McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99
SC-300 Sample 1 SC-300 Sample 2 SC-300 Sample 3 SC-300 Sample 4 SC-300 Sample 5 SC-300 Sample 6 SC-300 Sample 7 SC-300 Sample 8 SC-300 Sample 9 SC-300 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 47

Question 460

An identity project has this requirement: A supplier starts an assignment but must accept current legal terms before the access package can be granted. Which configuration should the administrator implement?

  1. Configure the access package assignment duration and appropriate expiration/extension behavior
  2. Use entitlement management lifecycle assignment controls or connected lifecycle workflows suitable for the authoritative offboarding event
  3. Bind a versioned Microsoft Entra Terms of Use requirement to the appropriate Conditional Access grant control protecting the access-package resources, and verify the actual acceptance record separately from package approval
  4. Create a properly licensed automatic access-package assignment policy with a supported authoritative identity-attribute rule, nonoverlapping scope and removal-on-scope-exit behavior

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct implementation. Bind a versioned Microsoft Entra Terms of Use requirement to the appropriate Conditional Access grant control protecting the access-package resources, and verify the actual acceptance record separately from package approval. It meets the stated requirement: A supplier starts an assignment but must accept current legal terms before the access package can be granted. Acceptance evidence is: The supplier accepts the required current Terms of Use under the applicable Conditional Access policy before receiving the protected resource session, with a recorded acceptance and package approval.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default. That condition is not the problem here: The current Terms of Use were saved but no enforcing Conditional Access terms-of-use grant applied to the protected resource. The targeted implementation is: Bind a versioned Microsoft Entra Terms of Use requirement to the appropriate Conditional Access grant control protecting the access-package resources, and verify the actual acceptance record separately from package approval.

B:

The user was removed from HR records but the package's access assignment remained active indefinitely. That condition is not the problem here: The current Terms of Use were saved but no enforcing Conditional Access terms-of-use grant applied to the protected resource. The targeted implementation is: Bind a versioned Microsoft Entra Terms of Use requirement to the appropriate Conditional Access grant control protecting the access-package resources, and verify the actual acceptance record separately from package approval.

D:

The auto-assignment rule uses the wrong or empty identity attribute or the policy overlaps an unsupported competing automatic-assignment scope. That condition is not the problem here: The current Terms of Use were saved but no enforcing Conditional Access terms-of-use grant applied to the protected resource. The targeted implementation is: Bind a versioned Microsoft Entra Terms of Use requirement to the appropriate Conditional Access grant control protecting the access-package resources, and verify the actual acceptance record separately from package approval.

Question 461

The owner wants independent acceptance evidence after the team chose: Bind a versioned Microsoft Entra Terms of Use requirement to the appropriate Conditional Access grant control protecting the access-package resources, and verify the actual acceptance record separately from package approval. It was meant to solve: A supplier starts an assignment but must accept current legal terms before the access package can be granted. Which result demonstrates success?

  1. The request remains pending after manager approval until the second required approver acts
  2. A partner employee can request the package and an unrelated organization cannot
  3. At expiry the old assignment is removed and re-access requires the defined approval or extension workflow
  4. The supplier accepts the required current Terms of Use under the applicable Conditional Access policy before receiving the protected resource session, with a recorded acceptance and package approval

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct acceptance check. The supplier accepts the required current Terms of Use under the applicable Conditional Access policy before receiving the protected resource session, with a recorded acceptance and package approval. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if configuring the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The supplier accepts the required current Terms of Use under the applicable Conditional Access policy before receiving the protected resource session, with a recorded acceptance and package approval.

B:

Even if defining the partner as a connected organization succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The supplier accepts the required current Terms of Use under the applicable Conditional Access policy before receiving the protected resource session, with a recorded acceptance and package approval.

C:

Even if configuring the access package assignment duration succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The supplier accepts the required current Terms of Use under the applicable Conditional Access policy before receiving the protected resource session, with a recorded acceptance and package approval.

Question 462

An engineer troubleshoots an identity solution for: A supplier starts an assignment but must accept current legal terms before the access package can be granted. The pilot result is: The supplier receives the package without acknowledging the legal terms. What is the most likely relevant fault?

  1. Only one approval stage was configured for the sensitive access package
  2. The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default
  3. The administrator placed both projects' resources into one mandatory package
  4. The current Terms of Use were saved but no enforcing Conditional Access terms-of-use grant applied to the protected resource

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct diagnosis. The current Terms of Use were saved but no enforcing Conditional Access terms-of-use grant applied to the protected resource. This fault explains the observed failure: The supplier receives the package without acknowledging the legal terms. The intended configuration would instead be: Bind a versioned Microsoft Entra Terms of Use requirement to the appropriate Conditional Access grant control protecting the access-package resources, and verify the actual acceptance record separately from package approval.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Only one approval stage was configured for the sensitive access package. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The current Terms of Use were saved but no enforcing Conditional Access terms-of-use grant applied to the protected resource. The corrective action is: Bind a versioned Microsoft Entra Terms of Use requirement to the appropriate Conditional Access grant control protecting the access-package resources, and verify the actual acceptance record separately from package approval.

B:

The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The current Terms of Use were saved but no enforcing Conditional Access terms-of-use grant applied to the protected resource. The corrective action is: Bind a versioned Microsoft Entra Terms of Use requirement to the appropriate Conditional Access grant control protecting the access-package resources, and verify the actual acceptance record separately from package approval.

C:

The administrator placed both projects' resources into one mandatory package. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The current Terms of Use were saved but no enforcing Conditional Access terms-of-use grant applied to the protected resource. The corrective action is: Bind a versioned Microsoft Entra Terms of Use requirement to the appropriate Conditional Access grant control protecting the access-package resources, and verify the actual acceptance record separately from package approval.

Question 463

A change request covers two Microsoft Entra needs. Requirement A: An external business partner must be made eligible to request a package without inviting its entire tenant to every resource. Requirement B: A resource owner needs two-stage signoff for a critical access package, first from manager and then application owner. Select TWO actions, one for each requirement.

  1. Configure the access package assignment duration and appropriate expiration/extension behavior
  2. Configure and validate entitlement management external-user lifecycle cleanup under the organization's supported settings
  3. Configure the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages and identified approvers
  4. Inspect access package request and approval records including policy, approver, and justification
  5. Define the partner as a connected organization and scope the access package request policy to it

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

Correct for task 2. Configure the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages and identified approvers. This addresses the independent second requirement: A resource owner needs two-stage signoff for a critical access package, first from manager and then application owner. Verify it by checking: The request remains pending after manager approval until the second required approver acts.

E:

Correct for task 1. Define the partner as a connected organization and scope the access package request policy to it. This directly addresses the first requirement: An external business partner must be made eligible to request a package without inviting its entire tenant to every resource. Verify it by checking: A partner employee can request the package and an unrelated organization cannot.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default. To satisfy task 1, use: Define the partner as a connected organization and scope the access package request policy to it. For task 2, use: Configure the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages and identified approvers.

B:

The external identity lifecycle setting is disabled or its cleanup delay is inconsistent with policy. To satisfy task 1, use: Define the partner as a connected organization and scope the access package request policy to it. For task 2, use: Configure the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages and identified approvers.

D:

The team looked only at the target security group's current membership. To satisfy task 1, use: Define the partner as a connected organization and scope the access package request policy to it. For task 2, use: Configure the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages and identified approvers.

Question 464

An operational review checks whether the change “Define the partner as a connected organization and scope the access package request policy to it” meets this need: An external business partner must be made eligible to request a package without inviting its entire tenant to every resource. Which finding supports acceptance?

  1. A partner employee can request the package and an unrelated organization cannot
  2. The denied request shows the decision, reviewer and recorded reason for audit
  3. An employee granted project A's package cannot access project B unless separately assigned
  4. A request enters the sponsor's approval queue and is provisioned only after approval

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct acceptance check. A partner employee can request the package and an unrelated organization cannot. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Even if inspecting access package request succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A partner employee can request the package and an unrelated organization cannot.

C:

Even if creating separate access packages with resource-role combinations succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A partner employee can request the package and an unrelated organization cannot.

D:

Even if configuring an access package assignment policy permitting the intended external population with a sponsor approval stage succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A partner employee can request the package and an unrelated organization cannot.

Question 465

A change appears correct at a glance, but the requirement is still unmet: An external business partner must be made eligible to request a package without inviting its entire tenant to every resource. The key observed symptom is: Partner users cannot find or request the package despite being recognized as external collaborators. Which cause should be investigated first?

  1. The external identity lifecycle setting is disabled or its cleanup delay is inconsistent with policy
  2. The package omits one required resource role or its policy does not expire the assignment after the authorized 90 days
  3. The connected organization was not included in the access package policy's requestor scope
  4. A broad tenant-wide entitlement administration role was assigned instead of catalog-scoped authority

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. The connected organization was not included in the access package policy's requestor scope. This fault explains the observed failure: Partner users cannot find or request the package despite being recognized as external collaborators. The intended configuration would instead be: Define the partner as a connected organization and scope the access package request policy to it.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The external identity lifecycle setting is disabled or its cleanup delay is inconsistent with policy. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The connected organization was not included in the access package policy's requestor scope. The corrective action is: Define the partner as a connected organization and scope the access package request policy to it.

B:

The package omits one required resource role or its policy does not expire the assignment after the authorized 90 days. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The connected organization was not included in the access package policy's requestor scope. The corrective action is: Define the partner as a connected organization and scope the access package request policy to it.

D:

A broad tenant-wide entitlement administration role was assigned instead of catalog-scoped authority. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The connected organization was not included in the access package policy's requestor scope. The corrective action is: Define the partner as a connected organization and scope the access package request policy to it.

Question 466

During an access-management pilot, the engineer is tasked with the following: A former contractor's access package must expire automatically instead of relying on a manager to remember a manual removal. Which action best addresses the requirement?

  1. Inspect access package request and approval records including policy, approver, and justification
  2. Create an entitlement management catalog and access package containing the exact group/Teams membership, supported SharePoint site role and enterprise application role, with a 90-day contractor assignment policy and expiry
  3. Configure the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages and identified approvers
  4. Configure the access package assignment duration and appropriate expiration/extension behavior

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct implementation. Configure the access package assignment duration and appropriate expiration/extension behavior. It meets the stated requirement: A former contractor's access package must expire automatically instead of relying on a manager to remember a manual removal. Acceptance evidence is: At expiry the old assignment is removed and re-access requires the defined approval or extension workflow.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The team looked only at the target security group's current membership. That condition is not the problem here: The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default. The targeted implementation is: Configure the access package assignment duration and appropriate expiration/extension behavior.

B:

The package omits one required resource role or its policy does not expire the assignment after the authorized 90 days. That condition is not the problem here: The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default. The targeted implementation is: Configure the access package assignment duration and appropriate expiration/extension behavior.

C:

Only one approval stage was configured for the sensitive access package. That condition is not the problem here: The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default. The targeted implementation is: Configure the access package assignment duration and appropriate expiration/extension behavior.

Question 467

After a deployment under this requirement — A former contractor's access package must expire automatically instead of relying on a manager to remember a manual removal — administrators claim the following solution is in place: Configure the access package assignment duration and appropriate expiration/extension behavior. Which pilot finding supports that claim?

  1. At expiry the old assignment is removed and re-access requires the defined approval or extension workflow
  2. The offboarded worker's entitlement assignments are removed and actual resource access is revoked
  3. A request enters the sponsor's approval queue and is provisioned only after approval
  4. The request remains pending after manager approval until the second required approver acts

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct acceptance check. At expiry the old assignment is removed and re-access requires the defined approval or extension workflow. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Even if using entitlement management lifecycle assignment controls or connected lifecycle workflows suitable for the authoritative offboarding event succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: At expiry the old assignment is removed and re-access requires the defined approval or extension workflow.

C:

Even if configuring an access package assignment policy permitting the intended external population with a sponsor approval stage succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: At expiry the old assignment is removed and re-access requires the defined approval or extension workflow.

D:

Even if configuring the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: At expiry the old assignment is removed and re-access requires the defined approval or extension workflow.

Question 468

The service desk escalates the following unsuccessful identity rollout. Requirement: A former contractor's access package must expire automatically instead of relying on a manager to remember a manual removal. Observed: The contractor still has bundled resource access after the documented end date. Which underlying misconfiguration is most consistent?

  1. Only one approval stage was configured for the sensitive access package
  2. The package omits one required resource role or its policy does not expire the assignment after the authorized 90 days
  3. The connected organization was not included in the access package policy's requestor scope
  4. The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct diagnosis. The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default. This fault explains the observed failure: The contractor still has bundled resource access after the documented end date. The intended configuration would instead be: Configure the access package assignment duration and appropriate expiration/extension behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Only one approval stage was configured for the sensitive access package. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default. The corrective action is: Configure the access package assignment duration and appropriate expiration/extension behavior.

B:

The package omits one required resource role or its policy does not expire the assignment after the authorized 90 days. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default. The corrective action is: Configure the access package assignment duration and appropriate expiration/extension behavior.

C:

The connected organization was not included in the access package policy's requestor scope. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default. The corrective action is: Configure the access package assignment duration and appropriate expiration/extension behavior.

Question 469

Select the most appropriate first configuration decision for this scenario: A new intern should receive access to a project package automatically based on an authoritative identity attribute when approved by policy.

  1. Create a properly licensed automatic access-package assignment policy with a supported authoritative identity-attribute rule, nonoverlapping scope and removal-on-scope-exit behavior
  2. Configure the access package assignment duration and appropriate expiration/extension behavior
  3. Inspect access package request and approval records including policy, approver, and justification
  4. Create an entitlement management catalog and access package containing the exact group/Teams membership, supported SharePoint site role and enterprise application role, with a 90-day contractor assignment policy and expiry

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct implementation. Create a properly licensed automatic access-package assignment policy with a supported authoritative identity-attribute rule, nonoverlapping scope and removal-on-scope-exit behavior. It meets the stated requirement: A new intern should receive access to a project package automatically based on an authoritative identity attribute when approved by policy. Acceptance evidence is: Only a matching intern receives the package after policy evaluation and loses its automatically granted access when the attribute no longer matches.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default. That condition is not the problem here: The auto-assignment rule uses the wrong or empty identity attribute or the policy overlaps an unsupported competing automatic-assignment scope. The targeted implementation is: Create a properly licensed automatic access-package assignment policy with a supported authoritative identity-attribute rule, nonoverlapping scope and removal-on-scope-exit behavior.

C:

The team looked only at the target security group's current membership. That condition is not the problem here: The auto-assignment rule uses the wrong or empty identity attribute or the policy overlaps an unsupported competing automatic-assignment scope. The targeted implementation is: Create a properly licensed automatic access-package assignment policy with a supported authoritative identity-attribute rule, nonoverlapping scope and removal-on-scope-exit behavior.

D:

The package omits one required resource role or its policy does not expire the assignment after the authorized 90 days. That condition is not the problem here: The auto-assignment rule uses the wrong or empty identity attribute or the policy overlaps an unsupported competing automatic-assignment scope. The targeted implementation is: Create a properly licensed automatic access-package assignment policy with a supported authoritative identity-attribute rule, nonoverlapping scope and removal-on-scope-exit behavior.

Question 470

The team implemented the following change: Create a properly licensed automatic access-package assignment policy with a supported authoritative identity-attribute rule, nonoverlapping scope and removal-on-scope-exit behavior. The acceptance requirement was: A new intern should receive access to a project package automatically based on an authoritative identity attribute when approved by policy. Which observed outcome most directly proves the change works?

  1. After the last package assignment ends, the external identity receives the intended removal/blocking action according to configured lifecycle policy
  2. An employee granted project A's package cannot access project B unless separately assigned
  3. Only a matching intern receives the package after policy evaluation and loses its automatically granted access when the attribute no longer matches
  4. A request enters the sponsor's approval queue and is provisioned only after approval

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. Only a matching intern receives the package after policy evaluation and loses its automatically granted access when the attribute no longer matches. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if configure succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Only a matching intern receives the package after policy evaluation and loses its automatically granted access when the attribute no longer matches.

B:

Even if creating separate access packages with resource-role combinations succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Only a matching intern receives the package after policy evaluation and loses its automatically granted access when the attribute no longer matches.

D:

Even if configuring an access package assignment policy permitting the intended external population with a sponsor approval stage succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Only a matching intern receives the package after policy evaluation and loses its automatically granted access when the attribute no longer matches.