McAfee Secure

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-102

Exam Name Microsoft 365 Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Expert

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle $44.99
MS-102 Sample 1 MS-102 Sample 2 MS-102 Sample 3 MS-102 Sample 4 MS-102 Sample 5 MS-102 Sample 6 MS-102 Sample 7 MS-102 Sample 8 MS-102 Sample 9 MS-102 Sample 10

100% Microsoft MS-102 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real MS-102 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-102 Questions & Answers

    473 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual MS-102 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • MS-102 Video Course

    MS-102 Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    MS-102 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the MS-102 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft 365 Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-102 Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 298-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace MS-102 exam.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    473 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-102 Video Course

    Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 45

Question 440

Security operations assumes all devices missing from the Defender vulnerability dashboard have no CVEs. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Reconcile Vulnerability Management coverage with onboarded devices and supported software inventory.
  2. Review and narrow Defender endpoint protection exclusions to documented necessary paths and processes.
  3. Onboard the eligible devices to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint using the approved management method.
  4. Separate endpoint onboarding administration from sensitive Defender response roles using least privilege.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The deciding issue is an unassessed device is not equivalent to an assessed device with no findings. The action 'Reconcile Vulnerability Management coverage with onboarded devices and supported software inventory.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: The audit identifies devices lacking vulnerability visibility rather than classifying them as clean.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Broad exclusions can create blind spots far larger than the original performance problem. The problem described here is that an unassessed device is not equivalent to an assessed device with no findings.

C:

Installing an unrelated antivirus product does not automatically enroll a device in Defender for Endpoint. The problem described here is that an unassessed device is not equivalent to an assessed device with no findings.

D:

Device telemetry enrollment and advanced endpoint response administration are different permissions. That concern does not account for the stated failure: An unassessed device is not equivalent to an assessed device with no findings. The relevant design change is: Reconcile Vulnerability Management coverage with onboarded devices and supported software inventory.

Question 441

A user completes cloud SSPR but sign-in errors persist because a device retains stale credentials. The change owner plans to: Troubleshoot credential synchronization, cached sessions and writeback state after the documented reset. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Prevent lockouts by excluding emergency accounts from fragile registration dependencies.
  2. Advise supported reauthentication and investigate persistence before repeated password changes.
  3. Pilot deployment across DCs and verify proxy health before enforcing broad password changes.
  4. Review agent network access and protect logs containing sensitive identity metadata.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The specific rollout control is Advise supported reauthentication and investigate persistence before repeated password changes. It protects the proposed intervention 'Troubleshoot credential synchronization, cached sessions and writeback state after the documented reset.' against the failure mode that resetting a password does not automatically refresh every device's stored credentials or existing session. Success should also be checked through: A controlled sign-in with fresh credentials succeeds while obsolete cached sessions are invalidated.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Authentication method registration alone does not require using MFA for every application. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Resetting a password does not automatically refresh every device's stored credentials or existing session. The applicable safeguard is: Advise supported reauthentication and investigate persistence before repeated password changes.

C:

Cloud-only password policy does not automatically execute on legacy on-premises domain controllers. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Resetting a password does not automatically refresh every device's stored credentials or existing session. The applicable safeguard is: Advise supported reauthentication and investigate persistence before repeated password changes.

D:

A broken local policy enforcement agent is an infrastructure issue, not proof all existing passwords are compromised. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Resetting a password does not automatically refresh every device's stored credentials or existing session. The applicable safeguard is: Advise supported reauthentication and investigate persistence before repeated password changes.

Question 442

A new Conditional Access policy unexpectedly blocks service accounts used by unattended automation. The administrator proposes: Use supported workload identity policies and exclude or redesign noninteractive flows from user interactive conditions. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. The user's risk state and recent sign-ins are reviewed and the account passes a clean recovery test.
  2. An approved automation identity operates with its intended restrictions while user policies remain enforced.
  3. The risk record is resolved with attributable evidence and new sign-ins meet protected policy.
  4. A pilot risk event maps to the documented challenge or investigation action.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The administrator plans 'Use supported workload identity policies and exclude or redesign noninteractive flows from user interactive conditions.' to correct the fact that user-focused interactive Conditional Access can affect service principals differently from human sign-in flows. The direct acceptance evidence is An approved automation identity operates with its intended restrictions while user policies remain enforced. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The user's risk state and recent sign-ins are reviewed and the account passes a clean recovery test. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: an approved automation identity operates with its intended restrictions while user policies remain enforced.

C:

The risk record is resolved with attributable evidence and new sign-ins meet protected policy. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: an approved automation identity operates with its intended restrictions while user policies remain enforced.

D:

A pilot risk event maps to the documented challenge or investigation action. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: an approved automation identity operates with its intended restrictions while user policies remain enforced.

Question 443

A regulated business wants administrative support details and its company branding updated but edits individual employee profile descriptions. The change owner plans to: Configure the appropriate Microsoft 365 organization profile, security and privacy settings in the admin center. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Assign the minimum organization-settings role and document the compliance approval for published contact details.
  2. Review account synchronization and service dependencies before changing UPNs for existing users.
  3. Publish rollback and compatibility guidance before promoting the update ring to all users.
  4. Validate MX, SPF, Autodiscover and relevant DKIM and DMARC settings before changing production routing.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The specific rollout control is Assign the minimum organization-settings role and document the compliance approval for published contact details. It protects the proposed intervention 'Configure the appropriate Microsoft 365 organization profile, security and privacy settings in the admin center.' against the failure mode that personal user profile fields do not establish tenant-wide organizational configuration or privacy preferences. Success should also be checked through: The tenant organization profile displays approved support contacts and newly issued notices use intended branding.

Incorrect Answers

B:

An added domain does not automatically rewrite every existing user's sign-in name or primary email address. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Personal user profile fields do not establish tenant-wide organizational configuration or privacy preferences. The applicable safeguard is: Assign the minimum organization-settings role and document the compliance approval for published contact details.

C:

Feature updates can change app behavior even when the cloud tenant service is healthy. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Personal user profile fields do not establish tenant-wide organizational configuration or privacy preferences. The applicable safeguard is: Assign the minimum organization-settings role and document the compliance approval for published contact details.

D:

Changing the organizational display name does not establish DNS ownership or configure email delivery. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Personal user profile fields do not establish tenant-wide organizational configuration or privacy preferences. The applicable safeguard is: Assign the minimum organization-settings role and document the compliance approval for published contact details.

Question 444

A business creates a retention policy requiring deletion after two years but legal hold applies to some of the same emails. The change owner plans to: Evaluate Microsoft Purview retention principles and applicable hold priority before configuring disposal. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Use least-privilege explorer roles and protect access to sensitive content previews.
  2. Consult legal counsel and test representative hold scenarios before enabling disposition automation.
  3. Check localization, word boundaries and policy exceptions before expanding enforcement.
  4. Review the DLP policy scope and false positives before turning on hard blocking.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The specific rollout control is Consult legal counsel and test representative hold scenarios before enabling disposition automation. It protects the proposed intervention 'Evaluate Microsoft Purview retention principles and applicable hold priority before configuring disposal.' against the failure mode that competing retention and hold requirements cannot be reduced to one simple earliest-delete timer. Success should also be checked through: A held test message remains preserved according to legal requirements despite the ordinary deletion schedule.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Mail security threat alerts are not an inventory of classified content stored across Microsoft 365. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Competing retention and hold requirements cannot be reduced to one simple earliest-delete timer. The applicable safeguard is: Consult legal counsel and test representative hold scenarios before enabling disposition automation.

C:

Ad hoc case-sensitive searches can miss supported alternative forms of classified keywords. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Competing retention and hold requirements cannot be reduced to one simple earliest-delete timer. The applicable safeguard is: Consult legal counsel and test representative hold scenarios before enabling disposition automation.

D:

Detection definitions identify content patterns but do not automatically enforce all sharing restrictions. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Competing retention and hold requirements cannot be reduced to one simple earliest-delete timer. The applicable safeguard is: Consult legal counsel and test representative hold scenarios before enabling disposition automation.

Question 445

A compliance lead needs to investigate how users applied or removed sensitivity labels but checks only current document metadata. What is the BEST corrective Microsoft 365 action for this tenant?

  1. Refine the custom Purview sensitive information type with suitable contextual keywords and confidence settings.
  2. Create or tune a supported sensitive information type using appropriate patterns, keywords and corroborating evidence.
  3. Evaluate Microsoft Purview retention principles and applicable hold priority before configuring disposal.
  4. Use Microsoft Purview Activity explorer and supported label activity reports to review historical labeling actions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The deciding issue is current label state does not explain the complete sequence of historical labeling events. The action 'Use Microsoft Purview Activity explorer and supported label activity reports to review historical labeling actions.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: The investigation identifies the who and when of a controlled label change.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Regular expressions without contextual conditions can overclassify unrelated data. The problem described here is that current label state does not explain the complete sequence of historical labeling events.

B:

Plain keywords cannot reliably characterize structured sensitive identifiers with validation rules. The problem described here is that current label state does not explain the complete sequence of historical labeling events.

C:

Competing retention and hold requirements cannot be reduced to one simple earliest-delete timer. The problem described here is that current label state does not explain the complete sequence of historical labeling events.

Question 446

A company removes an employee's Exchange Online license before securing legally required mailbox retention. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which misconception most directly led to the observed problem?

  1. Directory profile changes alone do not guarantee every downstream entitlement is removed.
  2. A friendly display name is not a substitute for the externally routed recipient address.
  3. License changes can affect data access and mailbox lifecycle despite separate retention requirements.
  4. Creating user principals for address-only contacts introduces needless identity and license exposure.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The actual failure mechanism is License changes can affect data access and mailbox lifecycle despite separate retention requirements. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by coordinate the approved mailbox retention or conversion pathway before reclaiming a workload license. Then verify: A compliance-approved test confirms required records remain recoverable under the selected supported policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Directory profile changes alone do not guarantee every downstream entitlement is removed. The stated symptoms instead indicate that license changes can affect data access and mailbox lifecycle despite separate retention requirements.

B:

A friendly display name is not a substitute for the externally routed recipient address. The stated symptoms instead indicate that license changes can affect data access and mailbox lifecycle despite separate retention requirements.

D:

Creating user principals for address-only contacts introduces needless identity and license exposure. The stated symptoms instead indicate that license changes can affect data access and mailbox lifecycle despite separate retention requirements.

Question 447

Security analysts confuse Defender for Cloud Apps tenant connector setup with granting every app full Microsoft 365 Graph access. The change owner plans to: Grant only supported minimum connector permissions and validate the exact app integration flow. What is the highest-priority residual-risk control before rollout?

  1. Record certification, contractual protection and data residency review before sanctioning.
  2. Assess business disruption and legal obligations before sanctioning or blocking services.
  3. Review consent and credential owner whenever app connector permissions change.
  4. Validate timestamps, source IP handling and privacy obligations before large imports.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The specific rollout control is Review consent and credential owner whenever app connector permissions change. It protects the proposed intervention 'Grant only supported minimum connector permissions and validate the exact app integration flow.' against the failure mode that connected app monitoring is not an excuse for unrestricted tenant-wide API permissions. Success should also be checked through: The intended activity telemetry arrives while unrelated high-privilege Graph scopes remain ungranted.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An unreviewed approval outside the security catalog does not automatically change app risk handling. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Connected app monitoring is not an excuse for unrestricted tenant-wide API permissions. The applicable safeguard is: Review consent and credential owner whenever app connector permissions change.

B:

Discovery identifies possible risk but does not by itself prove every instance is malicious. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Connected app monitoring is not an excuse for unrestricted tenant-wide API permissions. The applicable safeguard is: Review consent and credential owner whenever app connector permissions change.

D:

Unsupported or malformed traffic logs do not yield reliable app identification. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Connected app monitoring is not an excuse for unrestricted tenant-wide API permissions. The applicable safeguard is: Review consent and credential owner whenever app connector permissions change.

Question 448

A security team measures only the number of simulated phishing clicks and ignores reported suspicious messages and training completion. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which misconception most directly led to the observed problem?

  1. Subject lines alone are weak identifiers for a phishing campaign.
  2. Poorly tuned alert logic creates fatigue without necessarily increasing detection quality.
  3. Security notification workflows must meet their own data-sharing and privacy requirements.
  4. Click totals alone do not capture security reporting behavior or learning progress.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The actual failure mechanism is Click totals alone do not capture security reporting behavior or learning progress. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by review Microsoft Defender attack simulation outcomes including user reporting and remediation learning. Then verify: The exercise report differentiates clicks, reported messages and completed training across the intended cohort.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Subject lines alone are weak identifiers for a phishing campaign. The stated symptoms instead indicate that click totals alone do not capture security reporting behavior or learning progress.

B:

Poorly tuned alert logic creates fatigue without necessarily increasing detection quality. The stated symptoms instead indicate that click totals alone do not capture security reporting behavior or learning progress.

C:

Security notification workflows must meet their own data-sharing and privacy requirements. The stated symptoms instead indicate that click totals alone do not capture security reporting behavior or learning progress.

Question 449

An analyst treats Exposure Management risk scores as if each represents a confirmed attacker compromise of a particular host. The administrator proposes: Use exposure metrics for risk prioritization and correlate actual alert telemetry before asserting an intrusion. What acceptance evidence would demonstrate the desired behavior?

  1. A case record distinguishes an exposed critical asset from a host with actual compromise evidence.
  2. The coverage report identifies unmanaged endpoints instead of implying they have passed protection checks.
  3. A test query returns the affected host IDs, timestamps and matching process indicators.
  4. A query returns an ordered attack timeline from suspicious email to affected endpoint activity.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Use exposure metrics for risk prioritization and correlate actual alert telemetry before asserting an intrusion.' to correct the fact that security exposure posture evaluates potential risk, whereas incidents describe observed malicious activity. The direct acceptance evidence is A case record distinguishes an exposed critical asset from a host with actual compromise evidence. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The coverage report identifies unmanaged endpoints instead of implying they have passed protection checks. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a case record distinguishes an exposed critical asset from a host with actual compromise evidence.

C:

A test query returns the affected host IDs, timestamps and matching process indicators. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a case record distinguishes an exposed critical asset from a host with actual compromise evidence.

D:

A query returns an ordered attack timeline from suspicious email to affected endpoint activity. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a case record distinguishes an exposed critical asset from a host with actual compromise evidence.

Question 450

A sales support address must be answered by several employees without signing into a separately licensed individual account. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which misconception most directly led to the observed problem?

  1. Display names are not unique stable identifiers for destructive directory automation.
  2. Removing one group membership does not necessarily remove an independent direct license grant.
  3. Mail contacts are address-book objects and are not equivalent to interactive Entra workforce accounts.
  4. Mailbox access and sending as that mailbox are distinct delegated permissions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The actual failure mechanism is Mailbox access and sending as that mailbox are distinct delegated permissions. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by create a shared mailbox and grant the intended Full Access and Send As permissions separately. Then verify: An authorized delegate opens the shared mailbox and sends a reply with the approved sender identity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Display names are not unique stable identifiers for destructive directory automation. The stated symptoms instead indicate that mailbox access and sending as that mailbox are distinct delegated permissions.

B:

Removing one group membership does not necessarily remove an independent direct license grant. The stated symptoms instead indicate that mailbox access and sending as that mailbox are distinct delegated permissions.

C:

Mail contacts are address-book objects and are not equivalent to interactive Entra workforce accounts. The stated symptoms instead indicate that mailbox access and sending as that mailbox are distinct delegated permissions.