Question 260
A change advisory for Cedarline Hotels has two requirements: (1) prevent a downstream switch from claiming the root role over an uplink, and (2) differentiate topology discovery from actual routing reachability. Which plan correctly handles both requirements?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Both outcomes are covered: (1) Root Guard holds the port in a root-inconsistent state if superior BPDUs arrive. (2) Discovery advertisements do not prove that an IP route exists or that remote hosts are reachable. Neither action is a substitute for the other.
Incorrect Answers
Neither step is the requested pair: Select the switch with the lowest priority plus MAC bridge identifier is for identify the spanning-tree root switch from bridge IDs, and Recognize VLAN 1 as the default access VLAN is for place untagged access switchports into their default VLAN on a factory-reset switch. STP elects the lowest bridge ID as the root for a spanning-tree instance. The proposed plan misses the two stated outcomes.
The first step covers (1), but the second addresses route several VLANs using one router physical uplink. Router-on-a-stick separates VLAN traffic by subinterface over one physical trunk. It leaves outcome (2) unfulfilled.
The second step covers (2), but the first addresses bundle two compatible physical Ethernet switchports into one logical LACP link. LACP negotiates a logical port-channel while distributing eligible flows across member links. It leaves outcome (1) unfulfilled.