McAfee Secure

Microsoft SC-900 Bundle

Exam Code: SC-900

Exam Name Microsoft Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals

Certification Provider: Microsoft

Corresponding Certification: Microsoft Certified: Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals

Microsoft SC-900 Bundle $44.99
SC-900 Sample 1 SC-900 Sample 2 SC-900 Sample 3 SC-900 Sample 4 SC-900 Sample 5 SC-900 Sample 6 SC-900 Sample 7 SC-900 Sample 8 SC-900 Sample 9 SC-900 Sample 10

100% Microsoft SC-900 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real SC-900 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    SC-900 Questions & Answers

    259 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual SC-900 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • SC-900 Video Course

    SC-900 Training Course

    147 Video Lectures

    SC-900 Video Course is developed by Microsoft Professionals to help you pass the SC-900 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Microsoft Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals exam.
  • Study Guide

    SC-900 Study Guide

    413 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 413-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace SC-900 exam.

Microsoft Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals (SC-900) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    259 Questions

    $124.99
  • SC-900 Video Course

    Training Course

    147 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    413 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Microsoft SC-900 Practice Test 33

Question 320

At the Pinewick nonprofit organization, administrators combine a suspicious single login attempt and a possibly compromised long-term user identity into the same manual control. How should the organization sustain the improvement?

  1. Review targeted applications and exclusions during payroll app changes
  2. Revisit risk responses and false positives after identity incidents
  3. Review device identity health as Windows deployments change
  4. Monitor password writeback health after hybrid connector updates

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

For the Pinewick nonprofit organization, this maintenance action preserves the fix: revisit risk responses and false positives after identity incidents. It should be revisited as the workload evolves.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The option would have the team review targeted applications and exclusions during payroll app changes. For this situation, the preventive control should instead be to revisit risk responses and false positives after identity incidents. For the Pinewick nonprofit organization, the direct corrective action is to distinguish sign-in risk and user risk when selecting supported identity protection policies.

C:

That routine supports hybrid join device identity, but the relevant ongoing risk requires the team to revisit risk responses and false positives after identity incidents. For the Pinewick nonprofit organization, the direct corrective action is to distinguish sign-in risk and user risk when selecting supported identity protection policies.

D:

The suggested review does not track the condition behind the incident. Sustained improvement requires the team to revisit risk responses and false positives after identity incidents. For the Pinewick nonprofit organization, the direct corrective action is to distinguish sign-in risk and user risk when selecting supported identity protection policies.

Question 321

At the Birchhaven municipal government, a project repeatedly grants temporary contractor access manually with no request approval or expiry. Which approach best resolves the identified risk?

  1. Track guest sponsorship and periodic lifecycle reviews for the external identity
  2. Use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with suitable approvals and expiration
  3. Validate token issuer audience expiry and required claims at the relying application
  4. Configure Windows Hello for Business for eligible managed identities and devices

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

For the Birchhaven municipal government, the appropriate correction is to use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with suitable approvals and expiration. The decisive reason is that access packages can provide governed requestable collections of permissions with lifecycle controls; acceptance evidence is that a test contractor requests the approved package receives review and loses access at expiration.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Track guest sponsorship and periodic lifecycle reviews for the external identity can be useful for another workload, but it leaves the immediate failure unresolved. Here the priority is to use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with suitable approvals and expiration. For the Birchhaven municipal government, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with suitable approvals and expiration.

C:

This alternative would be suitable where a valid cryptographic signature does not make a token intended for one audience valid for another application. It does not by itself resolve the need to use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with suitable approvals and expiration. For the Birchhaven municipal government, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with suitable approvals and expiration.

D:

Configure Windows Hello for Business for eligible managed identities and devices addresses a different kind of problem: windows Hello for Business can use device-associated credentials unlocked by PIN or biometrics rather than submitting a reusable password to the service. Here the reported weakness is that access packages can provide governed requestable collections of permissions with lifecycle controls. For the Birchhaven municipal government, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with suitable approvals and expiration.

Question 322

At the Birchhaven municipal government, a project repeatedly grants temporary contractor access manually with no request approval or expiry. Which explanation best accounts for the concern?

  1. A compromised identity may be abused from different locations so user-level risk is not restricted to one connection
  2. Access packages can provide governed requestable collections of permissions with lifecycle controls
  3. Cloud-native Entra user accounts do not require an on-premises AD DS domain for basic cloud sign-in
  4. A time-limited bootstrap credential can support method registration without restoring broad permanent legacy authentication

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The problem stems from the fact that access packages can provide governed requestable collections of permissions with lifecycle controls. A correct solution would use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with suitable approvals and expiration and check that a test contractor requests the approved package receives review and loses access at expiration. This result addresses the stated challenge at the Birchhaven municipal government.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The case does not describe the failure mode involving identity protection risky users. Its core issue is that access packages can provide governed requestable collections of permissions with lifecycle controls. For the Birchhaven municipal government, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with suitable approvals and expiration.

C:

This explanation belongs to a different security or compliance situation. In this case, the observable gap is that access packages can provide governed requestable collections of permissions with lifecycle controls. For the Birchhaven municipal government, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with suitable approvals and expiration.

D:

A time-limited bootstrap credential can support method registration without restoring broad permanent legacy authentication. That may occur elsewhere, but the evidence at the Birchhaven municipal government instead points to the fact that access packages can provide governed requestable collections of permissions with lifecycle controls.

Question 323

At the Birchhaven municipal government, a project repeatedly grants temporary contractor access manually with no request approval or expiry. Which test result best shows the requirement is met?

  1. A test contractor requests the approved package receives review and loses access at expiration
  2. A review campaign records a denial and removes the stale guest's targeted resource access
  3. A simulated target user shows the expected policy outcome before the real policy is enforced
  4. A controlled series of invalid sign-ins triggers the documented protection and an authorized recovery path remains available

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

At the Birchhaven municipal government, evidence that a test contractor requests the approved package receives review and loses access at expiration directly validates the correction, instead of testing a neighboring service.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The cited result is too remote from the corrective action to use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with suitable approvals and expiration. The direct evidence should show that a test contractor requests the approved package receives review and loses access at expiration. For the Birchhaven municipal government, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with suitable approvals and expiration.

C:

That observation may be useful for another security or compliance workflow, but the current acceptance test must demonstrate that a test contractor requests the approved package receives review and loses access at expiration. For the Birchhaven municipal government, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with suitable approvals and expiration.

D:

At the Birchhaven municipal government, a result about smart lockout password guessing would not show that the team corrected the failure where access packages can provide governed requestable collections of permissions with lifecycle controls.

Question 324

At the Birchhaven municipal government, a project repeatedly grants temporary contractor access manually with no request approval or expiry. Which ongoing control best prevents this issue from recurring?

  1. Review user-risk resolutions and confirmed compromises after investigations
  2. Audit service principal role assignments when service scope changes
  3. Review targeted applications and exclusions during payroll app changes
  4. Review package owners and approval policies as projects close

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This control works beyond the initial remediation because it requires the team to review package owners and approval policies as projects close. This result addresses the stated challenge at the Birchhaven municipal government.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That routine supports identity protection risky users, but the relevant ongoing risk requires the team to review package owners and approval policies as projects close. For the Birchhaven municipal government, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with suitable approvals and expiration.

B:

The suggested review does not track the condition behind the incident. Sustained improvement requires the team to review package owners and approval policies as projects close. For the Birchhaven municipal government, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with suitable approvals and expiration.

C:

Review targeted applications and exclusions during payroll app changes is not the primary recurring safeguard for this problem. The team should review package owners and approval policies as projects close. For the Birchhaven municipal government, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with suitable approvals and expiration.

Question 325

At the Oakport automotive supplier, external guests retain access to confidential Teams resources long after their engagements end. Which implementation choice best addresses the situation?

  1. Run access reviews for the sensitive group with accountable reviewers and applied decisions
  2. Choose a supported password hash synchronization pass-through authentication or federation design based on requirements
  3. Assign a suitable built-in read role at the smallest necessary Azure resource scope
  4. Use Microsoft Entra access reviews to recertify guest or group access decisions

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The primary failure mode is that long-lived membership without periodic owner review can preserve obsolete collaboration permissions. The proposed action directly fixes it by requiring the team to use Microsoft Entra access reviews to recertify guest or group access decisions; afterward, verify that a review campaign records a denial and removes the stale guest's targeted resource access. This result addresses the stated challenge at the Oakport automotive supplier.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative would be suitable where role and group membership changes over time can outlive the business justification for access. It does not by itself resolve the need to use Microsoft Entra access reviews to recertify guest or group access decisions. For the Oakport automotive supplier, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra access reviews to recertify guest or group access decisions.

B:

Choose a supported password hash synchronization pass-through authentication or federation design based on requirements addresses a different kind of problem: identity synchronization and cloud sign-in validation are related but separate architectural decisions. Here the reported weakness is that long-lived membership without periodic owner review can preserve obsolete collaboration permissions. For the Oakport automotive supplier, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra access reviews to recertify guest or group access decisions.

C:

The option addresses the separate situation where Azure RBAC ties allowed actions to role assignments and inheritance at management-group subscription resource-group or resource scope. For this case, the more appropriate response is to use Microsoft Entra access reviews to recertify guest or group access decisions. For the Oakport automotive supplier, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra access reviews to recertify guest or group access decisions.

Question 326

At the Oakport automotive supplier, external guests retain access to confidential Teams resources long after their engagements end. What risk should the team identify as the primary issue?

  1. Long-lived membership without periodic owner review can preserve obsolete collaboration permissions
  2. Risk detections provide signals about suspicious authentication attempts beyond simple success and failure
  3. Two knowledge-only secrets do not necessarily represent different authentication factor types
  4. Identity credentials by themselves do not evaluate the network-location risk requirement

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The situation shows that long-lived membership without periodic owner review can preserve obsolete collaboration permissions, rather than merely a monitoring or presentation issue. Remediation is to use Microsoft Entra access reviews to recertify guest or group access decisions. This result addresses the stated challenge at the Oakport automotive supplier.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Risk detections provide signals about suspicious authentication attempts beyond simple success and failure. That may occur elsewhere, but the evidence at the Oakport automotive supplier instead points to the fact that long-lived membership without periodic owner review can preserve obsolete collaboration permissions.

C:

The proposed cause is relevant to mfa factor independence, but it does not explain why long-lived membership without periodic owner review can preserve obsolete collaboration permissions in the reported case. For the Oakport automotive supplier, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra access reviews to recertify guest or group access decisions.

D:

Identity credentials by themselves do not evaluate the network-location risk requirement. That is not the mechanism that accounts for the stated failure at the Oakport automotive supplier.

Question 327

At the Oakport automotive supplier, external guests retain access to confidential Teams resources long after their engagements end. What is the strongest acceptance test for this change?

  1. A test activation without the required factor is rejected while a compliant activation is recorded
  2. A review campaign records a denial and removes the stale guest's targeted resource access
  3. A decommissioned test app no longer receives tokens or accesses the previously granted resource
  4. A guarded emergency access rehearsal succeeds under documented exceptional conditions and produces an alert

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The team can confirm the fix by showing that a review campaign records a denial and removes the stale guest's targeted resource access. This aligns with the corrective design to use Microsoft Entra access reviews to recertify guest or group access decisions. This result addresses the stated challenge at the Oakport automotive supplier.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That observation may be useful for another security or compliance workflow, but the current acceptance test must demonstrate that a review campaign records a denial and removes the stale guest's targeted resource access. For the Oakport automotive supplier, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra access reviews to recertify guest or group access decisions.

C:

The alternative checks whether a decommissioned test app no longer receives tokens or accesses the previously granted resource, which is not the direct acceptance criterion for the stated problem. The required result is that a review campaign records a denial and removes the stale guest's targeted resource access. For the Oakport automotive supplier, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra access reviews to recertify guest or group access decisions.

D:

This result would validate conditional access emergency access, not the intended improvement. The needed observation is that a review campaign records a denial and removes the stale guest's targeted resource access. For the Oakport automotive supplier, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra access reviews to recertify guest or group access decisions.

Question 328

At the Oakport automotive supplier, external guests retain access to confidential Teams resources long after their engagements end. Which setting or practice should be reviewed in future?

  1. Schedule access recertification when partner rosters change
  2. Review both sign-in gates and role activation in privilege audits
  3. Recheck redirect URI and delegated scopes after application releases
  4. Monitor synchronization security and credential policy alignment

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

After implementation, the team should schedule access recertification when partner rosters change as the appropriate recurring safeguard against the identified issue. This result addresses the stated challenge at the Oakport automotive supplier.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This is a maintenance action for a different security or compliance situation, rather than the one that originally failed because long-lived membership without periodic owner review can preserve obsolete collaboration permissions. For the Oakport automotive supplier, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra access reviews to recertify guest or group access decisions.

C:

The option would have the team recheck redirect URI and delegated scopes after application releases. For this situation, the preventive control should instead be to schedule access recertification when partner rosters change. For the Oakport automotive supplier, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra access reviews to recertify guest or group access decisions.

D:

Although the proposed practice may address cases where password hash synchronization uses a derived hash mechanism rather than forwarding users' original plaintext passwords to cloud applications, it does not maintain the specific correction here. For the Oakport automotive supplier, the direct corrective action is to use Microsoft Entra access reviews to recertify guest or group access decisions.

Question 329

At the Claremont municipal government, a security group accumulates privileged members because no owner periodically confirms necessity. Which corrective action best meets the requirement?

  1. Pair identity governance with a suitable Microsoft Purview data loss prevention policy for content movement
  2. Distinguish sign-in risk and user risk when selecting supported identity protection policies
  3. Validate token issuer audience expiry and required claims at the relying application
  4. Run access reviews for the sensitive group with accountable reviewers and applied decisions

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

For the Claremont municipal government, the appropriate correction is to run access reviews for the sensitive group with accountable reviewers and applied decisions. The decisive reason is that role and group membership changes over time can outlive the business justification for access; acceptance evidence is that a rejected test membership is removed after the review applies its result.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The option addresses the separate situation where recertifying who can access a file is not the same as examining whether its sensitive content is being shared improperly. For this case, the more appropriate response is to run access reviews for the sensitive group with accountable reviewers and applied decisions. For the Claremont municipal government, the direct corrective action is to run access reviews for the sensitive group with accountable reviewers and applied decisions.

B:

This focuses on sign-in risk versus user risk; it does not directly correct the condition that role and group membership changes over time can outlive the business justification for access. For the Claremont municipal government, the direct corrective action is to run access reviews for the sensitive group with accountable reviewers and applied decisions.

C:

Validate token issuer audience expiry and required claims at the relying application can be useful for another workload, but it leaves the immediate failure unresolved. Here the priority is to run access reviews for the sensitive group with accountable reviewers and applied decisions. For the Claremont municipal government, the direct corrective action is to run access reviews for the sensitive group with accountable reviewers and applied decisions.

Question 330

At the Claremont municipal government, a security group accumulates privileged members because no owner periodically confirms necessity. Which underlying issue most directly explains this situation?

  1. Role and group membership changes over time can outlive the business justification for access
  2. Current membership alone does not explain historical access approval or denial decisions
  3. A successful tenant sign-in does not automatically satisfy an app-specific authorization boundary
  4. Report-only mode can observe policy results without applying the new grant or block control

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The evidence indicates that role and group membership changes over time can outlive the business justification for access. The appropriate response is to run access reviews for the sensitive group with accountable reviewers and applied decisions and demonstrate that a rejected test membership is removed after the review applies its result. This result addresses the stated challenge at the Claremont municipal government.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Current membership alone does not explain historical access approval or denial decisions. That is not the mechanism that accounts for the stated failure at the Claremont municipal government.

C:

The case does not describe the failure mode involving app role assignment authorization. Its core issue is that role and group membership changes over time can outlive the business justification for access. For the Claremont municipal government, the direct corrective action is to run access reviews for the sensitive group with accountable reviewers and applied decisions.

D:

Although report-only mode can observe policy results without applying the new grant or block control, the presented symptoms do not support that as the primary cause; they indicate that role and group membership changes over time can outlive the business justification for access. For the Claremont municipal government, the direct corrective action is to run access reviews for the sensitive group with accountable reviewers and applied decisions.