McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99
SC-300 Sample 1 SC-300 Sample 2 SC-300 Sample 3 SC-300 Sample 4 SC-300 Sample 5 SC-300 Sample 6 SC-300 Sample 7 SC-300 Sample 8 SC-300 Sample 9 SC-300 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 48

Question 470

The team implemented the following change: Create a properly licensed automatic access-package assignment policy with a supported authoritative identity-attribute rule, nonoverlapping scope and removal-on-scope-exit behavior. The acceptance requirement was: A new intern should receive access to a project package automatically based on an authoritative identity attribute when approved by policy. Which observed outcome most directly proves the change works?

  1. After the last package assignment ends, the external identity receives the intended removal/blocking action according to configured lifecycle policy
  2. An employee granted project A's package cannot access project B unless separately assigned
  3. Only a matching intern receives the package after policy evaluation and loses its automatically granted access when the attribute no longer matches
  4. A request enters the sponsor's approval queue and is provisioned only after approval

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. Only a matching intern receives the package after policy evaluation and loses its automatically granted access when the attribute no longer matches. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if configure succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Only a matching intern receives the package after policy evaluation and loses its automatically granted access when the attribute no longer matches.

B:

Even if creating separate access packages with resource-role combinations succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Only a matching intern receives the package after policy evaluation and loses its automatically granted access when the attribute no longer matches.

D:

Even if configuring an access package assignment policy permitting the intended external population with a sponsor approval stage succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Only a matching intern receives the package after policy evaluation and loses its automatically granted access when the attribute no longer matches.

Question 471

During post-change review of the requirement “A new intern should receive access to a project package automatically based on an authoritative identity attribute when approved by policy,” an auditor observes: New interns do not receive any package until someone manually assigns each one. Which root-cause finding would explain that symptom?

  1. The auto-assignment rule uses the wrong or empty identity attribute or the policy overlaps an unsupported competing automatic-assignment scope
  2. The external identity lifecycle setting is disabled or its cleanup delay is inconsistent with policy
  3. The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default
  4. The user was removed from HR records but the package's access assignment remained active indefinitely

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. The auto-assignment rule uses the wrong or empty identity attribute or the policy overlaps an unsupported competing automatic-assignment scope. This fault explains the observed failure: New interns do not receive any package until someone manually assigns each one. The intended configuration would instead be: Create a properly licensed automatic access-package assignment policy with a supported authoritative identity-attribute rule, nonoverlapping scope and removal-on-scope-exit behavior.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The external identity lifecycle setting is disabled or its cleanup delay is inconsistent with policy. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The auto-assignment rule uses the wrong or empty identity attribute or the policy overlaps an unsupported competing automatic-assignment scope. The corrective action is: Create a properly licensed automatic access-package assignment policy with a supported authoritative identity-attribute rule, nonoverlapping scope and removal-on-scope-exit behavior.

C:

The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The auto-assignment rule uses the wrong or empty identity attribute or the policy overlaps an unsupported competing automatic-assignment scope. The corrective action is: Create a properly licensed automatic access-package assignment policy with a supported authoritative identity-attribute rule, nonoverlapping scope and removal-on-scope-exit behavior.

D:

The user was removed from HR records but the package's access assignment remained active indefinitely. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The auto-assignment rule uses the wrong or empty identity attribute or the policy overlaps an unsupported competing automatic-assignment scope. The corrective action is: Create a properly licensed automatic access-package assignment policy with a supported authoritative identity-attribute rule, nonoverlapping scope and removal-on-scope-exit behavior.

Question 472

The security architect is given this constraint: A resource owner needs two-stage signoff for a critical access package, first from manager and then application owner. Which technical approach meets it without relying on unrelated controls?

  1. Configure and validate entitlement management external-user lifecycle cleanup under the organization's supported settings
  2. Configure the access package assignment duration and appropriate expiration/extension behavior
  3. Configure an access package assignment policy permitting the intended external population with a sponsor approval stage
  4. Configure the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages and identified approvers

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct implementation. Configure the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages and identified approvers. It meets the stated requirement: A resource owner needs two-stage signoff for a critical access package, first from manager and then application owner. Acceptance evidence is: The request remains pending after manager approval until the second required approver acts.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The external identity lifecycle setting is disabled or its cleanup delay is inconsistent with policy. That condition is not the problem here: Only one approval stage was configured for the sensitive access package. The targeted implementation is: Configure the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages and identified approvers.

B:

The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default. That condition is not the problem here: Only one approval stage was configured for the sensitive access package. The targeted implementation is: Configure the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages and identified approvers.

C:

The request policy uses automatic approval for the external population. That condition is not the problem here: Only one approval stage was configured for the sensitive access package. The targeted implementation is: Configure the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages and identified approvers.

Question 473

An auditor must verify this deployment decision: Configure the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages and identified approvers. Its purpose was: A resource owner needs two-stage signoff for a critical access package, first from manager and then application owner. Which test result is the strongest evidence?

  1. The request remains pending after manager approval until the second required approver acts
  2. A partner employee can request the package and an unrelated organization cannot
  3. At expiry the old assignment is removed and re-access requires the defined approval or extension workflow
  4. An employee granted project A's package cannot access project B unless separately assigned

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct acceptance check. The request remains pending after manager approval until the second required approver acts. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Even if defining the partner as a connected organization succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The request remains pending after manager approval until the second required approver acts.

C:

Even if configuring the access package assignment duration succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The request remains pending after manager approval until the second required approver acts.

D:

Even if creating separate access packages with resource-role combinations succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The request remains pending after manager approval until the second required approver acts.

Question 474

A team must isolate a broken configuration. Goal: A resource owner needs two-stage signoff for a critical access package, first from manager and then application owner. Symptom: A package is provisioned after manager approval even when the application owner never reviewed it. Which hypothesis most precisely accounts for the observed result?

  1. The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default
  2. The request policy uses automatic approval for the external population
  3. Only one approval stage was configured for the sensitive access package
  4. The administrator placed both projects' resources into one mandatory package

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. Only one approval stage was configured for the sensitive access package. This fault explains the observed failure: A package is provisioned after manager approval even when the application owner never reviewed it. The intended configuration would instead be: Configure the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages and identified approvers.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The package assignment policy allows indefinite assignments by default. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Only one approval stage was configured for the sensitive access package. The corrective action is: Configure the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages and identified approvers.

B:

The request policy uses automatic approval for the external population. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Only one approval stage was configured for the sensitive access package. The corrective action is: Configure the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages and identified approvers.

D:

The administrator placed both projects' resources into one mandatory package. The reported symptom instead has this cause: Only one approval stage was configured for the sensitive access package. The corrective action is: Configure the access package request policy with the two supported approval stages and identified approvers.

Question 475

Two teams share the same release window but not the same access policy. Team A needs: A company wants a user to request two separate project entitlements without granting blanket access to both by default. Team B needs: An external user gains an approved package and should no longer have broad tenant access once no packages remain. Which TWO implementations should be included?

  1. Define the partner as a connected organization and scope the access package request policy to it
  2. Configure and validate entitlement management external-user lifecycle cleanup under the organization's supported settings
  3. Create an entitlement management catalog and access package containing the exact group/Teams membership, supported SharePoint site role and enterprise application role, with a 90-day contractor assignment policy and expiry
  4. Place departmental resources in separate entitlement catalogs and delegate the appropriate catalog roles
  5. Create separate access packages with resource-role combinations and eligibility scopes appropriate to each project

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

Correct for task 2. Configure and validate entitlement management external-user lifecycle cleanup under the organization's supported settings. This addresses the independent second requirement: An external user gains an approved package and should no longer have broad tenant access once no packages remain. Verify it by checking: After the last package assignment ends, the external identity receives the intended removal/blocking action according to configured lifecycle policy.

E:

Correct for task 1. Create separate access packages with resource-role combinations and eligibility scopes appropriate to each project. This directly addresses the first requirement: A company wants a user to request two separate project entitlements without granting blanket access to both by default. Verify it by checking: An employee granted project A's package cannot access project B unless separately assigned.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The connected organization was not included in the access package policy's requestor scope. To satisfy task 1, use: Create separate access packages with resource-role combinations and eligibility scopes appropriate to each project. For task 2, use: Configure and validate entitlement management external-user lifecycle cleanup under the organization's supported settings.

C:

The package omits one required resource role or its policy does not expire the assignment after the authorized 90 days. To satisfy task 1, use: Create separate access packages with resource-role combinations and eligibility scopes appropriate to each project. For task 2, use: Configure and validate entitlement management external-user lifecycle cleanup under the organization's supported settings.

D:

A broad tenant-wide entitlement administration role was assigned instead of catalog-scoped authority. To satisfy task 1, use: Create separate access packages with resource-role combinations and eligibility scopes appropriate to each project. For task 2, use: Configure and validate entitlement management external-user lifecycle cleanup under the organization's supported settings.

Question 476

After configuring: Create separate access packages with resource-role combinations and eligibility scopes appropriate to each project, an engineer performs a targeted pilot for this objective: A company wants a user to request two separate project entitlements without granting blanket access to both by default. What result constitutes a pass?

  1. After the last package assignment ends, the external identity receives the intended removal/blocking action according to configured lifecycle policy
  2. Only a matching intern receives the package after policy evaluation and loses its automatically granted access when the attribute no longer matches
  3. A partner employee can request the package and an unrelated organization cannot
  4. An employee granted project A's package cannot access project B unless separately assigned

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct acceptance check. An employee granted project A's package cannot access project B unless separately assigned. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if configure succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An employee granted project A's package cannot access project B unless separately assigned.

B:

Even if creating a properly licensed automatic access-package assignment policy with a supported authoritative identity-attribute rule succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An employee granted project A's package cannot access project B unless separately assigned.

C:

Even if defining the partner as a connected organization succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An employee granted project A's package cannot access project B unless separately assigned.

Question 477

The deployment owner asks why this identity requirement failed: A company wants a user to request two separate project entitlements without granting blanket access to both by default. The test shows: Requesting project A grants project B access without a distinct request. Which fault is the best diagnosis?

  1. The connected organization was not included in the access package policy's requestor scope
  2. The user was removed from HR records but the package's access assignment remained active indefinitely
  3. The administrator placed both projects' resources into one mandatory package
  4. The catalog resource role selected was an app administrator role instead of its reader entitlement

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. The administrator placed both projects' resources into one mandatory package. This fault explains the observed failure: Requesting project A grants project B access without a distinct request. The intended configuration would instead be: Create separate access packages with resource-role combinations and eligibility scopes appropriate to each project.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The connected organization was not included in the access package policy's requestor scope. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The administrator placed both projects' resources into one mandatory package. The corrective action is: Create separate access packages with resource-role combinations and eligibility scopes appropriate to each project.

B:

The user was removed from HR records but the package's access assignment remained active indefinitely. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The administrator placed both projects' resources into one mandatory package. The corrective action is: Create separate access packages with resource-role combinations and eligibility scopes appropriate to each project.

D:

The catalog resource role selected was an app administrator role instead of its reader entitlement. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The administrator placed both projects' resources into one mandatory package. The corrective action is: Create separate access packages with resource-role combinations and eligibility scopes appropriate to each project.

Question 478

A change board will approve one identity configuration to satisfy: An onboarding pipeline must remove access packages when workers no longer meet the required directory conditions. Which change should it approve?

  1. Use entitlement management lifecycle assignment controls or connected lifecycle workflows suitable for the authoritative offboarding event
  2. Create separate access packages with resource-role combinations and eligibility scopes appropriate to each project
  3. Configure and validate entitlement management external-user lifecycle cleanup under the organization's supported settings
  4. Create an entitlement management catalog and access package containing the exact group/Teams membership, supported SharePoint site role and enterprise application role, with a 90-day contractor assignment policy and expiry

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct implementation. Use entitlement management lifecycle assignment controls or connected lifecycle workflows suitable for the authoritative offboarding event. It meets the stated requirement: An onboarding pipeline must remove access packages when workers no longer meet the required directory conditions. Acceptance evidence is: The offboarded worker's entitlement assignments are removed and actual resource access is revoked.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The administrator placed both projects' resources into one mandatory package. That condition is not the problem here: The user was removed from HR records but the package's access assignment remained active indefinitely. The targeted implementation is: Use entitlement management lifecycle assignment controls or connected lifecycle workflows suitable for the authoritative offboarding event.

C:

The external identity lifecycle setting is disabled or its cleanup delay is inconsistent with policy. That condition is not the problem here: The user was removed from HR records but the package's access assignment remained active indefinitely. The targeted implementation is: Use entitlement management lifecycle assignment controls or connected lifecycle workflows suitable for the authoritative offboarding event.

D:

The package omits one required resource role or its policy does not expire the assignment after the authorized 90 days. That condition is not the problem here: The user was removed from HR records but the package's access assignment remained active indefinitely. The targeted implementation is: Use entitlement management lifecycle assignment controls or connected lifecycle workflows suitable for the authoritative offboarding event.

Question 479

The requirement is: An onboarding pipeline must remove access packages when workers no longer meet the required directory conditions. The technical change was: Use entitlement management lifecycle assignment controls or connected lifecycle workflows suitable for the authoritative offboarding event. Which observation validates the intended boundary?

  1. An employee granted project A's package cannot access project B unless separately assigned
  2. The offboarded worker's entitlement assignments are removed and actual resource access is revoked
  3. A departmental catalog owner edits their own packages but cannot change another department's catalog
  4. After the last package assignment ends, the external identity receives the intended removal/blocking action according to configured lifecycle policy

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. The offboarded worker's entitlement assignments are removed and actual resource access is revoked. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if creating separate access packages with resource-role combinations succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The offboarded worker's entitlement assignments are removed and actual resource access is revoked.

C:

Even if placing departmental resources in separate entitlement catalogs succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The offboarded worker's entitlement assignments are removed and actual resource access is revoked.

D:

Even if configure succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The offboarded worker's entitlement assignments are removed and actual resource access is revoked.

Question 480

The deployment was intended to satisfy: An onboarding pipeline must remove access packages when workers no longer meet the required directory conditions. During testing, this happened: The disabled worker still appears assigned to the active entitlement bundle. Which configuration defect best explains the failure?

  1. Only one approval stage was configured for the sensitive access package
  2. The user was removed from HR records but the package's access assignment remained active indefinitely
  3. The external identity lifecycle setting is disabled or its cleanup delay is inconsistent with policy
  4. A broad tenant-wide entitlement administration role was assigned instead of catalog-scoped authority

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct diagnosis. The user was removed from HR records but the package's access assignment remained active indefinitely. This fault explains the observed failure: The disabled worker still appears assigned to the active entitlement bundle. The intended configuration would instead be: Use entitlement management lifecycle assignment controls or connected lifecycle workflows suitable for the authoritative offboarding event.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Only one approval stage was configured for the sensitive access package. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The user was removed from HR records but the package's access assignment remained active indefinitely. The corrective action is: Use entitlement management lifecycle assignment controls or connected lifecycle workflows suitable for the authoritative offboarding event.

C:

The external identity lifecycle setting is disabled or its cleanup delay is inconsistent with policy. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The user was removed from HR records but the package's access assignment remained active indefinitely. The corrective action is: Use entitlement management lifecycle assignment controls or connected lifecycle workflows suitable for the authoritative offboarding event.

D:

A broad tenant-wide entitlement administration role was assigned instead of catalog-scoped authority. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The user was removed from HR records but the package's access assignment remained active indefinitely. The corrective action is: Use entitlement management lifecycle assignment controls or connected lifecycle workflows suitable for the authoritative offboarding event.