McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99
SC-300 Sample 1 SC-300 Sample 2 SC-300 Sample 3 SC-300 Sample 4 SC-300 Sample 5 SC-300 Sample 6 SC-300 Sample 7 SC-300 Sample 8 SC-300 Sample 9 SC-300 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 2

Question 10

The security architect is given this constraint: A tenant has users with multiple built-in Microsoft Entra roles; an auditor needs the combined effective privileges rather than the label of a single role. Which technical approach meets it without relying on unrelated controls?

  1. Define a custom Microsoft Entra role containing only the required application read permissions and assign it at the intended scope
  2. Assign the minimum built-in role at the applicable administrative unit scopes for both populations
  3. Inspect the principal's direct and group-based role assignments, activation state, and applicable scope to evaluate effective permissions
  4. Put the individual nonprivileged Nordic user objects directly into an administrative unit and assign a suitably scoped User Administrator role, observing restrictions on resetting privileged users

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct implementation. Inspect the principal's direct and group-based role assignments, activation state, and applicable scope to evaluate effective permissions. It meets the stated requirement: A tenant has users with multiple built-in Microsoft Entra roles; an auditor needs the combined effective privileges rather than the label of a single role. Acceptance evidence is: A permission test aligns with all active scoped role assignments rather than a single role name.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The custom role includes an application credential-write action alongside read actions. That condition is not the problem here: An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review. The targeted implementation is: Inspect the principal's direct and group-based role assignments, activation state, and applicable scope to evaluate effective permissions.

B:

The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units. That condition is not the problem here: An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review. The targeted implementation is: Inspect the principal's direct and group-based role assignments, activation state, and applicable scope to evaluate effective permissions.

D:

The target account itself is not an administrative unit member; adding only its group does not grant user-management rights to each group member. That condition is not the problem here: An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review. The targeted implementation is: Inspect the principal's direct and group-based role assignments, activation state, and applicable scope to evaluate effective permissions.

Question 11

An operational review checks whether the change “Inspect the principal's direct and group-based role assignments, activation state, and applicable scope to evaluate effective permissions” meets this need: A tenant has users with multiple built-in Microsoft Entra roles; an auditor needs the combined effective privileges rather than the label of a single role. Which finding supports acceptance?

  1. A permission test aligns with all active scoped role assignments rather than a single role name
  2. Activation gives the role privileges for the allowed period, and the account loses those privileges afterward
  3. After the supported membership evaluation completes, a matching department account enters the unit and an unrelated account stays outside
  4. A fresh browser sign-in displays the updated organization-specific brand resources in the intended locale

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct acceptance check. A permission test aligns with all active scoped role assignments rather than a single role name. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Even if making suitable principals eligible for the Microsoft Entra role through PIM succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A permission test aligns with all active scoped role assignments rather than a single role name.

C:

Even if configuring a Dynamic User administrative unit with a tested department-attribute membership rule succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A permission test aligns with all active scoped role assignments rather than a single role name.

D:

Even if configuring company branding for the relevant sign-in experience succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A permission test aligns with all active scoped role assignments rather than a single role name.

Question 12

The deployment owner asks why this identity requirement failed: A tenant has users with multiple built-in Microsoft Entra roles; an auditor needs the combined effective privileges rather than the label of a single role. The test shows: The auditor cannot explain a permitted directory action from the one direct role shown. Which fault is the best diagnosis?

  1. The restriction was configured for the wrong group type, leaving Microsoft 365 group creation unrestricted
  2. The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow
  3. An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review
  4. The tenant's branding change was configured only for another language or uses unsupported image specifications

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review. This fault explains the observed failure: The auditor cannot explain a permitted directory action from the one direct role shown. The intended configuration would instead be: Inspect the principal's direct and group-based role assignments, activation state, and applicable scope to evaluate effective permissions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The restriction was configured for the wrong group type, leaving Microsoft 365 group creation unrestricted. The reported symptom instead has this cause: An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review. The corrective action is: Inspect the principal's direct and group-based role assignments, activation state, and applicable scope to evaluate effective permissions.

B:

The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow. The reported symptom instead has this cause: An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review. The corrective action is: Inspect the principal's direct and group-based role assignments, activation state, and applicable scope to evaluate effective permissions.

D:

The tenant's branding change was configured only for another language or uses unsupported image specifications. The reported symptom instead has this cause: An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review. The corrective action is: Inspect the principal's direct and group-based role assignments, activation state, and applicable scope to evaluate effective permissions.

Question 13

A change request covers two Microsoft Entra needs. Requirement A: An organization is introducing a custom sign-in domain while still using the default onmicrosoft.com domain. Requirement B: Security operations requires only a small admin group to invite guests; ordinary employees must not send B2B invitations. Select TWO actions, one for each requirement.

  1. Set the intended verified domain as the tenant default and explicitly check the UPN assigned by the provisioning workflow
  2. Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees
  3. Configure company branding for the relevant sign-in experience, with appropriate localized text and supported image dimensions
  4. Make suitable principals eligible for the Microsoft Entra role through PIM and configure activation conditions
  5. Add the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID and complete the required DNS ownership verification before assigning it to users

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

Correct for task 2. Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees. This addresses the independent second requirement: Security operations requires only a small admin group to invite guests; ordinary employees must not send B2B invitations. Verify it by checking: An ordinary member's guest invitation is blocked while an approved inviter can send one.

E:

Correct for task 1. Add the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID and complete the required DNS ownership verification before assigning it to users. This directly addresses the first requirement: An organization is introducing a custom sign-in domain while still using the default onmicrosoft.com domain. Verify it by checking: The domain shows as verified, and a test user can have the desired verified-domain UPN.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The new brand suffix is verified but has not been selected as the default domain. To satisfy task 1, use: Add the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID and complete the required DNS ownership verification before assigning it to users. For task 2, use: Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees.

C:

The tenant's branding change was configured only for another language or uses unsupported image specifications. To satisfy task 1, use: Add the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID and complete the required DNS ownership verification before assigning it to users. For task 2, use: Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees.

D:

The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow. To satisfy task 1, use: Add the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID and complete the required DNS ownership verification before assigning it to users. For task 2, use: Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees.

Question 14

After a deployment under this requirement — An organization is introducing a custom sign-in domain while still using the default onmicrosoft.com domain — administrators claim the following solution is in place: Add the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID and complete the required DNS ownership verification before assigning it to users. Which pilot finding supports that claim?

  1. A scoped operator resets a directly included nonadmin Nordic test user, but cannot reset a user outside the unit or an administrator beyond the scoped role limits
  2. The domain shows as verified, and a test user can have the desired verified-domain UPN
  3. A newly created test cloud user gets the intended brand suffix while previously assigned UPNs are not silently rewritten
  4. A delegated test principal can inspect app definitions but cannot add a client secret or alter API permissions

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. The domain shows as verified, and a test user can have the desired verified-domain UPN. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if putting the individual nonprivileged Nordic user objects directly into an administrative unit succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The domain shows as verified, and a test user can have the desired verified-domain UPN.

C:

Even if setting the intended verified domain as the tenant default succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The domain shows as verified, and a test user can have the desired verified-domain UPN.

D:

Even if defining a custom Microsoft Entra role containing only the required application read permissions succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The domain shows as verified, and a test user can have the desired verified-domain UPN.

Question 15

The deployment was intended to satisfy: An organization is introducing a custom sign-in domain while still using the default onmicrosoft.com domain. During testing, this happened: Verification remains pending although the team entered the domain name in the admin center. Which configuration defect best explains the failure?

  1. The target account itself is not an administrative unit member; adding only its group does not grant user-management rights to each group member
  2. The administrator changed Windows domain join policy instead of Entra device registration settings
  3. The new brand suffix is verified but has not been selected as the default domain
  4. The ownership TXT/MX verification record was not published at the authoritative DNS host

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct diagnosis. The ownership TXT/MX verification record was not published at the authoritative DNS host. This fault explains the observed failure: Verification remains pending although the team entered the domain name in the admin center. The intended configuration would instead be: Add the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID and complete the required DNS ownership verification before assigning it to users.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The target account itself is not an administrative unit member; adding only its group does not grant user-management rights to each group member. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The ownership TXT/MX verification record was not published at the authoritative DNS host. The corrective action is: Add the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID and complete the required DNS ownership verification before assigning it to users.

B:

The administrator changed Windows domain join policy instead of Entra device registration settings. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The ownership TXT/MX verification record was not published at the authoritative DNS host. The corrective action is: Add the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID and complete the required DNS ownership verification before assigning it to users.

C:

The new brand suffix is verified but has not been selected as the default domain. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The ownership TXT/MX verification record was not published at the authoritative DNS host. The corrective action is: Add the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID and complete the required DNS ownership verification before assigning it to users.

Question 16

A change board will approve one identity configuration to satisfy: A business has two verified domains and wants newly provisioned cloud users to default to the recently acquired brand domain. Which change should it approve?

  1. Set the intended verified domain as the tenant default and explicitly check the UPN assigned by the provisioning workflow
  2. Assign the minimum built-in role at the applicable administrative unit scopes for both populations
  3. Define a custom Microsoft Entra role containing only the required application read permissions and assign it at the intended scope
  4. Add the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID and complete the required DNS ownership verification before assigning it to users

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct implementation. Set the intended verified domain as the tenant default and explicitly check the UPN assigned by the provisioning workflow. It meets the stated requirement: A business has two verified domains and wants newly provisioned cloud users to default to the recently acquired brand domain. Acceptance evidence is: A newly created test cloud user gets the intended brand suffix while previously assigned UPNs are not silently rewritten.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units. That condition is not the problem here: The new brand suffix is verified but has not been selected as the default domain. The targeted implementation is: Set the intended verified domain as the tenant default and explicitly check the UPN assigned by the provisioning workflow.

C:

The custom role includes an application credential-write action alongside read actions. That condition is not the problem here: The new brand suffix is verified but has not been selected as the default domain. The targeted implementation is: Set the intended verified domain as the tenant default and explicitly check the UPN assigned by the provisioning workflow.

D:

The ownership TXT/MX verification record was not published at the authoritative DNS host. That condition is not the problem here: The new brand suffix is verified but has not been selected as the default domain. The targeted implementation is: Set the intended verified domain as the tenant default and explicitly check the UPN assigned by the provisioning workflow.

Question 17

The team implemented the following change: Set the intended verified domain as the tenant default and explicitly check the UPN assigned by the provisioning workflow. The acceptance requirement was: A business has two verified domains and wants newly provisioned cloud users to default to the recently acquired brand domain. Which observed outcome most directly proves the change works?

  1. A scoped operator resets a directly included nonadmin Nordic test user, but cannot reset a user outside the unit or an administrator beyond the scoped role limits
  2. A newly created test cloud user gets the intended brand suffix while previously assigned UPNs are not silently rewritten
  3. The domain shows as verified, and a test user can have the desired verified-domain UPN
  4. The restricted test user cannot complete the disallowed directory action while an authorized role retains access

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. A newly created test cloud user gets the intended brand suffix while previously assigned UPNs are not silently rewritten. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if putting the individual nonprivileged Nordic user objects directly into an administrative unit succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A newly created test cloud user gets the intended brand suffix while previously assigned UPNs are not silently rewritten.

C:

Even if adding the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A newly created test cloud user gets the intended brand suffix while previously assigned UPNs are not silently rewritten.

D:

Even if evaluate succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A newly created test cloud user gets the intended brand suffix while previously assigned UPNs are not silently rewritten.

Question 18

An engineer troubleshoots an identity solution for: A business has two verified domains and wants newly provisioned cloud users to default to the recently acquired brand domain. The pilot result is: New users still receive the previous default domain suffix. What is the most likely relevant fault?

  1. An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review
  2. The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units
  3. The ownership TXT/MX verification record was not published at the authoritative DNS host
  4. The new brand suffix is verified but has not been selected as the default domain

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct diagnosis. The new brand suffix is verified but has not been selected as the default domain. This fault explains the observed failure: New users still receive the previous default domain suffix. The intended configuration would instead be: Set the intended verified domain as the tenant default and explicitly check the UPN assigned by the provisioning workflow.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The new brand suffix is verified but has not been selected as the default domain. The corrective action is: Set the intended verified domain as the tenant default and explicitly check the UPN assigned by the provisioning workflow.

B:

The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The new brand suffix is verified but has not been selected as the default domain. The corrective action is: Set the intended verified domain as the tenant default and explicitly check the UPN assigned by the provisioning workflow.

C:

The ownership TXT/MX verification record was not published at the authoritative DNS host. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The new brand suffix is verified but has not been selected as the default domain. The corrective action is: Set the intended verified domain as the tenant default and explicitly check the UPN assigned by the provisioning workflow.

Question 19

An identity project has this requirement: A tenant must show a trusted corporate logo and customized sign-in wording for staff during Microsoft Entra authentication. Which configuration should the administrator implement?

  1. Add the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID and complete the required DNS ownership verification before assigning it to users
  2. Configure company branding for the relevant sign-in experience, with appropriate localized text and supported image dimensions
  3. Review and configure Microsoft Entra device registration settings and the permitted user scope
  4. Evaluate and configure the tenant user-settings restrictions and verify that each control affects its stated surface

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct implementation. Configure company branding for the relevant sign-in experience, with appropriate localized text and supported image dimensions. It meets the stated requirement: A tenant must show a trusted corporate logo and customized sign-in wording for staff during Microsoft Entra authentication. Acceptance evidence is: A fresh browser sign-in displays the updated organization-specific brand resources in the intended locale.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The ownership TXT/MX verification record was not published at the authoritative DNS host. That condition is not the problem here: The tenant's branding change was configured only for another language or uses unsupported image specifications. The targeted implementation is: Configure company branding for the relevant sign-in experience, with appropriate localized text and supported image dimensions.

C:

The administrator changed Windows domain join policy instead of Entra device registration settings. That condition is not the problem here: The tenant's branding change was configured only for another language or uses unsupported image specifications. The targeted implementation is: Configure company branding for the relevant sign-in experience, with appropriate localized text and supported image dimensions.

D:

A portal-navigation restriction was mistaken for full removal of underlying directory API permissions. That condition is not the problem here: The tenant's branding change was configured only for another language or uses unsupported image specifications. The targeted implementation is: Configure company branding for the relevant sign-in experience, with appropriate localized text and supported image dimensions.

Question 20

An auditor must verify this deployment decision: Configure company branding for the relevant sign-in experience, with appropriate localized text and supported image dimensions. Its purpose was: A tenant must show a trusted corporate logo and customized sign-in wording for staff during Microsoft Entra authentication. Which test result is the strongest evidence?

  1. A permission test aligns with all active scoped role assignments rather than a single role name
  2. A fresh browser sign-in displays the updated organization-specific brand resources in the intended locale
  3. The domain shows as verified, and a test user can have the desired verified-domain UPN
  4. A scoped operator resets a directly included nonadmin Nordic test user, but cannot reset a user outside the unit or an administrator beyond the scoped role limits

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. A fresh browser sign-in displays the updated organization-specific brand resources in the intended locale. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if inspecting the principal's direct succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A fresh browser sign-in displays the updated organization-specific brand resources in the intended locale.

C:

Even if adding the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A fresh browser sign-in displays the updated organization-specific brand resources in the intended locale.

D:

Even if putting the individual nonprivileged Nordic user objects directly into an administrative unit succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A fresh browser sign-in displays the updated organization-specific brand resources in the intended locale.