McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99
SC-300 Sample 1 SC-300 Sample 2 SC-300 Sample 3 SC-300 Sample 4 SC-300 Sample 5 SC-300 Sample 6 SC-300 Sample 7 SC-300 Sample 8 SC-300 Sample 9 SC-300 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 5

Question 40

An identity engineer has two independent tasks. Task 1: HR provisions seasonal employees with a stable employeeType value and wants security group membership to follow that attribute. Task 2: A device inventory distinguishes a personally owned phone registered for access from a corporate workstation joined to Microsoft Entra. Which TWO configuration changes jointly meet both tasks?

  1. Define a custom security attribute set and attribute, then assign the supported attribute roles and values to relevant users
  2. Update the dynamic membership expression or source attributes instead of trying manual Add member operations
  3. Create an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value and test its supported membership processing
  4. Assign the group to the enterprise application's defined app role rather than granting Entra directory administrator privileges
  5. Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

Correct for task 1. Create an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value and test its supported membership processing. This directly addresses the first requirement: HR provisions seasonal employees with a stable employeeType value and wants security group membership to follow that attribute. Verify it by checking: A new seasonal employee enters the group automatically and leaves after the type attribute changes.

E:

Correct for task 2. Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement. This addresses the independent second requirement: A device inventory distinguishes a personally owned phone registered for access from a corporate workstation joined to Microsoft Entra. Verify it by checking: The phone appears registered while the corporate machine appears joined and receives policies appropriate to its state.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The user received only a general User Administrator role rather than required custom security attribute privileges. To satisfy task 1, use: Create an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value and test its supported membership processing. For task 2, use: Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement.

B:

The operator attempts to add a member manually to a rule-based dynamic group. To satisfy task 1, use: Create an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value and test its supported membership processing. For task 2, use: Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement.

D:

The operator granted the group an Entra role instead of assigning an application role. To satisfy task 1, use: Create an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value and test its supported membership processing. For task 2, use: Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement.

Question 41

After configuring: Create an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value and test its supported membership processing, an engineer performs a targeted pilot for this objective: HR provisions seasonal employees with a stable employeeType value and wants security group membership to follow that attribute. What result constitutes a pass?

  1. A new engineer receives the requested plan while unrelated licenses remain unchanged for existing staff
  2. A new seasonal employee enters the group automatically and leaves after the type attribute changes
  3. Correcting the attribute changes calculated membership without hand-adding the target user
  4. A newly added eligible group member receives the service plans and a deliberately conflicting user reports an actionable error

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. A new seasonal employee enters the group automatically and leaves after the type attribute changes. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if adjusting the appropriate group-based license options for the engineering group succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A new seasonal employee enters the group automatically and leaves after the type attribute changes.

C:

Even if updating the dynamic membership expression or source attributes instead of trying manual Add member operations succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A new seasonal employee enters the group automatically and leaves after the type attribute changes.

D:

Even if applying group-based licensing with a valid SKU succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A new seasonal employee enters the group automatically and leaves after the type attribute changes.

Question 42

The service desk escalates the following unsuccessful identity rollout. Requirement: HR provisions seasonal employees with a stable employeeType value and wants security group membership to follow that attribute. Observed: A seasonal employee with the expected type fails to enter the group. Which underlying misconfiguration is most consistent?

  1. The operator attempts to add a member manually to a rule-based dynamic group
  2. The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite
  3. The operator granted the group an Entra role instead of assigning an application role
  4. The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct diagnosis. The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field. This fault explains the observed failure: A seasonal employee with the expected type fails to enter the group. The intended configuration would instead be: Create an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value and test its supported membership processing.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The operator attempts to add a member manually to a rule-based dynamic group. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field. The corrective action is: Create an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value and test its supported membership processing.

B:

The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field. The corrective action is: Create an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value and test its supported membership processing.

C:

The operator granted the group an Entra role instead of assigning an application role. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field. The corrective action is: Create an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value and test its supported membership processing.

Question 43

During an access-management pilot, the engineer is tasked with the following: A directory administrator must populate a nonstandard HR classification for cloud users while limiting who can read it. Which action best addresses the requirement?

  1. Define a custom security attribute set and attribute, then assign the supported attribute roles and values to relevant users
  2. Use device activity and ownership/trust information to build a review set before disabling or removing device objects
  3. Create an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value and test its supported membership processing
  4. Use a supported Microsoft Entra bulk creation method or Microsoft Graph/PowerShell with per-user validation and error logging

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct implementation. Define a custom security attribute set and attribute, then assign the supported attribute roles and values to relevant users. It meets the stated requirement: A directory administrator must populate a nonstandard HR classification for cloud users while limiting who can read it. Acceptance evidence is: A permitted attribute administrator can set the classification while an ordinary user without the role cannot view protected values.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The team uses device creation dates alone without checking recent sign-in or activity evidence. That condition is not the problem here: The user received only a general User Administrator role rather than required custom security attribute privileges. The targeted implementation is: Define a custom security attribute set and attribute, then assign the supported attribute roles and values to relevant users.

C:

The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field. That condition is not the problem here: The user received only a general User Administrator role rather than required custom security attribute privileges. The targeted implementation is: Define a custom security attribute set and attribute, then assign the supported attribute roles and values to relevant users.

D:

The import data omits a mandatory attribute or uses a malformed column mapping. That condition is not the problem here: The user received only a general User Administrator role rather than required custom security attribute privileges. The targeted implementation is: Define a custom security attribute set and attribute, then assign the supported attribute roles and values to relevant users.

Question 44

The requirement is: A directory administrator must populate a nonstandard HR classification for cloud users while limiting who can read it. The technical change was: Define a custom security attribute set and attribute, then assign the supported attribute roles and values to relevant users. Which observation validates the intended boundary?

  1. A known active device is retained and a genuinely retired device is reviewed with its last activity and management context
  2. A permitted attribute administrator can set the classification while an ordinary user without the role cannot view protected values
  3. The imported users have the expected attributes and the operator can enumerate any rejected records
  4. Group members receive the intended application authorization while they cannot administer directory settings

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. A permitted attribute administrator can set the classification while an ordinary user without the role cannot view protected values. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if using device activity succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A permitted attribute administrator can set the classification while an ordinary user without the role cannot view protected values.

C:

Even if using a supported Microsoft Entra bulk creation method or Microsoft Graph/PowerShell with per-user validation succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A permitted attribute administrator can set the classification while an ordinary user without the role cannot view protected values.

D:

Even if assigning the group to the enterprise application's defined app role rather than granting Entra directory administrator privileges succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A permitted attribute administrator can set the classification while an ordinary user without the role cannot view protected values.

Question 45

During post-change review of the requirement “A directory administrator must populate a nonstandard HR classification for cloud users while limiting who can read it,” an auditor observes: The administrator can edit basic user fields but cannot assign the custom security attribute. Which root-cause finding would explain that symptom?

  1. The operator granted the group an Entra role instead of assigning an application role
  2. The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field
  3. The user received only a general User Administrator role rather than required custom security attribute privileges
  4. The import data omits a mandatory attribute or uses a malformed column mapping

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. The user received only a general User Administrator role rather than required custom security attribute privileges. This fault explains the observed failure: The administrator can edit basic user fields but cannot assign the custom security attribute. The intended configuration would instead be: Define a custom security attribute set and attribute, then assign the supported attribute roles and values to relevant users.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The operator granted the group an Entra role instead of assigning an application role. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The user received only a general User Administrator role rather than required custom security attribute privileges. The corrective action is: Define a custom security attribute set and attribute, then assign the supported attribute roles and values to relevant users.

B:

The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The user received only a general User Administrator role rather than required custom security attribute privileges. The corrective action is: Define a custom security attribute set and attribute, then assign the supported attribute roles and values to relevant users.

D:

The import data omits a mandatory attribute or uses a malformed column mapping. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The user received only a general User Administrator role rather than required custom security attribute privileges. The corrective action is: Define a custom security attribute set and attribute, then assign the supported attribute roles and values to relevant users.

Question 46

Select the most appropriate first configuration decision for this scenario: The licensing team needs 300 users in a maintained security group to receive the same eligible Microsoft 365 license set automatically.

  1. Block the compromised user from new sign-in, revoke the available refresh sessions, and validate active resource access with CAE-aware clients without assuming all old access tokens instantly expire
  2. Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors
  3. Adjust the appropriate group-based license options for the engineering group and verify only intended service plans change
  4. Use a supported Microsoft Entra bulk creation method or Microsoft Graph/PowerShell with per-user validation and error logging

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct implementation. Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors. It meets the stated requirement: The licensing team needs 300 users in a maintained security group to receive the same eligible Microsoft 365 license set automatically. Acceptance evidence is: A newly added eligible group member receives the service plans and a deliberately conflicting user reports an actionable error.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The account's display name was changed without blocking sign-in or invalidating sessions. That condition is not the problem here: The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite. The targeted implementation is: Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors.

C:

The change removes an existing product assignment instead of only updating the intended group license options. That condition is not the problem here: The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite. The targeted implementation is: Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors.

D:

The import data omits a mandatory attribute or uses a malformed column mapping. That condition is not the problem here: The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite. The targeted implementation is: Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors.

Question 47

The owner wants independent acceptance evidence after the team chose: Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors. It was meant to solve: The licensing team needs 300 users in a maintained security group to receive the same eligible Microsoft 365 license set automatically. Which result demonstrates success?

  1. The user signs in with the planned identifier and receives mail on approved addresses without recreating the account
  2. Correcting the attribute changes calculated membership without hand-adding the target user
  3. A newly added eligible group member receives the service plans and a deliberately conflicting user reports an actionable error
  4. Group members receive the intended application authorization while they cannot administer directory settings

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. A newly added eligible group member receives the service plans and a deliberately conflicting user reports an actionable error. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if updating the supported display name succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A newly added eligible group member receives the service plans and a deliberately conflicting user reports an actionable error.

B:

Even if updating the dynamic membership expression or source attributes instead of trying manual Add member operations succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A newly added eligible group member receives the service plans and a deliberately conflicting user reports an actionable error.

D:

Even if assigning the group to the enterprise application's defined app role rather than granting Entra directory administrator privileges succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A newly added eligible group member receives the service plans and a deliberately conflicting user reports an actionable error.

Question 48

A team must isolate a broken configuration. Goal: The licensing team needs 300 users in a maintained security group to receive the same eligible Microsoft 365 license set automatically. Symptom: One test group member remains unlicensed and the licensing report identifies an assignment error. Which hypothesis most precisely accounts for the observed result?

  1. The change removes an existing product assignment instead of only updating the intended group license options
  2. The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field
  3. The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite
  4. The workstation completed only workplace registration rather than the intended Entra join

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite. This fault explains the observed failure: One test group member remains unlicensed and the licensing report identifies an assignment error. The intended configuration would instead be: Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The change removes an existing product assignment instead of only updating the intended group license options. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite. The corrective action is: Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors.

B:

The membership rule references department rather than the maintained employeeType field. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite. The corrective action is: Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors.

D:

The workstation completed only workplace registration rather than the intended Entra join. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The assigned SKU has no available licenses or a conflicting service-plan prerequisite. The corrective action is: Apply group-based licensing with a valid SKU and sufficient seats, then inspect processing errors.

Question 49

The security architect is given this constraint: A device inventory distinguishes a personally owned phone registered for access from a corporate workstation joined to Microsoft Entra. Which technical approach meets it without relying on unrelated controls?

  1. Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement
  2. Use device activity and ownership/trust information to build a review set before disabling or removing device objects
  3. Use a supported Microsoft Entra bulk creation method or Microsoft Graph/PowerShell with per-user validation and error logging
  4. Update the supported display name and desired UPN/proxy address carefully, validating required downstream mail attributes

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct implementation. Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement. It meets the stated requirement: A device inventory distinguishes a personally owned phone registered for access from a corporate workstation joined to Microsoft Entra. Acceptance evidence is: The phone appears registered while the corporate machine appears joined and receives policies appropriate to its state.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The team uses device creation dates alone without checking recent sign-in or activity evidence. That condition is not the problem here: The workstation completed only workplace registration rather than the intended Entra join. The targeted implementation is: Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement.

C:

The import data omits a mandatory attribute or uses a malformed column mapping. That condition is not the problem here: The workstation completed only workplace registration rather than the intended Entra join. The targeted implementation is: Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement.

D:

The sign-in UPN was edited without the associated domain being verified or mail routing checked. That condition is not the problem here: The workstation completed only workplace registration rather than the intended Entra join. The targeted implementation is: Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement.

Question 50

An operational review checks whether the change “Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement” meets this need: A device inventory distinguishes a personally owned phone registered for access from a corporate workstation joined to Microsoft Entra. Which finding supports acceptance?

  1. A permitted attribute administrator can set the classification while an ordinary user without the role cannot view protected values
  2. The user signs in with the planned identifier and receives mail on approved addresses without recreating the account
  3. A known active device is retained and a genuinely retired device is reviewed with its last activity and management context
  4. The phone appears registered while the corporate machine appears joined and receives policies appropriate to its state

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct acceptance check. The phone appears registered while the corporate machine appears joined and receives policies appropriate to its state. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if defining a custom security attribute set succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The phone appears registered while the corporate machine appears joined and receives policies appropriate to its state.

B:

Even if updating the supported display name succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The phone appears registered while the corporate machine appears joined and receives policies appropriate to its state.

C:

Even if using device activity succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The phone appears registered while the corporate machine appears joined and receives policies appropriate to its state.