Question 90
An access-security change request states: Two ISE PSNs authenticate to different AD domains after an acquisition, but one PSN has not joined the trusted domain and users at that site fail randomly. Which durable safeguard best prevents a recurrence?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Run cross-domain sign-in regression tests when adding or replacing PSNs. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: A distributed policy configuration does not guarantee that every PSN has functioning connectivity and identity-source state for all target domains. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The same authorized acquired-company account authenticates through each intended PSN and maps to its correct authorization group.
Incorrect Answers
Run cross-domain sign-in regression tests when adding or replacing PSNs. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Review ISE AD group mappings whenever directory groups are renamed or reorganized. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.
Run cross-domain sign-in regression tests when adding or replacing PSNs. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Validate directory organizational-unit moves against ISE LDAP search filters before cutover. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.
Run cross-domain sign-in regression tests when adding or replacing PSNs. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Register the printer's endpoint MAC as an authorized internal endpoint and configure a tightly scoped MAB authorization profile. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.