McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-715 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-715

Exam Name Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Security

Cisco 300-715 Bundle $25.00
300-715 Sample 1 300-715 Sample 2 300-715 Sample 3 300-715 Sample 4 300-715 Sample 5 300-715 Sample 6 300-715 Sample 7 300-715 Sample 8 300-715 Sample 9 300-715 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-715 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-715 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-715 Questions & Answers

    433 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-715 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-715 Video Course

    300-715 Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    300-715 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-715 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) exam.

Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) (300-715) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    433 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-715 Video Course

    Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 3

Question 20

An ISE administrator troubleshoots the following: A small laboratory needs one ISE instance for administration, policy, and monitoring, but engineers propose a multi-node design without a capacity or availability requirement. What is the most suitable solution within these constraints?

  1. Use Cisco-supported ISE load distribution and RADIUS source-address handling rather than an unvalidated generic proxy topology.
  2. Size and distribute PAN, PSN, and Monitoring services using published deployment scale and throughput limits for the target release.
  3. Use a supported standalone ISE deployment for the lab while acknowledging its single-node failure exposure.
  4. Separate central Policy Administration Node responsibilities from appropriate Policy Service Nodes, and distribute RADIUS requests to healthy PSNs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use a supported standalone ISE deployment for the lab while acknowledging its single-node failure exposure. This is appropriate because a standalone node can provide Administration, Policy Service, and Monitoring personas for limited environments; scale and resilience drive distributed designs. It should be verified by this evidence: One laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs.

Incorrect Answers

A:

When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out. The repeat risk here is different: a test authorization succeeds through the alternate PSN after the first PSN becomes unavailable. A directly relevant preventive control is: Use a supported standalone ISE deployment for the lab while acknowledging its single-node failure exposure.

B:

One laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs. The repeat risk here is different: a test authorization succeeds through the alternate PSN after the first PSN becomes unavailable. A directly relevant preventive control is: Use a supported standalone ISE deployment for the lab while acknowledging its single-node failure exposure.

D:

The PAN manages configuration while PSNs process live network-access authentication; co-locating them creates a common maintenance failure point. The repeat risk here is different: a test authorization succeeds through the alternate PSN after the first PSN becomes unavailable. A directly relevant preventive control is: Use a supported standalone ISE deployment for the lab while acknowledging its single-node failure exposure.

Question 21

An access-security change request states: A small laboratory needs one ISE instance for administration, policy, and monitoring, but engineers propose a multi-node design without a capacity or availability requirement. Which platform distinction is decisive in this scenario?

  1. Separate ISE deployments are not automatically one replicated PAN/PSN cluster merely because they share an AD domain.
  2. ISE policy and device selection can depend on NAD identity and actual RADIUS request context; arbitrary intermediaries can alter the intended authentication path.
  3. pxGrid publishes contextual identity and security information to integrations; the ordinary RADIUS access service is not a substitute for pxGrid messaging.
  4. A standalone node can provide Administration, Policy Service, and Monitoring personas for limited environments; scale and resilience drive distributed designs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A standalone node can provide Administration, Policy Service, and Monitoring personas for limited environments; scale and resilience drive distributed designs. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Use a supported standalone ISE deployment for the lab while acknowledging its single-node failure exposure. The acceptance result is: One laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A permitted test-policy update reaches all registered nodes in the defined deployment and not unrelated standalone installations. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: one laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs. The needed response is: A standalone node can provide Administration, Policy Service, and Monitoring personas for limited environments; scale and resilience drive distributed designs.

B:

Test requests from each NAD match the correct ISE network-device object and authorization policy across the balanced PSNs. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: one laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs. The needed response is: A standalone node can provide Administration, Policy Service, and Monitoring personas for limited environments; scale and resilience drive distributed designs.

C:

pxGrid publishes contextual identity and security information to integrations; the ordinary RADIUS access service is not a substitute for pxGrid messaging. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: one laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs. The needed response is: A standalone node can provide Administration, Policy Service, and Monitoring personas for limited environments; scale and resilience drive distributed designs.

Question 22

During a Cisco ISE postchange review, the following is observed: A small laboratory needs one ISE instance for administration, policy, and monitoring, but engineers propose a multi-node design without a capacity or availability requirement. Which acceptance test would directly establish the desired state?

  1. Test requests from each NAD match the correct ISE network-device object and authorization policy across the balanced PSNs.
  2. When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out.
  3. One laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs.
  4. During a PAN maintenance test, already provisioned PSNs continue making permitted RADIUS decisions using their synchronized policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

One laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs. The required remediation is: Use a supported standalone ISE deployment for the lab while acknowledging its single-node failure exposure. It works because a standalone node can provide Administration, Policy Service, and Monitoring personas for limited environments; scale and resilience drive distributed designs.

Incorrect Answers

A:

One laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Test requests from each NAD match the correct ISE network-device object and authorization policy across the balanced PSNs. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

One laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

One laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the PAN manages configuration while PSNs process live network-access authentication; co-locating them creates a common maintenance failure point. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 23

A security policy owner must resolve this specific case: A small laboratory needs one ISE instance for administration, policy, and monitoring, but engineers propose a multi-node design without a capacity or availability requirement. Which governance step most directly targets the root cause?

  1. Include concurrency, device count, log volume, and failover capacity in deployment sizing reviews.
  2. Validate production health checks against the actual services used by switches and controllers.
  3. Re-evaluate deployment mode when endpoint count, authentication load, or availability requirements grow.
  4. Validate PSN redundancy and device-side timeout behavior during site commissioning.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Re-evaluate deployment mode when endpoint count, authentication load, or availability requirements grow. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: A standalone node can provide Administration, Policy Service, and Monitoring personas for limited environments; scale and resilience drive distributed designs. The ongoing acceptance check remains: One laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective. In the case being tested, one laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Re-evaluate deployment mode when endpoint count, authentication load, or availability requirements grow.

B:

When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out. In the case being tested, one laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Re-evaluate deployment mode when endpoint count, authentication load, or availability requirements grow.

D:

A test authorization succeeds through the alternate PSN after the first PSN becomes unavailable. In the case being tested, one laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Re-evaluate deployment mode when endpoint count, authentication load, or availability requirements grow.

Question 24

An identity and device-administration engineer evaluates: An enterprise has 48,000 endpoints spread across regions, and a two-node ISE deployment is selected solely because its lab copy authenticated a handful of clients. Which change is justified by the observed evidence?

  1. Use Cisco-supported ISE load distribution and RADIUS source-address handling rather than an unvalidated generic proxy topology.
  2. Use a supported standalone ISE deployment for the lab while acknowledging its single-node failure exposure.
  3. Maintain a defined primary PAN and secondary PAN role, with supported administrative replication and promotion procedures.
  4. Size and distribute PAN, PSN, and Monitoring services using published deployment scale and throughput limits for the target release.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Size and distribute PAN, PSN, and Monitoring services using published deployment scale and throughput limits for the target release. This is appropriate because successful low-load authentication does not establish capacity for an enterprise's peak concurrent RADIUS and profiling workload. It should be verified by this evidence: Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective.

Incorrect Answers

A:

When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out. The repeat risk here is different: one laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs. A directly relevant preventive control is: Size and distribute PAN, PSN, and Monitoring services using published deployment scale and throughput limits for the target release.

B:

A test authorization succeeds through the alternate PSN after the first PSN becomes unavailable. The repeat risk here is different: one laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs. A directly relevant preventive control is: Size and distribute PAN, PSN, and Monitoring services using published deployment scale and throughput limits for the target release.

C:

A distributed ISE deployment has explicit primary configuration ownership; multiple unsynchronized primaries do not form a valid replicated policy set. The repeat risk here is different: one laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs. A directly relevant preventive control is: Size and distribute PAN, PSN, and Monitoring services using published deployment scale and throughput limits for the target release.

Question 25

A campus and branch network operator reports: An enterprise has 48,000 endpoints spread across regions, and a two-node ISE deployment is selected solely because its lab copy authenticated a handful of clients. What mechanism governs this authentication or management outcome?

  1. Successful low-load authentication does not establish capacity for an enterprise's peak concurrent RADIUS and profiling workload.
  2. ISE policy and device selection can depend on NAD identity and actual RADIUS request context; arbitrary intermediaries can alter the intended authentication path.
  3. Web management availability and RADIUS decision-service availability are separate health signals.
  4. ISE VM performance depends on reserved hypervisor capacity and supported resource specifications rather than the ISO image alone.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Successful low-load authentication does not establish capacity for an enterprise's peak concurrent RADIUS and profiling workload. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Size and distribute PAN, PSN, and Monitoring services using published deployment scale and throughput limits for the target release. The acceptance result is: Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Test requests from each NAD match the correct ISE network-device object and authorization policy across the balanced PSNs. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective. The needed response is: Successful low-load authentication does not establish capacity for an enterprise's peak concurrent RADIUS and profiling workload.

C:

When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective. The needed response is: Successful low-load authentication does not establish capacity for an enterprise's peak concurrent RADIUS and profiling workload.

D:

The VM meets the documented profile and representative authentication load remains within agreed latency and resource thresholds. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective. The needed response is: Successful low-load authentication does not establish capacity for an enterprise's peak concurrent RADIUS and profiling workload.

Question 26

A Cisco ISE operations team investigates this site issue: An enterprise has 48,000 endpoints spread across regions, and a two-node ISE deployment is selected solely because its lab copy authenticated a handful of clients. What is the strongest evidence that this requirement is met?

  1. Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective.
  2. When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out.
  3. Test requests from each NAD match the correct ISE network-device object and authorization policy across the balanced PSNs.
  4. The deployed node passes Cisco-supported installation validation and starts the intended services on approved virtual infrastructure.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective. The required remediation is: Size and distribute PAN, PSN, and Monitoring services using published deployment scale and throughput limits for the target release. It works because successful low-load authentication does not establish capacity for an enterprise's peak concurrent RADIUS and profiling workload.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Test requests from each NAD match the correct ISE network-device object and authorization policy across the balanced PSNs. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 27

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: An enterprise has 48,000 endpoints spread across regions, and a two-node ISE deployment is selected solely because its lab copy authenticated a handful of clients. Which recurring operational control would reduce this risk?

  1. Re-evaluate deployment mode when endpoint count, authentication load, or availability requirements grow.
  2. Include concurrency, device count, log volume, and failover capacity in deployment sizing reviews.
  3. Keep deployment membership, replication state, and ownership boundaries recorded.
  4. Keep administrative and runtime persona dependencies documented in node-placement and maintenance reviews.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Include concurrency, device count, log volume, and failover capacity in deployment sizing reviews. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Successful low-load authentication does not establish capacity for an enterprise's peak concurrent RADIUS and profiling workload. The ongoing acceptance check remains: Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective.

Incorrect Answers

A:

One laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs. In the case being tested, Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Include concurrency, device count, log volume, and failover capacity in deployment sizing reviews.

C:

A permitted test-policy update reaches all registered nodes in the defined deployment and not unrelated standalone installations. In the case being tested, Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Include concurrency, device count, log volume, and failover capacity in deployment sizing reviews.

D:

The PAN manages configuration while PSNs process live network-access authentication; co-locating them creates a common maintenance failure point. In the case being tested, Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Include concurrency, device count, log volume, and failover capacity in deployment sizing reviews.

Question 28

A security policy owner must resolve this specific case: A regional ISE deployment uses a primary and secondary PSN but the load balancer health check passes when HTTPS is up even though RADIUS processing has stopped. Which administrative action BEST addresses this specific situation?

  1. Register nodes into one supported distributed deployment when central configuration synchronization is required, or explicitly manage independent policy lifecycles.
  2. Size and distribute PAN, PSN, and Monitoring services using published deployment scale and throughput limits for the target release.
  3. Use health checks and client failover behavior that validate supported AAA processing rather than merely the management web listener.
  4. Separate central Policy Administration Node responsibilities from appropriate Policy Service Nodes, and distribute RADIUS requests to healthy PSNs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use health checks and client failover behavior that validate supported AAA processing rather than merely the management web listener. This is appropriate because web management availability and RADIUS decision-service availability are separate health signals. It should be verified by this evidence: When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Test requests from each NAD match the correct ISE network-device object and authorization policy across the balanced PSNs. The repeat risk here is different: Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective. A directly relevant preventive control is: Use health checks and client failover behavior that validate supported AAA processing rather than merely the management web listener.

B:

One laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs. The repeat risk here is different: Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective. A directly relevant preventive control is: Use health checks and client failover behavior that validate supported AAA processing rather than merely the management web listener.

D:

The PAN manages configuration while PSNs process live network-access authentication; co-locating them creates a common maintenance failure point. The repeat risk here is different: Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective. A directly relevant preventive control is: Use health checks and client failover behavior that validate supported AAA processing rather than merely the management web listener.

Question 29

A network identity engineer receives the following requirement: A regional ISE deployment uses a primary and secondary PSN but the load balancer health check passes when HTTPS is up even though RADIUS processing has stopped. Which architectural fact determines the appropriate fix?

  1. Web management availability and RADIUS decision-service availability are separate health signals.
  2. Separate ISE deployments are not automatically one replicated PAN/PSN cluster merely because they share an AD domain.
  3. ISE policy and device selection can depend on NAD identity and actual RADIUS request context; arbitrary intermediaries can alter the intended authentication path.
  4. Zero-touch provisioning automates initial appliance setup only when the bootstrap environment can deliver the correct configuration to the intended appliance.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Web management availability and RADIUS decision-service availability are separate health signals. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Use health checks and client failover behavior that validate supported AAA processing rather than merely the management web listener. The acceptance result is: When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A permitted test-policy update reaches all registered nodes in the defined deployment and not unrelated standalone installations. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out. The needed response is: Web management availability and RADIUS decision-service availability are separate health signals.

C:

Test requests from each NAD match the correct ISE network-device object and authorization policy across the balanced PSNs. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out. The needed response is: Web management availability and RADIUS decision-service availability are separate health signals.

D:

Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out. The needed response is: Web management availability and RADIUS decision-service availability are separate health signals.

Question 30

An enterprise access-control incident describes: A regional ISE deployment uses a primary and secondary PSN but the load balancer health check passes when HTTPS is up even though RADIUS processing has stopped. Which postchange outcome demonstrates correct implementation?

  1. A permitted test-policy update reaches all registered nodes in the defined deployment and not unrelated standalone installations.
  2. When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out.
  3. Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective.
  4. The VM meets the documented profile and representative authentication load remains within agreed latency and resource thresholds.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out. The required remediation is: Use health checks and client failover behavior that validate supported AAA processing rather than merely the management web listener. It works because web management availability and RADIUS decision-service availability are separate health signals.

Incorrect Answers

A:

When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: a permitted test-policy update reaches all registered nodes in the defined deployment and not unrelated standalone installations. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the VM meets the documented profile and representative authentication load remains within agreed latency and resource thresholds. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.