McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99
SC-300 Sample 1 SC-300 Sample 2 SC-300 Sample 3 SC-300 Sample 4 SC-300 Sample 5 SC-300 Sample 6 SC-300 Sample 7 SC-300 Sample 8 SC-300 Sample 9 SC-300 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 4

Question 30

A team must isolate a broken configuration. Goal: Finance wants a delegated operator to manage users across a headquarters unit and a branch unit without extending the role to all employees. Symptom: A branch user update is denied while the headquarters test succeeds. Which hypothesis most precisely accounts for the observed result?

  1. The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow
  2. The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units
  3. The target account itself is not an administrative unit member; adding only its group does not grant user-management rights to each group member
  4. The new brand suffix is verified but has not been selected as the default domain

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct diagnosis. The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units. This fault explains the observed failure: A branch user update is denied while the headquarters test succeeds. The intended configuration would instead be: Assign the minimum built-in role at the applicable administrative unit scopes for both populations.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units. The corrective action is: Assign the minimum built-in role at the applicable administrative unit scopes for both populations.

C:

The target account itself is not an administrative unit member; adding only its group does not grant user-management rights to each group member. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units. The corrective action is: Assign the minimum built-in role at the applicable administrative unit scopes for both populations.

D:

The new brand suffix is verified but has not been selected as the default domain. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units. The corrective action is: Assign the minimum built-in role at the applicable administrative unit scopes for both populations.

Question 31

The security architect is given this constraint: Admins plan to move an application administrator role from permanent assignment to on-demand elevation for eligible operators. Which technical approach meets it without relying on unrelated controls?

  1. Configure a Dynamic User administrative unit with a tested department-attribute membership rule and separately assign the regional administrator role at that unit scope
  2. Inspect the principal's direct and group-based role assignments, activation state, and applicable scope to evaluate effective permissions
  3. Define a custom Microsoft Entra role containing only the required application read permissions and assign it at the intended scope
  4. Make suitable principals eligible for the Microsoft Entra role through PIM and configure activation conditions

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct implementation. Make suitable principals eligible for the Microsoft Entra role through PIM and configure activation conditions. It meets the stated requirement: Admins plan to move an application administrator role from permanent assignment to on-demand elevation for eligible operators. Acceptance evidence is: Activation gives the role privileges for the allowed period, and the account loses those privileges afterward.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The dynamic unit membership rule uses a value that does not match the employee department attribute or the membership evaluation has not completed. That condition is not the problem here: The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow. The targeted implementation is: Make suitable principals eligible for the Microsoft Entra role through PIM and configure activation conditions.

B:

An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review. That condition is not the problem here: The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow. The targeted implementation is: Make suitable principals eligible for the Microsoft Entra role through PIM and configure activation conditions.

C:

The custom role includes an application credential-write action alongside read actions. That condition is not the problem here: The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow. The targeted implementation is: Make suitable principals eligible for the Microsoft Entra role through PIM and configure activation conditions.

Question 32

An operational review checks whether the change “Make suitable principals eligible for the Microsoft Entra role through PIM and configure activation conditions” meets this need: Admins plan to move an application administrator role from permanent assignment to on-demand elevation for eligible operators. Which finding supports acceptance?

  1. Activation gives the role privileges for the allowed period, and the account loses those privileges afterward
  2. A permission test aligns with all active scoped role assignments rather than a single role name
  3. The domain shows as verified, and a test user can have the desired verified-domain UPN
  4. The restricted test user cannot complete the disallowed directory action while an authorized role retains access

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct acceptance check. Activation gives the role privileges for the allowed period, and the account loses those privileges afterward. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Even if inspecting the principal's direct succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Activation gives the role privileges for the allowed period, and the account loses those privileges afterward.

C:

Even if adding the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Activation gives the role privileges for the allowed period, and the account loses those privileges afterward.

D:

Even if evaluate succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: Activation gives the role privileges for the allowed period, and the account loses those privileges afterward.

Question 33

The deployment owner asks why this identity requirement failed: Admins plan to move an application administrator role from permanent assignment to on-demand elevation for eligible operators. The test shows: The operator can change application settings continuously without activating a role. Which fault is the best diagnosis?

  1. The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow
  2. The ownership TXT/MX verification record was not published at the authoritative DNS host
  3. The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units
  4. An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct diagnosis. The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow. This fault explains the observed failure: The operator can change application settings continuously without activating a role. The intended configuration would instead be: Make suitable principals eligible for the Microsoft Entra role through PIM and configure activation conditions.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The ownership TXT/MX verification record was not published at the authoritative DNS host. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow. The corrective action is: Make suitable principals eligible for the Microsoft Entra role through PIM and configure activation conditions.

C:

The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow. The corrective action is: Make suitable principals eligible for the Microsoft Entra role through PIM and configure activation conditions.

D:

An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow. The corrective action is: Make suitable principals eligible for the Microsoft Entra role through PIM and configure activation conditions.

Question 34

Which implementation fits the following specific identity problem? A tenant owner wants to know which cloud directory property governs the ability to register devices, not join on-premises Active Directory computers.

  1. Configure company branding for the relevant sign-in experience, with appropriate localized text and supported image dimensions
  2. Evaluate and configure the tenant user-settings restrictions and verify that each control affects its stated surface
  3. Make suitable principals eligible for the Microsoft Entra role through PIM and configure activation conditions
  4. Review and configure Microsoft Entra device registration settings and the permitted user scope

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct implementation. Review and configure Microsoft Entra device registration settings and the permitted user scope. It meets the stated requirement: A tenant owner wants to know which cloud directory property governs the ability to register devices, not join on-premises Active Directory computers. Acceptance evidence is: An authorized pilot user registers an Entra-registered device; a disallowed pilot user cannot.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The tenant's branding change was configured only for another language or uses unsupported image specifications. That condition is not the problem here: The administrator changed Windows domain join policy instead of Entra device registration settings. The targeted implementation is: Review and configure Microsoft Entra device registration settings and the permitted user scope.

B:

A portal-navigation restriction was mistaken for full removal of underlying directory API permissions. That condition is not the problem here: The administrator changed Windows domain join policy instead of Entra device registration settings. The targeted implementation is: Review and configure Microsoft Entra device registration settings and the permitted user scope.

C:

The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow. That condition is not the problem here: The administrator changed Windows domain join policy instead of Entra device registration settings. The targeted implementation is: Review and configure Microsoft Entra device registration settings and the permitted user scope.

Question 35

After a deployment under this requirement — A tenant owner wants to know which cloud directory property governs the ability to register devices, not join on-premises Active Directory computers — administrators claim the following solution is in place: Review and configure Microsoft Entra device registration settings and the permitted user scope. Which pilot finding supports that claim?

  1. The domain shows as verified, and a test user can have the desired verified-domain UPN
  2. The restricted test user cannot complete the disallowed directory action while an authorized role retains access
  3. An authorized pilot user registers an Entra-registered device; a disallowed pilot user cannot
  4. A nonmember cannot create the restricted group type but an authorized creator can

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. An authorized pilot user registers an Entra-registered device; a disallowed pilot user cannot. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if adding the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An authorized pilot user registers an Entra-registered device; a disallowed pilot user cannot.

B:

Even if evaluate succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An authorized pilot user registers an Entra-registered device; a disallowed pilot user cannot.

D:

Even if configuring Microsoft 365 group creation restrictions for a designated security group of authorized creators succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An authorized pilot user registers an Entra-registered device; a disallowed pilot user cannot.

Question 36

The deployment was intended to satisfy: A tenant owner wants to know which cloud directory property governs the ability to register devices, not join on-premises Active Directory computers. During testing, this happened: Device registration remains permitted for a disallowed cloud user. Which configuration defect best explains the failure?

  1. The custom role includes an application credential-write action alongside read actions
  2. A portal-navigation restriction was mistaken for full removal of underlying directory API permissions
  3. The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow
  4. The administrator changed Windows domain join policy instead of Entra device registration settings

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct diagnosis. The administrator changed Windows domain join policy instead of Entra device registration settings. This fault explains the observed failure: Device registration remains permitted for a disallowed cloud user. The intended configuration would instead be: Review and configure Microsoft Entra device registration settings and the permitted user scope.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The custom role includes an application credential-write action alongside read actions. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The administrator changed Windows domain join policy instead of Entra device registration settings. The corrective action is: Review and configure Microsoft Entra device registration settings and the permitted user scope.

B:

A portal-navigation restriction was mistaken for full removal of underlying directory API permissions. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The administrator changed Windows domain join policy instead of Entra device registration settings. The corrective action is: Review and configure Microsoft Entra device registration settings and the permitted user scope.

C:

The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The administrator changed Windows domain join policy instead of Entra device registration settings. The corrective action is: Review and configure Microsoft Entra device registration settings and the permitted user scope.

Question 37

An identity engineer has two independent tasks. Task 1: Security review requires preventing nonadmin users from browsing Entra admin center directory information beyond their approved access. Task 2: The directory security team wants a custom role that can read application registrations but cannot modify app credentials. Which TWO configuration changes jointly meet both tasks?

  1. Review and configure Microsoft Entra device registration settings and the permitted user scope
  2. Define a custom Microsoft Entra role containing only the required application read permissions and assign it at the intended scope
  3. Evaluate and configure the tenant user-settings restrictions and verify that each control affects its stated surface
  4. Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees
  5. Inspect the principal's direct and group-based role assignments, activation state, and applicable scope to evaluate effective permissions

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

Correct for task 2. Define a custom Microsoft Entra role containing only the required application read permissions and assign it at the intended scope. This addresses the independent second requirement: The directory security team wants a custom role that can read application registrations but cannot modify app credentials. Verify it by checking: A delegated test principal can inspect app definitions but cannot add a client secret or alter API permissions.

C:

Correct for task 1. Evaluate and configure the tenant user-settings restrictions and verify that each control affects its stated surface. This directly addresses the first requirement: Security review requires preventing nonadmin users from browsing Entra admin center directory information beyond their approved access. Verify it by checking: The restricted test user cannot complete the disallowed directory action while an authorized role retains access.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The administrator changed Windows domain join policy instead of Entra device registration settings. To satisfy task 1, use: Evaluate and configure the tenant user-settings restrictions and verify that each control affects its stated surface. For task 2, use: Define a custom Microsoft Entra role containing only the required application read permissions and assign it at the intended scope.

D:

The invitation restriction is permissive for all members despite the group-specific governance requirement. To satisfy task 1, use: Evaluate and configure the tenant user-settings restrictions and verify that each control affects its stated surface. For task 2, use: Define a custom Microsoft Entra role containing only the required application read permissions and assign it at the intended scope.

E:

An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review. To satisfy task 1, use: Evaluate and configure the tenant user-settings restrictions and verify that each control affects its stated surface. For task 2, use: Define a custom Microsoft Entra role containing only the required application read permissions and assign it at the intended scope.

Question 38

The team implemented the following change: Evaluate and configure the tenant user-settings restrictions and verify that each control affects its stated surface. The acceptance requirement was: Security review requires preventing nonadmin users from browsing Entra admin center directory information beyond their approved access. Which observed outcome most directly proves the change works?

  1. A delegated test principal can inspect app definitions but cannot add a client secret or alter API permissions
  2. An ordinary member's guest invitation is blocked while an approved inviter can send one
  3. An authorized pilot user registers an Entra-registered device; a disallowed pilot user cannot
  4. The restricted test user cannot complete the disallowed directory action while an authorized role retains access

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct acceptance check. The restricted test user cannot complete the disallowed directory action while an authorized role retains access. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if defining a custom Microsoft Entra role containing only the required application read permissions succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The restricted test user cannot complete the disallowed directory action while an authorized role retains access.

B:

Even if setting the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The restricted test user cannot complete the disallowed directory action while an authorized role retains access.

C:

Even if review succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The restricted test user cannot complete the disallowed directory action while an authorized role retains access.

Question 39

An engineer troubleshoots an identity solution for: Security review requires preventing nonadmin users from browsing Entra admin center directory information beyond their approved access. The pilot result is: The interface is hidden but the reviewer incorrectly assumes all Graph permissions are revoked. What is the most likely relevant fault?

  1. The invitation restriction is permissive for all members despite the group-specific governance requirement
  2. A portal-navigation restriction was mistaken for full removal of underlying directory API permissions
  3. The restriction was configured for the wrong group type, leaving Microsoft 365 group creation unrestricted
  4. An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct diagnosis. A portal-navigation restriction was mistaken for full removal of underlying directory API permissions. This fault explains the observed failure: The interface is hidden but the reviewer incorrectly assumes all Graph permissions are revoked. The intended configuration would instead be: Evaluate and configure the tenant user-settings restrictions and verify that each control affects its stated surface.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The invitation restriction is permissive for all members despite the group-specific governance requirement. The reported symptom instead has this cause: A portal-navigation restriction was mistaken for full removal of underlying directory API permissions. The corrective action is: Evaluate and configure the tenant user-settings restrictions and verify that each control affects its stated surface.

C:

The restriction was configured for the wrong group type, leaving Microsoft 365 group creation unrestricted. The reported symptom instead has this cause: A portal-navigation restriction was mistaken for full removal of underlying directory API permissions. The corrective action is: Evaluate and configure the tenant user-settings restrictions and verify that each control affects its stated surface.

D:

An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review. The reported symptom instead has this cause: A portal-navigation restriction was mistaken for full removal of underlying directory API permissions. The corrective action is: Evaluate and configure the tenant user-settings restrictions and verify that each control affects its stated surface.

Question 40

An identity engineer has two independent tasks. Task 1: HR provisions seasonal employees with a stable employeeType value and wants security group membership to follow that attribute. Task 2: A device inventory distinguishes a personally owned phone registered for access from a corporate workstation joined to Microsoft Entra. Which TWO configuration changes jointly meet both tasks?

  1. Define a custom security attribute set and attribute, then assign the supported attribute roles and values to relevant users
  2. Update the dynamic membership expression or source attributes instead of trying manual Add member operations
  3. Create an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value and test its supported membership processing
  4. Assign the group to the enterprise application's defined app role rather than granting Entra directory administrator privileges
  5. Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

Correct for task 1. Create an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value and test its supported membership processing. This directly addresses the first requirement: HR provisions seasonal employees with a stable employeeType value and wants security group membership to follow that attribute. Verify it by checking: A new seasonal employee enters the group automatically and leaves after the type attribute changes.

E:

Correct for task 2. Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement. This addresses the independent second requirement: A device inventory distinguishes a personally owned phone registered for access from a corporate workstation joined to Microsoft Entra. Verify it by checking: The phone appears registered while the corporate machine appears joined and receives policies appropriate to its state.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The user received only a general User Administrator role rather than required custom security attribute privileges. To satisfy task 1, use: Create an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value and test its supported membership processing. For task 2, use: Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement.

B:

The operator attempts to add a member manually to a rule-based dynamic group. To satisfy task 1, use: Create an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value and test its supported membership processing. For task 2, use: Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement.

D:

The operator granted the group an Entra role instead of assigning an application role. To satisfy task 1, use: Create an attribute-based dynamic security group rule using the employeeType value and test its supported membership processing. For task 2, use: Use the appropriate device registration or Entra join workflow for each device ownership and management requirement.