Question 310
In a technical design review: During a predeployment review for a public-sector campus, the team discovers this design gap: a fiber uplink loses inbound BPDUs while remaining electrically up and starts forwarding in ways that risk a loop. An approval gate requires both a measurable acceptance check and a durable prevention control. Which technical principle BEST explains the design decision?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Loop Guard helps protect against unidirectional BPDU loss causing unexpected spanning-tree forwarding. The correct engineering response is: Use Loop Guard where appropriate to stop an expected non-designated port from transitioning to forwarding on lost BPDUs. The observable check is: The suspected port is held loop-inconsistent under the test condition instead of creating a forwarding loop. The public-sector campus acceptance record also captures this result.
Incorrect Answers
Loop Guard helps protect against unidirectional BPDU loss causing unexpected spanning-tree forwarding. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Ordinary local broadcast frames do not propagate across a Layer 3 boundary without an explicit WoL relay design. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.
Loop Guard helps protect against unidirectional BPDU loss causing unexpected spanning-tree forwarding. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: MST can map multiple VLANs to a smaller set of spanning-tree instances while Layer 2 domain size still matters. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.
Loop Guard helps protect against unidirectional BPDU loss causing unexpected spanning-tree forwarding. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Per-port support does not guarantee the chassis can supply simultaneous power across all endpoints. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.