McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99
SC-300 Sample 1 SC-300 Sample 2 SC-300 Sample 3 SC-300 Sample 4 SC-300 Sample 5 SC-300 Sample 6 SC-300 Sample 7 SC-300 Sample 8 SC-300 Sample 9 SC-300 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 59

Question 580

During an access-management pilot, the engineer is tasked with the following: A compliance team needs low-cost immutable retention of selected audit data outside the interactive Microsoft Entra portal. Which action best addresses the requirement?

  1. Configure the applicable diagnostic categories to an authorized Azure Event Hubs destination
  2. Export the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls
  3. Enable the specifically required AuditLogs, SignInLogs and service-principal/provisioning categories in Entra diagnostic settings for the correct Log Analytics workspace, and allow for ingestion latency and appropriate retention
  4. Query Microsoft Entra sign-in logs with the targeted app, user, time range and Conditional Access status

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct implementation. Export the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls. It meets the stated requirement: A compliance team needs low-cost immutable retention of selected audit data outside the interactive Microsoft Entra portal. Acceptance evidence is: A sampled old event can be retrieved from the configured storage destination after the portal's shorter window.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The diagnostic settings point to a different Event Hub namespace or lack its send authorization. That condition is not the problem here: No diagnostic storage export was configured for the audit log category. The targeted implementation is: Export the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls.

C:

The diagnostic export sent data to another destination or omitted the required AuditLogs category from the selected workspace. That condition is not the problem here: No diagnostic storage export was configured for the audit log category. The targeted implementation is: Export the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls.

D:

The analyst searched directory audit logs instead of sign-in logs. That condition is not the problem here: No diagnostic storage export was configured for the audit log category. The targeted implementation is: Export the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls.

Question 581

After a deployment under this requirement — A compliance team needs low-cost immutable retention of selected audit data outside the interactive Microsoft Entra portal — administrators claim the following solution is in place: Export the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls. Which pilot finding supports that claim?

  1. A matching test audit event arrives on the expected Event Hub with correct source fields
  2. Records identify the actor, changed member, target group and timestamp
  3. A sampled old event can be retrieved from the configured storage destination after the portal's shorter window
  4. The event appears in the chosen category with expected fields within an observed ingestion period

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. A sampled old event can be retrieved from the configured storage destination after the portal's shorter window. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if configuring the applicable diagnostic categories to an authorized Azure Event Hubs destination succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A sampled old event can be retrieved from the configured storage destination after the portal's shorter window.

B:

Even if inspecting Microsoft Entra audit logs filtered for group membership actions succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A sampled old event can be retrieved from the configured storage destination after the portal's shorter window.

D:

Even if generating a safe test event succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A sampled old event can be retrieved from the configured storage destination after the portal's shorter window.

Question 582

The service desk escalates the following unsuccessful identity rollout. Requirement: A compliance team needs low-cost immutable retention of selected audit data outside the interactive Microsoft Entra portal. Observed: An older event is no longer accessible even though the archive policy required retention. Which underlying misconfiguration is most consistent?

  1. The engineer tests a log category that wasn't selected in the diagnostic setting
  2. Investigators searched interactive user SigninLogs instead of service principal sign-in events for this nonuser authentication
  3. No diagnostic storage export was configured for the audit log category
  4. The analyst searched directory audit logs instead of sign-in logs

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. No diagnostic storage export was configured for the audit log category. This fault explains the observed failure: An older event is no longer accessible even though the archive policy required retention. The intended configuration would instead be: Export the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The engineer tests a log category that wasn't selected in the diagnostic setting. The reported symptom instead has this cause: No diagnostic storage export was configured for the audit log category. The corrective action is: Export the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls.

B:

Investigators searched interactive user SigninLogs instead of service principal sign-in events for this nonuser authentication. The reported symptom instead has this cause: No diagnostic storage export was configured for the audit log category. The corrective action is: Export the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls.

D:

The analyst searched directory audit logs instead of sign-in logs. The reported symptom instead has this cause: No diagnostic storage export was configured for the audit log category. The corrective action is: Export the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls.

Question 583

Select the most appropriate first configuration decision for this scenario: An analyst has a KQL query over SigninLogs and must narrow it to failed requests for one application in the last day.

  1. Filter provisioning logs to the enterprise application, target account and failed provisioning steps
  2. Query Microsoft Entra sign-in logs with the targeted app, user, time range and Conditional Access status
  3. Inspect Microsoft Entra audit logs filtered for group membership actions and target group
  4. Filter SigninLogs by TimeGenerated, AppDisplayName/AppId and ResultType as appropriate and project useful identifiers

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct implementation. Filter SigninLogs by TimeGenerated, AppDisplayName/AppId and ResultType as appropriate and project useful identifiers. It meets the stated requirement: An analyst has a KQL query over SigninLogs and must narrow it to failed requests for one application in the last day. Acceptance evidence is: Returned rows are failed sign-ins to the named app within the selected time interval.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The analyst examined only interactive sign-in events instead of provisioning transactions. That condition is not the problem here: The query uses an audit event table or omits the failure/result predicate. The targeted implementation is: Filter SigninLogs by TimeGenerated, AppDisplayName/AppId and ResultType as appropriate and project useful identifiers.

B:

The analyst searched directory audit logs instead of sign-in logs. That condition is not the problem here: The query uses an audit event table or omits the failure/result predicate. The targeted implementation is: Filter SigninLogs by TimeGenerated, AppDisplayName/AppId and ResultType as appropriate and project useful identifiers.

C:

The engineer searched only the sign-in logs, which record authentication rather than directory writes. That condition is not the problem here: The query uses an audit event table or omits the failure/result predicate. The targeted implementation is: Filter SigninLogs by TimeGenerated, AppDisplayName/AppId and ResultType as appropriate and project useful identifiers.

Question 584

The team implemented the following change: Filter SigninLogs by TimeGenerated, AppDisplayName/AppId and ResultType as appropriate and project useful identifiers. The acceptance requirement was: An analyst has a KQL query over SigninLogs and must narrow it to failed requests for one application in the last day. Which observed outcome most directly proves the change works?

  1. The error record shows the failed create/update action and vendor API response
  2. Returned rows are failed sign-ins to the named app within the selected time interval
  3. The results list relevant failed attempts, policy outcomes and correlation IDs while excluding unrelated apps
  4. A sampled old event can be retrieved from the configured storage destination after the portal's shorter window

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. Returned rows are failed sign-ins to the named app within the selected time interval. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if filtering provisioning logs to the enterprise application succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Returned rows are failed sign-ins to the named app within the selected time interval.

C:

Even if querying Microsoft Entra sign-in logs with the targeted app succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Returned rows are failed sign-ins to the named app within the selected time interval.

D:

Even if exporting the required directory log categories to a suitably protected Azure Storage account with defined retention controls succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Returned rows are failed sign-ins to the named app within the selected time interval.

Question 585

During post-change review of the requirement “An analyst has a KQL query over SigninLogs and must narrow it to failed requests for one application in the last day,” an auditor observes: Successful unrelated logins dominate the result despite the failure-focused investigation. Which root-cause finding would explain that symptom?

  1. The query uses an audit event table or omits the failure/result predicate
  2. The analyst searched directory audit logs instead of sign-in logs
  3. The diagnostic export sent data to another destination or omitted the required AuditLogs category from the selected workspace
  4. The analyst examined only interactive sign-in events instead of provisioning transactions

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. The query uses an audit event table or omits the failure/result predicate. This fault explains the observed failure: Successful unrelated logins dominate the result despite the failure-focused investigation. The intended configuration would instead be: Filter SigninLogs by TimeGenerated, AppDisplayName/AppId and ResultType as appropriate and project useful identifiers.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The analyst searched directory audit logs instead of sign-in logs. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The query uses an audit event table or omits the failure/result predicate. The corrective action is: Filter SigninLogs by TimeGenerated, AppDisplayName/AppId and ResultType as appropriate and project useful identifiers.

C:

The diagnostic export sent data to another destination or omitted the required AuditLogs category from the selected workspace. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The query uses an audit event table or omits the failure/result predicate. The corrective action is: Filter SigninLogs by TimeGenerated, AppDisplayName/AppId and ResultType as appropriate and project useful identifiers.

D:

The analyst examined only interactive sign-in events instead of provisioning transactions. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The query uses an audit event table or omits the failure/result predicate. The corrective action is: Filter SigninLogs by TimeGenerated, AppDisplayName/AppId and ResultType as appropriate and project useful identifiers.

Question 586

The security architect is given this constraint: A SOC report must show administrative group changes over time, rather than user sign-in volumes. Which technical approach meets it without relying on unrelated controls?

  1. Enable the specifically required AuditLogs, SignInLogs and service-principal/provisioning categories in Entra diagnostic settings for the correct Log Analytics workspace, and allow for ingestion latency and appropriate retention
  2. Filter provisioning logs to the enterprise application, target account and failed provisioning steps
  3. Use Microsoft Entra workbooks or supported reporting backed by the required log data and time filters
  4. Use AuditLogs in Log Analytics and filter the relevant group-management operation names and result status

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct implementation. Use AuditLogs in Log Analytics and filter the relevant group-management operation names and result status. It meets the stated requirement: A SOC report must show administrative group changes over time, rather than user sign-in volumes. Acceptance evidence is: The time chart counts actual group changes by the requested interval and actor context.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The diagnostic export sent data to another destination or omitted the required AuditLogs category from the selected workspace. That condition is not the problem here: The workbook's data source is SigninLogs rather than AuditLogs. The targeted implementation is: Use AuditLogs in Log Analytics and filter the relevant group-management operation names and result status.

B:

The analyst examined only interactive sign-in events instead of provisioning transactions. That condition is not the problem here: The workbook's data source is SigninLogs rather than AuditLogs. The targeted implementation is: Use AuditLogs in Log Analytics and filter the relevant group-management operation names and result status.

C:

The workbook has no connected data source or uses an expired time window. That condition is not the problem here: The workbook's data source is SigninLogs rather than AuditLogs. The targeted implementation is: Use AuditLogs in Log Analytics and filter the relevant group-management operation names and result status.

Question 587

An auditor must verify this deployment decision: Use AuditLogs in Log Analytics and filter the relevant group-management operation names and result status. Its purpose was: A SOC report must show administrative group changes over time, rather than user sign-in volumes. Which test result is the strongest evidence?

  1. The results list relevant failed attempts, policy outcomes and correlation IDs while excluding unrelated apps
  2. A matching test audit event arrives on the expected Event Hub with correct source fields
  3. The time chart counts actual group changes by the requested interval and actor context
  4. Records identify the actor, changed member, target group and timestamp

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. The time chart counts actual group changes by the requested interval and actor context. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if querying Microsoft Entra sign-in logs with the targeted app succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The time chart counts actual group changes by the requested interval and actor context.

B:

Even if configuring the applicable diagnostic categories to an authorized Azure Event Hubs destination succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The time chart counts actual group changes by the requested interval and actor context.

D:

Even if inspecting Microsoft Entra audit logs filtered for group membership actions succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The time chart counts actual group changes by the requested interval and actor context.

Question 588

A team must isolate a broken configuration. Goal: A SOC report must show administrative group changes over time, rather than user sign-in volumes. Symptom: The chart tracks authentication traffic but not directory group changes. Which hypothesis most precisely accounts for the observed result?

  1. The analyst searched directory audit logs instead of sign-in logs
  2. The workbook has no connected data source or uses an expired time window
  3. The diagnostic settings point to a different Event Hub namespace or lack its send authorization
  4. The workbook's data source is SigninLogs rather than AuditLogs

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct diagnosis. The workbook's data source is SigninLogs rather than AuditLogs. This fault explains the observed failure: The chart tracks authentication traffic but not directory group changes. The intended configuration would instead be: Use AuditLogs in Log Analytics and filter the relevant group-management operation names and result status.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The analyst searched directory audit logs instead of sign-in logs. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The workbook's data source is SigninLogs rather than AuditLogs. The corrective action is: Use AuditLogs in Log Analytics and filter the relevant group-management operation names and result status.

B:

The workbook has no connected data source or uses an expired time window. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The workbook's data source is SigninLogs rather than AuditLogs. The corrective action is: Use AuditLogs in Log Analytics and filter the relevant group-management operation names and result status.

C:

The diagnostic settings point to a different Event Hub namespace or lack its send authorization. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The workbook's data source is SigninLogs rather than AuditLogs. The corrective action is: Use AuditLogs in Log Analytics and filter the relevant group-management operation names and result status.

Question 589

Two teams share the same release window but not the same access policy. Team A needs: An enterprise needs one visual report showing risky sign-ins and identity usage trends for leadership. Team B needs: A security review needs to confirm whether newly enabled diagnostic categories produce records without assuming that the export is instantaneous. Which TWO implementations should be included?

  1. Inspect service principal sign-in activity (or the corresponding exported service-principal log category) filtered by the app/service principal ID, target resource and status, rather than interactive user SigninLogs
  2. Enable the specifically required AuditLogs, SignInLogs and service-principal/provisioning categories in Entra diagnostic settings for the correct Log Analytics workspace, and allow for ingestion latency and appropriate retention
  3. Query Microsoft Entra sign-in logs with the targeted app, user, time range and Conditional Access status
  4. Use Microsoft Entra workbooks or supported reporting backed by the required log data and time filters
  5. Generate a safe test event, verify category configuration and ingestion latency, and query the destination after reasonable processing

Explanation

Correct Answers

D:

Correct for task 1. Use Microsoft Entra workbooks or supported reporting backed by the required log data and time filters. This directly addresses the first requirement: An enterprise needs one visual report showing risky sign-ins and identity usage trends for leadership. Verify it by checking: The workbook refreshes with recent relevant events and displays both agreed risk and activity measures.

E:

Correct for task 2. Generate a safe test event, verify category configuration and ingestion latency, and query the destination after reasonable processing. This addresses the independent second requirement: A security review needs to confirm whether newly enabled diagnostic categories produce records without assuming that the export is instantaneous. Verify it by checking: The event appears in the chosen category with expected fields within an observed ingestion period.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Investigators searched interactive user SigninLogs instead of service principal sign-in events for this nonuser authentication. To satisfy task 1, use: Use Microsoft Entra workbooks or supported reporting backed by the required log data and time filters. For task 2, use: Generate a safe test event, verify category configuration and ingestion latency, and query the destination after reasonable processing.

B:

The diagnostic export sent data to another destination or omitted the required AuditLogs category from the selected workspace. To satisfy task 1, use: Use Microsoft Entra workbooks or supported reporting backed by the required log data and time filters. For task 2, use: Generate a safe test event, verify category configuration and ingestion latency, and query the destination after reasonable processing.

C:

The analyst searched directory audit logs instead of sign-in logs. To satisfy task 1, use: Use Microsoft Entra workbooks or supported reporting backed by the required log data and time filters. For task 2, use: Generate a safe test event, verify category configuration and ingestion latency, and query the destination after reasonable processing.

Question 590

After configuring: Use Microsoft Entra workbooks or supported reporting backed by the required log data and time filters, an engineer performs a targeted pilot for this objective: An enterprise needs one visual report showing risky sign-ins and identity usage trends for leadership. What result constitutes a pass?

  1. A completed remediation changes the applicable recommendation assessment while incident risk is still separately monitored
  2. The time chart counts actual group changes by the requested interval and actor context
  3. The workbook refreshes with recent relevant events and displays both agreed risk and activity measures
  4. Returned rows are failed sign-ins to the named app within the selected time interval

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. The workbook refreshes with recent relevant events and displays both agreed risk and activity measures. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if reviewing Identity Secure Score recommended actions succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The workbook refreshes with recent relevant events and displays both agreed risk and activity measures.

B:

Even if using AuditLogs in Log Analytics succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The workbook refreshes with recent relevant events and displays both agreed risk and activity measures.

D:

Even if filtering SigninLogs by TimeGenerated succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The workbook refreshes with recent relevant events and displays both agreed risk and activity measures.