McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-715 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-715

Exam Name Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Security

Cisco 300-715 Bundle $25.00
300-715 Sample 1 300-715 Sample 2 300-715 Sample 3 300-715 Sample 4 300-715 Sample 5 300-715 Sample 6 300-715 Sample 7 300-715 Sample 8 300-715 Sample 9 300-715 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-715 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-715 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-715 Questions & Answers

    433 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-715 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-715 Video Course

    300-715 Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    300-715 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-715 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) exam.

Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) (300-715) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    433 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-715 Video Course

    Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 12

Question 110

A security policy owner must resolve this specific case: Remote administrators need a second factor during a supported network access workflow, but policy is configured to validate only a directory password. Which recurring operational control would reduce this risk?

  1. Audit overlapping account namespaces before modifying identity-source sequences.
  2. Expire temporary local users and prevent test identity stores from matching production requests.
  3. Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set.
  4. Test external MFA service failures and document secure fail-closed or permitted exception behavior.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Test external MFA service failures and document secure fail-closed or permitted exception behavior. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Multifactor authentication adds proof beyond a single password; placing a password-only AD store in a sequence does not create a second factor. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A pilot access attempt requires and validates the approved second factor, with failed challenges denied.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Test external MFA service failures and document secure fail-closed or permitted exception behavior. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Audit overlapping account namespaces before modifying identity-source sequences. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Test external MFA service failures and document secure fail-closed or permitted exception behavior. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Expire temporary local users and prevent test identity stores from matching production requests. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Test external MFA service failures and document secure fail-closed or permitted exception behavior. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 111

An identity and device-administration engineer evaluates: A legacy directory contains network users identified by a `uid` attribute rather than AD `sAMAccountName`, and ISE's LDAP lookup searches only the latter. Which administrative action BEST addresses this specific situation?

  1. Install and trust the approved issuing CA chain in ISE and configure an appropriate certificate authentication profile and EAP-TLS policy.
  2. Integrate a supported MFA identity provider or method for the specific authentication flow and validate factor challenge and fallback behavior.
  3. Enable supported RADIUS accounting from the controller and confirm the necessary accounting server settings and message path.
  4. Configure the supported LDAP user search filter and identity attribute for that directory's schema.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Configure the supported LDAP user search filter and identity attribute for that directory's schema. This is appropriate because lDAP and AD identity repositories can expose different account attributes; lookup success depends on the configured schema mapping. It should be verified by this evidence: The known `uid` resolves to its proper directory entry while an unknown account does not authenticate.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Audit overlapping account namespaces before modifying identity-source sequences. In the case being tested, Test external MFA service failures and document secure fail-closed or permitted exception behavior. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Configure the supported LDAP user search filter and identity attribute for that directory's schema.

B:

Expire temporary local users and prevent test identity stores from matching production requests. In the case being tested, Test external MFA service failures and document secure fail-closed or permitted exception behavior. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Configure the supported LDAP user search filter and identity attribute for that directory's schema.

C:

Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. In the case being tested, Test external MFA service failures and document secure fail-closed or permitted exception behavior. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Configure the supported LDAP user search filter and identity attribute for that directory's schema.

Question 112

A campus and branch network operator reports: A legacy directory contains network users identified by a `uid` attribute rather than AD `sAMAccountName`, and ISE's LDAP lookup searches only the latter. Which architectural fact determines the appropriate fix?

  1. LDAP and AD identity repositories can expose different account attributes; lookup success depends on the configured schema mapping.
  2. Certificate-based authentication validates X.509 trust, identity extraction, and permitted EAP methods rather than a password lookup alone.
  3. Multifactor authentication adds proof beyond a single password; placing a password-only AD store in a sequence does not create a second factor.
  4. Event-driven IBNS 2.0 control policy governs how authentication state changes after RADIUS events; a static VLAN command alone does not define transitions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

LDAP and AD identity repositories can expose different account attributes; lookup success depends on the configured schema mapping. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Configure the supported LDAP user search filter and identity attribute for that directory's schema. The acceptance result is: The known `uid` resolves to its proper directory entry while an unknown account does not authenticate.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Audit overlapping account namespaces before modifying identity-source sequences. The repeat risk here is different: Test external MFA service failures and document secure fail-closed or permitted exception behavior. A directly relevant preventive control is: LDAP and AD identity repositories can expose different account attributes; lookup success depends on the configured schema mapping.

C:

Expire temporary local users and prevent test identity stores from matching production requests. The repeat risk here is different: Test external MFA service failures and document secure fail-closed or permitted exception behavior. A directly relevant preventive control is: LDAP and AD identity repositories can expose different account attributes; lookup success depends on the configured schema mapping.

D:

Inspect the IBNS 2.0 event and action mapping for reauthentication and apply a supported CoA-triggered session transition. The repeat risk here is different: Test external MFA service failures and document secure fail-closed or permitted exception behavior. A directly relevant preventive control is: LDAP and AD identity repositories can expose different account attributes; lookup success depends on the configured schema mapping.

Question 113

A Cisco ISE operations team investigates this site issue: A legacy directory contains network users identified by a `uid` attribute rather than AD `sAMAccountName`, and ISE's LDAP lookup searches only the latter. Which postchange outcome demonstrates correct implementation?

  1. A pilot access attempt requires and validates the approved second factor, with failed challenges denied.
  2. The known `uid` resolves to its proper directory entry while an unknown account does not authenticate.
  3. An unknown test principal is denied even when the primary identity source is unavailable, while approved continuity behavior is recorded.
  4. The pilot session downloads the approved employee ACL and a prohibited service remains inaccessible.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The known `uid` resolves to its proper directory entry while an unknown account does not authenticate. The required remediation is: Configure the supported LDAP user search filter and identity attribute for that directory's schema. It works because lDAP and AD identity repositories can expose different account attributes; lookup success depends on the configured schema mapping.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Test external MFA service failures and document secure fail-closed or permitted exception behavior. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Maintain per-directory schema mapping tests before identity store migrations. The needed response is: The known `uid` resolves to its proper directory entry while an unknown account does not authenticate.

C:

Test negative authentication cases during directory-failover policy reviews. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Maintain per-directory schema mapping tests before identity store migrations. The needed response is: The known `uid` resolves to its proper directory entry while an unknown account does not authenticate.

D:

Associate the appropriate dACL result with the employee authorization profile and confirm the switch supports its application. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Maintain per-directory schema mapping tests before identity store migrations. The needed response is: The known `uid` resolves to its proper directory entry while an unknown account does not authenticate.

Question 114

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: A legacy directory contains network users identified by a `uid` attribute rather than AD `sAMAccountName`, and ISE's LDAP lookup searches only the latter. What should be added to the maintenance or security review?

  1. Test external MFA service failures and document secure fail-closed or permitted exception behavior.
  2. Track EAP certificate chain, identity mapping, and renewal as distinct controls.
  3. Maintain per-directory schema mapping tests before identity store migrations.
  4. Maintain explicit exit criteria and a dated transition from monitor to enforced modes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Maintain per-directory schema mapping tests before identity store migrations. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: LDAP and AD identity repositories can expose different account attributes; lookup success depends on the configured schema mapping. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The known `uid` resolves to its proper directory entry while an unknown account does not authenticate.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Maintain per-directory schema mapping tests before identity store migrations. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Test external MFA service failures and document secure fail-closed or permitted exception behavior. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Maintain per-directory schema mapping tests before identity store migrations. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Track EAP certificate chain, identity mapping, and renewal as distinct controls. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Maintain per-directory schema mapping tests before identity store migrations. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Use a carefully scoped low-impact 802.1X design with a preauthentication ACL limited to required bootstrap services. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 115

A security policy owner must resolve this specific case: An enterprise EAP-TLS policy must authorize users based on a certificate subject alternative name, but the certificate authentication profile extracts an unrelated common name. What is the most appropriate next configuration or repair?

  1. Install and trust the approved issuing CA chain in ISE and configure an appropriate certificate authentication profile and EAP-TLS policy.
  2. Integrate a supported MFA identity provider or method for the specific authentication flow and validate factor challenge and fallback behavior.
  3. Update the ISE LDAP identity source search base and matching user object attributes to reflect the directory hierarchy.
  4. Set an appropriate certificate authentication profile identity extraction rule and map it to the required authorized identity source or policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Set an appropriate certificate authentication profile identity extraction rule and map it to the required authorized identity source or policy. This is appropriate because a trusted certificate may still fail identity resolution if the extracted principal field does not match the intended account mapping. It should be verified by this evidence: A pilot certificate maps to the intended user and produces the correct restricted or permitted authorization result.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Audit overlapping account namespaces before modifying identity-source sequences. In the case being tested, Maintain per-directory schema mapping tests before identity store migrations. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Set an appropriate certificate authentication profile identity extraction rule and map it to the required authorized identity source or policy.

B:

Expire temporary local users and prevent test identity stores from matching production requests. In the case being tested, Maintain per-directory schema mapping tests before identity store migrations. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Set an appropriate certificate authentication profile identity extraction rule and map it to the required authorized identity source or policy.

C:

Review ISE AD group mappings whenever directory groups are renamed or reorganized. In the case being tested, Maintain per-directory schema mapping tests before identity store migrations. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Set an appropriate certificate authentication profile identity extraction rule and map it to the required authorized identity source or policy.

Question 116

A network identity engineer receives the following requirement: An enterprise EAP-TLS policy must authorize users based on a certificate subject alternative name, but the certificate authentication profile extracts an unrelated common name. What is the key technical principle in this situation?

  1. LDAP and AD identity repositories can expose different account attributes; lookup success depends on the configured schema mapping.
  2. Multifactor authentication adds proof beyond a single password; placing a password-only AD store in a sequence does not create a second factor.
  3. An AD account authentication does not automatically cause every directory group to become available in ISE authorization rules.
  4. A trusted certificate may still fail identity resolution if the extracted principal field does not match the intended account mapping.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

A trusted certificate may still fail identity resolution if the extracted principal field does not match the intended account mapping. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Set an appropriate certificate authentication profile identity extraction rule and map it to the required authorized identity source or policy. The acceptance result is: A pilot certificate maps to the intended user and produces the correct restricted or permitted authorization result.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Test external MFA service failures and document secure fail-closed or permitted exception behavior. The repeat risk here is different: Maintain per-directory schema mapping tests before identity store migrations. A directly relevant preventive control is: A trusted certificate may still fail identity resolution if the extracted principal field does not match the intended account mapping.

B:

Expire temporary local users and prevent test identity stores from matching production requests. The repeat risk here is different: Maintain per-directory schema mapping tests before identity store migrations. A directly relevant preventive control is: A trusted certificate may still fail identity resolution if the extracted principal field does not match the intended account mapping.

C:

Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. The repeat risk here is different: Maintain per-directory schema mapping tests before identity store migrations. A directly relevant preventive control is: A trusted certificate may still fail identity resolution if the extracted principal field does not match the intended account mapping.

Question 117

An enterprise access-control incident describes: An enterprise EAP-TLS policy must authorize users based on a certificate subject alternative name, but the certificate authentication profile extracts an unrelated common name. What result should be documented before closing the issue?

  1. The named lab user authenticates in the lab policy while production policy does not accept that account.
  2. A pilot certificate maps to the intended user and produces the correct restricted or permitted authorization result.
  3. A pilot access attempt requires and validates the approved second factor, with failed challenges denied.
  4. The downstream enforcement device learns the expected IP-to-SGT mapping and applies the intended group policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A pilot certificate maps to the intended user and produces the correct restricted or permitted authorization result. The required remediation is: Set an appropriate certificate authentication profile identity extraction rule and map it to the required authorized identity source or policy. It works because a trusted certificate may still fail identity resolution if the extracted principal field does not match the intended account mapping.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Expire temporary local users and prevent test identity stores from matching production requests. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Document and test certificate naming conventions during enrollment-template changes. The needed response is: A pilot certificate maps to the intended user and produces the correct restricted or permitted authorization result.

C:

Test external MFA service failures and document secure fail-closed or permitted exception behavior. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Document and test certificate naming conventions during enrollment-template changes. The needed response is: A pilot certificate maps to the intended user and produces the correct restricted or permitted authorization result.

D:

Use a supported identity-to-SGT propagation method, such as SXP or an approved mapping, where inline tagging is unavailable. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Document and test certificate naming conventions during enrollment-template changes. The needed response is: A pilot certificate maps to the intended user and produces the correct restricted or permitted authorization result.

Question 118

In a staged Cisco ISE network access rollout, the team observes: An enterprise EAP-TLS policy must authorize users based on a certificate subject alternative name, but the certificate authentication profile extracts an unrelated common name. Which durable safeguard best prevents a recurrence?

  1. Audit overlapping account namespaces before modifying identity-source sequences.
  2. Test negative authentication cases during directory-failover policy reviews.
  3. Document and test certificate naming conventions during enrollment-template changes.
  4. Maintain explicit exit criteria and a dated transition from monitor to enforced modes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Document and test certificate naming conventions during enrollment-template changes. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: A trusted certificate may still fail identity resolution if the extracted principal field does not match the intended account mapping. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A pilot certificate maps to the intended user and produces the correct restricted or permitted authorization result.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Document and test certificate naming conventions during enrollment-template changes. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Audit overlapping account namespaces before modifying identity-source sequences. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Document and test certificate naming conventions during enrollment-template changes. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Test negative authentication cases during directory-failover policy reviews. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Document and test certificate naming conventions during enrollment-template changes. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Use a carefully scoped low-impact 802.1X design with a preauthentication ACL limited to required bootstrap services. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 119

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: A network-access policy is configured to ignore directory outage and silently authenticate all unknown usernames using a catch-all local account. Which implementation decision directly satisfies the stated requirement?

  1. Create a narrowly scoped ISE internal user and a lab-only authentication policy referencing that local identity store.
  2. Replace the catch-all fallback with an explicit supported identity-store and failure policy that denies unauthorized identities.
  3. Install and trust the approved issuing CA chain in ISE and configure an appropriate certificate authentication profile and EAP-TLS policy.
  4. Scope the wireless 802.1X policy to approved EAP-TLS methods and compatible client certificate trust and identity rules.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Replace the catch-all fallback with an explicit supported identity-store and failure policy that denies unauthorized identities. This is appropriate because identity-source failover must not turn a directory error into unconditional account acceptance; the authorization decision still requires validated identity. It should be verified by this evidence: An unknown test principal is denied even when the primary identity source is unavailable, while approved continuity behavior is recorded.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Track EAP certificate chain, identity mapping, and renewal as distinct controls. In the case being tested, Document and test certificate naming conventions during enrollment-template changes. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Replace the catch-all fallback with an explicit supported identity-store and failure policy that denies unauthorized identities.

C:

Audit overlapping account namespaces before modifying identity-source sequences. In the case being tested, Document and test certificate naming conventions during enrollment-template changes. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Replace the catch-all fallback with an explicit supported identity-store and failure policy that denies unauthorized identities.

D:

Verify RADIUS source interfaces after controller failover, redundancy, or interface changes. In the case being tested, Document and test certificate naming conventions during enrollment-template changes. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Replace the catch-all fallback with an explicit supported identity-store and failure policy that denies unauthorized identities.

Question 120

An ISE administrator troubleshoots the following: A network-access policy is configured to ignore directory outage and silently authenticate all unknown usernames using a catch-all local account. Which technical behavior is MOST relevant to this design?

  1. The ISE internal identity store can validate accounts without relying on an external AD or LDAP directory for the intended test.
  2. Identity-store ordering and duplicate account representations can change or block authentication when a username exists in multiple databases.
  3. Identity-source failover must not turn a directory error into unconditional account acceptance; the authorization decision still requires validated identity.
  4. Low-impact mode permits constrained preliminary access while authentication completes, unlike granting unrestricted traffic before the ISE decision.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Identity-source failover must not turn a directory error into unconditional account acceptance; the authorization decision still requires validated identity. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Replace the catch-all fallback with an explicit supported identity-store and failure policy that denies unauthorized identities. The acceptance result is: An unknown test principal is denied even when the primary identity source is unavailable, while approved continuity behavior is recorded.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Track EAP certificate chain, identity mapping, and renewal as distinct controls. The repeat risk here is different: Document and test certificate naming conventions during enrollment-template changes. A directly relevant preventive control is: Identity-source failover must not turn a directory error into unconditional account acceptance; the authorization decision still requires validated identity.

B:

Alert on ISE node time drift and authoritative NTP reachability. The repeat risk here is different: Document and test certificate naming conventions during enrollment-template changes. A directly relevant preventive control is: Identity-source failover must not turn a directory error into unconditional account acceptance; the authorization decision still requires validated identity.

D:

Use a carefully scoped low-impact 802.1X design with a preauthentication ACL limited to required bootstrap services. The repeat risk here is different: Document and test certificate naming conventions during enrollment-template changes. A directly relevant preventive control is: Identity-source failover must not turn a directory error into unconditional account acceptance; the authorization decision still requires validated identity.