McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-410 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-410

Exam Name Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Enterprise

Cisco 300-410 Bundle $25.00
300-410 Sample 1 300-410 Sample 2 300-410 Sample 3 300-410 Sample 4 300-410 Sample 5 300-410 Sample 6 300-410 Sample 7 300-410 Sample 8 300-410 Sample 9 300-410 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-410 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-410 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-410 Questions & Answers

    498 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-410 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-410 Video Course

    300-410 Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    300-410 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-410 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) exam.

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (ENARSI) (300-410) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    498 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-410 Video Course

    Training Course

    129 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-410 Practice Test 45

Question 440

At the Northport logistics site, an alternate EIGRP route is feasible but has a higher metric and is not installed alongside the primary path as desired. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. Queries no longer unnecessarily propagate into the leaf while approved routes remain reachable.
  2. The transit EIGRP neighbor forms while user-facing access interfaces remain passive.
  3. The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive.
  4. The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A meaningful acceptance check at the Northport logistics site should verify the actual forwarding or control-plane outcome. The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. Queries no longer unnecessarily propagate into the leaf while approved routes remain reachable. It would not establish the required outcome for eigrp variance traffic sharing at the Northport logistics site.

B:

The result addresses eigrp passive-interface adjacency, not the observed fault at the Northport logistics site. The decisive outcome is different: The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios.

C:

This validates an unrelated control at the Northport logistics site: The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive. It would not demonstrate correction of eigrp variance traffic sharing.

Question 441

At the Elmfield engineering office, engineers change a link's configured delay and the EIGRP best path to the Midtown engineering center shifts despite unchanged line bandwidth. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. Queries no longer unnecessarily propagate into the leaf while approved routes remain reachable.
  2. The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive.
  3. The transit EIGRP neighbor forms while user-facing access interfaces remain passive.
  4. The selected successor and displayed metric match the planned delay policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This tests the exact behavior that was failing at the Elmfield engineering office. The selected successor and displayed metric match the planned delay policy. The change supporting that outcome is: Assess the interface delay contribution to the EIGRP composite metric and set it deliberately.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This validates an unrelated control at the Elmfield engineering office: Queries no longer unnecessarily propagate into the leaf while approved routes remain reachable. It would not demonstrate correction of eigrp delay in composite metric.

B:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The EIGRP neighbor forms without authentication errors and intended prefixes arrive. It would not establish the required outcome for eigrp delay in composite metric at the Elmfield engineering office.

C:

The result addresses eigrp passive-interface adjacency, not the observed fault at the Elmfield engineering office. The decisive outcome is different: The selected successor and displayed metric match the planned delay policy.

Question 442

At the Granite manufacturing plant, engineers change a link's configured delay and the EIGRP best path to the Meridian corporate campus shifts despite unchanged line bandwidth. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. Queries no longer unnecessarily propagate into the leaf while approved routes remain reachable.
  2. The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios.
  3. The correct EIGRP neighbor appears and the expected routes are learned.
  4. The selected successor and displayed metric match the planned delay policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Granite manufacturing plant has been corrected. The selected successor and displayed metric match the planned delay policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The result addresses eigrp query scope using stub, not the observed fault at the Granite manufacturing plant. The decisive outcome is different: The selected successor and displayed metric match the planned delay policy.

B:

This validates an unrelated control at the Granite manufacturing plant: The routing table installs the permitted unequal-cost feasible paths with expected ratios. It would not demonstrate correction of eigrp delay in composite metric.

C:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The correct EIGRP neighbor appears and the expected routes are learned. It would not establish the required outcome for eigrp delay in composite metric at the Granite manufacturing plant.

Question 443

At the Aspen agricultural office, R-ASP-WAN1 and R-VAL-WAN2 share a working IPv4 subnet, yet OSPF adjacency fails; one interface is area 0 and the other area 10. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The route type in the routing table matches OSPF path-preference rules.
  2. The interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree.
  3. Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full.
  4. The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The stated result demonstrates that the specific condition at the Aspen agricultural office has been corrected. The interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The route type in the routing table matches OSPF path-preference rules. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf area mismatch at the Aspen agricultural office.

C:

This validates an unrelated control at the Aspen agricultural office: Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full. It would not demonstrate correction of ospf area mismatch.

D:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf area mismatch at the Aspen agricultural office.

Question 444

At the Oakbridge insurance office, R-OAK-EDGE1 and R-MOU-EDGE2 share a working IPv4 subnet, yet OSPF adjacency fails; one interface is area 0 and the other area 10. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree.
  2. The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored.
  3. The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures.
  4. The neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This tests the exact behavior that was failing at the Oakbridge insurance office. The interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree. The change supporting that outcome is: Configure the two ends of the intended OSPF adjacency in the same area.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf area mismatch at the Oakbridge insurance office.

C:

The result addresses ospf authentication mismatch, not the observed fault at the Oakbridge insurance office. The decisive outcome is different: The interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree.

D:

This validates an unrelated control at the Oakbridge insurance office: The neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design. It would not demonstrate correction of ospf area mismatch.

Question 445

At the Redwood medical campus, OSPF neighbors on the transit link repeatedly fail to reach Full state after one router's authentication key was rotated. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present.
  2. The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures.
  3. The appropriate type-7 route appears inside the NSSA and a translated external route appears elsewhere.
  4. The neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This tests the exact behavior that was failing at the Redwood medical campus. The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures. The change supporting that outcome is: Align OSPF authentication type, algorithm and matching credentials across the shared link.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The result addresses ospf stub area options mismatch, not the observed fault at the Redwood medical campus. The decisive outcome is different: The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures.

C:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The appropriate type-7 route appears inside the NSSA and a translated external route appears elsewhere. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf authentication mismatch at the Redwood medical campus.

D:

The result addresses ospf mtu exstart, not the observed fault at the Redwood medical campus. The decisive outcome is different: The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures.

Question 446

At the Cedarbrook hospital, OSPF neighbors on the transit link repeatedly fail to reach Full state after one router's authentication key was rotated. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The route type in the routing table matches OSPF path-preference rules.
  2. The interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree.
  3. The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures.
  4. OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This tests the exact behavior that was failing at the Cedarbrook hospital. The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures. The change supporting that outcome is: Align OSPF authentication type, algorithm and matching credentials across the shared link.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The route type in the routing table matches OSPF path-preference rules. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf authentication mismatch at the Cedarbrook hospital.

B:

The result addresses ospf area mismatch, not the observed fault at the Cedarbrook hospital. The decisive outcome is different: The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures.

D:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf authentication mismatch at the Cedarbrook hospital.

Question 447

At the Bayview university campus, R-BAY-DIST1 and R-ALB-DIST2 see each other's OSPF hellos, but the neighbor stalls in ExStart after an interface MTU change. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design.
  2. OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present.
  3. The interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree.
  4. The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This tests the exact behavior that was failing at the Bayview university campus. The neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design. The change supporting that outcome is: Correct the interface MTU mismatch rather than bypassing the OSPF database-description check.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf mtu exstart at the Bayview university campus.

C:

The result addresses ospf area mismatch, not the observed fault at the Bayview university campus. The decisive outcome is different: The neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design.

D:

This validates an unrelated control at the Bayview university campus: The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored. It would not demonstrate correction of ospf mtu exstart.

Question 448

At the Clearwater library district, R-CLW-EDGE1 and R-WES-RT2 see each other's OSPF hellos, but the neighbor stalls in ExStart after an interface MTU change. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The virtual link reaches Full and the isolated area's backbone reachability is restored.
  2. The neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design.
  3. The appropriate type-7 route appears inside the NSSA and a translated external route appears elsewhere.
  4. The route type in the routing table matches OSPF path-preference rules.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This tests the exact behavior that was failing at the Clearwater library district. The neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design. The change supporting that outcome is: Correct the interface MTU mismatch rather than bypassing the OSPF database-description check.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The result addresses ospf virtual link transit area, not the observed fault at the Clearwater library district. The decisive outcome is different: The neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design.

C:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The appropriate type-7 route appears inside the NSSA and a translated external route appears elsewhere. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf mtu exstart at the Clearwater library district.

D:

The result addresses ospf intra-area route preference, not the observed fault at the Clearwater library district. The decisive outcome is different: The neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design.

Question 449

At the Highland government office, a point-to-point circuit is modeled as broadcast on one OSPF side and point-to-point on the other, producing inconsistent neighbor behavior. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full.
  2. The route type in the routing table matches OSPF path-preference rules.
  3. The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures.
  4. The neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A meaningful acceptance check at the Highland government office should verify the actual forwarding or control-plane outcome. Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The result addresses ospf intra-area route preference, not the observed fault at the Highland government office. The decisive outcome is different: Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full.

C:

This validates an unrelated control at the Highland government office: The OSPF adjacency reaches Full with no authentication failures. It would not demonstrate correction of ospf dr network-type mismatch.

D:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. The neighbor progresses through database exchange to Full, and MTUs match the design. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf dr network-type mismatch at the Highland government office.

Question 450

At the Foothill municipal site, a point-to-point circuit is modeled as broadcast on one OSPF side and point-to-point on the other, producing inconsistent neighbor behavior. After remediation, which observation would most directly demonstrate the intended result?

  1. The route type in the routing table matches OSPF path-preference rules.
  2. OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present.
  3. The interface reports a Full OSPF neighbor after the area identifiers agree.
  4. Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This tests the exact behavior that was failing at the Foothill municipal site. Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full. The change supporting that outcome is: Set compatible OSPF network types appropriate to the actual transit medium on both ends.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This validates an unrelated control at the Foothill municipal site: The route type in the routing table matches OSPF path-preference rules. It would not demonstrate correction of ospf dr network-type mismatch.

B:

That test could pass while the specific fault remains. OSPF neighbors reach Full and the intended stub-area LSAs are present. It would not establish the required outcome for ospf dr network-type mismatch at the Foothill municipal site.

C:

The result addresses ospf area mismatch, not the observed fault at the Foothill municipal site. The decisive outcome is different: Both interfaces show the planned network type and the adjacency becomes Full.