured age and can be restored within the business retrieval target. However, this does not establish the required outcome: a simulated interruption causes bounded rework and lowers total compute cost without losing final results.

Question 688

For the enterprise requirement "An incident reviewer needs a timeline of a suspicious IAM policy change made across member accounts", the team implemented this change: Aggregate CloudTrail management events with appropriately protected central storage and searchable event records. Which result specifically demonstrates the fix works?

  1. Representative traffic reaches required throughput with improved CPU efficiency and no driver errors
  2. Logs identify blocked and counted requests by rule so false positives can be evaluated
  3. The actor, source and changed policy action appear in audit events from the affected account
  4. Security Hub centrally displays eligible standardized findings with source context preserved

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. CloudTrail API event evidence supports investigation of changes to account control-plane resources. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: An incident reviewer needs a timeline of a suspicious IAM policy change made across member accounts.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Representative traffic reaches required throughput with improved CPU efficiency and no driver errors. However, this does not establish the required outcome: the actor, source and changed policy action appear in audit events from the affected account.

B:

Logs identify blocked and counted requests by rule so false positives can be evaluated. However, this does not establish the required outcome: the actor, source and changed policy action appear in audit events from the affected account.

D:

Security Hub centrally displays eligible standardized findings with source context preserved. However, this does not establish the required outcome: the actor, source and changed policy action appear in audit events from the affected account.

Question 689

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: Compliance requires protected organization-wide API activity logs to flow into a centralized security account with controlled deletion. Requirement B: A customer database needs a near-real-time cross-Region read replica and an established disaster recovery promotion procedure. Which TWO responses resolve the stated issues without substituting unrelated mechanisms?

  1. Adopt an Aurora Global Database topology where supported and rehearse cross-Region failover or switchover
  2. Distribute worker nodes and eligible pods across multiple AZs with topology rules and disruption-aware service routing
  3. Use AWS Private CA to issue private certificates with a managed trust chain and documented renewal
  4. Configure an organization trail delivered to a protected central S3 bucket with appropriate key and bucket controls
  5. Configure the applicable AWS Organizations delegated administrator in a dedicated security account

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: A customer database needs a near-real-time cross-Region read replica and an established disaster recovery promotion procedure. Aurora Global Database supports low-latency crossregional replication with explicit recovery operations. A direct acceptance check is: Replica lag and promotion tests meet defined RPO and RTO targets during planned and simulated events.

D:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: Compliance requires protected organization-wide API activity logs to flow into a centralized security account with controlled deletion. AWS Organizations trails centralize multi-account CloudTrail logging when storage access is secured. A direct acceptance check is: Every enrolled account produces expected trail events in the security account and workloads cannot delete retained logs.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This action targets a different technical need: A latency-sensitive API running in EKS cannot tolerate a single Availability Zone outage. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Multi-AZ Kubernetes workloads need scheduled replicas and correctly configured networking across zones; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

C:

This action targets a different technical need: Internal mTLS certificates for services must be issued under a private organizational trust root with controlled rotation. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. AWS Private CA supports private certificate authorities for internal certificate issuance; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

E:

This action targets a different technical need: An organization needs a central security team to administer Inspector or GuardDuty for member accounts without using the management account daily. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Service-specific delegated administration provides controlled cross-account security operations; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 690

A deployed environment still does not meet the original requirement: A source MySQL workload must migrate to Amazon RDS MySQL without an engine conversion project. Which underlying cause should be investigated first?

  1. Source virtualization format was mistaken for a guarantee of target runtime compatibility
  2. Replicating table data alone does not translate incompatible source SQL constructs
  3. The migration plan assumes a new AWS Snowball Edge device can still be ordered even though new-customer ordering is unavailable
  4. Complex heterogeneous schema conversion was selected unnecessarily for a same-engine migration

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This is the technical design error aligned with the unmet requirement. Homogeneous migrations usually focus on data replication, compatibility details and cutover rather than engine-language rewrite. The appropriate correction is: Prefer a supported homogeneous DMS migration or native replication pattern with CDC where suitable. The control should then be tested by verifying that Destination table state stays synchronized and the application passes a reversible cutover test.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Source virtualization format was mistaken for a guarantee of target runtime compatibility. The stated evidence instead indicates: Complex heterogeneous schema conversion was selected unnecessarily for a same-engine migration.

B:

Replicating table data alone does not translate incompatible source SQL constructs. The stated evidence instead indicates: Complex heterogeneous schema conversion was selected unnecessarily for a same-engine migration.

C:

The migration plan assumes a new AWS Snowball Edge device can still be ordered even though new-customer ordering is unavailable. The stated evidence instead indicates: Complex heterogeneous schema conversion was selected unnecessarily for a same-engine migration.