McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-715 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-715

Exam Name Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Security

Cisco 300-715 Bundle $25.00
300-715 Sample 1 300-715 Sample 2 300-715 Sample 3 300-715 Sample 4 300-715 Sample 5 300-715 Sample 6 300-715 Sample 7 300-715 Sample 8 300-715 Sample 9 300-715 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-715 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-715 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-715 Questions & Answers

    433 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-715 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-715 Video Course

    300-715 Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    300-715 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-715 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) exam.

Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) (300-715) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    433 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-715 Video Course

    Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 14

Question 130

An enterprise access-control incident describes: A campus mandates certificate-only corporate Wi-Fi, but its pilot SSID still allows password-based PEAP in an overly broad allowed-protocol set. What should be incorporated into the change checklist?

  1. Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set.
  2. Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests.
  3. Test policy-set selection on each NAD and access medium before enabling broad changes.
  4. Audit EAP method availability and certificate trust before deploying new WLANs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Audit EAP method availability and certificate trust before deploying new WLANs. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: 802.1X is the access framework; its selected EAP method determines whether certificates or password-based credential exchange is used. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A valid managed EAP-TLS client joins and a password-only test client does not meet the secure SSID policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Audit EAP method availability and certificate trust before deploying new WLANs. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Audit EAP method availability and certificate trust before deploying new WLANs. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Audit EAP method availability and certificate trust before deploying new WLANs. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Change the authentication and authorization exception actions to controlled denial or strictly limited approved critical access. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 131

A Cisco ISE operations team investigates this site issue: An authenticated wireless employee is placed into the guest VLAN even though the corporate authorization profile is configured correctly for another SSID. What is the most suitable solution within these constraints?

  1. Enable supported RADIUS Change of Authorization handling on the WLC and verify policy-triggered reauthorization for that client.
  2. Scope the wireless 802.1X policy to approved EAP-TLS methods and compatible client certificate trust and identity rules.
  3. Install and trust the approved issuing CA chain in ISE and configure an appropriate certificate authentication profile and EAP-TLS policy.
  4. Inspect the matched wireless policy set and authorization condition, then return the appropriate supported VLAN or role attributes to the WLC.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Inspect the matched wireless policy set and authorization condition, then return the appropriate supported VLAN or role attributes to the WLC. This is appropriate because authentication verifies the identity; authorization policy chooses the resulting access attributes, and a rule match from the wrong SSID can return an unintended role. It should be verified by this evidence: The live log identifies the corporate SSID rule and the client receives the expected VLAN while guest clients remain isolated.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. In the case being tested, Audit EAP method availability and certificate trust before deploying new WLANs. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Inspect the matched wireless policy set and authorization condition, then return the appropriate supported VLAN or role attributes to the WLC.

B:

Verify RADIUS source interfaces after controller failover, redundancy, or interface changes. In the case being tested, Audit EAP method availability and certificate trust before deploying new WLANs. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Inspect the matched wireless policy set and authorization condition, then return the appropriate supported VLAN or role attributes to the WLC.

C:

Audit overlapping account namespaces before modifying identity-source sequences. In the case being tested, Audit EAP method availability and certificate trust before deploying new WLANs. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Inspect the matched wireless policy set and authorization condition, then return the appropriate supported VLAN or role attributes to the WLC.

Question 132

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: An authenticated wireless employee is placed into the guest VLAN even though the corporate authorization profile is configured correctly for another SSID. Which platform distinction is decisive in this scenario?

  1. RADIUS authentication exchanges grant access, while accounting records session start, stop, and interim usage events when configured.
  2. An existing 802.1X session does not automatically renegotiate its authorization until a supported reauthentication or CoA path occurs.
  3. Kerberos and certificate-related authentication paths depend on appropriate time consistency; network reachability alone does not eliminate clock-related failures.
  4. Authentication verifies the identity; authorization policy chooses the resulting access attributes, and a rule match from the wrong SSID can return an unintended role.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Authentication verifies the identity; authorization policy chooses the resulting access attributes, and a rule match from the wrong SSID can return an unintended role. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Inspect the matched wireless policy set and authorization condition, then return the appropriate supported VLAN or role attributes to the WLC. The acceptance result is: The live log identifies the corporate SSID rule and the client receives the expected VLAN while guest clients remain isolated.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. The repeat risk here is different: Audit EAP method availability and certificate trust before deploying new WLANs. A directly relevant preventive control is: Authentication verifies the identity; authorization policy chooses the resulting access attributes, and a rule match from the wrong SSID can return an unintended role.

B:

Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. The repeat risk here is different: Audit EAP method availability and certificate trust before deploying new WLANs. A directly relevant preventive control is: Authentication verifies the identity; authorization policy chooses the resulting access attributes, and a rule match from the wrong SSID can return an unintended role.

C:

Run cross-domain sign-in regression tests when adding or replacing PSNs. The repeat risk here is different: Audit EAP method availability and certificate trust before deploying new WLANs. A directly relevant preventive control is: Authentication verifies the identity; authorization policy chooses the resulting access attributes, and a rule match from the wrong SSID can return an unintended role.

Question 133

An ISE administrator troubleshoots the following: An authenticated wireless employee is placed into the guest VLAN even though the corporate authorization profile is configured correctly for another SSID. Which acceptance test would directly establish the desired state?

  1. A test wireless session generates a matching accounting start and stop tied to its authenticated identity.
  2. The WLC's pilot association creates an ISE live-log entry under its intended NAD object and receives a valid Access-Accept or Reject.
  3. The live log identifies the corporate SSID rule and the client receives the expected VLAN while guest clients remain isolated.
  4. A pilot access attempt requires and validates the approved second factor, with failed challenges denied.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The live log identifies the corporate SSID rule and the client receives the expected VLAN while guest clients remain isolated. The required remediation is: Inspect the matched wireless policy set and authorization condition, then return the appropriate supported VLAN or role attributes to the WLC. It works because authentication verifies the identity; authorization policy chooses the resulting access attributes, and a rule match from the wrong SSID can return an unintended role.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Monitor accounting packet delivery separately from successful authentication counts. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. The needed response is: The live log identifies the corporate SSID rule and the client receives the expected VLAN while guest clients remain isolated.

B:

Verify RADIUS source interfaces after controller failover, redundancy, or interface changes. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. The needed response is: The live log identifies the corporate SSID rule and the client receives the expected VLAN while guest clients remain isolated.

D:

Test external MFA service failures and document secure fail-closed or permitted exception behavior. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. The needed response is: The live log identifies the corporate SSID rule and the client receives the expected VLAN while guest clients remain isolated.

Question 134

An access-security change request states: An authenticated wireless employee is placed into the guest VLAN even though the corporate authorization profile is configured correctly for another SSID. Which governance step most directly targets the root cause?

  1. Verify RADIUS source interfaces after controller failover, redundancy, or interface changes.
  2. Audit EAP method availability and certificate trust before deploying new WLANs.
  3. Measure actual method fallback time when onboarding new non-supplicant device types.
  4. Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Authentication verifies the identity; authorization policy chooses the resulting access attributes, and a rule match from the wrong SSID can return an unintended role. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The live log identifies the corporate SSID rule and the client receives the expected VLAN while guest clients remain isolated.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Verify RADIUS source interfaces after controller failover, redundancy, or interface changes. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Audit EAP method availability and certificate trust before deploying new WLANs. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Register the printer's endpoint MAC as an authorized internal endpoint and configure a tightly scoped MAB authorization profile. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 135

An enterprise access-control incident describes: A wireless user initially authenticates but must receive a changed access role after a posture state update; ISE policy changes do not appear on the active WLC session. Which change is justified by the observed evidence?

  1. Register the actual controller RADIUS source address in ISE, configure matching shared secrets, and associate the correct allowed protocols.
  2. Enable supported RADIUS accounting from the controller and confirm the necessary accounting server settings and message path.
  3. Enable supported RADIUS Change of Authorization handling on the WLC and verify policy-triggered reauthorization for that client.
  4. Reauthenticate the session using supported CoA or session refresh and verify the resulting TrustSec authorization.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Enable supported RADIUS Change of Authorization handling on the WLC and verify policy-triggered reauthorization for that client. This is appropriate because an existing 802.1X session does not automatically renegotiate its authorization until a supported reauthentication or CoA path occurs. It should be verified by this evidence: A posture transition triggers reauthorization and the WLC applies the new role without requiring an unrelated controller restart.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Test negative authentication cases during directory-failover policy reviews. In the case being tested, Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Enable supported RADIUS Change of Authorization handling on the WLC and verify policy-triggered reauthorization for that client.

B:

Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. In the case being tested, Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Enable supported RADIUS Change of Authorization handling on the WLC and verify policy-triggered reauthorization for that client.

D:

Reauthenticate the session using supported CoA or session refresh and verify the resulting TrustSec authorization. In the case being tested, Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Enable supported RADIUS Change of Authorization handling on the WLC and verify policy-triggered reauthorization for that client.

Question 136

In a staged Cisco ISE network access rollout, the team observes: A wireless user initially authenticates but must receive a changed access role after a posture state update; ISE policy changes do not appear on the active WLC session. What mechanism governs this authentication or management outcome?

  1. An existing 802.1X session does not automatically renegotiate its authorization until a supported reauthentication or CoA path occurs.
  2. RADIUS authentication exchanges grant access, while accounting records session start, stop, and interim usage events when configured.
  3. Authentication verifies the identity; authorization policy chooses the resulting access attributes, and a rule match from the wrong SSID can return an unintended role.
  4. LDAP authentication can expose credentials when confidentiality is absent; a protected bind path requires TLS trust as well as directory access.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

An existing 802.1X session does not automatically renegotiate its authorization until a supported reauthentication or CoA path occurs. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Enable supported RADIUS Change of Authorization handling on the WLC and verify policy-triggered reauthorization for that client. The acceptance result is: A posture transition triggers reauthorization and the WLC applies the new role without requiring an unrelated controller restart.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. The repeat risk here is different: Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. A directly relevant preventive control is: An existing 802.1X session does not automatically renegotiate its authorization until a supported reauthentication or CoA path occurs.

C:

Audit EAP method availability and certificate trust before deploying new WLANs. The repeat risk here is different: Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. A directly relevant preventive control is: An existing 802.1X session does not automatically renegotiate its authorization until a supported reauthentication or CoA path occurs.

D:

Validate directory organizational-unit moves against ISE LDAP search filters before cutover. The repeat risk here is different: Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. A directly relevant preventive control is: An existing 802.1X session does not automatically renegotiate its authorization until a supported reauthentication or CoA path occurs.

Question 137

An identity and device-administration engineer evaluates: A wireless user initially authenticates but must receive a changed access role after a posture state update; ISE policy changes do not appear on the active WLC session. What is the strongest evidence that this requirement is met?

  1. The live log identifies the corporate SSID rule and the client receives the expected VLAN while guest clients remain isolated.
  2. The WLC's pilot association creates an ISE live-log entry under its intended NAD object and receives a valid Access-Accept or Reject.
  3. The laboratory port matches its intended policy set and the guest SSID remains matched separately.
  4. A posture transition triggers reauthorization and the WLC applies the new role without requiring an unrelated controller restart.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A posture transition triggers reauthorization and the WLC applies the new role without requiring an unrelated controller restart. The required remediation is: Enable supported RADIUS Change of Authorization handling on the WLC and verify policy-triggered reauthorization for that client. It works because an existing 802.1X session does not automatically renegotiate its authorization until a supported reauthentication or CoA path occurs.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. The needed response is: A posture transition triggers reauthorization and the WLC applies the new role without requiring an unrelated controller restart.

B:

Verify RADIUS source interfaces after controller failover, redundancy, or interface changes. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. The needed response is: A posture transition triggers reauthorization and the WLC applies the new role without requiring an unrelated controller restart.

C:

Narrow the policy-set conditions using authentic network-device group, SSID, and protocol attributes before evaluating its detailed rules. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. The needed response is: A posture transition triggers reauthorization and the WLC applies the new role without requiring an unrelated controller restart.

Question 138

A campus and branch network operator reports: A wireless user initially authenticates but must receive a changed access role after a posture state update; ISE policy changes do not appear on the active WLC session. Which recurring operational control would reduce this risk?

  1. Verify RADIUS source interfaces after controller failover, redundancy, or interface changes.
  2. Monitor accounting packet delivery separately from successful authentication counts.
  3. Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests.
  4. Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: An existing 802.1X session does not automatically renegotiate its authorization until a supported reauthentication or CoA path occurs. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A posture transition triggers reauthorization and the WLC applies the new role without requiring an unrelated controller restart.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Verify RADIUS source interfaces after controller failover, redundancy, or interface changes. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Monitor accounting packet delivery separately from successful authentication counts. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 139

An access-security change request states: A wireless 802.1X rollout has successful connections but no traceable per-user session-end accounting in ISE when users disconnect. Which administrative action BEST addresses this specific situation?

  1. Inspect the matched wireless policy set and authorization condition, then return the appropriate supported VLAN or role attributes to the WLC.
  2. Enable supported RADIUS Change of Authorization handling on the WLC and verify policy-triggered reauthorization for that client.
  3. Enable supported RADIUS accounting from the controller and confirm the necessary accounting server settings and message path.
  4. Reduce the MAB role to least privilege and supplement admission with profiling, port context, or stronger supported controls where feasible.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Enable supported RADIUS accounting from the controller and confirm the necessary accounting server settings and message path. This is appropriate because rADIUS authentication exchanges grant access, while accounting records session start, stop, and interim usage events when configured. It should be verified by this evidence: A test wireless session generates a matching accounting start and stop tied to its authenticated identity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Audit EAP method availability and certificate trust before deploying new WLANs. In the case being tested, Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Enable supported RADIUS accounting from the controller and confirm the necessary accounting server settings and message path.

B:

Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. In the case being tested, Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Enable supported RADIUS accounting from the controller and confirm the necessary accounting server settings and message path.

D:

Reduce the MAB role to least privilege and supplement admission with profiling, port context, or stronger supported controls where feasible. In the case being tested, Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Enable supported RADIUS accounting from the controller and confirm the necessary accounting server settings and message path.

Question 140

During a Cisco ISE postchange review, the following is observed: A wireless 802.1X rollout has successful connections but no traceable per-user session-end accounting in ISE when users disconnect. Which architectural fact determines the appropriate fix?

  1. An existing 802.1X session does not automatically renegotiate its authorization until a supported reauthentication or CoA path occurs.
  2. RADIUS authentication exchanges grant access, while accounting records session start, stop, and interim usage events when configured.
  3. 802.1X is the access framework; its selected EAP method determines whether certificates or password-based credential exchange is used.
  4. An AD account authentication does not automatically cause every directory group to become available in ISE authorization rules.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

RADIUS authentication exchanges grant access, while accounting records session start, stop, and interim usage events when configured. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Enable supported RADIUS accounting from the controller and confirm the necessary accounting server settings and message path. The acceptance result is: A test wireless session generates a matching accounting start and stop tied to its authenticated identity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. The repeat risk here is different: Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. A directly relevant preventive control is: RADIUS authentication exchanges grant access, while accounting records session start, stop, and interim usage events when configured.

C:

Verify RADIUS source interfaces after controller failover, redundancy, or interface changes. The repeat risk here is different: Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. A directly relevant preventive control is: RADIUS authentication exchanges grant access, while accounting records session start, stop, and interim usage events when configured.

D:

Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. The repeat risk here is different: Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. A directly relevant preventive control is: RADIUS authentication exchanges grant access, while accounting records session start, stop, and interim usage events when configured.