McAfee Secure

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle $23.86

100% Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course is developed by Amazon Professionals to help you pass the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.
  • Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Developed by industry experts, this 1066-page guide spells out in painstaking detail all of the information you need to ace AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 exam.

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 57

Question 560

For the enterprise requirement "Operations retains detached EBS volumes after instance termination and pays for unused storage for months", the team implemented this change: Inventory unattached EBS volumes and delete or archive approved volumes after snapshot and ownership checks. Which observation should be required before the change is approved?

  1. Cross-account access findings identify external principals and clear only when permissions are corrected
  2. Approved orphaned volumes stop generating storage costs while protected volumes remain recoverable
  3. Tested gp3 configuration meets IO SLOs at lower monthly storage and provisioned-performance cost
  4. Identified buckets show smaller unnecessary version and multipart storage after retention-safe cleanup

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. EBS storage billing continues for allocated volumes until they are deleted or otherwise changed. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: Operations retains detached EBS volumes after instance termination and pays for unused storage for months.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Cross-account access findings identify external principals and clear only when permissions are corrected. However, this does not establish the required outcome: approved orphaned volumes stop generating storage costs while protected volumes remain recoverable.

C:

Tested gp3 configuration meets IO SLOs at lower monthly storage and provisioned-performance cost. However, this does not establish the required outcome: approved orphaned volumes stop generating storage costs while protected volumes remain recoverable.

D:

Identified buckets show smaller unnecessary version and multipart storage after retention-safe cleanup. However, this does not establish the required outcome: approved orphaned volumes stop generating storage costs while protected volumes remain recoverable.

Question 561

An architecture review recommends this solution: Use ElastiCache Redis/Valkey-compatible cache with a suitable eviction and high-availability design. The motivating situation is: A high-throughput session API must share ephemeral session data among multiple application instances without database round trips. Which principle would a reviewer use to defend this design?

  1. WAF rate-based rules can limit excessive HTTP request patterns by aggregation key
  2. DAX offers managed in-memory caching for eligible DynamoDB read workloads
  3. A shared in-memory cache reduces backend read pressure when expiry and failure behavior are designed
  4. RDS read replicas scale read throughput but are asynchronous relative to the primary

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Use ElastiCache Redis/Valkey-compatible cache with a suitable eviction and high-availability design. The expected supporting evidence is: Hot session lookups avoid repeated database queries and failure recovery preserves acceptable service behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The service relies solely on application code with no rate-based edge filtering. The stated evidence instead indicates: Instance-local caches cannot share consistent ephemeral state across horizontally scaled hosts.

B:

Every read request traverses the backing DynamoDB service despite highly reusable cacheable data. The stated evidence instead indicates: Instance-local caches cannot share consistent ephemeral state across horizontally scaled hosts.

D:

Read-only analytical traffic saturates the production database's single writable instance. The stated evidence instead indicates: Instance-local caches cannot share consistent ephemeral state across horizontally scaled hosts.

Question 562

A professional architect is reviewing two independent workstreams. Requirement A: A business-critical order API has no measured user-facing latency objective and responders cannot tell if changes make availability worse. Requirement B: A public S3 bucket and KMS key unexpectedly trust principals outside the company's AWS organization. Select TWO actions, one for each independently scoped requirement.

  1. Define service level indicators and targets in CloudWatch dashboards and alarms grounded in request success and p95 latency
  2. Add AWS Config evaluation for the risky security-group condition with controlled notification and remediation
  3. Integrate AWS Health organizational events with EventBridge alerts and owner routing
  4. Run IAM Access Analyzer external-access findings scoped to the organization and fix the exact resource policies
  5. Run controlled AWS Fault Injection Service scenarios with safety guardrails and predeclared stop conditions

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

This action meets the independently stated requirement A: A business-critical order API has no measured user-facing latency objective and responders cannot tell if changes make availability worse. Operational excellence requires observable application SLOs tied to business-critical behavior. A direct acceptance check is: Release decisions reference tracked error rate and latency burn rather than raw instance uptime alone.

D:

This action meets the independently stated requirement B: A public S3 bucket and KMS key unexpectedly trust principals outside the company's AWS organization. Access Analyzer detects eligible resource trust outside its zone of trust. A direct acceptance check is: Cross-account access findings identify external principals and clear only when permissions are corrected.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This action targets a different technical need: An engineer repeatedly leaves management ports publicly accessible despite a configuration guardrail document. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. AWS Config checks configuration changes against evaluable rules and supports managed remediation actions; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

C:

This action targets a different technical need: A platform team learns about upcoming service maintenance only after workloads start failing. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. AWS Health can surface AWS-side events relevant to affected resources and accounts; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

E:

This action targets a different technical need: A multi-AZ production stack has never been tested with a failed Availability Zone during working hours. It does not replace either required solution in A or B. Fault injection validates real system behavior within approved experiment boundaries; verify the two stated requirements independently rather than accepting an unrelated change.

Question 563

An architecture review recommends this solution: Configure Route 53 failover routing with suitable health checks and a tested secondary target. The motivating situation is: A public application must divert DNS traffic away from an endpoint when health checks show it has failed. Why does this approach fit the stated design constraints?

  1. SQS dead-letter queues preserve failed messages for separate inspection and remediation
  2. Step Functions supports explicit state-level retry and error handling but side effects still require idempotency
  3. EC2 Image Builder automates reproducible image lifecycles with testing and distribution
  4. DNS failover requires health-aware routing and realistic expectations for cached answers

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Configure Route 53 failover routing with suitable health checks and a tested secondary target. The expected supporting evidence is: New DNS lookups return the secondary endpoint after a primary health check changes to unhealthy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Repeated retries of one failed message prevent useful error isolation and redrive workflow. The stated evidence instead indicates: DNS simple routing cannot automatically reflect the application's health.

B:

Imperative glue retries all upstream steps and creates duplicate side effects. The stated evidence instead indicates: DNS simple routing cannot automatically reflect the application's health.

C:

Each team independently patches hand-built machine images without reproducible validation. The stated evidence instead indicates: DNS simple routing cannot automatically reflect the application's health.

Question 564

An architecture review recommends this solution: Collect proper monitoring and evaluate AWS Compute Optimizer recommendations with SLO tests. The motivating situation is: An EC2 fleet has low utilization and a migration team wants instance-family replacement recommendations backed by memory metrics. Why is this architecture appropriate for the described workload?

  1. EBS storage billing continues for allocated volumes until they are deleted or otherwise changed
  2. Compute Optimizer estimates rightsizing opportunities subject to compatibility and workload validation
  3. Consolidated savings recommendations should not be summed blindly across sources
  4. Load balancer health checks must match actual application readiness rather than superficial liveness

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Collect proper monitoring and evaluate AWS Compute Optimizer recommendations with SLO tests. The expected supporting evidence is: Chosen sizes meet memory and peak latency needs while reducing wasteful instance spending.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Unattached volumes are treated as free merely because they are not mounted. The stated evidence instead indicates: Instances remain oversized based only on purchase history rather than performance evidence.

C:

Potential savings from the same infrastructure change are double counted in separate reports. The stated evidence instead indicates: Instances remain oversized based only on purchase history rather than performance evidence.

D:

Health checks use an unrelated always-200 endpoint that does not reflect the service readiness. The stated evidence instead indicates: Instances remain oversized based only on purchase history rather than performance evidence.

Question 565

An enterprise architecture team faces this design requirement: A latency-sensitive global TCP application requires fast traffic steering to healthy regional application load balancers using static anycast addresses. Which option best aligns with the business and technical requirement?

  1. Attach the VPCs to one centrally governed Transit Gateway and propagate approved attachment routes
  2. Use AWS Global Accelerator with endpoint groups and regional health-based routing
  3. Deploy organization-managed AWS Config rules and targeted auto-remediation through approved Systems Manager Automation
  4. Expose the provider through an endpoint service behind a Network Load Balancer and create consumer interface VPC endpoints

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Global Accelerator provides stable global anycast addresses and network-level endpoint health routing. The required architecture outcome is: A latency-sensitive global TCP application requires fast traffic steering to healthy regional application load balancers using static anycast addresses. Validate this choice by checking that Clients retain accelerator anycast IPs and are directed to a healthy regional endpoint when one Region fails.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Separate point-to-point VPC peering connections lack transitive routing and are difficult to govern at scale. The specific problem here is that ordinary regional endpoints offer neither the requested global anycast entry point nor accelerator health steering.

C:

Per-account one-off inspections do not continuously evaluate drift across accounts. The specific problem here is that ordinary regional endpoints offer neither the requested global anycast entry point nor accelerator health steering.

D:

A broad VPC peering link was used where a service-scoped private access path was needed. The specific problem here is that ordinary regional endpoints offer neither the requested global anycast entry point nor accelerator health steering.

Question 566

An architecture review recommends this solution: Distribute worker nodes and eligible pods across multiple AZs with topology rules and disruption-aware service routing. The motivating situation is: A latency-sensitive API running in EKS cannot tolerate a single Availability Zone outage. Why is this architecture appropriate for the described workload?

  1. Multi-AZ Kubernetes workloads need scheduled replicas and correctly configured networking across zones
  2. EventBridge cross-account routing requires rules and resource-based permissions
  3. Durable queues decouple intake availability from downstream processing failures
  4. Aurora Global Database supports low-latency crossregional replication with explicit recovery operations

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Distribute worker nodes and eligible pods across multiple AZs with topology rules and disruption-aware service routing. The expected supporting evidence is: Draining all nodes in one zone still leaves enough healthy replicas serving traffic from others.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Events remain confined to local account buses because cross-account bus authorization is absent. The stated evidence instead indicates: All service replicas were scheduled in one zone despite multi-AZ infrastructure.

C:

Synchronous request-to-database coupling loses or rejects work whenever the database is unavailable. The stated evidence instead indicates: All service replicas were scheduled in one zone despite multi-AZ infrastructure.

D:

A single-Region Aurora cluster lacks a suitable crossregional disaster recovery target. The stated evidence instead indicates: All service replicas were scheduled in one zone despite multi-AZ infrastructure.

Question 567

For the enterprise requirement "Service owners cannot separate API traffic incidents from infrastructure incidents across ten microservices", the team implemented this change: Build CloudWatch operational dashboards with service-specific metrics, structured logging, and correlation identifiers. Which result specifically demonstrates the fix works?

  1. Identified buckets show smaller unnecessary version and multipart storage after retention-safe cleanup
  2. An incident view identifies the affected service and response latency rather than just total fleet CPU
  3. Compliance reports show applied baselines and chosen hosts patched only during approved windows
  4. A test transaction shows the slow downstream dependency and request trace span timing

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. Meaningful dashboards align telemetry with system service boundaries and indicators. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: Service owners cannot separate API traffic incidents from infrastructure incidents across ten microservices.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Identified buckets show smaller unnecessary version and multipart storage after retention-safe cleanup. However, this does not establish the required outcome: an incident view identifies the affected service and response latency rather than just total fleet CPU.

C:

Compliance reports show applied baselines and chosen hosts patched only during approved windows. However, this does not establish the required outcome: an incident view identifies the affected service and response latency rather than just total fleet CPU.

D:

A test transaction shows the slow downstream dependency and request trace span timing. However, this does not establish the required outcome: an incident view identifies the affected service and response latency rather than just total fleet CPU.

Question 568

For the enterprise requirement "An AWS KMS-encrypted data key is shared with a role but decrypts still fail because the key's resource policy grants no access", the team implemented this change: Update the KMS key policy or grants alongside the principal's IAM permissions as required. Which observation should be required before the change is approved?

  1. The authorized role decrypts the designated ciphertext while an unrelated role remains denied
  2. Identical input configurations yield reviewed deployment changes and detectable drift rather than ad hoc resources
  3. Cloud instances access approved services privately while disallowed API paths are rejected
  4. A rotation completes, the application authenticates with the new value, and old credentials are not exposed

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This measures the behavior required by the specific solution, rather than simply checking that it was configured. KMS key authorization depends on the owning key policy as well as applicable principal policies. The acceptance condition is linked directly to the scenario: An AWS KMS-encrypted data key is shared with a role but decrypts still fail because the key's resource policy grants no access.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Identical input configurations yield reviewed deployment changes and detectable drift rather than ad hoc resources. However, this does not establish the required outcome: the authorized role decrypts the designated ciphertext while an unrelated role remains denied.

C:

Cloud instances access approved services privately while disallowed API paths are rejected. However, this does not establish the required outcome: the authorized role decrypts the designated ciphertext while an unrelated role remains denied.

D:

A rotation completes, the application authenticates with the new value, and old credentials are not exposed. However, this does not establish the required outcome: the authorized role decrypts the designated ciphertext while an unrelated role remains denied.

Question 569

An architecture review recommends this solution: Classify applications through a defined 7 Rs migration assessment with business value, risk and retirement criteria. The motivating situation is: Executives request one default migration method for every workload regardless of technical debt or value. Which statement explains why the recommendation solves the specific problem?

  1. Platform migration viability depends on software support and hardware or driver compatibility
  2. Regulatory and data-classification constraints affect target location and migration scope
  3. EKS provides a managed Kubernetes control plane for teams using Kubernetes-native tooling
  4. The 7 Rs decision framework matches migration strategy to application context

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Classify applications through a defined 7 Rs migration assessment with business value, risk and retirement criteria. The expected supporting evidence is: Each workload has justified retire, retain, relocate, rehost, replatform, repurchase or refactor decision.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Source virtualization format was mistaken for a guarantee of target runtime compatibility. The stated evidence instead indicates: All assets are scheduled for direct rehost even when some are obsolete or unsuitable.

B:

Migration scheduling ignored data classification and jurisdictional control requirements. The stated evidence instead indicates: All assets are scheduled for direct rehost even when some are obsolete or unsuitable.

C:

A non-Kubernetes orchestrator was chosen despite strict Kubernetes extension compatibility requirements. The stated evidence instead indicates: All assets are scheduled for direct rehost even when some are obsolete or unsuitable.

Question 570

An architecture review recommends this solution: Use AWS Application Migration Service for compatible server replication, test launches and cutover orchestration. The motivating situation is: An estate of supported Linux and Windows VMs must rehost to EC2 with minimal application modification and short cutovers. Why does this approach fit the stated design constraints?

  1. AWS MGN supports continuous server replication and orchestrated rehosting validation
  2. Mainframe migrations need purpose-built assessment and conversion or replatform planning
  3. A centralized migration tracking layer supports coordination across application teams
  4. Container modernization requires tested runtime behavior and reversible client routing

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This principle explains why the prescribed control is appropriate for the described requirement. The matching design action is: Use AWS Application Migration Service for compatible server replication, test launches and cutover orchestration. The expected supporting evidence is: Replicated servers boot in AWS test VPCs with verified application functionality before cutover.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Mainframe batch and transaction semantics were treated as if they were ordinary Linux workloads. The stated evidence instead indicates: Manual one-time disk copying cannot keep hundreds of moving workloads synchronized until cutover.

C:

Migration tasks are tracked in separate team documents with no common portfolio state. The stated evidence instead indicates: Manual one-time disk copying cannot keep hundreds of moving workloads synchronized until cutover.

D:

Traffic was switched to the container environment before dependent services and probes were verified. The stated evidence instead indicates: Manual one-time disk copying cannot keep hundreds of moving workloads synchronized until cutover.