McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-410 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-410

Exam Name Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Enterprise

Cisco 300-410 Bundle $25.00
300-410 Sample 1 300-410 Sample 2 300-410 Sample 3 300-410 Sample 4 300-410 Sample 5 300-410 Sample 6 300-410 Sample 7 300-410 Sample 8 300-410 Sample 9 300-410 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-410 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-410 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-410 Questions & Answers

    498 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-410 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-410 Video Course

    300-410 Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    300-410 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-410 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) exam.

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) (300-410) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    498 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-410 Video Course

    Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-410 Practice Test 46

Question 450

At the Foothill municipal site, a point-to-point circuit is modeled as broadcast on one OSPF side and point-to-point on the other, producing inconsistent neighbor behavior. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The route type in the routing table matches OSPF path-preference rules.
  2. OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present.
  3. The interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree.
  4. Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This tests the exact behavior that was failing at the Foothill municipal site. Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full. The change supporting that outcome is: Set compatible OSPF network types appropriate to the actual transit medium on both ends.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This validates an unrelated control at the Foothill municipal site: The route type in the routing table matches OSPF path-preference rules. It would not demonstrate correction of ospf dr network-type mismatch.

B:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf dr network-type mismatch at the Foothill municipal site.

C:

The result addresses ospf area mismatch, not the observed fault at the Foothill municipal site. The decisive outcome is different: Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full.

Question 451

At the Silverstream data center, routers in an OSPF stub area disagree on stub-area capability and fail to form neighbors after R-RIV-PE2 was reconfigured. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored.
  2. The interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree.
  3. Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full.
  4. OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Silverstream data center has been corrected. OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The result addresses ospf virtual link transit area, not the observed fault at the Silverstream data center. The decisive outcome is different: OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present.

B:

This validates an unrelated control at the Silverstream data center: The interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree. It would not demonstrate correction of ospf stub area options mismatch.

C:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf stub area options mismatch at the Silverstream data center.

Question 452

At the Brookstone distribution branch, routers in an OSPF stub area disagree on stub-area capability and fail to form neighbors after R-NEW-EDGE2 was reconfigured. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree.
  2. The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored.
  3. The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures.
  4. OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A meaningful acceptance check at the Brookstone distribution branch should verify the actual forwarding or control-plane outcome. OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf stub area options mismatch at the Brookstone distribution branch.

B:

The result addresses ospf virtual link transit area, not the observed fault at the Brookstone distribution branch. The decisive outcome is different: OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present.

C:

This validates an unrelated control at the Brookstone distribution branch: The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures. It would not demonstrate correction of ospf stub area options mismatch.

Question 453

At the Southridge banking office, an ASBR inside an OSPF NSSA originates an external route, but the ABR is not translating the expected type-7 route for other areas. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design.
  2. The appropriate type-7 route appears inside the NSSA and a translated external route appears elsewhere.
  3. Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full.
  4. The interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A meaningful acceptance check at the Southridge banking office should verify the actual forwarding or control-plane outcome. The appropriate type-7 route appears inside the NSSA and a translated external route appears elsewhere.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This validates an unrelated control at the Southridge banking office: The neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design. It would not demonstrate correction of ospf nssa external routes.

C:

The result addresses ospf dr network-type mismatch, not the observed fault at the Southridge banking office. The decisive outcome is different: The appropriate type-7 route appears inside the NSSA and a translated external route appears elsewhere.

D:

This validates an unrelated control at the Southridge banking office: The interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree. It would not demonstrate correction of ospf nssa external routes.

Question 454

At the Lakeside transit hub, an ASBR inside an OSPF NSSA originates an external route, but the ABR is not translating the expected type-7 route for other areas. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The appropriate type-7 route appears inside the NSSA and a translated external route appears elsewhere.
  2. The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored.
  3. OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present.
  4. The route type in the routing table matches OSPF path-preference rules.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Lakeside transit hub has been corrected. The appropriate type-7 route appears inside the NSSA and a translated external route appears elsewhere.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This validates an unrelated control at the Lakeside transit hub: The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored. It would not demonstrate correction of ospf nssa external routes.

C:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf nssa external routes at the Lakeside transit hub.

D:

The result addresses ospf intra-area route preference, not the observed fault at the Lakeside transit hub. The decisive outcome is different: The appropriate type-7 route appears inside the NSSA and a translated external route appears elsewhere.

Question 455

At the Pinecrest freight terminal, an isolated OSPF area cannot reach the backbone through its intended ABR because the virtual link traverses a stub transit area. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The appropriate type-7 route appears inside the NSSA and a translated external route appears elsewhere.
  2. The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored.
  3. The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures.
  4. The interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Pinecrest freight terminal has been corrected. The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The appropriate type-7 route appears inside the NSSA and a translated external route appears elsewhere. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf virtual link transit area at the Pinecrest freight terminal.

C:

This validates an unrelated control at the Pinecrest freight terminal: The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures. It would not demonstrate correction of ospf virtual link transit area.

D:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf virtual link transit area at the Pinecrest freight terminal.

Question 456

At the Westlake utility network, an isolated OSPF area cannot reach the backbone through its intended ABR because the virtual link traverses a stub transit area. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design.
  2. The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures.
  3. Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full.
  4. The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This tests the exact behavior that was failing at the Westlake utility network. The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored. The change supporting that outcome is: Rework the backbone connection or place the OSPF virtual link over an eligible non-stub transit area.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This validates an unrelated control at the Westlake utility network: The neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design. It would not demonstrate correction of ospf virtual link transit area.

B:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf virtual link transit area at the Westlake utility network.

C:

The result addresses ospf dr network-type mismatch, not the observed fault at the Westlake utility network. The decisive outcome is different: The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored.

Question 457

At the Bluewater clinical network, an OSPF prefix arrives as an intra-area and an inter-area path, but an engineer assumes the lower displayed metric always makes the inter-area route preferable. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The route type in the routing table matches OSPF path-preference rules.
  2. OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present.
  3. The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored.
  4. Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Bluewater clinical network has been corrected. The route type in the routing table matches OSPF path-preference rules.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This validates an unrelated control at the Bluewater clinical network: OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present. It would not demonstrate correction of ospf intra-area route preference.

C:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf intra-area route preference at the Bluewater clinical network.

D:

The result addresses ospf dr network-type mismatch, not the observed fault at the Bluewater clinical network. The decisive outcome is different: The route type in the routing table matches OSPF path-preference rules.

Question 458

At the Cedarfield retail branch, an OSPF prefix arrives as an intra-area and an inter-area path, but an engineer assumes the lower displayed metric always makes the inter-area route preferable. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The route type in the routing table matches OSPF path-preference rules.
  2. The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures.
  3. Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full.
  4. The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A meaningful acceptance check at the Cedarfield retail branch should verify the actual forwarding or control-plane outcome. The route type in the routing table matches OSPF path-preference rules.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The result addresses ospf authentication mismatch, not the observed fault at the Cedarfield retail branch. The decisive outcome is different: The route type in the routing table matches OSPF path-preference rules.

C:

This validates an unrelated control at the Cedarfield retail branch: Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full. It would not demonstrate correction of ospf intra-area route preference.

D:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf intra-area route preference at the Cedarfield retail branch.

Question 459

At the Ironwood training campus, R-IRN-RT1 must peer by eBGP with a reachable loopback on R-CLR-RT2 multiple routed hops away; TCP never reaches Established using default TTL behavior. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. Only the approved routes remain in the accepted BGP table after soft policy re-evaluation.
  2. Routes learned from one client are appropriately reflected to other clients without a full mesh.
  3. BGP reaches Established over the loopback path and exchanges authorized prefixes.
  4. The BGP next hop resolves and the intended prefix becomes eligible for installation.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Ironwood training campus has been corrected. BGP reaches Established over the loopback path and exchanges authorized prefixes.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This validates an unrelated control at the Ironwood training campus: Only the approved routes remain in the accepted BGP table after soft policy re-evaluation. It would not demonstrate correction of ebgp non-direct neighbor multihop.

B:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. Routes learned from one client are appropriately reflected to other clients without a full mesh. It would not establish the required outcome for ebgp non-direct neighbor multihop at the Ironwood training campus.

D:

This validates an unrelated control at the Ironwood training campus: The BGP next hop resolves and the intended prefix becomes eligible for installation. It would not demonstrate correction of ebgp non-direct neighbor multihop.

Question 460

At the Harborview media campus, R-HAR-DIST1 must peer by eBGP with a reachable loopback on R-INL-DIST2 multiple routed hops away; TCP never reaches Established using default TTL behavior. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The BGP next hop resolves and the intended prefix becomes eligible for installation.
  2. Routes learned from one client are appropriately reflected to other clients without a full mesh.
  3. Internal routers prefer the exit with the higher approved local-preference value.
  4. BGP reaches Established over the loopback path and exchanges authorized prefixes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Harborview media campus has been corrected. BGP reaches Established over the loopback path and exchanges authorized prefixes.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The result addresses ibgp next-hop reachability, not the observed fault at the Harborview media campus. The decisive outcome is different: BGP reaches Established over the loopback path and exchanges authorized prefixes.

B:

This validates an unrelated control at the Harborview media campus: Routes learned from one client are appropriately reflected to other clients without a full mesh. It would not demonstrate correction of ebgp non-direct neighbor multihop.

C:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. Internal routers prefer the exit with the higher approved local-preference value. It would not establish the required outcome for ebgp non-direct neighbor multihop at the Harborview media campus.