McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99
SC-300 Sample 1 SC-300 Sample 2 SC-300 Sample 3 SC-300 Sample 4 SC-300 Sample 5 SC-300 Sample 6 SC-300 Sample 7 SC-300 Sample 8 SC-300 Sample 9 SC-300 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 6

Question 50

An operational review checks whether the change “Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement” meets this need: A device inventory distinguishes a personally owned phone registered for access from a corporate workstation joined to Microsoft Entra. Which finding supports acceptance?

  1. A permitted attribute administrator can set the classification while an ordinary user without the role cannot view protected values
  2. The user signs in with the planned identifier and receives mail on approved addresses without recreating the account
  3. A known active device is retained and a genuinely retired device is reviewed with its last activity and management context
  4. The phone appears registered while the corporate machine appears joined and receives policies appropriate to its state

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct acceptance check. The phone appears registered while the corporate machine appears joined and receives policies appropriate to its state. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if defining a custom security attribute set succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The phone appears registered while the corporate machine appears joined and receives policies appropriate to its state.

B:

Even if updating the supported display name succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The phone appears registered while the corporate machine appears joined and receives policies appropriate to its state.

C:

Even if using device activity succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The phone appears registered while the corporate machine appears joined and receives policies appropriate to its state.

Question 51

The deployment owner asks why this identity requirement failed: A device inventory distinguishes a personally owned phone registered for access from a corporate workstation joined to Microsoft Entra. The test shows: The corporate workstation shows Registered, not the expected Joined trust type. Which fault is the best diagnosis?

  1. The user received only a general User Administrator role rather than required custom security attribute privileges
  2. The operator granted the group an Entra role instead of assigning an application role
  3. The workstation completed only workplace registration rather than the intended Entra join
  4. The team uses device creation dates alone without checking recent sign-in or activity evidence

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. The workstation completed only workplace registration rather than the intended Entra join. This fault explains the observed failure: The corporate workstation shows Registered, not the expected Joined trust type. The intended configuration would instead be: Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The user received only a general User Administrator role rather than required custom security attribute privileges. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The workstation completed only workplace registration rather than the intended Entra join. The corrective action is: Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement.

B:

The operator granted the group an Entra role instead of assigning an application role. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The workstation completed only workplace registration rather than the intended Entra join. The corrective action is: Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement.

D:

The team uses device creation dates alone without checking recent sign-in or activity evidence. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The workstation completed only workplace registration rather than the intended Entra join. The corrective action is: Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement.

Question 52

A change request covers two Microsoft Entra needs. Requirement A: A cloud user has changed legal surname and must retain sign-in and mailbox access while displaying updated identity information. Requirement B: A project owner needs to assign an app role to a group, but the group should not receive a directory administrator role. Select TWO actions, one for each requirement.

  1. Update the dynamic membership expression or source attributes instead of trying manual Add member operations
  2. Block the compromised user from new sign-in, revoke the available refresh sessions, and validate active resource access with CAE-aware clients without assuming all old access tokens instantly expire
  3. Define a custom security attribute set and attribute, then assign the supported attribute roles and values to relevant users
  4. Assign the group to the enterprise application's defined app role rather than granting Entra directory administrator privileges
  5. Update the supported display name and desired UPN/proxy address carefully, validating required downstream mail attributes

Explanation

Correct Answers

D:

Correct for task 2. Assign the group to the enterprise application's defined app role rather than granting Entra directory administrator privileges. This addresses the independent second requirement: A project owner needs to assign an app role to a group, but the group should not receive a directory administrator role. Verify it by checking: Group members receive the intended application authorization while they cannot administer directory settings.

E:

Correct for task 1. Update the supported display name and desired UPN/proxy address carefully, validating required downstream mail attributes. This directly addresses the first requirement: A cloud user has changed legal surname and must retain sign-in and mailbox access while displaying updated identity information. Verify it by checking: The user signs in with the planned identifier and receives mail on approved addresses without recreating the account.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The operator attempts to add a member manually to a rule-based dynamic group. To satisfy task 1, use: Update the supported display name and desired UPN/proxy address carefully, validating required downstream mail attributes. For task 2, use: Assign the group to the enterprise application's defined app role rather than granting Entra directory administrator privileges.

B:

The account's display name was changed without blocking sign-in or invalidating sessions. To satisfy task 1, use: Update the supported display name and desired UPN/proxy address carefully, validating required downstream mail attributes. For task 2, use: Assign the group to the enterprise application's defined app role rather than granting Entra directory administrator privileges.

C:

The user received only a general User Administrator role rather than required custom security attribute privileges. To satisfy task 1, use: Update the supported display name and desired UPN/proxy address carefully, validating required downstream mail attributes. For task 2, use: Assign the group to the enterprise application's defined app role rather than granting Entra directory administrator privileges.

Question 53

After a deployment under this requirement — A cloud user has changed legal surname and must retain sign-in and mailbox access while displaying updated identity information — administrators claim the following solution is in place: Update the supported display name and desired UPN/proxy address carefully, validating required downstream mail attributes. Which pilot finding supports that claim?

  1. A contractor receives the distribution message but cannot open the restricted app without its own assignment
  2. The user signs in with the planned identifier and receives mail on approved addresses without recreating the account
  3. The phone appears registered while the corporate machine appears joined and receives policies appropriate to its state
  4. New sign-in and refresh-token requests fail, while supported CAE resource access is denied within documented event-propagation bounds and unsupported token sessions are tracked separately

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. The user signs in with the planned identifier and receives mail on approved addresses without recreating the account. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if using a distribution group for messaging succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The user signs in with the planned identifier and receives mail on approved addresses without recreating the account.

C:

Even if using the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The user signs in with the planned identifier and receives mail on approved addresses without recreating the account.

D:

Even if blocking the compromised user from new sign-in succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The user signs in with the planned identifier and receives mail on approved addresses without recreating the account.

Question 54

The deployment was intended to satisfy: A cloud user has changed legal surname and must retain sign-in and mailbox access while displaying updated identity information. During testing, this happened: The updated display name appears, but the proposed new sign-in suffix is rejected. Which configuration defect best explains the failure?

  1. The workstation completed only workplace registration rather than the intended Entra join
  2. A mail distribution group was incorrectly assumed to establish app-specific authorization
  3. The account's display name was changed without blocking sign-in or invalidating sessions
  4. The sign-in UPN was edited without the associated domain being verified or mail routing checked

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct diagnosis. The sign-in UPN was edited without the associated domain being verified or mail routing checked. This fault explains the observed failure: The updated display name appears, but the proposed new sign-in suffix is rejected. The intended configuration would instead be: Update the supported display name and desired UPN/proxy address carefully, validating required downstream mail attributes.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The workstation completed only workplace registration rather than the intended Entra join. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The sign-in UPN was edited without the associated domain being verified or mail routing checked. The corrective action is: Update the supported display name and desired UPN/proxy address carefully, validating required downstream mail attributes.

B:

A mail distribution group was incorrectly assumed to establish app-specific authorization. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The sign-in UPN was edited without the associated domain being verified or mail routing checked. The corrective action is: Update the supported display name and desired UPN/proxy address carefully, validating required downstream mail attributes.

C:

The account's display name was changed without blocking sign-in or invalidating sessions. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The sign-in UPN was edited without the associated domain being verified or mail routing checked. The corrective action is: Update the supported display name and desired UPN/proxy address carefully, validating required downstream mail attributes.

Question 55

A change board will approve one identity configuration to satisfy: An onboarding script must add hundreds of users with consistent location, usage location, and department values. Which change should it approve?

  1. Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors
  2. Use a supported Microsoft Entra bulk creation method or Microsoft Graph/PowerShell with per-user validation and error logging
  3. Block the compromised user from new sign-in, revoke the available refresh sessions, and validate active resource access with CAE-aware clients without assuming all old access tokens instantly expire
  4. Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct implementation. Use a supported Microsoft Entra bulk creation method or Microsoft Graph/PowerShell with per-user validation and error logging. It meets the stated requirement: An onboarding script must add hundreds of users with consistent location, usage location, and department values. Acceptance evidence is: The imported users have the expected attributes and the operator can enumerate any rejected records.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite. That condition is not the problem here: The import data omits a mandatory attribute or uses a malformed column mapping. The targeted implementation is: Use a supported Microsoft Entra bulk creation method or Microsoft Graph/PowerShell with per-user validation and error logging.

C:

The account's display name was changed without blocking sign-in or invalidating sessions. That condition is not the problem here: The import data omits a mandatory attribute or uses a malformed column mapping. The targeted implementation is: Use a supported Microsoft Entra bulk creation method or Microsoft Graph/PowerShell with per-user validation and error logging.

D:

The workstation completed only workplace registration rather than the intended Entra join. That condition is not the problem here: The import data omits a mandatory attribute or uses a malformed column mapping. The targeted implementation is: Use a supported Microsoft Entra bulk creation method or Microsoft Graph/PowerShell with per-user validation and error logging.

Question 56

The team implemented the following change: Use a supported Microsoft Entra bulk creation method or Microsoft Graph/PowerShell with per-user validation and error logging. The acceptance requirement was: An onboarding script must add hundreds of users with consistent location, usage location, and department values. Which observed outcome most directly proves the change works?

  1. New sign-in and refresh-token requests fail, while supported CAE resource access is denied within documented event-propagation bounds and unsupported token sessions are tracked separately
  2. The imported users have the expected attributes and the operator can enumerate any rejected records
  3. Counts and stable object IDs reconcile, and a test rollback restores the old department on the intended object
  4. A new seasonal employee enters the group automatically and leaves after the type attribute changes

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. The imported users have the expected attributes and the operator can enumerate any rejected records. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if blocking the compromised user from new sign-in succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The imported users have the expected attributes and the operator can enumerate any rejected records.

C:

Even if exporting a baseline of exact user IDs succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The imported users have the expected attributes and the operator can enumerate any rejected records.

D:

Even if creating an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The imported users have the expected attributes and the operator can enumerate any rejected records.

Question 57

An engineer troubleshoots an identity solution for: An onboarding script must add hundreds of users with consistent location, usage location, and department values. The pilot result is: Only some accounts appear and the error report shows invalid attribute values. What is the most likely relevant fault?

  1. The team uses device creation dates alone without checking recent sign-in or activity evidence
  2. The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field
  3. The import data omits a mandatory attribute or uses a malformed column mapping
  4. The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. The import data omits a mandatory attribute or uses a malformed column mapping. This fault explains the observed failure: Only some accounts appear and the error report shows invalid attribute values. The intended configuration would instead be: Use a supported Microsoft Entra bulk creation method or Microsoft Graph/PowerShell with per-user validation and error logging.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The team uses device creation dates alone without checking recent sign-in or activity evidence. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The import data omits a mandatory attribute or uses a malformed column mapping. The corrective action is: Use a supported Microsoft Entra bulk creation method or Microsoft Graph/PowerShell with per-user validation and error logging.

B:

The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The import data omits a mandatory attribute or uses a malformed column mapping. The corrective action is: Use a supported Microsoft Entra bulk creation method or Microsoft Graph/PowerShell with per-user validation and error logging.

D:

The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The import data omits a mandatory attribute or uses a malformed column mapping. The corrective action is: Use a supported Microsoft Entra bulk creation method or Microsoft Graph/PowerShell with per-user validation and error logging.

Question 58

An identity project has this requirement: A security team needs to disable a compromised cloud account immediately without deleting historical audit records. Which configuration should the administrator implement?

  1. Update the supported display name and desired UPN/proxy address carefully, validating required downstream mail attributes
  2. Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors
  3. Export a baseline of exact user IDs and old attributes, apply scoped updates, and verify each changed object by ID
  4. Block the compromised user from new sign-in, revoke the available refresh sessions, and validate active resource access with CAE-aware clients without assuming all old access tokens instantly expire

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct implementation. Block the compromised user from new sign-in, revoke the available refresh sessions, and validate active resource access with CAE-aware clients without assuming all old access tokens instantly expire. It meets the stated requirement: A security team needs to disable a compromised cloud account immediately without deleting historical audit records. Acceptance evidence is: New sign-in and refresh-token requests fail, while supported CAE resource access is denied within documented event-propagation bounds and unsupported token sessions are tracked separately.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The sign-in UPN was edited without the associated domain being verified or mail routing checked. That condition is not the problem here: The account's display name was changed without blocking sign-in or invalidating sessions. The targeted implementation is: Block the compromised user from new sign-in, revoke the available refresh sessions, and validate active resource access with CAE-aware clients without assuming all old access tokens instantly expire.

B:

The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite. That condition is not the problem here: The account's display name was changed without blocking sign-in or invalidating sessions. The targeted implementation is: Block the compromised user from new sign-in, revoke the available refresh sessions, and validate active resource access with CAE-aware clients without assuming all old access tokens instantly expire.

C:

The update joins records by display name, producing collisions for duplicate names. That condition is not the problem here: The account's display name was changed without blocking sign-in or invalidating sessions. The targeted implementation is: Block the compromised user from new sign-in, revoke the available refresh sessions, and validate active resource access with CAE-aware clients without assuming all old access tokens instantly expire.

Question 59

An auditor must verify this deployment decision: Block the compromised user from new sign-in, revoke the available refresh sessions, and validate active resource access with CAE-aware clients without assuming all old access tokens instantly expire. Its purpose was: A security team needs to disable a compromised cloud account immediately without deleting historical audit records. Which test result is the strongest evidence?

  1. A new engineer receives the requested plan while unrelated licenses remain unchanged for existing staff
  2. Group members receive the intended application authorization while they cannot administer directory settings
  3. New sign-in and refresh-token requests fail, while supported CAE resource access is denied within documented event-propagation bounds and unsupported token sessions are tracked separately
  4. A newly added eligible group member receives the service plans and a deliberately conflicting user reports an actionable error

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. New sign-in and refresh-token requests fail, while supported CAE resource access is denied within documented event-propagation bounds and unsupported token sessions are tracked separately. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if adjusting the appropriate group-based license options for the engineering group succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: New sign-in and refresh-token requests fail, while supported CAE resource access is denied within documented event-propagation bounds and unsupported token sessions are tracked separately.

B:

Even if assigning the group to the enterprise application's defined app role rather than granting Entra directory administrator privileges succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: New sign-in and refresh-token requests fail, while supported CAE resource access is denied within documented event-propagation bounds and unsupported token sessions are tracked separately.

D:

Even if applying group-based licensing with a valid SKU succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: New sign-in and refresh-token requests fail, while supported CAE resource access is denied within documented event-propagation bounds and unsupported token sessions are tracked separately.

Question 60

A change appears correct at a glance, but the requirement is still unmet: A security team needs to disable a compromised cloud account immediately without deleting historical audit records. The key observed symptom is: The compromised user can still complete a new interactive sign-in. Which cause should be investigated first?

  1. The sign-in UPN was edited without the associated domain being verified or mail routing checked
  2. The account's display name was changed without blocking sign-in or invalidating sessions
  3. The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite
  4. The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct diagnosis. The account's display name was changed without blocking sign-in or invalidating sessions. This fault explains the observed failure: The compromised user can still complete a new interactive sign-in. The intended configuration would instead be: Block the compromised user from new sign-in, revoke the available refresh sessions, and validate active resource access with CAE-aware clients without assuming all old access tokens instantly expire.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The sign-in UPN was edited without the associated domain being verified or mail routing checked. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The account's display name was changed without blocking sign-in or invalidating sessions. The corrective action is: Block the compromised user from new sign-in, revoke the available refresh sessions, and validate active resource access with CAE-aware clients without assuming all old access tokens instantly expire.

C:

The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The account's display name was changed without blocking sign-in or invalidating sessions. The corrective action is: Block the compromised user from new sign-in, revoke the available refresh sessions, and validate active resource access with CAE-aware clients without assuming all old access tokens instantly expire.

D:

The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The account's display name was changed without blocking sign-in or invalidating sessions. The corrective action is: Block the compromised user from new sign-in, revoke the available refresh sessions, and validate active resource access with CAE-aware clients without assuming all old access tokens instantly expire.