McAfee Secure

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle

Exam Code: MS-102

Exam Name Microsoft 365 Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft 365 Certified: Administrator Expert

Microsoft MS-102 Bundle $44.99
MS-102 Sample 1 MS-102 Sample 2 MS-102 Sample 3 MS-102 Sample 4 MS-102 Sample 5 MS-102 Sample 6 MS-102 Sample 7 MS-102 Sample 8 MS-102 Sample 9 MS-102 Sample 10

100% Microsoft MS-102 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real MS-102 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    MS-102 Questions & Answers

    473 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual MS-102 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • MS-102 Video Course

    MS-102 Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    MS-102 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the MS-102 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft 365 Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    MS-102 Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 298-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace MS-102 exam.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    473 Questions

    $124.99
  • MS-102 Video Course

    Training Course

    61 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    298 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 88

Question 870

A SOC sees repeated unusual process execution on multiple hosts but relies only on the incident summary card. What should the administrator do FIRST to correct the problem?

  1. Rank Microsoft Secure Score and exposure improvement actions by threat relevance, coverage and change feasibility.
  2. Validate the actual tenant security control configuration associated with the Secure Score action.
  3. Explain Defender XDR reporting scope and choose supported hunting or incident feeds for time-critical investigation.
  4. Use Defender XDR advanced hunting KQL to scope process activity across supported device telemetry.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The deciding issue is incident summaries may omit the detailed event relationships required for broad threat scoping. The action 'Use Defender XDR advanced hunting KQL to scope process activity across supported device telemetry.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A test query returns the affected host IDs, timestamps and matching process indicators.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Scoring and security value are related but not identical for all enterprise risk contexts. The problem described here is that incident summaries may omit the detailed event relationships required for broad threat scoping.

B:

Administrative completion markers do not always demonstrate that the preventive control is effective. The problem described here is that incident summaries may omit the detailed event relationships required for broad threat scoping.

C:

Periodic analytical reports and real-time detection pipelines are different operational services. That concern does not account for the stated failure: Incident summaries may omit the detailed event relationships required for broad threat scoping. The relevant design change is: Use Defender XDR advanced hunting KQL to scope process activity across supported device telemetry.

Question 871

A bank wants Microsoft Purview to detect customer account numbers in documents, but analysts search only for a generic phrase such as confidential. The change owner plans to: Create or tune a supported sensitive information type using appropriate patterns, keywords and corroborating evidence. Which validation or governance guardrail is best suited to the proposed fix?

  1. Use audited disposition procedures and check record-lock restrictions before policy changes.
  2. Communicate export limitations and avoid unsupported promises of universal encryption.
  3. Consult legal counsel and test representative hold scenarios before enabling disposition automation.
  4. Test false positives and avoid storing real customer identifiers in classification test artifacts.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The specific rollout control is Test false positives and avoid storing real customer identifiers in classification test artifacts. It protects the proposed intervention 'Create or tune a supported sensitive information type using appropriate patterns, keywords and corroborating evidence.' against the failure mode that plain keywords cannot reliably characterize structured sensitive identifiers with validation rules. Success should also be checked through: A controlled document with valid account-number structure is detected and a benign lookalike is not misclassified.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Removing a visible label does not necessarily erase retention-controlled content or preservation copies. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Plain keywords cannot reliably characterize structured sensitive identifiers with validation rules. The applicable safeguard is: Test false positives and avoid storing real customer identifiers in classification test artifacts.

B:

Label metadata and protection propagation differ across file formats and workloads. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Plain keywords cannot reliably characterize structured sensitive identifiers with validation rules. The applicable safeguard is: Test false positives and avoid storing real customer identifiers in classification test artifacts.

C:

Competing retention and hold requirements cannot be reduced to one simple earliest-delete timer. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Plain keywords cannot reliably characterize structured sensitive identifiers with validation rules. The applicable safeguard is: Test false positives and avoid storing real customer identifiers in classification test artifacts.

Question 872

A warehouse worker uses a shared kiosk and security wants a suitable method without distributing reusable account passwords. The change owner plans to: Select supported passwordless authentication options with device and account lifecycle considerations. Which validation or governance guardrail is best suited to the proposed fix?

  1. Tune the custom list without exposing protected terms in user-facing error messages.
  2. Do not solve resource authorization failures with unnecessary Global Administrator privileges.
  3. Check registration requirements and exclude high-privilege identities from weak recovery paths.
  4. Assess shared-device session isolation and recovery when credentials are lost.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The specific rollout control is Assess shared-device session isolation and recovery when credentials are lost. It protects the proposed intervention 'Select supported passwordless authentication options with device and account lifecycle considerations.' against the failure mode that shared reusable passwords undermine accountability and phishing resistance. Success should also be checked through: A worker completes permitted sign-in using an approved passwordless credential without exposing a shared secret.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Generic complexity rules may allow easily guessed organization-related password patterns. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Shared reusable passwords undermine accountability and phishing resistance. The applicable safeguard is: Assess shared-device session isolation and recovery when credentials are lost.

B:

Authentication proves identity; it does not confer permission to every protected resource. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Shared reusable passwords undermine accountability and phishing resistance. The applicable safeguard is: Assess shared-device session isolation and recovery when credentials are lost.

C:

An enabled cloud identity does not automatically imply SSPR is licensed and configured. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Shared reusable passwords undermine accountability and phishing resistance. The applicable safeguard is: Assess shared-device session isolation and recovery when credentials are lost.

Question 873

An organization with one on-premises AD DS forest needs synchronized users and password hash synchronization in Microsoft Entra ID. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which failure mechanism best matches the observed facts?

  1. An agent-to-service communication failure is distinct from user password quality or sign-in status.
  2. An unverified or invalid sign-in suffix can prevent desired cloud UPN alignment.
  3. Directory synchronization can fail or create duplicate identities when legacy attributes violate cloud requirements.
  4. Hybrid users need a supported sync pipeline; merely connecting two directory consoles does not copy identities.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The actual failure mechanism is Hybrid users need a supported sync pipeline; merely connecting two directory consoles does not copy identities. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by deploy Microsoft Entra Connect Sync with an approved sign-in method and supported organizational unit scoping. Then verify: An in-scope employee is created or matched in Entra ID and an eligible password update propagates.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An agent-to-service communication failure is distinct from user password quality or sign-in status. The stated symptoms instead indicate that hybrid users need a supported sync pipeline; merely connecting two directory consoles does not copy identities.

B:

An unverified or invalid sign-in suffix can prevent desired cloud UPN alignment. The stated symptoms instead indicate that hybrid users need a supported sync pipeline; merely connecting two directory consoles does not copy identities.

C:

Directory synchronization can fail or create duplicate identities when legacy attributes violate cloud requirements. The stated symptoms instead indicate that hybrid users need a supported sync pipeline; merely connecting two directory consoles does not copy identities.

Question 874

A finance team is impersonated by display-name spoofing, and admins assume SPF success guarantees the message is authentic. The administrator proposes: Configure Defender for Office 365 anti-phishing impersonation protection using supported identity and domain intelligence. What test distinguishes successful remediation from an unrelated improvement?

  1. A test campaign produces actionable notifications without excessive duplicate incident tickets.
  2. The analyst links the event to a specific policy condition and affected sending identity.
  3. A test impersonation attempt triggers the intended policy response while legitimate senders remain usable.
  4. The exercise report differentiates clicks, reported messages and completed training across the intended cohort.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The administrator plans 'Configure Defender for Office 365 anti-phishing impersonation protection using supported identity and domain intelligence.' to correct the fact that sPF authorization alone cannot establish that a display name represents the claimed executive. The direct acceptance evidence is A test impersonation attempt triggers the intended policy response while legitimate senders remain usable. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A test campaign produces actionable notifications without excessive duplicate incident tickets. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a test impersonation attempt triggers the intended policy response while legitimate senders remain usable.

B:

The analyst links the event to a specific policy condition and affected sending identity. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a test impersonation attempt triggers the intended policy response while legitimate senders remain usable.

D:

The exercise report differentiates clicks, reported messages and completed training across the intended cohort. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: a test impersonation attempt triggers the intended policy response while legitimate senders remain usable.

Question 875

A pilot change switches production devices to a faster Microsoft 365 Apps channel without testing add-ins used by accounting. The administrator proposes: Stage the update-channel change through a representative ring and review app update reports before expansion. What test distinguishes successful remediation from an unrelated improvement?

  1. Accounting add-ins pass acceptance tests in the pilot and the deployed build matches the approved version.
  2. The service-health incident displays affected workloads and administrative updates corresponding to the user reports.
  3. Reports distinguish enabled accounts from active collaboration usage while protecting individual privacy.
  4. A test or real targeted advisory reaches the owned distribution channel with actionable incident context.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The administrator plans 'Stage the update-channel change through a representative ring and review app update reports before expansion.' to correct the fact that feature updates can change app behavior even when the cloud tenant service is healthy. The direct acceptance evidence is Accounting add-ins pass acceptance tests in the pilot and the deployed build matches the approved version. This observation is linked to this change's intended outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The service-health incident displays affected workloads and administrative updates corresponding to the user reports. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: accounting add-ins pass acceptance tests in the pilot and the deployed build matches the approved version.

C:

Reports distinguish enabled accounts from active collaboration usage while protecting individual privacy. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: accounting add-ins pass acceptance tests in the pilot and the deployed build matches the approved version.

D:

A test or real targeted advisory reaches the owned distribution channel with actionable incident context. However, that result would not establish the required outcome: accounting add-ins pass acceptance tests in the pilot and the deployed build matches the approved version.

Question 876

Security auditing requires a person to read privileged role assignments but not grant or remove them. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which failure mechanism best matches the observed facts?

  1. Parallel legacy and unified security assignments can create unclear effective access.
  2. Visibility into role assignments is different from authorization to change assignments.
  3. Administrative unit scope depends on accurate object membership, not merely branch naming conventions.
  4. Security and compliance role groups are not interchangeable with read-only directory roles.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The actual failure mechanism is Visibility into role assignments is different from authorization to change assignments. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by use a read-only Microsoft Entra role with the necessary role-management visibility. Then verify: The auditor exports approved role assignment reports but cannot create a privileged assignment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Parallel legacy and unified security assignments can create unclear effective access. The stated symptoms instead indicate that visibility into role assignments is different from authorization to change assignments.

C:

Administrative unit scope depends on accurate object membership, not merely branch naming conventions. The stated symptoms instead indicate that visibility into role assignments is different from authorization to change assignments.

D:

Security and compliance role groups are not interchangeable with read-only directory roles. The stated symptoms instead indicate that visibility into role assignments is different from authorization to change assignments.

Question 877

A subsidiary needs its own Microsoft 365 identity boundary and the architect proposes putting it in an existing unrelated tenant. The team believes no other action is necessary. Which failure mechanism best matches the observed facts?

  1. A Microsoft 365 tenant is a directory and administrative boundary, not just a second SharePoint site.
  2. A provider resolution notice does not prove all customer-side configuration and client dependencies have recovered.
  3. Changing the organizational display name does not establish DNS ownership or configure email delivery.
  4. Tenant experience may be degraded by user-location egress and DNS choices rather than total internet bandwidth.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The actual failure mechanism is A Microsoft 365 tenant is a directory and administrative boundary, not just a second SharePoint site. Its relevance follows from the stated tenant facts, not just a generic security recommendation. Correct it by create a new Microsoft 365 tenant after documenting directory, subscription, and identity boundary requirements. Then verify: The subsidiary can administer its own tenant without granting administrators access to the parent company's directory.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A provider resolution notice does not prove all customer-side configuration and client dependencies have recovered. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a Microsoft 365 tenant is a directory and administrative boundary, not just a second SharePoint site.

C:

Changing the organizational display name does not establish DNS ownership or configure email delivery. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a Microsoft 365 tenant is a directory and administrative boundary, not just a second SharePoint site.

D:

Tenant experience may be degraded by user-location egress and DNS choices rather than total internet bandwidth. The stated symptoms instead indicate that a Microsoft 365 tenant is a directory and administrative boundary, not just a second SharePoint site.

Question 878

A security team configures redundant Defender for Office 365 alerts for one mail-threat signature, overwhelming its responders. The change owner plans to: Consolidate or tune supported alert policy conditions, thresholds and severity based on triage need. Which validation or governance guardrail is best suited to the proposed fix?

  1. Apply remediation permissions cautiously and preserve evidence before bulk deletion.
  2. Set authorized unlock roles and escalation for repeat offending identities.
  3. Preserve high-severity escalation paths while adjusting duplicate suppression.
  4. Communicate scan delays and validate behavior for mail flow rules and encrypted attachments.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The specific rollout control is Preserve high-severity escalation paths while adjusting duplicate suppression. It protects the proposed intervention 'Consolidate or tune supported alert policy conditions, thresholds and severity based on triage need.' against the failure mode that poorly tuned alert logic creates fatigue without necessarily increasing detection quality. Success should also be checked through: A test campaign produces actionable notifications without excessive duplicate incident tickets.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A single deleted email does not remove other copies of the same phishing campaign. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Poorly tuned alert logic creates fatigue without necessarily increasing detection quality. The applicable safeguard is: Preserve high-severity escalation paths while adjusting duplicate suppression.

B:

Restricted entities serve containment and should not be cleared without verifying the cause. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Poorly tuned alert logic creates fatigue without necessarily increasing detection quality. The applicable safeguard is: Preserve high-severity escalation paths while adjusting duplicate suppression.

D:

A temporary attachment placeholder is not proof the attachment has passed scanning. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Poorly tuned alert logic creates fatigue without necessarily increasing detection quality. The applicable safeguard is: Preserve high-severity escalation paths while adjusting duplicate suppression.

Question 879

Users click rewritten URLs in Outlook, but the tenant's Safe Links policy excludes a relevant recipient group. What should the administrator do FIRST to correct the problem?

  1. Review Microsoft Defender attack simulation outcomes including user reporting and remediation learning.
  2. Correct Safe Links coverage and supported user or group policy scoping.
  3. Configure the appropriate Defender for Office 365 alert policy and notification recipients.
  4. Use supported Defender attack simulation payload and landing-page configuration approved by the organization.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deciding issue is safe Links cannot protect users omitted by its effective policy coverage. The action 'Correct Safe Links coverage and supported user or group policy scoping.' targets that issue rather than a neighboring Microsoft 365 workload. Confirm it by checking: A permitted simulated malicious URL produces the required time-of-click protection result.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Click totals alone do not capture security reporting behavior or learning progress. The problem described here is that safe Links cannot protect users omitted by its effective policy coverage.

C:

Historical reports do not automatically route real-time operational notifications. The problem described here is that safe Links cannot protect users omitted by its effective policy coverage.

D:

Phishing simulations must not expose passwords to uncontrolled third-party services. The problem described here is that safe Links cannot protect users omitted by its effective policy coverage.

Question 880

An administrator ignores repeated leaked-credential alerts because the affected user has never signed in from a new country. The change owner plans to: Use Identity Protection leaked-credential and user-risk signals rather than relying solely on location changes. Which validation or governance guardrail is best suited to the proposed fix?

  1. Validate cross-tenant access and licensing implications before broad guest restrictions.
  2. Avoid exposing breach detection details in end-user messages and retain audit history.
  3. Review exclusions and block policies carefully before turning on enforcement.
  4. Review all applicable grant logic with security owners before switching from report-only.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The specific rollout control is Avoid exposing breach detection details in end-user messages and retain audit history. It protects the proposed intervention 'Use Identity Protection leaked-credential and user-risk signals rather than relying solely on location changes.' against the failure mode that compromised passwords can be used from ordinary or previously seen network locations. Success should also be checked through: A confirmed exposed account triggers approved credential remediation and protected reauthentication.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Different identity populations may require different access controls and device trust models. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Compromised passwords can be used from ordinary or previously seen network locations. The applicable safeguard is: Avoid exposing breach detection details in end-user messages and retain audit history.

C:

Conditional Access evaluates applicable policies together, not a universal last-writer override. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Compromised passwords can be used from ordinary or previously seen network locations. The applicable safeguard is: Avoid exposing breach detection details in end-user messages and retain audit history.

D:

Logical grant-control operators can materially change the strength of access enforcement. The proposed change also needs protection against this risk: Compromised passwords can be used from ordinary or previously seen network locations. The applicable safeguard is: Avoid exposing breach detection details in end-user messages and retain audit history.