McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99
SC-300 Sample 1 SC-300 Sample 2 SC-300 Sample 3 SC-300 Sample 4 SC-300 Sample 5 SC-300 Sample 6 SC-300 Sample 7 SC-300 Sample 8 SC-300 Sample 9 SC-300 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 58

Question 570

The deployment owner asks why this identity requirement failed: A directory engineer needs to know who changed group membership yesterday and when the change occurred. The test shows: The report shows the actor's logins but not the group membership modification. Which fault is the best diagnosis?

  1. The engineer searched only the sign-in logs, which record authentication rather than directory writes
  2. The workbook's data source is SigninLogs rather than AuditLogs
  3. The workbook has no connected data source or uses an expired time window
  4. The analyst searched directory audit logs instead of sign-in logs

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. The engineer searched only the sign-in logs, which record authentication rather than directory writes. This fault explains the observed failure: The report shows the actor's logins but not the group membership modification. The intended configuration would instead be: Inspect Microsoft Entra audit logs filtered for group membership actions and target group.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The workbook's data source is SigninLogs rather than AuditLogs. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The engineer searched only the sign-in logs, which record authentication rather than directory writes. The corrective action is: Inspect Microsoft Entra audit logs filtered for group membership actions and target group.

C:

The workbook has no connected data source or uses an expired time window. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The engineer searched only the sign-in logs, which record authentication rather than directory writes. The corrective action is: Inspect Microsoft Entra audit logs filtered for group membership actions and target group.

D:

The analyst searched directory audit logs instead of sign-in logs. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The engineer searched only the sign-in logs, which record authentication rather than directory writes. The corrective action is: Inspect Microsoft Entra audit logs filtered for group membership actions and target group.

Question 571

A change board will approve one identity configuration to satisfy: A SaaS operations analyst wants to troubleshoot failed automated provisioning without confusing it with authentication issues. Which change should it approve?

  1. Filter SigninLogs by TimeGenerated, AppDisplayName/AppId and ResultType as appropriate and project useful identifiers
  2. Use AuditLogs in Log Analytics and filter the relevant group-management operation names and result status
  3. Filter provisioning logs to the enterprise application, target account and failed provisioning steps
  4. Inspect Microsoft Entra audit logs filtered for group membership actions and target group

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct implementation. Filter provisioning logs to the enterprise application, target account and failed provisioning steps. It meets the stated requirement: A SaaS operations analyst wants to troubleshoot failed automated provisioning without confusing it with authentication issues. Acceptance evidence is: The error record shows the failed create/update action and vendor API response.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The query uses an audit event table or omits the failure/result predicate. That condition is not the problem here: The analyst examined only interactive sign-in events instead of provisioning transactions. The targeted implementation is: Filter provisioning logs to the enterprise application, target account and failed provisioning steps.

B:

The workbook's data source is SigninLogs rather than AuditLogs. That condition is not the problem here: The analyst examined only interactive sign-in events instead of provisioning transactions. The targeted implementation is: Filter provisioning logs to the enterprise application, target account and failed provisioning steps.

D:

The engineer searched only the sign-in logs, which record authentication rather than directory writes. That condition is not the problem here: The analyst examined only interactive sign-in events instead of provisioning transactions. The targeted implementation is: Filter provisioning logs to the enterprise application, target account and failed provisioning steps.

Question 572

The requirement is: A SaaS operations analyst wants to troubleshoot failed automated provisioning without confusing it with authentication issues. The technical change was: Filter provisioning logs to the enterprise application, target account and failed provisioning steps. Which observation validates the intended boundary?

  1. Returned rows are failed sign-ins to the named app within the selected time interval
  2. A sampled old event can be retrieved from the configured storage destination after the portal's shorter window
  3. The error record shows the failed create/update action and vendor API response
  4. Records identify the actor, changed member, target group and timestamp

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. The error record shows the failed create/update action and vendor API response. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if filtering SigninLogs by TimeGenerated succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The error record shows the failed create/update action and vendor API response.

B:

Even if exporting the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The error record shows the failed create/update action and vendor API response.

D:

Even if inspecting Microsoft Entra audit logs filtered for group membership actions succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The error record shows the failed create/update action and vendor API response.

Question 573

The deployment was intended to satisfy: A SaaS operations analyst wants to troubleshoot failed automated provisioning without confusing it with authentication issues. During testing, this happened: Users can sign in to Entra but are missing from the SaaS directory without an explanation. Which configuration defect best explains the failure?

  1. The analyst examined only interactive sign-in events instead of provisioning transactions
  2. Investigators searched interactive user SigninLogs instead of service principal sign-in events for this nonuser authentication
  3. The workbook's data source is SigninLogs rather than AuditLogs
  4. The analyst reported a high Secure Score as proof no identity compromise can occur

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. The analyst examined only interactive sign-in events instead of provisioning transactions. This fault explains the observed failure: Users can sign in to Entra but are missing from the SaaS directory without an explanation. The intended configuration would instead be: Filter provisioning logs to the enterprise application, target account and failed provisioning steps.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Investigators searched interactive user SigninLogs instead of service principal sign-in events for this nonuser authentication. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The analyst examined only interactive sign-in events instead of provisioning transactions. The corrective action is: Filter provisioning logs to the enterprise application, target account and failed provisioning steps.

C:

The workbook's data source is SigninLogs rather than AuditLogs. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The analyst examined only interactive sign-in events instead of provisioning transactions. The corrective action is: Filter provisioning logs to the enterprise application, target account and failed provisioning steps.

D:

The analyst reported a high Secure Score as proof no identity compromise can occur. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The analyst examined only interactive sign-in events instead of provisioning transactions. The corrective action is: Filter provisioning logs to the enterprise application, target account and failed provisioning steps.

Question 574

An identity project has this requirement: Security analytics needs to send selected Entra log categories to Log Analytics for queries across a 30-day investigation window. Which configuration should the administrator implement?

  1. Use AuditLogs in Log Analytics and filter the relevant group-management operation names and result status
  2. Filter SigninLogs by TimeGenerated, AppDisplayName/AppId and ResultType as appropriate and project useful identifiers
  3. Enable the specifically required AuditLogs, SignInLogs and service-principal/provisioning categories in Entra diagnostic settings for the correct Log Analytics workspace, and allow for ingestion latency and appropriate retention
  4. Export the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct implementation. Enable the specifically required AuditLogs, SignInLogs and service-principal/provisioning categories in Entra diagnostic settings for the correct Log Analytics workspace, and allow for ingestion latency and appropriate retention. It meets the stated requirement: Security analytics needs to send selected Entra log categories to Log Analytics for queries across a 30-day investigation window. Acceptance evidence is: A seeded directory configuration audit and user authentication event appear in the intended workspace under their correct categories after observable ingestion lag.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The workbook's data source is SigninLogs rather than AuditLogs. That condition is not the problem here: The diagnostic export sent data to another destination or omitted the required AuditLogs category from the selected workspace. The targeted implementation is: Enable the specifically required AuditLogs, SignInLogs and service-principal/provisioning categories in Entra diagnostic settings for the correct Log Analytics workspace, and allow for ingestion latency and appropriate retention.

B:

The query uses an audit event table or omits the failure/result predicate. That condition is not the problem here: The diagnostic export sent data to another destination or omitted the required AuditLogs category from the selected workspace. The targeted implementation is: Enable the specifically required AuditLogs, SignInLogs and service-principal/provisioning categories in Entra diagnostic settings for the correct Log Analytics workspace, and allow for ingestion latency and appropriate retention.

D:

No diagnostic storage export was configured for the audit log category. That condition is not the problem here: The diagnostic export sent data to another destination or omitted the required AuditLogs category from the selected workspace. The targeted implementation is: Enable the specifically required AuditLogs, SignInLogs and service-principal/provisioning categories in Entra diagnostic settings for the correct Log Analytics workspace, and allow for ingestion latency and appropriate retention.

Question 575

The owner wants independent acceptance evidence after the team chose: Enable the specifically required AuditLogs, SignInLogs and service-principal/provisioning categories in Entra diagnostic settings for the correct Log Analytics workspace, and allow for ingestion latency and appropriate retention. It was meant to solve: Security analytics needs to send selected Entra log categories to Log Analytics for queries across a 30-day investigation window. Which result demonstrates success?

  1. The workbook refreshes with recent relevant events and displays both agreed risk and activity measures
  2. The event appears in the chosen category with expected fields within an observed ingestion period
  3. A seeded directory configuration audit and user authentication event appear in the intended workspace under their correct categories after observable ingestion lag
  4. A sampled old event can be retrieved from the configured storage destination after the portal's shorter window

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. A seeded directory configuration audit and user authentication event appear in the intended workspace under their correct categories after observable ingestion lag. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if using Microsoft Entra workbooks or supported reporting backed by the required log data succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A seeded directory configuration audit and user authentication event appear in the intended workspace under their correct categories after observable ingestion lag.

B:

Even if generating a safe test event succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A seeded directory configuration audit and user authentication event appear in the intended workspace under their correct categories after observable ingestion lag.

D:

Even if exporting the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A seeded directory configuration audit and user authentication event appear in the intended workspace under their correct categories after observable ingestion lag.

Question 576

An engineer troubleshoots an identity solution for: Security analytics needs to send selected Entra log categories to Log Analytics for queries across a 30-day investigation window. The pilot result is: The Log Analytics table is empty even though raw logs exist at another destination. What is the most likely relevant fault?

  1. No diagnostic storage export was configured for the audit log category
  2. The diagnostic export sent data to another destination or omitted the required AuditLogs category from the selected workspace
  3. The analyst searched directory audit logs instead of sign-in logs
  4. The engineer tests a log category that wasn't selected in the diagnostic setting

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct diagnosis. The diagnostic export sent data to another destination or omitted the required AuditLogs category from the selected workspace. This fault explains the observed failure: The Log Analytics table is empty even though raw logs exist at another destination. The intended configuration would instead be: Enable the specifically required AuditLogs, SignInLogs and service-principal/provisioning categories in Entra diagnostic settings for the correct Log Analytics workspace, and allow for ingestion latency and appropriate retention.

Incorrect Answers

A:

No diagnostic storage export was configured for the audit log category. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The diagnostic export sent data to another destination or omitted the required AuditLogs category from the selected workspace. The corrective action is: Enable the specifically required AuditLogs, SignInLogs and service-principal/provisioning categories in Entra diagnostic settings for the correct Log Analytics workspace, and allow for ingestion latency and appropriate retention.

C:

The analyst searched directory audit logs instead of sign-in logs. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The diagnostic export sent data to another destination or omitted the required AuditLogs category from the selected workspace. The corrective action is: Enable the specifically required AuditLogs, SignInLogs and service-principal/provisioning categories in Entra diagnostic settings for the correct Log Analytics workspace, and allow for ingestion latency and appropriate retention.

D:

The engineer tests a log category that wasn't selected in the diagnostic setting. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The diagnostic export sent data to another destination or omitted the required AuditLogs category from the selected workspace. The corrective action is: Enable the specifically required AuditLogs, SignInLogs and service-principal/provisioning categories in Entra diagnostic settings for the correct Log Analytics workspace, and allow for ingestion latency and appropriate retention.

Question 577

A change request covers two Microsoft Entra needs. Requirement A: A central SOC requires near-real-time downstream processing of Microsoft Entra identity event streams. Requirement B: A SOC report must show administrative group changes over time, rather than user sign-in volumes. Select TWO actions, one for each requirement.

  1. Query Microsoft Entra sign-in logs with the targeted app, user, time range and Conditional Access status
  2. Use AuditLogs in Log Analytics and filter the relevant group-management operation names and result status
  3. Generate a safe test event, verify category configuration and ingestion latency, and query the destination after reasonable processing
  4. Configure the applicable diagnostic categories to an authorized Azure Event Hubs destination
  5. Use Microsoft Entra workbooks or supported reporting backed by the required log data and time filters

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

Correct for task 2. Use AuditLogs in Log Analytics and filter the relevant group-management operation names and result status. This addresses the independent second requirement: A SOC report must show administrative group changes over time, rather than user sign-in volumes. Verify it by checking: The time chart counts actual group changes by the requested interval and actor context.

D:

Correct for task 1. Configure the applicable diagnostic categories to an authorized Azure Event Hubs destination. This directly addresses the first requirement: A central SOC requires near-real-time downstream processing of Microsoft Entra identity event streams. Verify it by checking: A matching test audit event arrives on the expected Event Hub with correct source fields.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The analyst searched directory audit logs instead of sign-in logs. To satisfy task 1, use: Configure the applicable diagnostic categories to an authorized Azure Event Hubs destination. For task 2, use: Use AuditLogs in Log Analytics and filter the relevant group-management operation names and result status.

C:

The engineer tests a log category that wasn't selected in the diagnostic setting. To satisfy task 1, use: Configure the applicable diagnostic categories to an authorized Azure Event Hubs destination. For task 2, use: Use AuditLogs in Log Analytics and filter the relevant group-management operation names and result status.

E:

The workbook has no connected data source or uses an expired time window. To satisfy task 1, use: Configure the applicable diagnostic categories to an authorized Azure Event Hubs destination. For task 2, use: Use AuditLogs in Log Analytics and filter the relevant group-management operation names and result status.

Question 578

An operational review checks whether the change “Configure the applicable diagnostic categories to an authorized Azure Event Hubs destination” meets this need: A central SOC requires near-real-time downstream processing of Microsoft Entra identity event streams. Which finding supports acceptance?

  1. A matching test audit event arrives on the expected Event Hub with correct source fields
  2. A sampled old event can be retrieved from the configured storage destination after the portal's shorter window
  3. The workbook refreshes with recent relevant events and displays both agreed risk and activity measures
  4. A seeded directory configuration audit and user authentication event appear in the intended workspace under their correct categories after observable ingestion lag

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct acceptance check. A matching test audit event arrives on the expected Event Hub with correct source fields. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Even if exporting the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A matching test audit event arrives on the expected Event Hub with correct source fields.

C:

Even if using Microsoft Entra workbooks or supported reporting backed by the required log data succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A matching test audit event arrives on the expected Event Hub with correct source fields.

D:

Even if enabling the specifically required AuditLogs succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A matching test audit event arrives on the expected Event Hub with correct source fields.

Question 579

A change appears correct at a glance, but the requirement is still unmet: A central SOC requires near-real-time downstream processing of Microsoft Entra identity event streams. The key observed symptom is: The SOC consumer receives no identity events despite recent directory activity. Which cause should be investigated first?

  1. The diagnostic settings point to a different Event Hub namespace or lack its send authorization
  2. The workbook's data source is SigninLogs rather than AuditLogs
  3. No diagnostic storage export was configured for the audit log category
  4. The workbook has no connected data source or uses an expired time window

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. The diagnostic settings point to a different Event Hub namespace or lack its send authorization. This fault explains the observed failure: The SOC consumer receives no identity events despite recent directory activity. The intended configuration would instead be: Configure the applicable diagnostic categories to an authorized Azure Event Hubs destination.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The workbook's data source is SigninLogs rather than AuditLogs. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The diagnostic settings point to a different Event Hub namespace or lack its send authorization. The corrective action is: Configure the applicable diagnostic categories to an authorized Azure Event Hubs destination.

C:

No diagnostic storage export was configured for the audit log category. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The diagnostic settings point to a different Event Hub namespace or lack its send authorization. The corrective action is: Configure the applicable diagnostic categories to an authorized Azure Event Hubs destination.

D:

The workbook has no connected data source or uses an expired time window. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The diagnostic settings point to a different Event Hub namespace or lack its send authorization. The corrective action is: Configure the applicable diagnostic categories to an authorized Azure Event Hubs destination.

Question 580

During an access-management pilot, the engineer is tasked with the following: A compliance team needs low-cost immutable retention of selected audit data outside the interactive Microsoft Entra portal. Which action best addresses the requirement?

  1. Configure the applicable diagnostic categories to an authorized Azure Event Hubs destination
  2. Export the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls
  3. Enable the specifically required AuditLogs, SignInLogs and service-principal/provisioning categories in Entra diagnostic settings for the correct Log Analytics workspace, and allow for ingestion latency and appropriate retention
  4. Query Microsoft Entra sign-in logs with the targeted app, user, time range and Conditional Access status

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct implementation. Export the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls. It meets the stated requirement: A compliance team needs low-cost immutable retention of selected audit data outside the interactive Microsoft Entra portal. Acceptance evidence is: A sampled old event can be retrieved from the configured storage destination after the portal's shorter window.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The diagnostic settings point to a different Event Hub namespace or lack its send authorization. That condition is not the problem here: No diagnostic storage export was configured for the audit log category. The targeted implementation is: Export the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls.

C:

The diagnostic export sent data to another destination or omitted the required AuditLogs category from the selected workspace. That condition is not the problem here: No diagnostic storage export was configured for the audit log category. The targeted implementation is: Export the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls.

D:

The analyst searched directory audit logs instead of sign-in logs. That condition is not the problem here: No diagnostic storage export was configured for the audit log category. The targeted implementation is: Export the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls.