McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99
SC-300 Sample 1 SC-300 Sample 2 SC-300 Sample 3 SC-300 Sample 4 SC-300 Sample 5 SC-300 Sample 6 SC-300 Sample 7 SC-300 Sample 8 SC-300 Sample 9 SC-300 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 29

Question 280

An identity project has this requirement: A tenant must connect an internal line-of-business site through a dedicated on-premises connector without exposing it to anonymous internet users. Which configuration should the administrator implement?

  1. Edit the Private Access application segment to include the destination FQDN/IP, actual TCP/UDP protocol and supported custom port or port range; verify app assignment and forwarding profile
  2. Use scoped Global Secure Access app/user policy assignments and test each pilot group
  3. Publish a Private Access application segment and connector, but leave all intended users unassigned and keep the Private Access traffic-forwarding profile disabled
  4. Configure an active Microsoft Entra private network connector group and private-app segment for the internal FQDN and required port; assign authorized users, enable the Private Access forwarding profile, deploy the Global Secure Access client, and verify access is limited to the intended application

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct. Configure the active on-premises connector group, the exact internal private-app segment, authorized user assignment, enabled Private Access forwarding profile and Global Secure Access client. Validate connector-to-backend reachability; an assigned user reaches only the intended app and an unassigned user cannot access it.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Updating an existing destination segment and port can be necessary, but by itself it does not provision a working private network connector or end-to-end client routing and user authorization for this site. The question requires the complete connection, not an isolated segment edit.

B:

Scoping application/user policy without configuring the internal connector, private application segment and the client forwarding path cannot provide the required on-premises connectivity. Policy assignment alone does not establish the network path.

C:

The proposed connector and application cannot serve the intended users: no users are assigned and the Private Access forwarding profile is disabled, so the Global Secure Access client cannot route this private-app traffic for authorized employees.

Question 281

After configuring: Configure an active Microsoft Entra private network connector group and private-app segment for the internal FQDN and required port; assign authorized users, enable the Private Access forwarding profile, deploy the Global Secure Access client, and verify access is limited to the intended application, an engineer performs a targeted pilot for this objective: A tenant must connect an internal line-of-business site through a dedicated on-premises connector without exposing it to anonymous internet users. What result constitutes a pass?

  1. Connector health is green and only authorized clients can reach the defined private endpoint
  2. Supported Microsoft 365 endpoints match the Microsoft profile and unrelated general sites are not indiscriminately captured
  3. The target app works for the assigned pilot, but an unassigned user can also access the same internal site and unrelated private resources
  4. The diagnostic record identifies the profile handling the destination, and client health is verified

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct. A healthy connector and successful access by only the intended assigned users demonstrate both the private path and the authorization boundary. Verify the endpoint and relevant port from an authorized client and confirm access is denied for an unassigned identity.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Even if enable succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Connector health is green and only authorized clients can reach the defined private endpoint.

C:

This is a failed acceptance result, not success: an unassigned user reaching the private app or unrelated internal resources demonstrates that user assignment or resource scoping is too broad despite working connector reachability.

D:

Even if inspecting client health succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Connector health is green and only authorized clients can reach the defined private endpoint.

Question 282

During post-change review of the requirement “A tenant must connect an internal line-of-business site through a dedicated on-premises connector without exposing it to anonymous internet users,” an auditor observes: The connector accepts client requests but cannot establish a backend connection. Which root-cause finding would explain that symptom?

  1. The Microsoft traffic profile was left disabled when the client was deployed
  2. The Conditional Access policy scopes a different cloud application than the private console
  3. The private network connector cannot resolve or contact the internal DNS name
  4. Network forwarding works but the principal is missing the application or resource authorization

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. The connector receives the private-app connection attempt, then fails to resolve the backend FQDN or establish its required internal network and port connection. Test DNS resolution and backend reachability from the connector host, and repair the failing DNS, routing or firewall path.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An inactive traffic-forwarding profile would normally prevent the client from forwarding the private-app request into the service. Here the connector is receiving requests but cannot connect to the backend, which points past the forwarding stage.

B:

Incorrect Conditional Access application scoping can prevent authorization, but does not explain a connector receiving a routed request and then failing to resolve or reach the internal backend host.

D:

Missing user/application authorization would block or deny an unauthorized request; it is not the observed connector-to-backend DNS or network failure after a request has been received.

Question 283

A team is reviewing its proposed Microsoft Entra change. The required outcome is: Two pilot populations must receive different private access app policies without changing all employees. What is the most suitable implementation?

  1. Deploy Microsoft Entra Private Access with a healthy private network connector group, exact FQDN/IP plus ports and protocols, app/group assignment, enabled traffic-forwarding profile and Global Secure Access client
  2. Use scoped Global Secure Access app/user policy assignments and test each pilot group
  3. Combine Private Access resource scope with a properly targeted Conditional Access authentication requirement
  4. Deploy the client through supported device management policy to the pilot group and verify registration and health

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct implementation. Use scoped Global Secure Access app/user policy assignments and test each pilot group. It meets the stated requirement: Two pilot populations must receive different private access app policies without changing all employees. Acceptance evidence is: Pilot A reaches only its assigned resource and Pilot B cannot access that resource unless separately granted.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The private application segment omits its exact destination or port, or the required connector, client, app assignment or Private Access forwarding profile is inactive. That condition is not the problem here: The policy assignment includes All users instead of the intended pilot group. The targeted implementation is: Use scoped Global Secure Access app/user policy assignments and test each pilot group.

C:

The Conditional Access policy scopes a different cloud application than the private console. That condition is not the problem here: The policy assignment includes All users instead of the intended pilot group. The targeted implementation is: Use scoped Global Secure Access app/user policy assignments and test each pilot group.

D:

The device assignment does not include the pilot machine or client sign-in is incomplete. That condition is not the problem here: The policy assignment includes All users instead of the intended pilot group. The targeted implementation is: Use scoped Global Secure Access app/user policy assignments and test each pilot group.

Question 284

The requirement is: Two pilot populations must receive different private access app policies without changing all employees. The technical change was: Use scoped Global Secure Access app/user policy assignments and test each pilot group. Which observation validates the intended boundary?

  1. Pilot A reaches only its assigned resource and Pilot B cannot access that resource unless separately granted
  2. An assigned pilot reaches the tested custom-port private app through a healthy connector while an unlisted port remains outside the published segment
  3. Pilot devices show the client connected and forwarding relevant traffic; nonpilot devices remain unchanged
  4. A permitted strong-authenticated user reaches the console while a low-assurance login is denied

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct acceptance check. Pilot A reaches only its assigned resource and Pilot B cannot access that resource unless separately granted. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Even if editing the Private Access application segment to include the destination FQDN/IP succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Pilot A reaches only its assigned resource and Pilot B cannot access that resource unless separately granted.

C:

Even if deploying the client through supported device management policy to the pilot group succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Pilot A reaches only its assigned resource and Pilot B cannot access that resource unless separately granted.

D:

Even if combining Private Access resource scope with a properly targeted Conditional Access authentication requirement succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Pilot A reaches only its assigned resource and Pilot B cannot access that resource unless separately granted.

Question 285

A team must isolate a broken configuration. Goal: Two pilot populations must receive different private access app policies without changing all employees. Symptom: Nonpilot employees gain access to the private test resource. Which hypothesis most precisely accounts for the observed result?

  1. The private application segment omits its exact destination or port, or the required connector, client, app assignment or Private Access forwarding profile is inactive
  2. The device assignment does not include the pilot machine or client sign-in is incomplete
  3. The policy assignment includes All users instead of the intended pilot group
  4. The administrator granted overly broad network ranges instead of named private app segments

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. The policy assignment includes All users instead of the intended pilot group. This fault explains the observed failure: Nonpilot employees gain access to the private test resource. The intended configuration would instead be: Use scoped Global Secure Access app/user policy assignments and test each pilot group.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The private application segment omits its exact destination or port, or the required connector, client, app assignment or Private Access forwarding profile is inactive. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The policy assignment includes All users instead of the intended pilot group. The corrective action is: Use scoped Global Secure Access app/user policy assignments and test each pilot group.

B:

The device assignment does not include the pilot machine or client sign-in is incomplete. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The policy assignment includes All users instead of the intended pilot group. The corrective action is: Use scoped Global Secure Access app/user policy assignments and test each pilot group.

D:

The administrator granted overly broad network ranges instead of named private app segments. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The policy assignment includes All users instead of the intended pilot group. The corrective action is: Use scoped Global Secure Access app/user policy assignments and test each pilot group.

Question 286

During an access-management pilot, the engineer is tasked with the following: An organization notices unstable connectivity after Global Secure Access deployment and needs to identify whether traffic matches the intended forwarding profile. Which action best addresses the requirement?

  1. Combine Private Access resource scope with a properly targeted Conditional Access authentication requirement
  2. Inspect client health, traffic forwarding profiles and Global Secure Access traffic logs for the affected connection
  3. Deploy the client through supported device management policy to the pilot group and verify registration and health
  4. Deploy Microsoft Entra Internet Access with the required client and appropriate forwarding profile and policy

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct implementation. Inspect client health, traffic forwarding profiles and Global Secure Access traffic logs for the affected connection. It meets the stated requirement: An organization notices unstable connectivity after Global Secure Access deployment and needs to identify whether traffic matches the intended forwarding profile. Acceptance evidence is: The diagnostic record identifies the profile handling the destination, and client health is verified.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The Conditional Access policy scopes a different cloud application than the private console. That condition is not the problem here: The troubleshooting review looks at a Microsoft 365 traffic profile for an ordinary private-app endpoint. The targeted implementation is: Inspect client health, traffic forwarding profiles and Global Secure Access traffic logs for the affected connection.

C:

The device assignment does not include the pilot machine or client sign-in is incomplete. That condition is not the problem here: The troubleshooting review looks at a Microsoft 365 traffic profile for an ordinary private-app endpoint. The targeted implementation is: Inspect client health, traffic forwarding profiles and Global Secure Access traffic logs for the affected connection.

D:

The Internet Access forwarding profile is disabled or the client is not forwarding the expected traffic. That condition is not the problem here: The troubleshooting review looks at a Microsoft 365 traffic profile for an ordinary private-app endpoint. The targeted implementation is: Inspect client health, traffic forwarding profiles and Global Secure Access traffic logs for the affected connection.

Question 287

The owner wants independent acceptance evidence after the team chose: Inspect client health, traffic forwarding profiles and Global Secure Access traffic logs for the affected connection. It was meant to solve: An organization notices unstable connectivity after Global Secure Access deployment and needs to identify whether traffic matches the intended forwarding profile. Which result demonstrates success?

  1. The diagnostic record identifies the profile handling the destination, and client health is verified
  2. Pilot A reaches only its assigned resource and Pilot B cannot access that resource unless separately granted
  3. Managed pilot devices receive the approved client version, and operational reports identify missing clients
  4. An enrolled client sends intended internet traffic through the defined forwarding profile while excluded traffic follows its planned route

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct acceptance check. The diagnostic record identifies the profile handling the destination, and client health is verified. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Even if using scoped Global Secure Access app/user policy assignments succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The diagnostic record identifies the profile handling the destination, and client health is verified.

C:

Even if distribute succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The diagnostic record identifies the profile handling the destination, and client health is verified.

D:

Even if deploying Microsoft Entra Internet Access with the required client succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The diagnostic record identifies the profile handling the destination, and client health is verified.

Question 288

The deployment owner asks why this identity requirement failed: An organization notices unstable connectivity after Global Secure Access deployment and needs to identify whether traffic matches the intended forwarding profile. The test shows: Engineers see no relevant match while troubleshooting in the wrong profile category. Which fault is the best diagnosis?

  1. The Conditional Access policy scopes a different cloud application than the private console
  2. The Microsoft traffic profile was left disabled when the client was deployed
  3. The device assignment does not include the pilot machine or client sign-in is incomplete
  4. The troubleshooting review looks at a Microsoft 365 traffic profile for an ordinary private-app endpoint

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct diagnosis. The troubleshooting review looks at a Microsoft 365 traffic profile for an ordinary private-app endpoint. This fault explains the observed failure: Engineers see no relevant match while troubleshooting in the wrong profile category. The intended configuration would instead be: Inspect client health, traffic forwarding profiles and Global Secure Access traffic logs for the affected connection.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The Conditional Access policy scopes a different cloud application than the private console. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The troubleshooting review looks at a Microsoft 365 traffic profile for an ordinary private-app endpoint. The corrective action is: Inspect client health, traffic forwarding profiles and Global Secure Access traffic logs for the affected connection.

B:

The Microsoft traffic profile was left disabled when the client was deployed. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The troubleshooting review looks at a Microsoft 365 traffic profile for an ordinary private-app endpoint. The corrective action is: Inspect client health, traffic forwarding profiles and Global Secure Access traffic logs for the affected connection.

C:

The device assignment does not include the pilot machine or client sign-in is incomplete. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The troubleshooting review looks at a Microsoft 365 traffic profile for an ordinary private-app endpoint. The corrective action is: Inspect client health, traffic forwarding profiles and Global Secure Access traffic logs for the affected connection.

Question 289

Two teams share the same release window but not the same access policy. Team A needs: A private app uses a custom port and administrators added only its hostname to the resource definition. Team B needs: Network security wants to distinguish app-level Private Access from generalized tunnel connectivity during design review. Which TWO implementations should be included?

  1. Edit the Private Access application segment to include the destination FQDN/IP, actual TCP/UDP protocol and supported custom port or port range; verify app assignment and forwarding profile
  2. Deploy Microsoft Entra Private Access with a healthy private network connector group, exact FQDN/IP plus ports and protocols, app/group assignment, enabled traffic-forwarding profile and Global Secure Access client
  3. Use scoped Global Secure Access app/user policy assignments and test each pilot group
  4. Combine Private Access resource scope with a properly targeted Conditional Access authentication requirement
  5. Model only named private application destinations and required ports in the access policy, validating default-deny for other resources

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Correct for task 1. Edit the Private Access application segment to include the destination FQDN/IP, actual TCP/UDP protocol and supported custom port or port range; verify app assignment and forwarding profile. This directly addresses the first requirement: A private app uses a custom port and administrators added only its hostname to the resource definition. Verify it by checking: An assigned pilot reaches the tested custom-port private app through a healthy connector while an unlisted port remains outside the published segment.

E:

Correct for task 2. Model only named private application destinations and required ports in the access policy, validating default-deny for other resources. This addresses the independent second requirement: Network security wants to distinguish app-level Private Access from generalized tunnel connectivity during design review. Verify it by checking: The defined HR app is available but an unrelated internal finance host cannot be reached through that access path.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The private application segment omits its exact destination or port, or the required connector, client, app assignment or Private Access forwarding profile is inactive. To satisfy task 1, use: Edit the Private Access application segment to include the destination FQDN/IP, actual TCP/UDP protocol and supported custom port or port range; verify app assignment and forwarding profile. For task 2, use: Model only named private application destinations and required ports in the access policy, validating default-deny for other resources.

C:

The policy assignment includes All users instead of the intended pilot group. To satisfy task 1, use: Edit the Private Access application segment to include the destination FQDN/IP, actual TCP/UDP protocol and supported custom port or port range; verify app assignment and forwarding profile. For task 2, use: Model only named private application destinations and required ports in the access policy, validating default-deny for other resources.

D:

The Conditional Access policy scopes a different cloud application than the private console. To satisfy task 1, use: Edit the Private Access application segment to include the destination FQDN/IP, actual TCP/UDP protocol and supported custom port or port range; verify app assignment and forwarding profile. For task 2, use: Model only named private application destinations and required ports in the access policy, validating default-deny for other resources.

Question 290

An operational review checks whether the change “Edit the Private Access application segment to include the destination FQDN/IP, actual TCP/UDP protocol and supported custom port or port range; verify app assignment and forwarding profile” meets this need: A private app uses a custom port and administrators added only its hostname to the resource definition. Which finding supports acceptance?

  1. Pilot A reaches only its assigned resource and Pilot B cannot access that resource unless separately granted
  2. Pilot devices show the client connected and forwarding relevant traffic; nonpilot devices remain unchanged
  3. An assigned pilot reaches the tested custom-port private app through a healthy connector while an unlisted port remains outside the published segment
  4. The defined HR app is available but an unrelated internal finance host cannot be reached through that access path

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. An assigned pilot reaches the tested custom-port private app through a healthy connector while an unlisted port remains outside the published segment. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if using scoped Global Secure Access app/user policy assignments succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An assigned pilot reaches the tested custom-port private app through a healthy connector while an unlisted port remains outside the published segment.

B:

Even if deploying the client through supported device management policy to the pilot group succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An assigned pilot reaches the tested custom-port private app through a healthy connector while an unlisted port remains outside the published segment.

D:

Even if modeling only named private application destinations succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An assigned pilot reaches the tested custom-port private app through a healthy connector while an unlisted port remains outside the published segment.