McAfee Secure

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-102

Exam Name Microsoft 365 Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Expert

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle $44.99

100% Microsoft MS-102 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real MS-102 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-102 Questions & Answers

    473 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual MS-102 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • MS-102 Video Course

    MS-102 Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    MS-102 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the MS-102 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft 365 Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-102 Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 298-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace MS-102 exam.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    473 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-102 Video Course

    Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 33

Question 320

A tenant has a DLP policy for SharePoint but assumes it also blocks Teams chat messages containing sensitive data. The administrator proposes: Explicitly include supported Microsoft Teams locations in an appropriate Microsoft Purview DLP policy. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. A macOS pilot demonstrates the specific configured control or its documented limitation.
  2. A test classified file copy to removable storage is blocked or audited according to the policy.
  3. A simulated Teams message with protected test data produces the specified enforcement result.
  4. The trend separates blocked attempts, user overrides and policy matches under consistent time windows.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The administrator plans 'Explicitly include supported Microsoft Teams locations in an appropriate Microsoft Purview DLP policy.' to correct the fact that dLP policies target supported workload locations; SharePoint scope does not automatically include Teams chat. The direct acceptance evidence is A simulated Teams message with protected test data produces the specified enforcement result. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A macOS pilot demonstrates the specific configured control or its documented limitation. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a simulated Teams message with protected test data produces the specified enforcement result.

B:

A test classified file copy to removable storage is blocked or audited according to the policy. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a simulated Teams message with protected test data produces the specified enforcement result.

D:

The trend separates blocked attempts, user overrides and policy matches under consistent time windows. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a simulated Teams message with protected test data produces the specified enforcement result.

Question 321

Microsoft Entra Connect Sync has rising export errors yet the team notices them only after payroll staff fail to sign in. The change owner plans to: Configure Connect Health notifications and routinely review export and synchronization error trends. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Tune alerts for persistent failures and avoid exposing sensitive user details in broad messages.
  2. Test source identity dependencies and communicate sign-in changes before synchronizing all users.
  3. Protect service credentials and inspect network filtering before reinstalling connectors.
  4. Verify group source authority and downstream licensing dependencies before repairs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The specific rollout control is Tune alerts for persistent failures and avoid exposing sensitive user details in broad messages. It protects the proposed intervention 'Configure Connect Health notifications and routinely review export and synchronization error trends.' against the failure mode that unmonitored sync errors can persist even when overall server availability appears normal. Success should also be checked through: A test or real connector failure produces an actionable health alert before the next access escalation.

Incorrect Answers

B:

An unverified or invalid sign-in suffix can prevent desired cloud UPN alignment. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Unmonitored sync errors can persist even when overall server availability appears normal. The applicable safeguard is: Tune alerts for persistent failures and avoid exposing sensitive user details in broad messages.

C:

An agent-to-service communication failure is distinct from user password quality or sign-in status. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Unmonitored sync errors can persist even when overall server availability appears normal. The applicable safeguard is: Tune alerts for persistent failures and avoid exposing sensitive user details in broad messages.

D:

Object synchronization scope may differ for groups and their member user objects. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Unmonitored sync errors can persist even when overall server availability appears normal. The applicable safeguard is: Tune alerts for persistent failures and avoid exposing sensitive user details in broad messages.

Question 322

A company wants to find unsanctioned file-sharing services accessed by employees but has no inventory outside its licensed apps. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Configure Cloud App Discovery through supported network or endpoint signals for the user population.
  2. Review discovered application usage, risk score, data sensitivity and sanctioned alternatives before enforcement.
  3. Interpret Cloud Apps activity and sign-in context before claiming account takeover.
  4. Configure an appropriate Defender for Cloud Apps activity policy with scoped conditions and alerts.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The deciding issue is a Microsoft 365 tenant app list alone cannot enumerate shadow cloud use across endpoints. The action 'Configure Cloud App Discovery through supported network or endpoint signals for the user population.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: The discovery dashboard identifies candidate cloud services and relevant risk indicators from real usage.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Discovery identifies possible risk but does not by itself prove every instance is malicious. The problem described here is that a Microsoft 365 tenant app list alone cannot enumerate shadow cloud use across endpoints.

C:

Network geolocation can be misleading when users share secure remote-access egress infrastructure. The problem described here is that a Microsoft 365 tenant app list alone cannot enumerate shadow cloud use across endpoints.

D:

Unspecific manual reporting cannot reliably detect defined high-risk cloud app activity. The problem described here is that a Microsoft 365 tenant app list alone cannot enumerate shadow cloud use across endpoints.

Question 323

A team blocks every domain listed in a global threat intelligence feed without checking that the list contains shared cloud service endpoints. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which misconception most directly led to the observed problem?

  1. An increase in detections can represent improved visibility or attack volume rather than failed protection.
  2. Reports limited to onboarded devices can undercount unprotected inventory outside the sensor population.
  3. Global indicators can have context and false positives that make unconditional blocking harmful.
  4. Alert severity alone is not a reliable substitute for investigation of correlated activity.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The actual failure mechanism is Global indicators can have context and false positives that make unconditional blocking harmful. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by evaluate actionable threat intelligence against local evidence and scope prevention rules precisely. Then verify: A pilot blocks the confirmed malicious destination without disrupting approved shared cloud services.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An increase in detections can represent improved visibility or attack volume rather than failed protection. The stated symptoms instead indicate that global indicators can have context and false positives that make unconditional blocking harmful.

B:

Reports limited to onboarded devices can undercount unprotected inventory outside the sensor population. The stated symptoms instead indicate that global indicators can have context and false positives that make unconditional blocking harmful.

D:

Alert severity alone is not a reliable substitute for investigation of correlated activity. The stated symptoms instead indicate that global indicators can have context and false positives that make unconditional blocking harmful.

Question 324

A compliance officer uses a document sensitivity label marked Confidential and assumes the same label automatically enforces a five-year retention rule. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Test supported sensitivity-label protection and inheritance for each export and file type.
  2. Configure separate Microsoft Purview retention labels or policies to enforce the required lifecycle period.
  3. Create or tune a supported sensitive information type using appropriate patterns, keywords and corroborating evidence.
  4. Correlate Microsoft Purview label reports with labeling policy scope and Content explorer results.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is sensitivity labels address classification and protection; retention controls manage preservation and disposal. The action 'Configure separate Microsoft Purview retention labels or policies to enforce the required lifecycle period.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A test item carries the approved classification and remains subject to the independent five-year retention policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Label metadata and protection propagation differ across file formats and workloads. The problem described here is that sensitivity labels address classification and protection; retention controls manage preservation and disposal.

C:

Plain keywords cannot reliably characterize structured sensitive identifiers with validation rules. The problem described here is that sensitivity labels address classification and protection; retention controls manage preservation and disposal.

D:

Label usage counts alone may reflect policy rollout gaps rather than the actual sensitivity of data. The problem described here is that sensitivity labels address classification and protection; retention controls manage preservation and disposal.

Question 325

An endpoint administrator closes a vulnerability ticket after deploying a patch package but Defender still reports the vulnerable version. The administrator proposes: Review Defender Vulnerability Management evidence and verify software inventory reflects the patched version. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. The affected device no longer shows the specific vulnerable software build after evaluation.
  2. A helpdesk technician can view approved device status without arbitrary remote response execution.
  3. Coverage reporting identifies the 600 missing or unsupported devices for appropriate action.
  4. A pilot endpoint appears as onboarded and sends the expected security telemetry.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Review Defender Vulnerability Management evidence and verify software inventory reflects the patched version.' to correct the fact that a patch deployment success message does not prove the endpoint installed and activated the fix. The direct acceptance evidence is The affected device no longer shows the specific vulnerable software build after evaluation. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A helpdesk technician can view approved device status without arbitrary remote response execution. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the affected device no longer shows the specific vulnerable software build after evaluation.

C:

Coverage reporting identifies the 600 missing or unsupported devices for appropriate action. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the affected device no longer shows the specific vulnerable software build after evaluation.

D:

A pilot endpoint appears as onboarded and sends the expected security telemetry. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the affected device no longer shows the specific vulnerable software build after evaluation.

Question 326

A Defender for Endpoint dashboard lists 2,000 devices but asset inventory shows 2,600 corporate endpoints. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which misconception most directly led to the observed problem?

  1. Broad exclusions can create blind spots far larger than the original performance problem.
  2. A patch deployment success message does not prove the endpoint installed and activated the fix.
  3. Quantity of patch actions is not a proxy for the risk removed from critical assets.
  4. A device inventory limited to onboarded assets cannot establish whole-fleet security coverage.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The actual failure mechanism is A device inventory limited to onboarded assets cannot establish whole-fleet security coverage. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by reconcile Defender onboarding coverage against the authorized enterprise device inventory. Then verify: Coverage reporting identifies the 600 missing or unsupported devices for appropriate action.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Broad exclusions can create blind spots far larger than the original performance problem. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a device inventory limited to onboarded assets cannot establish whole-fleet security coverage.

B:

A patch deployment success message does not prove the endpoint installed and activated the fix. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a device inventory limited to onboarded assets cannot establish whole-fleet security coverage.

C:

Quantity of patch actions is not a proxy for the risk removed from critical assets. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a device inventory limited to onboarded assets cannot establish whole-fleet security coverage.

Question 327

An auditor tests a Conditional Access MFA policy while already holding a valid authentication session and incorrectly declares the policy ineffective. The administrator proposes: Use a controlled fresh sign-in and examine the applied Conditional Access authentication requirement. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. A controlled noncompliant sign-in is blocked under the enforced policy and recorded in logs.
  2. The risk record is resolved with attributable evidence and new sign-ins meet protected policy.
  3. The user's risk state and recent sign-ins are reviewed and the account passes a clean recovery test.
  4. The test prompts for the required factor or shows a previously satisfied claim with exact evaluation context.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The administrator plans 'Use a controlled fresh sign-in and examine the applied Conditional Access authentication requirement.' to correct the fact that existing sessions and authentication claims can satisfy controls without an apparent new MFA prompt. The direct acceptance evidence is The test prompts for the required factor or shows a previously satisfied claim with exact evaluation context. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A controlled noncompliant sign-in is blocked under the enforced policy and recorded in logs. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the test prompts for the required factor or shows a previously satisfied claim with exact evaluation context.

B:

The risk record is resolved with attributable evidence and new sign-ins meet protected policy. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the test prompts for the required factor or shows a previously satisfied claim with exact evaluation context.

C:

The user's risk state and recent sign-ins are reviewed and the account passes a clean recovery test. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the test prompts for the required factor or shows a previously satisfied claim with exact evaluation context.

Question 328

An analyst reports 100% device protection from a dashboard covering only devices already onboarded to Defender. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which misconception most directly led to the observed problem?

  1. A shared indicator can occur in unrelated activity and does not alone establish adversary identity.
  2. Security exposure posture evaluates potential risk, whereas incidents describe observed malicious activity.
  3. External threat intelligence gains operational value only when matched to actual enterprise exposure.
  4. Reports limited to onboarded devices can undercount unprotected inventory outside the sensor population.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The actual failure mechanism is Reports limited to onboarded devices can undercount unprotected inventory outside the sensor population. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by reconcile protected-device reporting with the full authorized device inventory and excluded assets. Then verify: The coverage report identifies unmanaged endpoints instead of implying they have passed protection checks.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A shared indicator can occur in unrelated activity and does not alone establish adversary identity. The stated symptoms instead indicate that reports limited to onboarded devices can undercount unprotected inventory outside the sensor population.

B:

Security exposure posture evaluates potential risk, whereas incidents describe observed malicious activity. The stated symptoms instead indicate that reports limited to onboarded devices can undercount unprotected inventory outside the sensor population.

C:

External threat intelligence gains operational value only when matched to actual enterprise exposure. The stated symptoms instead indicate that reports limited to onboarded devices can undercount unprotected inventory outside the sensor population.

Question 329

An admin creates a Conditional Access policy but leaves it in report-only state while announcing that all risky logins are blocked. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Use supported directory-role targeting for appropriate privileged Conditional Access policies.
  2. Enable the validated Conditional Access policy after confirming report-only results and recovery mechanisms.
  3. Use a risk-informed authentication design covering location, device and privileged roles appropriately.
  4. Assess identities, application dependencies and sign-in methods before designing identity protection policy scope.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is report-only evaluation does not enforce the selected block or grant control. The action 'Enable the validated Conditional Access policy after confirming report-only results and recovery mechanisms.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A controlled noncompliant sign-in is blocked under the enforced policy and recorded in logs.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Manually enumerated privileged users can omit new or rotated administrators. The problem described here is that report-only evaluation does not enforce the selected block or grant control.

C:

Physical location alone is not a reliable identity trust signal for modern hybrid work. The problem described here is that report-only evaluation does not enforce the selected block or grant control.

D:

A broad access policy can disrupt critical workflows when sign-in dependencies are unknown. The problem described here is that report-only evaluation does not enforce the selected block or grant control.

Question 330

A Teams operator needs to manage Teams calling settings but cannot see the controls with a general Reader role. The change owner plans to: Assign a supported workload-specific administrator role such as Teams Administrator when warranted. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Scope the assignment duration and periodically review whether the role remains needed.
  2. Export protected audit evidence within retention limits and alert on suspicious activation patterns.
  3. Test migration with representative roles before removing production responders' access.
  4. Test dynamic membership delays and protect attributes used by scoping rules.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The specific rollout control is Scope the assignment duration and periodically review whether the role remains needed. It protects the proposed intervention 'Assign a supported workload-specific administrator role such as Teams Administrator when warranted.' against the failure mode that read-only access does not grant role-specific management permissions for collaboration workloads. Success should also be checked through: The operator changes the approved Teams setting without acquiring unrelated Exchange or tenant Global Admin rights.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Privileged access investigations need activation history, not only current role membership. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Read-only access does not grant role-specific management permissions for collaboration workloads. The applicable safeguard is: Scope the assignment duration and periodically review whether the role remains needed.

C:

Parallel legacy and unified security assignments can create unclear effective access. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Read-only access does not grant role-specific management permissions for collaboration workloads. The applicable safeguard is: Scope the assignment duration and periodically review whether the role remains needed.

D:

Administrative unit scope depends on accurate object membership, not merely branch naming conventions. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Read-only access does not grant role-specific management permissions for collaboration workloads. The applicable safeguard is: Scope the assignment duration and periodically review whether the role remains needed.