McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99
SC-300 Sample 1 SC-300 Sample 2 SC-300 Sample 3 SC-300 Sample 4 SC-300 Sample 5 SC-300 Sample 6 SC-300 Sample 7 SC-300 Sample 8 SC-300 Sample 9 SC-300 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 28

Question 270

The deployment was intended to satisfy: A company needs traffic controls for internet-bound destinations through the Global Secure Access platform, not just internal apps. During testing, this happened: The planned internet test destination never appears in Global Secure Access traffic telemetry. Which configuration defect best explains the failure?

  1. Network forwarding works but the principal is missing the application or resource authorization
  2. The troubleshooting review looks at a Microsoft 365 traffic profile for an ordinary private-app endpoint
  3. The Internet Access forwarding profile is disabled or the client is not forwarding the expected traffic
  4. Device assignment or endpoint management deployment detection rules fail to target the expected fleet

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. The Internet Access forwarding profile is disabled or the client is not forwarding the expected traffic. This fault explains the observed failure: The planned internet test destination never appears in Global Secure Access traffic telemetry. The intended configuration would instead be: Deploy Microsoft Entra Internet Access with the required client and appropriate forwarding profile and policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Network forwarding works but the principal is missing the application or resource authorization. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The Internet Access forwarding profile is disabled or the client is not forwarding the expected traffic. The corrective action is: Deploy Microsoft Entra Internet Access with the required client and appropriate forwarding profile and policy.

B:

The troubleshooting review looks at a Microsoft 365 traffic profile for an ordinary private-app endpoint. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The Internet Access forwarding profile is disabled or the client is not forwarding the expected traffic. The corrective action is: Deploy Microsoft Entra Internet Access with the required client and appropriate forwarding profile and policy.

D:

Device assignment or endpoint management deployment detection rules fail to target the expected fleet. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The Internet Access forwarding profile is disabled or the client is not forwarding the expected traffic. The corrective action is: Deploy Microsoft Entra Internet Access with the required client and appropriate forwarding profile and policy.

Question 271

The security architect is given this constraint: A deployment is meant to forward Microsoft 365 traffic through the dedicated Microsoft traffic profile without intercepting all web browsing. Which technical approach meets it without relying on unrelated controls?

  1. Combine Private Access resource scope with a properly targeted Conditional Access authentication requirement
  2. Deploy the client through supported device management policy to the pilot group and verify registration and health
  3. Enable and scope the Microsoft traffic profile to supported Microsoft 365 traffic, with proper client deployment
  4. Inspect client health, traffic forwarding profiles and Global Secure Access traffic logs for the affected connection

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct implementation. Enable and scope the Microsoft traffic profile to supported Microsoft 365 traffic, with proper client deployment. It meets the stated requirement: A deployment is meant to forward Microsoft 365 traffic through the dedicated Microsoft traffic profile without intercepting all web browsing. Acceptance evidence is: Supported Microsoft 365 endpoints match the Microsoft profile and unrelated general sites are not indiscriminately captured.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The Conditional Access policy scopes a different cloud application than the private console. That condition is not the problem here: The Microsoft traffic profile was left disabled when the client was deployed. The targeted implementation is: Enable and scope the Microsoft traffic profile to supported Microsoft 365 traffic, with proper client deployment.

B:

The device assignment does not include the pilot machine or client sign-in is incomplete. That condition is not the problem here: The Microsoft traffic profile was left disabled when the client was deployed. The targeted implementation is: Enable and scope the Microsoft traffic profile to supported Microsoft 365 traffic, with proper client deployment.

D:

The troubleshooting review looks at a Microsoft 365 traffic profile for an ordinary private-app endpoint. That condition is not the problem here: The Microsoft traffic profile was left disabled when the client was deployed. The targeted implementation is: Enable and scope the Microsoft traffic profile to supported Microsoft 365 traffic, with proper client deployment.

Question 272

After a deployment under this requirement — A deployment is meant to forward Microsoft 365 traffic through the dedicated Microsoft traffic profile without intercepting all web browsing — administrators claim the following solution is in place: Enable and scope the Microsoft traffic profile to supported Microsoft 365 traffic, with proper client deployment. Which pilot finding supports that claim?

  1. An assigned user reaches and authenticates to the app; a nonassigned user is denied even with network route
  2. The diagnostic record identifies the profile handling the destination, and client health is verified
  3. Supported Microsoft 365 endpoints match the Microsoft profile and unrelated general sites are not indiscriminately captured
  4. An assigned pilot uses the configured private-app segment, while an unrelated subnet and unassigned identity do not gain generalized VPN reachability

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. Supported Microsoft 365 endpoints match the Microsoft profile and unrelated general sites are not indiscriminately captured. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if assigning the private app to intended identities succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Supported Microsoft 365 endpoints match the Microsoft profile and unrelated general sites are not indiscriminately captured.

B:

Even if inspecting client health succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Supported Microsoft 365 endpoints match the Microsoft profile and unrelated general sites are not indiscriminately captured.

D:

Even if deploying Microsoft Entra Private Access with a healthy private network connector group succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Supported Microsoft 365 endpoints match the Microsoft profile and unrelated general sites are not indiscriminately captured.

Question 273

An engineer troubleshoots an identity solution for: A deployment is meant to forward Microsoft 365 traffic through the dedicated Microsoft traffic profile without intercepting all web browsing. The pilot result is: Microsoft 365 traffic continues by the ordinary direct route instead of the intended profile. What is the most likely relevant fault?

  1. The private application segment omits its exact destination or port, or the required connector, client, app assignment or Private Access forwarding profile is inactive
  2. Device assignment or endpoint management deployment detection rules fail to target the expected fleet
  3. The Microsoft traffic profile was left disabled when the client was deployed
  4. The troubleshooting review looks at a Microsoft 365 traffic profile for an ordinary private-app endpoint

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. The Microsoft traffic profile was left disabled when the client was deployed. This fault explains the observed failure: Microsoft 365 traffic continues by the ordinary direct route instead of the intended profile. The intended configuration would instead be: Enable and scope the Microsoft traffic profile to supported Microsoft 365 traffic, with proper client deployment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The private application segment omits its exact destination or port, or the required connector, client, app assignment or Private Access forwarding profile is inactive. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The Microsoft traffic profile was left disabled when the client was deployed. The corrective action is: Enable and scope the Microsoft traffic profile to supported Microsoft 365 traffic, with proper client deployment.

B:

Device assignment or endpoint management deployment detection rules fail to target the expected fleet. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The Microsoft traffic profile was left disabled when the client was deployed. The corrective action is: Enable and scope the Microsoft traffic profile to supported Microsoft 365 traffic, with proper client deployment.

D:

The troubleshooting review looks at a Microsoft 365 traffic profile for an ordinary private-app endpoint. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The Microsoft traffic profile was left disabled when the client was deployed. The corrective action is: Enable and scope the Microsoft traffic profile to supported Microsoft 365 traffic, with proper client deployment.

Question 274

Which implementation fits the following specific identity problem? A pilot needs the Global Secure Access client only on managed machines before organization-wide deployment.

  1. Model only named private application destinations and required ports in the access policy, validating default-deny for other resources
  2. Deploy the client through supported device management policy to the pilot group and verify registration and health
  3. Use scoped Global Secure Access app/user policy assignments and test each pilot group
  4. Distribute and maintain the supported client using centralized endpoint management and health reporting

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct implementation. Deploy the client through supported device management policy to the pilot group and verify registration and health. It meets the stated requirement: A pilot needs the Global Secure Access client only on managed machines before organization-wide deployment. Acceptance evidence is: Pilot devices show the client connected and forwarding relevant traffic; nonpilot devices remain unchanged.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The administrator granted overly broad network ranges instead of named private app segments. That condition is not the problem here: The device assignment does not include the pilot machine or client sign-in is incomplete. The targeted implementation is: Deploy the client through supported device management policy to the pilot group and verify registration and health.

C:

The policy assignment includes All users instead of the intended pilot group. That condition is not the problem here: The device assignment does not include the pilot machine or client sign-in is incomplete. The targeted implementation is: Deploy the client through supported device management policy to the pilot group and verify registration and health.

D:

Device assignment or endpoint management deployment detection rules fail to target the expected fleet. That condition is not the problem here: The device assignment does not include the pilot machine or client sign-in is incomplete. The targeted implementation is: Deploy the client through supported device management policy to the pilot group and verify registration and health.

Question 275

The team implemented the following change: Deploy the client through supported device management policy to the pilot group and verify registration and health. The acceptance requirement was: A pilot needs the Global Secure Access client only on managed machines before organization-wide deployment. Which observed outcome most directly proves the change works?

  1. Managed pilot devices receive the approved client version, and operational reports identify missing clients
  2. An assigned pilot uses the configured private-app segment, while an unrelated subnet and unassigned identity do not gain generalized VPN reachability
  3. The diagnostic record identifies the profile handling the destination, and client health is verified
  4. Pilot devices show the client connected and forwarding relevant traffic; nonpilot devices remain unchanged

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct acceptance check. Pilot devices show the client connected and forwarding relevant traffic; nonpilot devices remain unchanged. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if distribute succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Pilot devices show the client connected and forwarding relevant traffic; nonpilot devices remain unchanged.

B:

Even if deploying Microsoft Entra Private Access with a healthy private network connector group succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Pilot devices show the client connected and forwarding relevant traffic; nonpilot devices remain unchanged.

C:

Even if inspecting client health succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Pilot devices show the client connected and forwarding relevant traffic; nonpilot devices remain unchanged.

Question 276

A change appears correct at a glance, but the requirement is still unmet: A pilot needs the Global Secure Access client only on managed machines before organization-wide deployment. The key observed symptom is: The pilot device has the installer but the client reports disconnected and forwards no traffic. Which cause should be investigated first?

  1. Device assignment or endpoint management deployment detection rules fail to target the expected fleet
  2. The administrator granted overly broad network ranges instead of named private app segments
  3. The device assignment does not include the pilot machine or client sign-in is incomplete
  4. The policy assignment includes All users instead of the intended pilot group

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. The device assignment does not include the pilot machine or client sign-in is incomplete. This fault explains the observed failure: The pilot device has the installer but the client reports disconnected and forwards no traffic. The intended configuration would instead be: Deploy the client through supported device management policy to the pilot group and verify registration and health.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Device assignment or endpoint management deployment detection rules fail to target the expected fleet. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The device assignment does not include the pilot machine or client sign-in is incomplete. The corrective action is: Deploy the client through supported device management policy to the pilot group and verify registration and health.

B:

The administrator granted overly broad network ranges instead of named private app segments. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The device assignment does not include the pilot machine or client sign-in is incomplete. The corrective action is: Deploy the client through supported device management policy to the pilot group and verify registration and health.

D:

The policy assignment includes All users instead of the intended pilot group. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The device assignment does not include the pilot machine or client sign-in is incomplete. The corrective action is: Deploy the client through supported device management policy to the pilot group and verify registration and health.

Question 277

A change request covers two Microsoft Entra needs. Requirement A: A private web app must apply user authorization after successful network reachability is established. Requirement B: An organization notices unstable connectivity after Global Secure Access deployment and needs to identify whether traffic matches the intended forwarding profile. Select TWO actions, one for each requirement.

  1. Deploy a healthy Global Secure Access private network connector group and publish the supported private app segment
  2. Combine Private Access resource scope with a properly targeted Conditional Access authentication requirement
  3. Assign the private app to intended identities and apply the required Conditional Access policies independently of connector reachability
  4. Inspect client health, traffic forwarding profiles and Global Secure Access traffic logs for the affected connection
  5. Edit the Private Access application segment to include the destination FQDN/IP, actual TCP/UDP protocol and supported custom port or port range; verify app assignment and forwarding profile

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

Correct for task 1. Assign the private app to intended identities and apply the required Conditional Access policies independently of connector reachability. This directly addresses the first requirement: A private web app must apply user authorization after successful network reachability is established. Verify it by checking: An assigned user reaches and authenticates to the app; a nonassigned user is denied even with network route.

D:

Correct for task 2. Inspect client health, traffic forwarding profiles and Global Secure Access traffic logs for the affected connection. This addresses the independent second requirement: An organization notices unstable connectivity after Global Secure Access deployment and needs to identify whether traffic matches the intended forwarding profile. Verify it by checking: The diagnostic record identifies the profile handling the destination, and client health is verified.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The private network connector cannot resolve or contact the internal DNS name. To satisfy task 1, use: Assign the private app to intended identities and apply the required Conditional Access policies independently of connector reachability. For task 2, use: Inspect client health, traffic forwarding profiles and Global Secure Access traffic logs for the affected connection.

B:

The Conditional Access policy scopes a different cloud application than the private console. To satisfy task 1, use: Assign the private app to intended identities and apply the required Conditional Access policies independently of connector reachability. For task 2, use: Inspect client health, traffic forwarding profiles and Global Secure Access traffic logs for the affected connection.

E:

The configured Private Access application segment omits the backend transport protocol or custom destination port. To satisfy task 1, use: Assign the private app to intended identities and apply the required Conditional Access policies independently of connector reachability. For task 2, use: Inspect client health, traffic forwarding profiles and Global Secure Access traffic logs for the affected connection.

Question 278

An auditor must verify this deployment decision: Assign the private app to intended identities and apply the required Conditional Access policies independently of connector reachability. Its purpose was: A private web app must apply user authorization after successful network reachability is established. Which test result is the strongest evidence?

  1. Pilot A reaches only its assigned resource and Pilot B cannot access that resource unless separately granted
  2. A permitted strong-authenticated user reaches the console while a low-assurance login is denied
  3. An assigned pilot uses the configured private-app segment, while an unrelated subnet and unassigned identity do not gain generalized VPN reachability
  4. An assigned user reaches and authenticates to the app; a nonassigned user is denied even with network route

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct acceptance check. An assigned user reaches and authenticates to the app; a nonassigned user is denied even with network route. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if using scoped Global Secure Access app/user policy assignments succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An assigned user reaches and authenticates to the app; a nonassigned user is denied even with network route.

B:

Even if combining Private Access resource scope with a properly targeted Conditional Access authentication requirement succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An assigned user reaches and authenticates to the app; a nonassigned user is denied even with network route.

C:

Even if deploying Microsoft Entra Private Access with a healthy private network connector group succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An assigned user reaches and authenticates to the app; a nonassigned user is denied even with network route.

Question 279

The service desk escalates the following unsuccessful identity rollout. Requirement: A private web app must apply user authorization after successful network reachability is established. Observed: The authorized user's traffic reaches the connector but app sign-in returns an access denied message. Which underlying misconfiguration is most consistent?

  1. The Internet Access forwarding profile is disabled or the client is not forwarding the expected traffic
  2. The configured Private Access application segment omits the backend transport protocol or custom destination port
  3. Network forwarding works but the principal is missing the application or resource authorization
  4. The administrator granted overly broad network ranges instead of named private app segments

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. Network forwarding works but the principal is missing the application or resource authorization. This fault explains the observed failure: The authorized user's traffic reaches the connector but app sign-in returns an access denied message. The intended configuration would instead be: Assign the private app to intended identities and apply the required Conditional Access policies independently of connector reachability.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The Internet Access forwarding profile is disabled or the client is not forwarding the expected traffic. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Network forwarding works but the principal is missing the application or resource authorization. The corrective action is: Assign the private app to intended identities and apply the required Conditional Access policies independently of connector reachability.

B:

The configured Private Access application segment omits the backend transport protocol or custom destination port. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Network forwarding works but the principal is missing the application or resource authorization. The corrective action is: Assign the private app to intended identities and apply the required Conditional Access policies independently of connector reachability.

D:

The administrator granted overly broad network ranges instead of named private app segments. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Network forwarding works but the principal is missing the application or resource authorization. The corrective action is: Assign the private app to intended identities and apply the required Conditional Access policies independently of connector reachability.

Question 280

An identity project has this requirement: A tenant must connect an internal line-of-business site through a dedicated on-premises connector without exposing it to anonymous internet users. Which configuration should the administrator implement?

  1. Edit the Private Access application segment to include the destination FQDN/IP, actual TCP/UDP protocol and supported custom port or port range; verify app assignment and forwarding profile
  2. Use scoped Global Secure Access app/user policy assignments and test each pilot group
  3. Publish a Private Access application segment and connector, but leave all intended users unassigned and keep the Private Access traffic-forwarding profile disabled
  4. Configure an active Microsoft Entra private network connector group and private-app segment for the internal FQDN and required port; assign authorized users, enable the Private Access forwarding profile, deploy the Global Secure Access client, and verify access is limited to the intended application

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct. Configure the active on-premises connector group, the exact internal private-app segment, authorized user assignment, enabled Private Access forwarding profile and Global Secure Access client. Validate connector-to-backend reachability; an assigned user reaches only the intended app and an unassigned user cannot access it.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Updating an existing destination segment and port can be necessary, but by itself it does not provision a working private network connector or end-to-end client routing and user authorization for this site. The question requires the complete connection, not an isolated segment edit.

B:

Scoping application/user policy without configuring the internal connector, private application segment and the client forwarding path cannot provide the required on-premises connectivity. Policy assignment alone does not establish the network path.

C:

The proposed connector and application cannot serve the intended users: no users are assigned and the Private Access forwarding profile is disabled, so the Global Secure Access client cannot route this private-app traffic for authorized employees.