McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-715 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-715

Exam Name Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Security

Cisco 300-715 Bundle $25.00
300-715 Sample 1 300-715 Sample 2 300-715 Sample 3 300-715 Sample 4 300-715 Sample 5 300-715 Sample 6 300-715 Sample 7 300-715 Sample 8 300-715 Sample 9 300-715 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-715 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-715 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-715 Questions & Answers

    433 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-715 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-715 Video Course

    300-715 Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    300-715 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-715 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) exam.

Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) (300-715) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    433 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-715 Video Course

    Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 61

Question 600

During a Cisco ISE postchange review, the following is observed: A noncompliant endpoint can download a patch but still retains quarantine authorization because its posture agent never reevaluates the repaired condition. Which change is justified by the observed evidence?

  1. Configure an appropriate supported application or service-state posture condition and attach it to the relevant OS requirements.
  2. Configure a supported posture reassessment and authorization transition after remediation completes.
  3. Use a supported patch or OS-health condition within the appropriate posture requirement and combine conditions according to policy.
  4. Check the Posture Work Center deployment, posture agent onboarding, and policy-service availability for the branch.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Configure a supported posture reassessment and authorization transition after remediation completes. This is appropriate because changing endpoint health does not modify an established NAD role until the posture result and supported session update occur. It should be verified by this evidence: After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The test client reports a completed posture state once agent and PSN communication is restored, with password validation unchanged. The repeat risk here is different: the pilot laptop downloads the intended module, installs it, and completes the configured posture checks. A directly relevant preventive control is: Configure a supported posture reassessment and authorization transition after remediation completes.

C:

Both positive and negative pilot machines return the expected posture verdicts for their actual settings. The repeat risk here is different: the pilot laptop downloads the intended module, installs it, and completes the configured posture checks. A directly relevant preventive control is: Configure a supported posture reassessment and authorization transition after remediation completes.

D:

Managed corporate laptops undergo mandatory posture while excluded guests receive only their separately restricted guest role. The repeat risk here is different: the pilot laptop downloads the intended module, installs it, and completes the configured posture checks. A directly relevant preventive control is: Configure a supported posture reassessment and authorization transition after remediation completes.

Question 601

A security policy owner must resolve this specific case: A noncompliant endpoint can download a patch but still retains quarantine authorization because its posture agent never reevaluates the repaired condition. What mechanism governs this authentication or management outcome?

  1. Posture requirements evaluate specified checks; a successful unrelated condition should not substitute for a missing mandated patch.
  2. Changing endpoint health does not modify an established NAD role until the posture result and supported session update occur.
  3. ISE authorization uses the matched policy result; correct posture detection does not protect the network if the wrong rule wins.
  4. An endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Changing endpoint health does not modify an established NAD role until the posture result and supported session update occur. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Configure a supported posture reassessment and authorization transition after remediation completes. The acceptance result is: After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The unpatched test endpoint remains restricted while a fully patched counterpart becomes compliant. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile. The needed response is: Changing endpoint health does not modify an established NAD role until the posture result and supported session update occur.

C:

A known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile. The needed response is: Changing endpoint health does not modify an established NAD role until the posture result and supported session update occur.

D:

An endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile. The needed response is: Changing endpoint health does not modify an established NAD role until the posture result and supported session update occur.

Question 602

A network identity engineer receives the following requirement: A noncompliant endpoint can download a patch but still retains quarantine authorization because its posture agent never reevaluates the repaired condition. What is the strongest evidence that this requirement is met?

  1. The test endpoint fails while the service is stopped and passes after approved operation resumes.
  2. A known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role.
  3. The laptop receives a posture assessment and reaches a clear Compliant or NonCompliant state instead of indefinite Unknown.
  4. After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile. The required remediation is: Configure a supported posture reassessment and authorization transition after remediation completes. It works because changing endpoint health does not modify an established NAD role until the posture result and supported session update occur.

Incorrect Answers

A:

After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the test endpoint fails while the service is stopped and passes after approved operation resumes. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: a known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: an endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 603

An enterprise access-control incident describes: A noncompliant endpoint can download a patch but still retains quarantine authorization because its posture agent never reevaluates the repaired condition. Which recurring operational control would reduce this risk?

  1. Keep platform and architecture fixtures for registry-based posture rules.
  2. Use state-based checks when a compliance requirement concerns a running service.
  3. Test full remediation-to-reauthorization sequences, not only patch delivery.
  4. Verify least-privilege access in every posture state before production rollout.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Test full remediation-to-reauthorization sequences, not only patch delivery. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Changing endpoint health does not modify an established NAD role until the posture result and supported session update occur. The ongoing acceptance check remains: After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Both positive and negative pilot machines return the expected posture verdicts for their actual settings. In the case being tested, After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Test full remediation-to-reauthorization sequences, not only patch delivery.

B:

The test endpoint fails while the service is stopped and passes after approved operation resumes. In the case being tested, After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Test full remediation-to-reauthorization sequences, not only patch delivery.

D:

The offered option specifies “Verify least-privilege access in every posture state before production rollout”. The question requires “Test full remediation-to-reauthorization sequences, not only patch delivery”: After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile. These are not equivalent responses to the stated requirement.

Question 604

A Cisco ISE operations team investigates this site issue: A contractor remediation portal is reachable, but its policy includes an unrestricted allow rule above the specific NonCompliant result, granting all devices full access. Which administrative action BEST addresses this specific situation?

  1. Order authorization conditions so the required posture state selects the restrictive remediation profile ahead of any broad allow fallback.
  2. Configure an eligible supported Secure Client posture provisioning resource with the correct OS matching conditions.
  3. Configure a supported posture reassessment and authorization transition after remediation completes.
  4. Distinguish Unknown, Pending, Compliant, and NonCompliant states, then provide the supported client provisioning and assessment path.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Order authorization conditions so the required posture state selects the restrictive remediation profile ahead of any broad allow fallback. This is appropriate because iSE authorization uses the matched policy result; correct posture detection does not protect the network if the wrong rule wins. It should be verified by this evidence: A known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The unpatched test endpoint remains restricted while a fully patched counterpart becomes compliant. The repeat risk here is different: After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile. A directly relevant preventive control is: Order authorization conditions so the required posture state selects the restrictive remediation profile ahead of any broad allow fallback.

C:

The pilot laptop downloads the intended module, installs it, and completes the configured posture checks. The repeat risk here is different: After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile. A directly relevant preventive control is: Order authorization conditions so the required posture state selects the restrictive remediation profile ahead of any broad allow fallback.

D:

An endpoint cannot be called failed for a health requirement before the required agent or assessment has reported a result. The repeat risk here is different: After patch installation and a successful rescan, the endpoint receives its compliant authorization profile. A directly relevant preventive control is: Order authorization conditions so the required posture state selects the restrictive remediation profile ahead of any broad allow fallback.

Question 605

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: A contractor remediation portal is reachable, but its policy includes an unrestricted allow rule above the specific NonCompliant result, granting all devices full access. Which architectural fact determines the appropriate fix?

  1. Posture requirements evaluate specified checks; a successful unrelated condition should not substitute for a missing mandated patch.
  2. ISE authorization uses the matched policy result; correct posture detection does not protect the network if the wrong rule wins.
  3. A posture rule must query the intended OS and data location; the same key path may not be valid across platforms.
  4. Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

ISE authorization uses the matched policy result; correct posture detection does not protect the network if the wrong rule wins. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Order authorization conditions so the required posture state selects the restrictive remediation profile ahead of any broad allow fallback. The acceptance result is: A known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The unpatched test endpoint remains restricted while a fully patched counterpart becomes compliant. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: a known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role. The needed response is: ISE authorization uses the matched policy result; correct posture detection does not protect the network if the wrong rule wins.

C:

Both positive and negative pilot machines return the expected posture verdicts for their actual settings. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: a known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role. The needed response is: ISE authorization uses the matched policy result; correct posture detection does not protect the network if the wrong rule wins.

D:

Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: a known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role. The needed response is: ISE authorization uses the matched policy result; correct posture detection does not protect the network if the wrong rule wins.

Question 606

An ISE administrator troubleshoots the following: A contractor remediation portal is reachable, but its policy includes an unrestricted allow rule above the specific NonCompliant result, granting all devices full access. Which postchange outcome demonstrates correct implementation?

  1. The test endpoint fails while the service is stopped and passes after approved operation resumes.
  2. A known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role.
  3. The unpatched test endpoint remains restricted while a fully patched counterpart becomes compliant.
  4. The failing update or security-service condition appears in the client assessment and matches the enforced limited role.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role. The required remediation is: Order authorization conditions so the required posture state selects the restrictive remediation profile ahead of any broad allow fallback. It works because iSE authorization uses the matched policy result; correct posture detection does not protect the network if the wrong rule wins.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the test endpoint fails while the service is stopped and passes after approved operation resumes. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

A known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the unpatched test endpoint remains restricted while a fully patched counterpart becomes compliant. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

A known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Retain condition-level posture evidence with high-impact access-denial tickets. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 607

An access-security change request states: A contractor remediation portal is reachable, but its policy includes an unrestricted allow rule above the specific NonCompliant result, granting all devices full access. What should be added to the maintenance or security review?

  1. Validate posture authorization rule order and deliberately test noncompliant users.
  2. Regression-test multi-condition policy logic after every compliance rule change.
  3. Use state-based checks when a compliance requirement concerns a running service.
  4. Retain condition-level posture evidence with high-impact access-denial tickets.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Validate posture authorization rule order and deliberately test noncompliant users. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: ISE authorization uses the matched policy result; correct posture detection does not protect the network if the wrong rule wins. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The unpatched test endpoint remains restricted while a fully patched counterpart becomes compliant. In the case being tested, a known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Validate posture authorization rule order and deliberately test noncompliant users.

C:

The test endpoint fails while the service is stopped and passes after approved operation resumes. In the case being tested, a known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Validate posture authorization rule order and deliberately test noncompliant users.

D:

Retain condition-level posture evidence with high-impact access-denial tickets. In the case being tested, a known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Validate posture authorization rule order and deliberately test noncompliant users.

Question 608

An enterprise access-control incident describes: An administrator enables mandatory posture assessment for all guests, including unsupported personal devices that cannot run the required module, causing widespread access failures. What is the most appropriate next configuration or repair?

  1. Scope the compliance rules and provisioning resources to supported eligible endpoint categories and business requirements.
  2. Configure a supported posture reassessment and authorization transition after remediation completes.
  3. Select supported agent-based or agentless posture techniques according to each endpoint platform and assessment requirement.
  4. Introduce an appropriate ISE posture assessment and authorization flow in addition to initial authentication.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Scope the compliance rules and provisioning resources to supported eligible endpoint categories and business requirements. This is appropriate because posture support and assessment policy should be conditional on endpoint type; unsupported clients cannot satisfy an impossible software dependency. It should be verified by this evidence: Managed corporate laptops undergo mandatory posture while excluded guests receive only their separately restricted guest role.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The pilot laptop downloads the intended module, installs it, and completes the configured posture checks. The repeat risk here is different: a known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role. A directly relevant preventive control is: Scope the compliance rules and provisioning resources to supported eligible endpoint categories and business requirements.

C:

Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. The repeat risk here is different: a known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role. A directly relevant preventive control is: Scope the compliance rules and provisioning resources to supported eligible endpoint categories and business requirements.

D:

Authentication verifies an identity, while posture measures endpoint compliance against configured health requirements. The repeat risk here is different: a known noncompliant client receives remediation-only access while a compliant test client receives its approved normal role. A directly relevant preventive control is: Scope the compliance rules and provisioning resources to supported eligible endpoint categories and business requirements.

Question 609

In a staged Cisco ISE network access rollout, the team observes: An administrator enables mandatory posture assessment for all guests, including unsupported personal devices that cannot run the required module, causing widespread access failures. What is the key technical principle in this situation?

  1. A posture rule must query the intended OS and data location; the same key path may not be valid across platforms.
  2. File existence alone does not prove a security service is active; the evaluated posture condition must match the intended health control.
  3. Compliance is a set of configured health conditions; presence of one security application does not establish satisfaction of unrelated patch or encryption requirements.
  4. Posture support and assessment policy should be conditional on endpoint type; unsupported clients cannot satisfy an impossible software dependency.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Posture support and assessment policy should be conditional on endpoint type; unsupported clients cannot satisfy an impossible software dependency. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Scope the compliance rules and provisioning resources to supported eligible endpoint categories and business requirements. The acceptance result is: Managed corporate laptops undergo mandatory posture while excluded guests receive only their separately restricted guest role.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Both positive and negative pilot machines return the expected posture verdicts for their actual settings. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Managed corporate laptops undergo mandatory posture while excluded guests receive only their separately restricted guest role. The needed response is: Posture support and assessment policy should be conditional on endpoint type; unsupported clients cannot satisfy an impossible software dependency.

B:

The test endpoint fails while the service is stopped and passes after approved operation resumes. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Managed corporate laptops undergo mandatory posture while excluded guests receive only their separately restricted guest role. The needed response is: Posture support and assessment policy should be conditional on endpoint type; unsupported clients cannot satisfy an impossible software dependency.

C:

A device missing the mandated OS update fails its relevant condition despite having an approved antivirus product. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Managed corporate laptops undergo mandatory posture while excluded guests receive only their separately restricted guest role. The needed response is: Posture support and assessment policy should be conditional on endpoint type; unsupported clients cannot satisfy an impossible software dependency.

Question 610

An identity and device-administration engineer evaluates: An administrator enables mandatory posture assessment for all guests, including unsupported personal devices that cannot run the required module, causing widespread access failures. What result should be documented before closing the issue?

  1. The test endpoint fails while the service is stopped and passes after approved operation resumes.
  2. Both positive and negative pilot machines return the expected posture verdicts for their actual settings.
  3. A managed laptop and an eligible agentless test endpoint each complete their intended compliance check.
  4. Managed corporate laptops undergo mandatory posture while excluded guests receive only their separately restricted guest role.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Managed corporate laptops undergo mandatory posture while excluded guests receive only their separately restricted guest role. The required remediation is: Scope the compliance rules and provisioning resources to supported eligible endpoint categories and business requirements. It works because posture support and assessment policy should be conditional on endpoint type; unsupported clients cannot satisfy an impossible software dependency.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Managed corporate laptops undergo mandatory posture while excluded guests receive only their separately restricted guest role. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the test endpoint fails while the service is stopped and passes after approved operation resumes. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Managed corporate laptops undergo mandatory posture while excluded guests receive only their separately restricted guest role. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Both positive and negative pilot machines return the expected posture verdicts for their actual settings. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Managed corporate laptops undergo mandatory posture while excluded guests receive only their separately restricted guest role. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Posture service capabilities differ by endpoint type and available probes; a desktop software module is not universally deployable. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.