McAfee Secure

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-102

Exam Name Microsoft 365 Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Expert

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle $44.99
MS-102 Sample 1 MS-102 Sample 2 MS-102 Sample 3 MS-102 Sample 4 MS-102 Sample 5 MS-102 Sample 6 MS-102 Sample 7 MS-102 Sample 8 MS-102 Sample 9 MS-102 Sample 10

100% Microsoft MS-102 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real MS-102 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-102 Questions & Answers

    473 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual MS-102 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • MS-102 Video Course

    MS-102 Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    MS-102 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the MS-102 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft 365 Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-102 Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 298-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace MS-102 exam.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    473 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-102 Video Course

    Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 83

Question 820

An administrator requires a compliant device and MFA simultaneously but uses an OR-style grant configuration unintentionally. What should the administrator do FIRST to correct the problem?

  1. Plan Microsoft Entra risk-based identity protection with clear user and sign-in risk remediation thresholds.
  2. Configure Conditional Access grant controls to require the intended combination of device compliance and MFA.
  3. Complete supported risk remediation or administrator confirmation workflows after a verified investigation.
  4. Use Identity Protection leaked-credential and user-risk signals rather than relying solely on location changes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is logical grant-control operators can materially change the strength of access enforcement. The action 'Configure Conditional Access grant controls to require the intended combination of device compliance and MFA.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A test passes only when both required conditions are met, not merely one.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Identity risk signals need policy and response decisions rather than automatic blanket account deletion. The problem described here is that logical grant-control operators can materially change the strength of access enforcement.

C:

Incident closure in a separate portal does not necessarily clear the directory's risk state. The problem described here is that logical grant-control operators can materially change the strength of access enforcement.

D:

Compromised passwords can be used from ordinary or previously seen network locations. The problem described here is that logical grant-control operators can materially change the strength of access enforcement.

Question 821

An operator is eligible for a privileged Microsoft Entra role but cannot use it and claims PIM is broken. The administrator proposes: Activate the eligible PIM role through the required workflow and verify activation requirements. What test distinguishes successful remediation from an unrelated improvement?

  1. The operator performs only the approved compliance operation while Exchange administration remains scoped.
  2. The operator changes the approved Teams setting without acquiring unrelated Exchange or tenant Global Admin rights.
  3. The role becomes active only after the assigned MFA, approval or ticket requirements pass.
  4. A staged new-hire object appears in the correct AU and delegated admins can operate on it.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The administrator plans 'Activate the eligible PIM role through the required workflow and verify activation requirements.' to correct the fact that pIM eligibility is not the same state as an activated privileged role. The direct acceptance evidence is The role becomes active only after the assigned MFA, approval or ticket requirements pass. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The operator performs only the approved compliance operation while Exchange administration remains scoped. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the role becomes active only after the assigned MFA, approval or ticket requirements pass.

B:

The operator changes the approved Teams setting without acquiring unrelated Exchange or tenant Global Admin rights. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the role becomes active only after the assigned MFA, approval or ticket requirements pass.

D:

A staged new-hire object appears in the correct AU and delegated admins can operate on it. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: the role becomes active only after the assigned MFA, approval or ticket requirements pass.

Question 822

A company cannot explain why Microsoft Defender reports more detected phishing after deploying improved email protection. The change owner plans to: Use Defender XDR report details to distinguish newly detected attempts from actual successful compromises. Which validation or governance guardrail is best suited to the proposed fix?

  1. Validate schema support and access rights before assuming all event tables are available.
  2. Preserve per-alert evidence and verify correlation before taking disruptive remediation actions.
  3. Prioritize business-risk and operational impact rather than maximizing score without evaluation.
  4. Compare common time windows and detection rule changes before claiming a security trend.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The specific rollout control is Compare common time windows and detection rule changes before claiming a security trend. It protects the proposed intervention 'Use Defender XDR report details to distinguish newly detected attempts from actual successful compromises.' against the failure mode that an increase in detections can represent improved visibility or attack volume rather than failed protection. Success should also be checked through: The report shows blocked malicious mail increased while confirmed compromise outcomes remained limited.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Single-workload hunting can miss subsequent activity that occurs in other Microsoft security products. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: An increase in detections can represent improved visibility or attack volume rather than failed protection. The applicable safeguard is: Compare common time windows and detection rule changes before claiming a security trend.

B:

Cross-domain incident correlation helps identify one attack chain spread across multiple products. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: An increase in detections can represent improved visibility or attack volume rather than failed protection. The applicable safeguard is: Compare common time windows and detection rule changes before claiming a security trend.

C:

Secure Score reports posture improvement opportunities but is not an automatic remediation engine. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: An increase in detections can represent improved visibility or attack volume rather than failed protection. The applicable safeguard is: Compare common time windows and detection rule changes before claiming a security trend.

Question 823

A company wants to find unsanctioned file-sharing services accessed by employees but has no inventory outside its licensed apps. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which failure mechanism best matches the observed facts?

  1. Marking an app unsanctioned does not guarantee all devices or network paths are immediately blocked.
  2. Broad cloud-app control rules can unintentionally interrupt routine business processes.
  3. A Microsoft 365 tenant app list alone cannot enumerate shadow cloud use across endpoints.
  4. An unreviewed approval outside the security catalog does not automatically change app risk handling.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The actual failure mechanism is A Microsoft 365 tenant app list alone cannot enumerate shadow cloud use across endpoints. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by configure Cloud App Discovery through supported network or endpoint signals for the user population. Then verify: The discovery dashboard identifies candidate cloud services and relevant risk indicators from real usage.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Marking an app unsanctioned does not guarantee all devices or network paths are immediately blocked. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a Microsoft 365 tenant app list alone cannot enumerate shadow cloud use across endpoints.

B:

Broad cloud-app control rules can unintentionally interrupt routine business processes. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a Microsoft 365 tenant app list alone cannot enumerate shadow cloud use across endpoints.

D:

An unreviewed approval outside the security catalog does not automatically change app risk handling. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a Microsoft 365 tenant app list alone cannot enumerate shadow cloud use across endpoints.

Question 824

An HR team offboards an employee but removes only a visible display name from a Teams channel. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which failure mechanism best matches the observed facts?

  1. A friendly display name is not a substitute for the externally routed recipient address.
  2. Creating user principals for address-only contacts introduces needless identity and license exposure.
  3. Mail contacts are address-book objects and are not equivalent to interactive Entra workforce accounts.
  4. Removing a collaboration membership does not disable an identity or revoke every active session.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The actual failure mechanism is Removing a collaboration membership does not disable an identity or revoke every active session. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by block and deprovision the Microsoft Entra user account according to the approved offboarding workflow. Then verify: The former employee cannot sign in while approved mailbox and OneDrive retention actions are recorded.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A friendly display name is not a substitute for the externally routed recipient address. The stated symptoms instead indicate that removing a collaboration membership does not disable an identity or revoke every active session.

B:

Creating user principals for address-only contacts introduces needless identity and license exposure. The stated symptoms instead indicate that removing a collaboration membership does not disable an identity or revoke every active session.

C:

Mail contacts are address-book objects and are not equivalent to interactive Entra workforce accounts. The stated symptoms instead indicate that removing a collaboration membership does not disable an identity or revoke every active session.

Question 825

A privileged admin's authentication succeeds but an application returns access denied, and support treats it as an MFA failure. The change owner plans to: Separate token authentication from application authorization by reviewing sign-in and resource permission logs. Which validation or governance guardrail is best suited to the proposed fix?

  1. Avoid treating one control's success as proof the full authentication posture is sufficient.
  2. Tune the custom list without exposing protected terms in user-facing error messages.
  3. Review agent network access and protect logs containing sensitive identity metadata.
  4. Do not solve resource authorization failures with unnecessary Global Administrator privileges.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The specific rollout control is Do not solve resource authorization failures with unnecessary Global Administrator privileges. It protects the proposed intervention 'Separate token authentication from application authorization by reviewing sign-in and resource permission logs.' against the failure mode that authentication proves identity; it does not confer permission to every protected resource. Success should also be checked through: The account signs in successfully and receives the expected application role only after a scoped grant.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Banned password checking reduces guessing risk but cannot replace multi-factor protection. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Authentication proves identity; it does not confer permission to every protected resource. The applicable safeguard is: Do not solve resource authorization failures with unnecessary Global Administrator privileges.

B:

Generic complexity rules may allow easily guessed organization-related password patterns. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Authentication proves identity; it does not confer permission to every protected resource. The applicable safeguard is: Do not solve resource authorization failures with unnecessary Global Administrator privileges.

C:

A broken local policy enforcement agent is an infrastructure issue, not proof all existing passwords are compromised. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Authentication proves identity; it does not confer permission to every protected resource. The applicable safeguard is: Do not solve resource authorization failures with unnecessary Global Administrator privileges.

Question 826

An analyst treats Exposure Management risk scores as if each represents a confirmed attacker compromise of a particular host. The change owner plans to: Use exposure metrics for risk prioritization and correlate actual alert telemetry before asserting an intrusion. Which validation or governance guardrail is best suited to the proposed fix?

  1. Respect intelligence confidence levels and corroborate with observed local telemetry.
  2. Do not isolate production assets solely from risk scoring without response criteria.
  3. Define refresh cadence and latency assumptions for any security KPI dashboard.
  4. Protect sensitive incident exports and annotate any retention or reporting gaps.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The specific rollout control is Do not isolate production assets solely from risk scoring without response criteria. It protects the proposed intervention 'Use exposure metrics for risk prioritization and correlate actual alert telemetry before asserting an intrusion.' against the failure mode that security exposure posture evaluates potential risk, whereas incidents describe observed malicious activity. Success should also be checked through: A case record distinguishes an exposed critical asset from a host with actual compromise evidence.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A shared indicator can occur in unrelated activity and does not alone establish adversary identity. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Security exposure posture evaluates potential risk, whereas incidents describe observed malicious activity. The applicable safeguard is: Do not isolate production assets solely from risk scoring without response criteria.

C:

Periodic analytical reports and real-time detection pipelines are different operational services. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Security exposure posture evaluates potential risk, whereas incidents describe observed malicious activity. The applicable safeguard is: Do not isolate production assets solely from risk scoring without response criteria.

D:

Current incident status is not equivalent to the full historical incident workload. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Security exposure posture evaluates potential risk, whereas incidents describe observed malicious activity. The applicable safeguard is: Do not isolate production assets solely from risk scoring without response criteria.

Question 827

A team blocks every domain listed in a global threat intelligence feed without checking that the list contains shared cloud service endpoints. What should the administrator do FIRST to correct the problem?

  1. Rank Microsoft Secure Score and exposure improvement actions by threat relevance, coverage and change feasibility.
  2. Review the incident's evidence, impacted assets and investigation graph before disposition.
  3. Use Defender XDR report details to distinguish newly detected attempts from actual successful compromises.
  4. Evaluate actionable threat intelligence against local evidence and scope prevention rules precisely.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The deciding issue is global indicators can have context and false positives that make unconditional blocking harmful. The action 'Evaluate actionable threat intelligence against local evidence and scope prevention rules precisely.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A pilot blocks the confirmed malicious destination without disrupting approved shared cloud services.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Scoring and security value are related but not identical for all enterprise risk contexts. The problem described here is that global indicators can have context and false positives that make unconditional blocking harmful.

B:

Alert severity alone is not a reliable substitute for investigation of correlated activity. The problem described here is that global indicators can have context and false positives that make unconditional blocking harmful.

C:

An increase in detections can represent improved visibility or attack volume rather than failed protection. The problem described here is that global indicators can have context and false positives that make unconditional blocking harmful.

Question 828

A company wants safe phishing-awareness training but the security team considers sending live malicious attachments to employees. The change owner plans to: Configure a Microsoft Defender attack simulation training campaign with approved benign payloads. Which validation or governance guardrail is best suited to the proposed fix?

  1. Preserve high-severity escalation paths while adjusting duplicate suppression.
  2. Check consent, recipient quality and message volume before reinstating send rights.
  3. Get stakeholder approval and preserve employee privacy in simulation reporting.
  4. Revoke sessions and validate mailbox forwarding or inbox rules during containment.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The specific rollout control is Get stakeholder approval and preserve employee privacy in simulation reporting. It protects the proposed intervention 'Configure a Microsoft Defender attack simulation training campaign with approved benign payloads.' against the failure mode that real malicious payloads are unnecessary and unsafe for a security awareness measurement. Success should also be checked through: A supervised campaign collects participation results without delivering real credential theft or malware.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Poorly tuned alert logic creates fatigue without necessarily increasing detection quality. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Real malicious payloads are unnecessary and unsafe for a security awareness measurement. The applicable safeguard is: Get stakeholder approval and preserve employee privacy in simulation reporting.

B:

A single restricted sender does not justify disabling protections for every mailbox. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Real malicious payloads are unnecessary and unsafe for a security awareness measurement. The applicable safeguard is: Get stakeholder approval and preserve employee privacy in simulation reporting.

D:

Email account compromise can propagate through collaboration workflows without a detected local malware file. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Real malicious payloads are unnecessary and unsafe for a security awareness measurement. The applicable safeguard is: Get stakeholder approval and preserve employee privacy in simulation reporting.

Question 829

An administrator enables a tenant-wide external-sharing setting without reviewing company rules about guest access. What should the administrator do FIRST to correct the problem?

  1. Use Service health incident status together with representative workload acceptance tests before closing an incident.
  2. Apply approved organization security and privacy defaults and align workload-sharing controls with the policy.
  3. Configure Microsoft 365 Backup where supported for eligible SharePoint, OneDrive or Exchange workloads.
  4. Remove conflicting uses and release the domain from the prior tenant before verifying it in the destination.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is tenant and workload settings jointly determine external-sharing behavior; one toggle is not a complete access model. The action 'Apply approved organization security and privacy defaults and align workload-sharing controls with the policy.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A test guest gains only authorized collaboration access while forbidden anonymous sharing remains blocked.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A provider resolution notice does not prove all customer-side configuration and client dependencies have recovered. The problem described here is that tenant and workload settings jointly determine external-sharing behavior; one toggle is not a complete access model.

C:

Retention governance and operational backup restoration have different objectives and recovery mechanisms. That concern does not account for the stated failure: Tenant and workload settings jointly determine external-sharing behavior; one toggle is not a complete access model. The relevant design change is: Apply approved organization security and privacy defaults and align workload-sharing controls with the policy.

D:

A custom domain generally cannot be concurrently verified as an ordinary domain in two different Entra tenants. That concern does not account for the stated failure: Tenant and workload settings jointly determine external-sharing behavior; one toggle is not a complete access model. The relevant design change is: Apply approved organization security and privacy defaults and align workload-sharing controls with the policy.

Question 830

Defender Threat Intelligence reports active exploitation of a vulnerability used by an internet-facing business app. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which failure mechanism best matches the observed facts?

  1. Administrative completion markers do not always demonstrate that the preventive control is effective.
  2. External threat intelligence gains operational value only when matched to actual enterprise exposure.
  3. Secure Score reports posture improvement opportunities but is not an automatic remediation engine.
  4. Single-workload hunting can miss subsequent activity that occurs in other Microsoft security products.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The actual failure mechanism is External threat intelligence gains operational value only when matched to actual enterprise exposure. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by enrich the local exposure and alert findings with relevant threat intelligence to prioritize remediation. Then verify: Affected assets are identified and a patch or mitigation plan reflects verified exploit relevance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Administrative completion markers do not always demonstrate that the preventive control is effective. The stated symptoms instead indicate that external threat intelligence gains operational value only when matched to actual enterprise exposure.

C:

Secure Score reports posture improvement opportunities but is not an automatic remediation engine. The stated symptoms instead indicate that external threat intelligence gains operational value only when matched to actual enterprise exposure.

D:

Single-workload hunting can miss subsequent activity that occurs in other Microsoft security products. The stated symptoms instead indicate that external threat intelligence gains operational value only when matched to actual enterprise exposure.