McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-410 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-410

Exam Name Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Enterprise

Cisco 300-410 Bundle $25.00
300-410 Sample 1 300-410 Sample 2 300-410 Sample 3 300-410 Sample 4 300-410 Sample 5 300-410 Sample 6 300-410 Sample 7 300-410 Sample 8 300-410 Sample 9 300-410 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-410 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-410 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-410 Questions & Answers

    498 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-410 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-410 Video Course

    300-410 Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    300-410 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-410 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) exam.

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) (300-410) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    498 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-410 Video Course

    Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-410 Practice Test 44

Question 430

At the Silverstream data center, EIGRP hellos pass across the transit link, yet R-SIL-PE1 never forms a neighbor with R-RIV-PE2; the peers use different EIGRP AS numbers. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The selected successor and displayed metric match the planned delay policy.
  2. The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios.
  3. The correct EIGRP neighbor appears and the expected routes are learned.
  4. The transit EIGRP neighbor forms while user-facing access interfaces remain passive.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

A meaningful acceptance check at the Silverstream data center should verify the actual forwarding or control-plane outcome. The correct EIGRP neighbor appears and the expected routes are learned.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The result addresses eigrp delay in composite metric, not the observed fault at the Silverstream data center. The decisive outcome is different: The correct EIGRP neighbor appears and the expected routes are learned.

B:

This validates an unrelated control at the Silverstream data center: The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios. It would not demonstrate correction of eigrp as mismatch.

D:

The result addresses eigrp passive-interface adjacency, not the observed fault at the Silverstream data center. The decisive outcome is different: The correct EIGRP neighbor appears and the expected routes are learned.

Question 431

At the Lakeside transit hub, R-LAK-CORE1 and R-EAST-EDGE2 exchange EIGRP hello packets but authentication failures prevent the neighbor from coming up. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The transit EIGRP neighbor forms while user-facing access interfaces remain passive.
  2. The selected successor and displayed metric match the planned delay policy.
  3. The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive.
  4. The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This tests the exact behavior that was failing at the Lakeside transit hub. The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive. The change supporting that outcome is: Make the EIGRP authentication mode and key configuration consistent on both ends.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The transit EIGRP neighbor forms while user-facing access interfaces remain passive. It would not establish the required outcome for eigrp authentication mismatch at the Lakeside transit hub.

B:

The result addresses eigrp delay in composite metric, not the observed fault at the Lakeside transit hub. The decisive outcome is different: The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive.

D:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios. It would not establish the required outcome for eigrp authentication mismatch at the Lakeside transit hub.

Question 432

At the Southridge banking office, R-SRG-EDGE1 and R-MPC-EDGE2 exchange EIGRP hello packets but authentication failures prevent the neighbor from coming up. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The correct EIGRP neighbor appears and the expected routes are learned.
  2. The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive.
  3. The selected successor and displayed metric match the planned delay policy.
  4. The topology table identifies only loop-free feasible successors meeting the inequality.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A meaningful acceptance check at the Southridge banking office should verify the actual forwarding or control-plane outcome. The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This validates an unrelated control at the Southridge banking office: The correct EIGRP neighbor appears and the expected routes are learned. It would not demonstrate correction of eigrp authentication mismatch.

C:

The result addresses eigrp delay in composite metric, not the observed fault at the Southridge banking office. The decisive outcome is different: The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive.

D:

This validates an unrelated control at the Southridge banking office: The topology table identifies only loop-free feasible successors meeting the inequality. It would not demonstrate correction of eigrp authentication mismatch.

Question 433

At the Westlake utility network, R-WLK-EDGE1 advertises connected networks locally but will not discover R-GRID-EDGE2 across the transit interface because that interface is passive. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. Queries no longer unnecessarily propagate into the leaf while approved routes remain reachable.
  2. The correct EIGRP neighbor appears and the expected routes are learned.
  3. The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios.
  4. The transit EIGRP neighbor forms while user-facing access interfaces remain passive.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Westlake utility network has been corrected. The transit EIGRP neighbor forms while user-facing access interfaces remain passive.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The result addresses eigrp query scope using stub, not the observed fault at the Westlake utility network. The decisive outcome is different: The transit EIGRP neighbor forms while user-facing access interfaces remain passive.

B:

This validates an unrelated control at the Westlake utility network: The correct EIGRP neighbor appears and the expected routes are learned. It would not demonstrate correction of eigrp passive-interface adjacency.

C:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios. It would not establish the required outcome for eigrp passive-interface adjacency at the Westlake utility network.

Question 434

At the Pinecrest freight terminal, R-PIN-WAN1 advertises connected networks locally but will not discover R-PRT-WAN2 across the transit interface because that interface is passive. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios.
  2. The correct EIGRP neighbor appears and the expected routes are learned.
  3. The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive.
  4. The transit EIGRP neighbor forms while user-facing access interfaces remain passive.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A meaningful acceptance check at the Pinecrest freight terminal should verify the actual forwarding or control-plane outcome. The transit EIGRP neighbor forms while user-facing access interfaces remain passive.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios. It would not establish the required outcome for eigrp passive-interface adjacency at the Pinecrest freight terminal.

B:

The result addresses eigrp as mismatch, not the observed fault at the Pinecrest freight terminal. The decisive outcome is different: The transit EIGRP neighbor forms while user-facing access interfaces remain passive.

C:

This validates an unrelated control at the Pinecrest freight terminal: The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive. It would not demonstrate correction of eigrp passive-interface adjacency.

Question 435

At the Cedarfield retail branch, a backup EIGRP path to 10.94.0.0/16 has reported distance 130 and the current feasible distance is 100; a technician labels it an immediately usable feasible successor. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The correct EIGRP neighbor appears and the expected routes are learned.
  2. Queries no longer unnecessarily propagate into the leaf while approved routes remain reachable.
  3. The topology table identifies only loop-free feasible successors meeting the inequality.
  4. The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Cedarfield retail branch has been corrected. The topology table identifies only loop-free feasible successors meeting the inequality.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This validates an unrelated control at the Cedarfield retail branch: The correct EIGRP neighbor appears and the expected routes are learned. It would not demonstrate correction of eigrp feasible successor inequality.

B:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. Queries no longer unnecessarily propagate into the leaf while approved routes remain reachable. It would not establish the required outcome for eigrp feasible successor inequality at the Cedarfield retail branch.

D:

This validates an unrelated control at the Cedarfield retail branch: The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive. It would not demonstrate correction of eigrp feasible successor inequality.

Question 436

At the Bluewater clinical network, a backup EIGRP path to 10.215.0.0/16 has reported distance 130 and the current feasible distance is 100; a technician labels it an immediately usable feasible successor. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive.
  2. The correct EIGRP neighbor appears and the expected routes are learned.
  3. The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios.
  4. The topology table identifies only loop-free feasible successors meeting the inequality.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Bluewater clinical network has been corrected. The topology table identifies only loop-free feasible successors meeting the inequality.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The result addresses eigrp authentication mismatch, not the observed fault at the Bluewater clinical network. The decisive outcome is different: The topology table identifies only loop-free feasible successors meeting the inequality.

B:

This validates an unrelated control at the Bluewater clinical network: The correct EIGRP neighbor appears and the expected routes are learned. It would not demonstrate correction of eigrp feasible successor inequality.

C:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios. It would not establish the required outcome for eigrp feasible successor inequality at the Bluewater clinical network.

Question 437

At the Harborview media campus, a remote spoke R-INL-DIST2 receives broad EIGRP queries when a hub loses 10.127.0.0/16, leaving the route active for too long. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The transit EIGRP neighbor forms while user-facing access interfaces remain passive.
  2. Queries no longer unnecessarily propagate into the leaf while approved routes remain reachable.
  3. The topology table identifies only loop-free feasible successors meeting the inequality.
  4. The selected successor and displayed metric match the planned delay policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Harborview media campus has been corrected. Queries no longer unnecessarily propagate into the leaf while approved routes remain reachable.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The transit EIGRP neighbor forms while user-facing access interfaces remain passive. It would not establish the required outcome for eigrp query scope using stub at the Harborview media campus.

C:

This validates an unrelated control at the Harborview media campus: The topology table identifies only loop-free feasible successors meeting the inequality. It would not demonstrate correction of eigrp query scope using stub.

D:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The selected successor and displayed metric match the planned delay policy. It would not establish the required outcome for eigrp query scope using stub at the Harborview media campus.

Question 438

At the Ironwood training campus, a remote spoke R-CLR-RT2 receives broad EIGRP queries when a hub loses 10.248.0.0/16, leaving the route active for too long. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. Queries no longer unnecessarily propagate into the leaf while approved routes remain reachable.
  2. The selected successor and displayed metric match the planned delay policy.
  3. The correct EIGRP neighbor appears and the expected routes are learned.
  4. The transit EIGRP neighbor forms while user-facing access interfaces remain passive.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This tests the exact behavior that was failing at the Ironwood training campus. Queries no longer unnecessarily propagate into the leaf while approved routes remain reachable. The change supporting that outcome is: Configure appropriate EIGRP stub behavior on the leaf spoke and verify permitted route advertisements.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The selected successor and displayed metric match the planned delay policy. It would not establish the required outcome for eigrp query scope using stub at the Ironwood training campus.

C:

The result addresses eigrp as mismatch, not the observed fault at the Ironwood training campus. The decisive outcome is different: Queries no longer unnecessarily propagate into the leaf while approved routes remain reachable.

D:

This validates an unrelated control at the Ironwood training campus: The transit EIGRP neighbor forms while user-facing access interfaces remain passive. It would not demonstrate correction of eigrp query scope using stub.

Question 439

At the Hillcrest research lab, an alternate EIGRP route is feasible but has a higher metric and is not installed alongside the primary path as desired. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The topology table identifies only loop-free feasible successors meeting the inequality.
  2. The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive.
  3. The selected successor and displayed metric match the planned delay policy.
  4. The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Hillcrest research lab has been corrected. The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The result addresses eigrp feasible successor inequality, not the observed fault at the Hillcrest research lab. The decisive outcome is different: The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios.

B:

This validates an unrelated control at the Hillcrest research lab: The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive. It would not demonstrate correction of eigrp variance traffic sharing.

C:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The selected successor and displayed metric match the planned delay policy. It would not establish the required outcome for eigrp variance traffic sharing at the Hillcrest research lab.

Question 440

At the Northport logistics site, an alternate EIGRP route is feasible but has a higher metric and is not installed alongside the primary path as desired. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. Queries no longer unnecessarily propagate into the leaf while approved routes remain reachable.
  2. The transit EIGRP neighbor forms while user-facing access interfaces remain passive.
  3. The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive.
  4. The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A meaningful acceptance check at the Northport logistics site should verify the actual forwarding or control-plane outcome. The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. Queries no longer unnecessarily propagate into the leaf while approved routes remain reachable. It would not establish the required outcome for eigrp variance traffic sharing at the Northport logistics site.

B:

The result addresses eigrp passive-interface adjacency, not the observed fault at the Northport logistics site. The decisive outcome is different: The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios.

C:

This validates an unrelated control at the Northport logistics site: The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive. It would not demonstrate correction of eigrp variance traffic sharing.