McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99
SC-300 Sample 1 SC-300 Sample 2 SC-300 Sample 3 SC-300 Sample 4 SC-300 Sample 5 SC-300 Sample 6 SC-300 Sample 7 SC-300 Sample 8 SC-300 Sample 9 SC-300 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 8

Question 70

The security architect is given this constraint: A fleet administrator must identify stale Entra devices for cleanup while avoiding deletion of actively used endpoints. Which technical approach meets it without relying on unrelated controls?

  1. Use a distribution group for messaging and a separately controlled security/app assignment group for application access
  2. Use device activity and ownership/trust information to build a review set before disabling or removing device objects
  3. Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement
  4. Define a custom security attribute set and attribute, then assign the supported attribute roles and values to relevant users

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct implementation. Use device activity and ownership/trust information to build a review set before disabling or removing device objects. It meets the stated requirement: A fleet administrator must identify stale Entra devices for cleanup while avoiding deletion of actively used endpoints. Acceptance evidence is: A known active device is retained and a genuinely retired device is reviewed with its last activity and management context.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A mail distribution group was incorrectly assumed to establish app-specific authorization. That condition is not the problem here: The team uses device creation dates alone without checking recent sign-in or activity evidence. The targeted implementation is: Use device activity and ownership/trust information to build a review set before disabling or removing device objects.

C:

The workstation completed only workplace registration rather than the intended Entra join. That condition is not the problem here: The team uses device creation dates alone without checking recent sign-in or activity evidence. The targeted implementation is: Use device activity and ownership/trust information to build a review set before disabling or removing device objects.

D:

The user received only a general User Administrator role rather than required custom security attribute privileges. That condition is not the problem here: The team uses device creation dates alone without checking recent sign-in or activity evidence. The targeted implementation is: Use device activity and ownership/trust information to build a review set before disabling or removing device objects.

Question 71

An operational review checks whether the change “Use device activity and ownership/trust information to build a review set before disabling or removing device objects” meets this need: A fleet administrator must identify stale Entra devices for cleanup while avoiding deletion of actively used endpoints. Which finding supports acceptance?

  1. The phone appears registered while the corporate machine appears joined and receives policies appropriate to its state
  2. Group members receive the intended application authorization while they cannot administer directory settings
  3. The imported users have the expected attributes and the operator can enumerate any rejected records
  4. A known active device is retained and a genuinely retired device is reviewed with its last activity and management context

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct acceptance check. A known active device is retained and a genuinely retired device is reviewed with its last activity and management context. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if using the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A known active device is retained and a genuinely retired device is reviewed with its last activity and management context.

B:

Even if assigning the group to the enterprise application's defined app role rather than granting Entra directory administrator privileges succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A known active device is retained and a genuinely retired device is reviewed with its last activity and management context.

C:

Even if using a supported Microsoft Entra bulk creation method or Microsoft Graph/PowerShell with per-user validation succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A known active device is retained and a genuinely retired device is reviewed with its last activity and management context.

Question 72

The deployment owner asks why this identity requirement failed: A fleet administrator must identify stale Entra devices for cleanup while avoiding deletion of actively used endpoints. The test shows: An active pilot device is marked for deletion despite a recent successful sign-in. Which fault is the best diagnosis?

  1. The team uses device creation dates alone without checking recent sign-in or activity evidence
  2. The workstation completed only workplace registration rather than the intended Entra join
  3. The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite
  4. The user received only a general User Administrator role rather than required custom security attribute privileges

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. The team uses device creation dates alone without checking recent sign-in or activity evidence. This fault explains the observed failure: An active pilot device is marked for deletion despite a recent successful sign-in. The intended configuration would instead be: Use device activity and ownership/trust information to build a review set before disabling or removing device objects.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The workstation completed only workplace registration rather than the intended Entra join. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The team uses device creation dates alone without checking recent sign-in or activity evidence. The corrective action is: Use device activity and ownership/trust information to build a review set before disabling or removing device objects.

C:

The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The team uses device creation dates alone without checking recent sign-in or activity evidence. The corrective action is: Use device activity and ownership/trust information to build a review set before disabling or removing device objects.

D:

The user received only a general User Administrator role rather than required custom security attribute privileges. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The team uses device creation dates alone without checking recent sign-in or activity evidence. The corrective action is: Use device activity and ownership/trust information to build a review set before disabling or removing device objects.

Question 73

Which implementation fits the following specific identity problem? A bulk update changes department for 200 users and must be safely reversible from an authoritative inventory.

  1. Use a supported Microsoft Entra bulk creation method or Microsoft Graph/PowerShell with per-user validation and error logging
  2. Export a baseline of exact user IDs and old attributes, apply scoped updates, and verify each changed object by ID
  3. Block the compromised user from new sign-in, revoke the available refresh sessions, and validate active resource access with CAE-aware clients without assuming all old access tokens instantly expire
  4. Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct implementation. Export a baseline of exact user IDs and old attributes, apply scoped updates, and verify each changed object by ID. It meets the stated requirement: A bulk update changes department for 200 users and must be safely reversible from an authoritative inventory. Acceptance evidence is: Counts and stable object IDs reconcile, and a test rollback restores the old department on the intended object.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The import data omits a mandatory attribute or uses a malformed column mapping. That condition is not the problem here: The update joins records by display name, producing collisions for duplicate names. The targeted implementation is: Export a baseline of exact user IDs and old attributes, apply scoped updates, and verify each changed object by ID.

C:

The account's display name was changed without blocking sign-in or invalidating sessions. That condition is not the problem here: The update joins records by display name, producing collisions for duplicate names. The targeted implementation is: Export a baseline of exact user IDs and old attributes, apply scoped updates, and verify each changed object by ID.

D:

The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite. That condition is not the problem here: The update joins records by display name, producing collisions for duplicate names. The targeted implementation is: Export a baseline of exact user IDs and old attributes, apply scoped updates, and verify each changed object by ID.

Question 74

After a deployment under this requirement — A bulk update changes department for 200 users and must be safely reversible from an authoritative inventory — administrators claim the following solution is in place: Export a baseline of exact user IDs and old attributes, apply scoped updates, and verify each changed object by ID. Which pilot finding supports that claim?

  1. The imported users have the expected attributes and the operator can enumerate any rejected records
  2. The phone appears registered while the corporate machine appears joined and receives policies appropriate to its state
  3. The user signs in with the planned identifier and receives mail on approved addresses without recreating the account
  4. Counts and stable object IDs reconcile, and a test rollback restores the old department on the intended object

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct acceptance check. Counts and stable object IDs reconcile, and a test rollback restores the old department on the intended object. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if using a supported Microsoft Entra bulk creation method or Microsoft Graph/PowerShell with per-user validation succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Counts and stable object IDs reconcile, and a test rollback restores the old department on the intended object.

B:

Even if using the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Counts and stable object IDs reconcile, and a test rollback restores the old department on the intended object.

C:

Even if updating the supported display name succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Counts and stable object IDs reconcile, and a test rollback restores the old department on the intended object.

Question 75

The deployment was intended to satisfy: A bulk update changes department for 200 users and must be safely reversible from an authoritative inventory. During testing, this happened: A different employee with the same display name receives the department change. Which configuration defect best explains the failure?

  1. The account's display name was changed without blocking sign-in or invalidating sessions
  2. The operator granted the group an Entra role instead of assigning an application role
  3. The update joins records by display name, producing collisions for duplicate names
  4. The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. The update joins records by display name, producing collisions for duplicate names. This fault explains the observed failure: A different employee with the same display name receives the department change. The intended configuration would instead be: Export a baseline of exact user IDs and old attributes, apply scoped updates, and verify each changed object by ID.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The account's display name was changed without blocking sign-in or invalidating sessions. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The update joins records by display name, producing collisions for duplicate names. The corrective action is: Export a baseline of exact user IDs and old attributes, apply scoped updates, and verify each changed object by ID.

B:

The operator granted the group an Entra role instead of assigning an application role. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The update joins records by display name, producing collisions for duplicate names. The corrective action is: Export a baseline of exact user IDs and old attributes, apply scoped updates, and verify each changed object by ID.

D:

The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The update joins records by display name, producing collisions for duplicate names. The corrective action is: Export a baseline of exact user IDs and old attributes, apply scoped updates, and verify each changed object by ID.

Question 76

An identity engineer has two independent tasks. Task 1: A licensing policy should assign a new service plan to all new engineering staff but not alter existing unrelated product assignments. Task 2: The licensing team needs 300 users in a maintained security group to receive the same eligible Microsoft 365 license set automatically. Which TWO configuration changes jointly meet both tasks?

  1. Assign the group to the enterprise application's defined app role rather than granting Entra directory administrator privileges
  2. Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors
  3. Adjust the appropriate group-based license options for the engineering group and verify only intended service plans change
  4. Create an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value and test its supported membership processing
  5. Export a baseline of exact user IDs and old attributes, apply scoped updates, and verify each changed object by ID

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

Correct for task 2. Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors. This addresses the independent second requirement: The licensing team needs 300 users in a maintained security group to receive the same eligible Microsoft 365 license set automatically. Verify it by checking: A newly added eligible group member receives the service plans and a deliberately conflicting user reports an actionable error.

C:

Correct for task 1. Adjust the appropriate group-based license options for the engineering group and verify only intended service plans change. This directly addresses the first requirement: A licensing policy should assign a new service plan to all new engineering staff but not alter existing unrelated product assignments. Verify it by checking: A new engineer receives the requested plan while unrelated licenses remain unchanged for existing staff.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The operator granted the group an Entra role instead of assigning an application role. To satisfy task 1, use: Adjust the appropriate group-based license options for the engineering group and verify only intended service plans change. For task 2, use: Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors.

D:

The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field. To satisfy task 1, use: Adjust the appropriate group-based license options for the engineering group and verify only intended service plans change. For task 2, use: Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors.

E:

The update joins records by display name, producing collisions for duplicate names. To satisfy task 1, use: Adjust the appropriate group-based license options for the engineering group and verify only intended service plans change. For task 2, use: Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors.

Question 77

The team implemented the following change: Adjust the appropriate group-based license options for the engineering group and verify only intended service plans change. The acceptance requirement was: A licensing policy should assign a new service plan to all new engineering staff but not alter existing unrelated product assignments. Which observed outcome most directly proves the change works?

  1. A contractor receives the distribution message but cannot open the restricted app without its own assignment
  2. A new engineer receives the requested plan while unrelated licenses remain unchanged for existing staff
  3. A new seasonal employee enters the group automatically and leaves after the type attribute changes
  4. New sign-in and refresh-token requests fail, while supported CAE resource access is denied within documented event-propagation bounds and unsupported token sessions are tracked separately

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. A new engineer receives the requested plan while unrelated licenses remain unchanged for existing staff. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if using a distribution group for messaging succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A new engineer receives the requested plan while unrelated licenses remain unchanged for existing staff.

C:

Even if creating an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A new engineer receives the requested plan while unrelated licenses remain unchanged for existing staff.

D:

Even if blocking the compromised user from new sign-in succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A new engineer receives the requested plan while unrelated licenses remain unchanged for existing staff.

Question 78

An engineer troubleshoots an identity solution for: A licensing policy should assign a new service plan to all new engineering staff but not alter existing unrelated product assignments. The pilot result is: Staff lose an unrelated service plan after the license change. What is the most likely relevant fault?

  1. The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field
  2. The operator granted the group an Entra role instead of assigning an application role
  3. The change removes an existing product assignment instead of only updating the intended group license options
  4. The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. The change removes an existing product assignment instead of only updating the intended group license options. This fault explains the observed failure: Staff lose an unrelated service plan after the license change. The intended configuration would instead be: Adjust the appropriate group-based license options for the engineering group and verify only intended service plans change.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The change removes an existing product assignment instead of only updating the intended group license options. The corrective action is: Adjust the appropriate group-based license options for the engineering group and verify only intended service plans change.

B:

The operator granted the group an Entra role instead of assigning an application role. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The change removes an existing product assignment instead of only updating the intended group license options. The corrective action is: Adjust the appropriate group-based license options for the engineering group and verify only intended service plans change.

D:

The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The change removes an existing product assignment instead of only updating the intended group license options. The corrective action is: Adjust the appropriate group-based license options for the engineering group and verify only intended service plans change.

Question 79

An identity engineer has two independent tasks. Task 1: A supplier must collaborate on a SharePoint site using its own organizational credentials rather than receiving a new employee account. Task 2: An enterprise must supply synchronized B2B users to a receiving tenant instead of emailing each employee an invitation. Which TWO configuration changes jointly meet both tasks?

  1. Invite the supplier through Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration with appropriate tenant and resource permissions
  2. Set Microsoft Entra cross-tenant access inbound B2B collaboration settings to allow the named partner, with suitable app and user scopes
  3. Restrict new guest invitations to authorized inviters while preserving explicitly granted access for existing guests
  4. Configure the supported SAML federation settings for the external identity provider with validated issuer, endpoints, and trust material
  5. Configure source-tenant push synchronization of in-scope internal members with source attribute mappings, and authorize inbound synchronization and redemption in the target tenant

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Correct for task 1. Invite the supplier through Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration with appropriate tenant and resource permissions. This directly addresses the first requirement: A supplier must collaborate on a SharePoint site using its own organizational credentials rather than receiving a new employee account. Verify it by checking: The supplier redeems the invitation, appears with the expected guest identity, and accesses only the granted site.

E:

Correct for task 2. Configure source-tenant push synchronization of in-scope internal members with source attribute mappings, and authorize inbound synchronization and redemption in the target tenant. This addresses the independent second requirement: An enterprise must supply synchronized B2B users to a receiving tenant instead of emailing each employee an invitation. Verify it by checking: An in-scope source internal member is provisioned as a cross-tenant B2B object in the target while source external guests and excluded members are not provisioned.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The inbound cross-tenant policy was configured for the wrong tenant ID. To satisfy task 1, use: Invite the supplier through Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration with appropriate tenant and resource permissions. For task 2, use: Configure source-tenant push synchronization of in-scope internal members with source attribute mappings, and authorize inbound synchronization and redemption in the target tenant.

C:

The policy removes all existing guest objects instead of restricting who may send invitations. To satisfy task 1, use: Invite the supplier through Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration with appropriate tenant and resource permissions. For task 2, use: Configure source-tenant push synchronization of in-scope internal members with source attribute mappings, and authorize inbound synchronization and redemption in the target tenant.

D:

The SAML issuer or signing certificate does not match the configured trust. To satisfy task 1, use: Invite the supplier through Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration with appropriate tenant and resource permissions. For task 2, use: Configure source-tenant push synchronization of in-scope internal members with source attribute mappings, and authorize inbound synchronization and redemption in the target tenant.

Question 80

After configuring: Invite the supplier through Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration with appropriate tenant and resource permissions, an engineer performs a targeted pilot for this objective: A supplier must collaborate on a SharePoint site using its own organizational credentials rather than receiving a new employee account. What result constitutes a pass?

  1. The terminated guest cannot access the app and the access review records the removal decision
  2. An in-scope source internal member is provisioned as a cross-tenant B2B object in the target while source external guests and excluded members are not provisioned
  3. The supplier redeems the invitation, appears with the expected guest identity, and accesses only the granted site
  4. An unauthorized member cannot invite a new vendor, and an existing approved guest can still reach its allocated resource

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. The supplier redeems the invitation, appears with the expected guest identity, and accesses only the granted site. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if removing the obsolete guest's resource assignments succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The supplier redeems the invitation, appears with the expected guest identity, and accesses only the granted site.

B:

Even if configuring source-tenant push synchronization of in-scope internal members with source attribute mappings succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The supplier redeems the invitation, appears with the expected guest identity, and accesses only the granted site.

D:

Even if restricting new guest invitations to authorized inviters while preserving explicitly granted access for existing guests succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The supplier redeems the invitation, appears with the expected guest identity, and accesses only the granted site.