McAfee Secure

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-102

Exam Name Microsoft 365 Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Expert

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle $44.99
MS-102 Sample 1 MS-102 Sample 2 MS-102 Sample 3 MS-102 Sample 4 MS-102 Sample 5 MS-102 Sample 6 MS-102 Sample 7 MS-102 Sample 8 MS-102 Sample 9 MS-102 Sample 10

100% Microsoft MS-102 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real MS-102 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-102 Questions & Answers

    473 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual MS-102 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • MS-102 Video Course

    MS-102 Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    MS-102 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the MS-102 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft 365 Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-102 Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 298-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace MS-102 exam.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    473 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-102 Video Course

    Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 67

Question 660

A tenant leaves permanent Global Administrator assignments active for engineering contractors who need emergency changes only. The administrator proposes: Use Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management to make supported privileged roles eligible for time-limited activation. Which observation is the most decisive validation of this solution?

  1. The analyst can manage approved incidents but cannot modify unrelated Microsoft 365 tenant settings.
  2. The auditor exports approved role assignment reports but cannot create a privileged assignment.
  3. An engineer activates the approved role temporarily and loses active permissions at expiry.
  4. The authorized cloud operation works after a scoped Entra role assignment, independent of local Windows rights.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The administrator plans 'Use Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management to make supported privileged roles eligible for time-limited activation.' to correct the fact that permanent privileged standing access expands compromise risk beyond the actual maintenance period. The direct acceptance evidence is An engineer activates the approved role temporarily and loses active permissions at expiry. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The analyst can manage approved incidents but cannot modify unrelated Microsoft 365 tenant settings. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: an engineer activates the approved role temporarily and loses active permissions at expiry.

B:

The auditor exports approved role assignment reports but cannot create a privileged assignment. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: an engineer activates the approved role temporarily and loses active permissions at expiry.

D:

The authorized cloud operation works after a scoped Entra role assignment, independent of local Windows rights. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: an engineer activates the approved role temporarily and loses active permissions at expiry.

Question 661

During password-policy rollout, audit logs show weak password attempts but the organization incorrectly declares them blocked. The administrator proposes: Set Microsoft Entra Password Protection from audit to the approved enforcement mode when the rollout is ready. Which observation is the most decisive validation of this solution?

  1. The test sign-in invokes an approved verification method and blocks password-only completion.
  2. A test user resets via SSPR and the same password authenticates to the authoritative on-premises directory.
  3. A controlled sign-in with fresh credentials succeeds while obsolete cached sessions are invalidated.
  4. A previously audited weak password is rejected during a permitted test reset.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The administrator plans 'Set Microsoft Entra Password Protection from audit to the approved enforcement mode when the rollout is ready.' to correct the fact that audit-only reporting records weak attempts but does not necessarily prevent them. The direct acceptance evidence is A previously audited weak password is rejected during a permitted test reset. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The test sign-in invokes an approved verification method and blocks password-only completion. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a previously audited weak password is rejected during a permitted test reset.

B:

A test user resets via SSPR and the same password authenticates to the authoritative on-premises directory. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a previously audited weak password is rejected during a permitted test reset.

C:

A controlled sign-in with fresh credentials succeeds while obsolete cached sessions are invalidated. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a previously audited weak password is rejected during a permitted test reset.

Question 662

HR imports hundreds of employees from a CSV and each portal click introduces inconsistent account attributes. The administrator proposes: Use supported Microsoft Graph PowerShell or Microsoft Entra PowerShell for validated bulk user creation. Which observation is the most decisive validation of this solution?

  1. A pilot user receives the expected Exchange license and can open their mailbox.
  2. A reconciliation shows the expected identities with accurate UPNs, departments and manager attributes.
  3. The contractor authenticates with their external identity and cannot access unrelated internal workloads.
  4. A pilot group exposes its supported shared calendar and SharePoint workspace to approved members.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The administrator plans 'Use supported Microsoft Graph PowerShell or Microsoft Entra PowerShell for validated bulk user creation.' to correct the fact that manual repetitive changes raise the risk of inconsistent user provisioning at scale. The direct acceptance evidence is A reconciliation shows the expected identities with accurate UPNs, departments and manager attributes. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A pilot user receives the expected Exchange license and can open their mailbox. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a reconciliation shows the expected identities with accurate UPNs, departments and manager attributes.

C:

The contractor authenticates with their external identity and cannot access unrelated internal workloads. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a reconciliation shows the expected identities with accurate UPNs, departments and manager attributes.

D:

A pilot group exposes its supported shared calendar and SharePoint workspace to approved members. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a reconciliation shows the expected identities with accurate UPNs, departments and manager attributes.

Question 663

A SaaS application is marked unsanctioned in Defender for Cloud Apps but continues to appear in endpoint network traces. The administrator proposes: Investigate the supported enforcement integration and endpoint coverage for unsanctioned applications. Which observation is the most decisive validation of this solution?

  1. The Cloud Apps activity view receives supported Microsoft 365 events for an approved test action.
  2. A covered endpoint receives the intended blocking indicator while unsupported devices are identified separately.
  3. The reviewed activity record identifies the supported download event and principal.
  4. The report defines the supported investigation period and confirms records exist for a test date.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The administrator plans 'Investigate the supported enforcement integration and endpoint coverage for unsanctioned applications.' to correct the fact that marking an app unsanctioned does not guarantee all devices or network paths are immediately blocked. The direct acceptance evidence is A covered endpoint receives the intended blocking indicator while unsupported devices are identified separately. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The Cloud Apps activity view receives supported Microsoft 365 events for an approved test action. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a covered endpoint receives the intended blocking indicator while unsupported devices are identified separately.

C:

The reviewed activity record identifies the supported download event and principal. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a covered endpoint receives the intended blocking indicator while unsupported devices are identified separately.

D:

The report defines the supported investigation period and confirms records exist for a test date. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a covered endpoint receives the intended blocking indicator while unsupported devices are identified separately.

Question 664

An HR team offboards an employee but removes only a visible display name from a Teams channel. The administrator proposes: Block and deprovision the Microsoft Entra user account according to the approved offboarding workflow. Which observation is the most decisive validation of this solution?

  1. The former employee cannot sign in while approved mailbox and OneDrive retention actions are recorded.
  2. A pilot user receives the planned Teams entitlement after the correct supported service plan is enabled.
  3. A pilot group exposes its supported shared calendar and SharePoint workspace to approved members.
  4. A reconciliation shows the expected identities with accurate UPNs, departments and manager attributes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Block and deprovision the Microsoft Entra user account according to the approved offboarding workflow.' to correct the fact that removing a collaboration membership does not disable an identity or revoke every active session. The direct acceptance evidence is The former employee cannot sign in while approved mailbox and OneDrive retention actions are recorded. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A pilot user receives the planned Teams entitlement after the correct supported service plan is enabled. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the former employee cannot sign in while approved mailbox and OneDrive retention actions are recorded.

C:

A pilot group exposes its supported shared calendar and SharePoint workspace to approved members. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the former employee cannot sign in while approved mailbox and OneDrive retention actions are recorded.

D:

A reconciliation shows the expected identities with accurate UPNs, departments and manager attributes. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the former employee cannot sign in while approved mailbox and OneDrive retention actions are recorded.

Question 665

A synchronized user appears twice in Entra ID after a migration because an existing cloud identity did not match the source anchor. The administrator proposes: Investigate hard or soft matching using supported identifiers and repair identity join issues safely. Which observation is the most decisive validation of this solution?

  1. The user attribute remains correct after several synchronization cycles.
  2. The corrected sync yields one intended cloud identity with preserved authorized service associations.
  3. The sync test provisions approved organizational units and excludes the restricted service accounts.
  4. A controlled agent outage does not stop eligible identities from syncing within the defined recovery objective.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The administrator plans 'Investigate hard or soft matching using supported identifiers and repair identity join issues safely.' to correct the fact that ambiguous source anchor or account matching can create duplicates during hybrid identity onboarding. The direct acceptance evidence is The corrected sync yields one intended cloud identity with preserved authorized service associations. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The user attribute remains correct after several synchronization cycles. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the corrected sync yields one intended cloud identity with preserved authorized service associations.

C:

The sync test provisions approved organizational units and excludes the restricted service accounts. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the corrected sync yields one intended cloud identity with preserved authorized service associations.

D:

Single-agent topology can make cloud synchronization dependent on one server's availability. That finding would not establish that the current design works. The required evidence is: The corrected sync yields one intended cloud identity with preserved authorized service associations.

Question 666

Procurement believes assigning more Microsoft 365 licenses than purchased simply queues users for future entitlement. Which implementation best resolves the specific requirement?

  1. Invite an authorized Microsoft Entra B2B guest and scope the guest to the project resources.
  2. Use mail contacts for external directory recipients that do not require login or hosted mailboxes.
  3. Check available SKU quantities and resolve licensing failures before provisioning eligible users.
  4. Create a Microsoft 365 Group when shared mailbox conversations, calendar and collaboration resources are needed.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The deciding issue is license allocation is constrained by purchased capacity and supported assignment rules. The action 'Check available SKU quantities and resolve licensing failures before provisioning eligible users.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: The assignment report shows no failed entitlements and purchased capacity covers the active population.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A guest collaboration model can avoid unnecessary provisioning of internal workforce accounts. The problem described here is that license allocation is constrained by purchased capacity and supported assignment rules.

B:

Creating user principals for address-only contacts introduces needless identity and license exposure. The problem described here is that license allocation is constrained by purchased capacity and supported assignment rules.

D:

A distribution list provides mail distribution, not the full Microsoft 365 Group collaboration experience. The problem described here is that license allocation is constrained by purchased capacity and supported assignment rules.

Question 667

A SOC analyst finds an unfamiliar malware indicator but treats the filename alone as definitive proof of a specific threat actor. The team believes no other action is necessary. Why is the current tenant configuration inadequate for this requirement?

  1. Single-workload hunting can miss subsequent activity that occurs in other Microsoft security products.
  2. A shared indicator can occur in unrelated activity and does not alone establish adversary identity.
  3. Security exposure posture evaluates potential risk, whereas incidents describe observed malicious activity.
  4. Administrative completion markers do not always demonstrate that the preventive control is effective.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The actual failure mechanism is A shared indicator can occur in unrelated activity and does not alone establish adversary identity. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by use Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence context to assess indicators and associated campaigns before attribution. Then verify: The incident report distinguishes indicator confidence from confirmed malicious behavior and actor attribution.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Single-workload hunting can miss subsequent activity that occurs in other Microsoft security products. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a shared indicator can occur in unrelated activity and does not alone establish adversary identity.

C:

Security exposure posture evaluates potential risk, whereas incidents describe observed malicious activity. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a shared indicator can occur in unrelated activity and does not alone establish adversary identity.

D:

Administrative completion markers do not always demonstrate that the preventive control is effective. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a shared indicator can occur in unrelated activity and does not alone establish adversary identity.

Question 668

Security operations assumes all devices missing from the Defender vulnerability dashboard have no CVEs. The administrator proposes: Reconcile Vulnerability Management coverage with onboarded devices and supported software inventory. Which observation is the most decisive validation of this solution?

  1. The audit identifies devices lacking vulnerability visibility rather than classifying them as clean.
  2. A helpdesk technician can view approved device status without arbitrary remote response execution.
  3. A supervised device appears only in the approved production tenant inventory.
  4. The device reports the intended managed policy after synchronization without unexpected local overrides.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Reconcile Vulnerability Management coverage with onboarded devices and supported software inventory.' to correct the fact that an unassessed device is not equivalent to an assessed device with no findings. The direct acceptance evidence is The audit identifies devices lacking vulnerability visibility rather than classifying them as clean. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A helpdesk technician can view approved device status without arbitrary remote response execution. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the audit identifies devices lacking vulnerability visibility rather than classifying them as clean.

C:

A supervised device appears only in the approved production tenant inventory. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the audit identifies devices lacking vulnerability visibility rather than classifying them as clean.

D:

The device reports the intended managed policy after synchronization without unexpected local overrides. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the audit identifies devices lacking vulnerability visibility rather than classifying them as clean.

Question 669

Security operations closes a confirmed compromised account incident but leaves the risky user state unresolved in Entra. The change owner plans to: Complete supported risk remediation or administrator confirmation workflows after a verified investigation. Which precaution directly prevents a predictable failure of this approach?

  1. Revoke test sessions only in an approved environment and inspect sign-in token details.
  2. Check session revocation, password reset and token invalidation before marking risk resolved.
  3. Use What If validation and sign-in logs for both allowed and denied test cases.
  4. Protect emergency accounts and assess inherited role membership when scoping policies.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The specific rollout control is Check session revocation, password reset and token invalidation before marking risk resolved. It protects the proposed intervention 'Complete supported risk remediation or administrator confirmation workflows after a verified investigation.' against the failure mode that incident closure in a separate portal does not necessarily clear the directory's risk state. Success should also be checked through: The risk record is resolved with attributable evidence and new sign-ins meet protected policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Existing sessions and authentication claims can satisfy controls without an apparent new MFA prompt. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Incident closure in a separate portal does not necessarily clear the directory's risk state. The applicable safeguard is: Check session revocation, password reset and token invalidation before marking risk resolved.

C:

Policy existence cannot protect an app omitted from its target scope. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Incident closure in a separate portal does not necessarily clear the directory's risk state. The applicable safeguard is: Check session revocation, password reset and token invalidation before marking risk resolved.

D:

Manually enumerated privileged users can omit new or rotated administrators. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Incident closure in a separate portal does not necessarily clear the directory's risk state. The applicable safeguard is: Check session revocation, password reset and token invalidation before marking risk resolved.

Question 670

An operator is eligible for a privileged Microsoft Entra role but cannot use it and claims PIM is broken. Which implementation best resolves the specific requirement?

  1. Scope supported Entra roles with an administrative unit containing the authorized regional users.
  2. Activate the eligible PIM role through the required workflow and verify activation requirements.
  3. Assign a supported workload-specific administrator role such as Teams Administrator when warranted.
  4. Assign an appropriate Microsoft Defender XDR security role or supported unified RBAC permission set.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is pIM eligibility is not the same state as an activated privileged role. The action 'Activate the eligible PIM role through the required workflow and verify activation requirements.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: The role becomes active only after the assigned MFA, approval or ticket requirements pass.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Administrative units can constrain some role assignments rather than granting every role tenant-wide. The problem described here is that pIM eligibility is not the same state as an activated privileged role.

C:

Read-only access does not grant role-specific management permissions for collaboration workloads. The problem described here is that pIM eligibility is not the same state as an activated privileged role.

D:

Defender workload permissions can be narrower than broad Entra directory administration. The problem described here is that pIM eligibility is not the same state as an activated privileged role.