McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-300

Exam Name Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate

Microsoft SC-300 Bundle $44.99
SC-300 Sample 1 SC-300 Sample 2 SC-300 Sample 3 SC-300 Sample 4 SC-300 Sample 5 SC-300 Sample 6 SC-300 Sample 7 SC-300 Sample 8 SC-300 Sample 9 SC-300 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-300 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-300 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-300 Questions & Answers

    490 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-300 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-300 Video Course

    SC-300 Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    SC-300 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-300 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-300 Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 599-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-300 exam.

Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator (SC-300) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    490 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-300 Video Course

    Training Course

    43 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    599 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-300 Practice Test 3

Question 20

An auditor must verify this deployment decision: Configure company branding for the relevant sign-in experience, with appropriate localized text and supported image dimensions. Its purpose was: A tenant must show a trusted corporate logo and customized sign-in wording for staff during Microsoft Entra authentication. Which test result is the strongest evidence?

  1. A permission test aligns with all active scoped role assignments rather than a single role name
  2. A fresh browser sign-in displays the updated organization-specific brand resources in the intended locale
  3. The domain shows as verified, and a test user can have the desired verified-domain UPN
  4. A scoped operator resets a directly included nonadmin Nordic test user, but cannot reset a user outside the unit or an administrator beyond the scoped role limits

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. A fresh browser sign-in displays the updated organization-specific brand resources in the intended locale. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if inspecting the principal's direct succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A fresh browser sign-in displays the updated organization-specific brand resources in the intended locale.

C:

Even if adding the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A fresh browser sign-in displays the updated organization-specific brand resources in the intended locale.

D:

Even if putting the individual nonprivileged Nordic user objects directly into an administrative unit succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A fresh browser sign-in displays the updated organization-specific brand resources in the intended locale.

Question 21

A change appears correct at a glance, but the requirement is still unmet: A tenant must show a trusted corporate logo and customized sign-in wording for staff during Microsoft Entra authentication. The key observed symptom is: The test sign-in falls back to the old or generic visual treatment. Which cause should be investigated first?

  1. The dynamic unit membership rule uses a value that does not match the employee department attribute or the membership evaluation has not completed
  2. An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review
  3. The tenant's branding change was configured only for another language or uses unsupported image specifications
  4. The restriction was configured for the wrong group type, leaving Microsoft 365 group creation unrestricted

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct diagnosis. The tenant's branding change was configured only for another language or uses unsupported image specifications. This fault explains the observed failure: The test sign-in falls back to the old or generic visual treatment. The intended configuration would instead be: Configure company branding for the relevant sign-in experience, with appropriate localized text and supported image dimensions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The dynamic unit membership rule uses a value that does not match the employee department attribute or the membership evaluation has not completed. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The tenant's branding change was configured only for another language or uses unsupported image specifications. The corrective action is: Configure company branding for the relevant sign-in experience, with appropriate localized text and supported image dimensions.

B:

An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The tenant's branding change was configured only for another language or uses unsupported image specifications. The corrective action is: Configure company branding for the relevant sign-in experience, with appropriate localized text and supported image dimensions.

D:

The restriction was configured for the wrong group type, leaving Microsoft 365 group creation unrestricted. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The tenant's branding change was configured only for another language or uses unsupported image specifications. The corrective action is: Configure company branding for the relevant sign-in experience, with appropriate localized text and supported image dimensions.

Question 22

A team is reviewing its proposed Microsoft Entra change. The required outcome is: Security operations requires only a small admin group to invite guests; ordinary employees must not send B2B invitations. What is the most suitable implementation?

  1. Put the individual nonprivileged Nordic user objects directly into an administrative unit and assign a suitably scoped User Administrator role, observing restrictions on resetting privileged users
  2. Inspect the principal's direct and group-based role assignments, activation state, and applicable scope to evaluate effective permissions
  3. Evaluate and configure the tenant user-settings restrictions and verify that each control affects its stated surface
  4. Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct implementation. Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees. It meets the stated requirement: Security operations requires only a small admin group to invite guests; ordinary employees must not send B2B invitations. Acceptance evidence is: An ordinary member's guest invitation is blocked while an approved inviter can send one.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The target account itself is not an administrative unit member; adding only its group does not grant user-management rights to each group member. That condition is not the problem here: The invitation restriction is permissive for all members despite the group-specific governance requirement. The targeted implementation is: Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees.

B:

An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review. That condition is not the problem here: The invitation restriction is permissive for all members despite the group-specific governance requirement. The targeted implementation is: Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees.

C:

A portal-navigation restriction was mistaken for full removal of underlying directory API permissions. That condition is not the problem here: The invitation restriction is permissive for all members despite the group-specific governance requirement. The targeted implementation is: Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees.

Question 23

After configuring: Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees, an engineer performs a targeted pilot for this objective: Security operations requires only a small admin group to invite guests; ordinary employees must not send B2B invitations. What result constitutes a pass?

  1. The operator can update permitted attributes in both units but receives an authorization failure for unrelated employees
  2. The domain shows as verified, and a test user can have the desired verified-domain UPN
  3. An ordinary member's guest invitation is blocked while an approved inviter can send one
  4. A nonmember cannot create the restricted group type but an authorized creator can

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. An ordinary member's guest invitation is blocked while an approved inviter can send one. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if assigning the minimum built-in role at the applicable administrative unit scopes for both populations succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An ordinary member's guest invitation is blocked while an approved inviter can send one.

B:

Even if adding the DNS domain to Microsoft Entra ID succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An ordinary member's guest invitation is blocked while an approved inviter can send one.

D:

Even if configuring Microsoft 365 group creation restrictions for a designated security group of authorized creators succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: An ordinary member's guest invitation is blocked while an approved inviter can send one.

Question 24

The service desk escalates the following unsuccessful identity rollout. Requirement: Security operations requires only a small admin group to invite guests; ordinary employees must not send B2B invitations. Observed: A standard member without delegated invitation privileges still adds an external guest. Which underlying misconfiguration is most consistent?

  1. The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units
  2. The ownership TXT/MX verification record was not published at the authoritative DNS host
  3. The restriction was configured for the wrong group type, leaving Microsoft 365 group creation unrestricted
  4. The invitation restriction is permissive for all members despite the group-specific governance requirement

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct diagnosis. The invitation restriction is permissive for all members despite the group-specific governance requirement. This fault explains the observed failure: A standard member without delegated invitation privileges still adds an external guest. The intended configuration would instead be: Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The invitation restriction is permissive for all members despite the group-specific governance requirement. The corrective action is: Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees.

B:

The ownership TXT/MX verification record was not published at the authoritative DNS host. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The invitation restriction is permissive for all members despite the group-specific governance requirement. The corrective action is: Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees.

C:

The restriction was configured for the wrong group type, leaving Microsoft 365 group creation unrestricted. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The invitation restriction is permissive for all members despite the group-specific governance requirement. The corrective action is: Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees.

Question 25

Two teams share the same release window but not the same access policy. Team A needs: The directory should prevent ordinary staff from creating Microsoft 365 groups while preserving group creation by designated administrators. Team B needs: A tenant owner wants to know which cloud directory property governs the ability to register devices, not join on-premises Active Directory computers. Which TWO implementations should be included?

  1. Define a custom Microsoft Entra role containing only the required application read permissions and assign it at the intended scope
  2. Review and configure Microsoft Entra device registration settings and the permitted user scope
  3. Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees
  4. Configure Microsoft 365 group creation restrictions for a designated security group of authorized creators
  5. Configure company branding for the relevant sign-in experience, with appropriate localized text and supported image dimensions

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

Correct for task 2. Review and configure Microsoft Entra device registration settings and the permitted user scope. This addresses the independent second requirement: A tenant owner wants to know which cloud directory property governs the ability to register devices, not join on-premises Active Directory computers. Verify it by checking: An authorized pilot user registers an Entra-registered device; a disallowed pilot user cannot.

D:

Correct for task 1. Configure Microsoft 365 group creation restrictions for a designated security group of authorized creators. This directly addresses the first requirement: The directory should prevent ordinary staff from creating Microsoft 365 groups while preserving group creation by designated administrators. Verify it by checking: A nonmember cannot create the restricted group type but an authorized creator can.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The custom role includes an application credential-write action alongside read actions. To satisfy task 1, use: Configure Microsoft 365 group creation restrictions for a designated security group of authorized creators. For task 2, use: Review and configure Microsoft Entra device registration settings and the permitted user scope.

C:

The invitation restriction is permissive for all members despite the group-specific governance requirement. To satisfy task 1, use: Configure Microsoft 365 group creation restrictions for a designated security group of authorized creators. For task 2, use: Review and configure Microsoft Entra device registration settings and the permitted user scope.

E:

The tenant's branding change was configured only for another language or uses unsupported image specifications. To satisfy task 1, use: Configure Microsoft 365 group creation restrictions for a designated security group of authorized creators. For task 2, use: Review and configure Microsoft Entra device registration settings and the permitted user scope.

Question 26

The requirement is: The directory should prevent ordinary staff from creating Microsoft 365 groups while preserving group creation by designated administrators. The technical change was: Configure Microsoft 365 group creation restrictions for a designated security group of authorized creators. Which observation validates the intended boundary?

  1. A scoped operator resets a directly included nonadmin Nordic test user, but cannot reset a user outside the unit or an administrator beyond the scoped role limits
  2. An ordinary member's guest invitation is blocked while an approved inviter can send one
  3. A nonmember cannot create the restricted group type but an authorized creator can
  4. A fresh browser sign-in displays the updated organization-specific brand resources in the intended locale

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct acceptance check. A nonmember cannot create the restricted group type but an authorized creator can. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if putting the individual nonprivileged Nordic user objects directly into an administrative unit succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A nonmember cannot create the restricted group type but an authorized creator can.

B:

Even if setting the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A nonmember cannot create the restricted group type but an authorized creator can.

D:

Even if configuring company branding for the relevant sign-in experience succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: A nonmember cannot create the restricted group type but an authorized creator can.

Question 27

During post-change review of the requirement “The directory should prevent ordinary staff from creating Microsoft 365 groups while preserving group creation by designated administrators,” an auditor observes: Ordinary employees continue to create Microsoft 365 groups after the change. Which root-cause finding would explain that symptom?

  1. An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review
  2. The restriction was configured for the wrong group type, leaving Microsoft 365 group creation unrestricted
  3. The invitation restriction is permissive for all members despite the group-specific governance requirement
  4. The administrator changed Windows domain join policy instead of Entra device registration settings

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct diagnosis. The restriction was configured for the wrong group type, leaving Microsoft 365 group creation unrestricted. This fault explains the observed failure: Ordinary employees continue to create Microsoft 365 groups after the change. The intended configuration would instead be: Configure Microsoft 365 group creation restrictions for a designated security group of authorized creators.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An inherited or activated role assignment is excluded from the permissions review. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The restriction was configured for the wrong group type, leaving Microsoft 365 group creation unrestricted. The corrective action is: Configure Microsoft 365 group creation restrictions for a designated security group of authorized creators.

C:

The invitation restriction is permissive for all members despite the group-specific governance requirement. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The restriction was configured for the wrong group type, leaving Microsoft 365 group creation unrestricted. The corrective action is: Configure Microsoft 365 group creation restrictions for a designated security group of authorized creators.

D:

The administrator changed Windows domain join policy instead of Entra device registration settings. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The restriction was configured for the wrong group type, leaving Microsoft 365 group creation unrestricted. The corrective action is: Configure Microsoft 365 group creation restrictions for a designated security group of authorized creators.

Question 28

Select the most appropriate first configuration decision for this scenario: Finance wants a delegated operator to manage users across a headquarters unit and a branch unit without extending the role to all employees.

  1. Configure a Dynamic User administrative unit with a tested department-attribute membership rule and separately assign the regional administrator role at that unit scope
  2. Put the individual nonprivileged Nordic user objects directly into an administrative unit and assign a suitably scoped User Administrator role, observing restrictions on resetting privileged users
  3. Assign the minimum built-in role at the applicable administrative unit scopes for both populations
  4. Set the External collaboration guest-invite restrictions and delegate invitation capability only to approved roles or invitees

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct implementation. Assign the minimum built-in role at the applicable administrative unit scopes for both populations. It meets the stated requirement: Finance wants a delegated operator to manage users across a headquarters unit and a branch unit without extending the role to all employees. Acceptance evidence is: The operator can update permitted attributes in both units but receives an authorization failure for unrelated employees.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The dynamic unit membership rule uses a value that does not match the employee department attribute or the membership evaluation has not completed. That condition is not the problem here: The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units. The targeted implementation is: Assign the minimum built-in role at the applicable administrative unit scopes for both populations.

B:

The target account itself is not an administrative unit member; adding only its group does not grant user-management rights to each group member. That condition is not the problem here: The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units. The targeted implementation is: Assign the minimum built-in role at the applicable administrative unit scopes for both populations.

D:

The invitation restriction is permissive for all members despite the group-specific governance requirement. That condition is not the problem here: The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units. The targeted implementation is: Assign the minimum built-in role at the applicable administrative unit scopes for both populations.

Question 29

The owner wants independent acceptance evidence after the team chose: Assign the minimum built-in role at the applicable administrative unit scopes for both populations. It was meant to solve: Finance wants a delegated operator to manage users across a headquarters unit and a branch unit without extending the role to all employees. Which result demonstrates success?

  1. A delegated test principal can inspect app definitions but cannot add a client secret or alter API permissions
  2. The operator can update permitted attributes in both units but receives an authorization failure for unrelated employees
  3. Activation gives the role privileges for the allowed period, and the account loses those privileges afterward
  4. After the supported membership evaluation completes, a matching department account enters the unit and an unrelated account stays outside

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct acceptance check. The operator can update permitted attributes in both units but receives an authorization failure for unrelated employees. This tests the intended access or synchronization boundary instead of merely checking that a setting exists.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Even if defining a custom Microsoft Entra role containing only the required application read permissions succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The operator can update permitted attributes in both units but receives an authorization failure for unrelated employees.

C:

Even if making suitable principals eligible for the Microsoft Entra role through PIM succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The operator can update permitted attributes in both units but receives an authorization failure for unrelated employees.

D:

Even if configuring a Dynamic User administrative unit with a tested department-attribute membership rule succeeds, this does not prove the required identity-control outcome. The decisive check is: The operator can update permitted attributes in both units but receives an authorization failure for unrelated employees.

Question 30

A team must isolate a broken configuration. Goal: Finance wants a delegated operator to manage users across a headquarters unit and a branch unit without extending the role to all employees. Symptom: A branch user update is denied while the headquarters test succeeds. Which hypothesis most precisely accounts for the observed result?

  1. The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow
  2. The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units
  3. The target account itself is not an administrative unit member; adding only its group does not grant user-management rights to each group member
  4. The new brand suffix is verified but has not been selected as the default domain

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct diagnosis. The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units. This fault explains the observed failure: A branch user update is denied while the headquarters test succeeds. The intended configuration would instead be: Assign the minimum built-in role at the applicable administrative unit scopes for both populations.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The operator only received a standing role assignment without the intended eligibility and activation workflow. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units. The corrective action is: Assign the minimum built-in role at the applicable administrative unit scopes for both populations.

C:

The target account itself is not an administrative unit member; adding only its group does not grant user-management rights to each group member. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units. The corrective action is: Assign the minimum built-in role at the applicable administrative unit scopes for both populations.

D:

The new brand suffix is verified but has not been selected as the default domain. The reported symptom instead has this cause: The delegated role was scoped to only one of the two required administrative units. The corrective action is: Assign the minimum built-in role at the applicable administrative unit scopes for both populations.