McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-715 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-715

Exam Name Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Security

Cisco 300-715 Bundle $25.00
300-715 Sample 1 300-715 Sample 2 300-715 Sample 3 300-715 Sample 4 300-715 Sample 5 300-715 Sample 6 300-715 Sample 7 300-715 Sample 8 300-715 Sample 9 300-715 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-715 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-715 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-715 Questions & Answers

    433 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-715 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-715 Video Course

    300-715 Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    300-715 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-715 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) exam.

Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) (300-715) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    433 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-715 Video Course

    Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 8

Question 70

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: A technician wants to use zero-touch provisioning to modify every already-running ISE node's authorization policies, bypassing PAN change control. Which ongoing practice is most appropriate for this failure mode?

  1. Add DNS and NTP acceptance tests to the automated provisioning pipeline.
  2. Protect provisioning files, rotate temporary secrets, and audit bootstrap access after onboarding.
  3. Re-evaluate deployment mode when endpoint count, authentication load, or availability requirements grow.
  4. Separate initial-node bootstrap rights from production policy-administration privileges.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Separate initial-node bootstrap rights from production policy-administration privileges. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Provisioning bootstrap and steady-state distributed policy management solve different lifecycle tasks. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The new node is bootstrapped with its intended system settings while existing authorization policies change only through approved PAN operations.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Separate initial-node bootstrap rights from production policy-administration privileges. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Add DNS and NTP acceptance tests to the automated provisioning pipeline. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Separate initial-node bootstrap rights from production policy-administration privileges. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Protect provisioning files, rotate temporary secrets, and audit bootstrap access after onboarding. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Separate initial-node bootstrap rights from production policy-administration privileges. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: one laboratory node manages policy, answers test RADIUS requests, and records corresponding live logs. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 71

A security policy owner must resolve this specific case: The ISE PSN reports an Active Directory join failure after the domain controller IP was changed, and DNS lookup of the domain SRV records points to retired controllers. Which response most directly corrects the described failure?

  1. Restore AD-aware DNS resolution and reachable domain-controller discovery from the PSN, then retry the supported domain join.
  2. Reconcile native AD join points and access to required trusted domains across participating PSNs, then test each authentication path.
  3. Retrieve the eligible AD groups and include the correct group in ISE's configured AD identity-source group selections and authorization conditions.
  4. Use a carefully scoped low-impact 802.1X design with a preauthentication ACL limited to required bootstrap services.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Restore AD-aware DNS resolution and reachable domain-controller discovery from the PSN, then retry the supported domain join. This is appropriate because iSE's native AD integration depends on DNS discovery and communication with eligible domain services, not just a username and password. It should be verified by this evidence: The PSN joins the intended domain and a known AD test account authenticates through the correct identity source.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Monitor LDAP certificate renewal and prohibit cleartext bind exceptions. In the case being tested, Separate initial-node bootstrap rights from production policy-administration privileges. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Restore AD-aware DNS resolution and reachable domain-controller discovery from the PSN, then retry the supported domain join.

C:

Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. In the case being tested, Separate initial-node bootstrap rights from production policy-administration privileges. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Restore AD-aware DNS resolution and reachable domain-controller discovery from the PSN, then retry the supported domain join.

D:

Use a carefully scoped low-impact 802.1X design with a preauthentication ACL limited to required bootstrap services. In the case being tested, Separate initial-node bootstrap rights from production policy-administration privileges. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Restore AD-aware DNS resolution and reachable domain-controller discovery from the PSN, then retry the supported domain join.

Question 72

A network identity engineer receives the following requirement: The ISE PSN reports an Active Directory join failure after the domain controller IP was changed, and DNS lookup of the domain SRV records points to retired controllers. Which statement best explains why the correct response works?

  1. Kerberos and certificate-related authentication paths depend on appropriate time consistency; network reachability alone does not eliminate clock-related failures.
  2. LDAP search scope and attribute mappings determine whether an otherwise reachable directory returns eligible user records.
  3. ISE's native AD integration depends on DNS discovery and communication with eligible domain services, not just a username and password.
  4. RADIUS authentication exchanges grant access, while accounting records session start, stop, and interim usage events when configured.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

ISE's native AD integration depends on DNS discovery and communication with eligible domain services, not just a username and password. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Restore AD-aware DNS resolution and reachable domain-controller discovery from the PSN, then retry the supported domain join. The acceptance result is: The PSN joins the intended domain and a known AD test account authenticates through the correct identity source.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Run cross-domain sign-in regression tests when adding or replacing PSNs. The repeat risk here is different: Separate initial-node bootstrap rights from production policy-administration privileges. A directly relevant preventive control is: ISE's native AD integration depends on DNS discovery and communication with eligible domain services, not just a username and password.

B:

Review ISE AD group mappings whenever directory groups are renamed or reorganized. The repeat risk here is different: Separate initial-node bootstrap rights from production policy-administration privileges. A directly relevant preventive control is: ISE's native AD integration depends on DNS discovery and communication with eligible domain services, not just a username and password.

D:

Include CoA reachability and session-identity checks in wireless integration acceptance tests. The repeat risk here is different: Separate initial-node bootstrap rights from production policy-administration privileges. A directly relevant preventive control is: ISE's native AD integration depends on DNS discovery and communication with eligible domain services, not just a username and password.

Question 73

An enterprise access-control incident describes: The ISE PSN reports an Active Directory join failure after the domain controller IP was changed, and DNS lookup of the domain SRV records points to retired controllers. Which observation would BEST verify successful remediation?

  1. The PSN joins the intended domain and a known AD test account authenticates through the correct identity source.
  2. The affected PSN's clock offset falls within policy and the same test user authenticates reliably.
  3. The same authorized acquired-company account authenticates through each intended PSN and maps to its correct authorization group.
  4. An unauthenticated client obtains only approved bootstrap services and receives full permitted access after a successful 802.1X decision.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The PSN joins the intended domain and a known AD test account authenticates through the correct identity source. The required remediation is: Restore AD-aware DNS resolution and reachable domain-controller discovery from the PSN, then retry the supported domain join. It works because iSE's native AD integration depends on DNS discovery and communication with eligible domain services, not just a username and password.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Alert on ISE node time drift and authoritative NTP reachability. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. The needed response is: The PSN joins the intended domain and a known AD test account authenticates through the correct identity source.

C:

Run cross-domain sign-in regression tests when adding or replacing PSNs. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. The needed response is: The PSN joins the intended domain and a known AD test account authenticates through the correct identity source.

D:

Use a carefully scoped low-impact 802.1X design with a preauthentication ACL limited to required bootstrap services. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. The needed response is: The PSN joins the intended domain and a known AD test account authenticates through the correct identity source.

Question 74

In a staged Cisco ISE network access rollout, the team observes: The ISE PSN reports an Active Directory join failure after the domain controller IP was changed, and DNS lookup of the domain SRV records points to retired controllers. What should be incorporated into the change checklist?

  1. Monitor LDAP certificate renewal and prohibit cleartext bind exceptions.
  2. Validate directory organizational-unit moves against ISE LDAP search filters before cutover.
  3. Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering.
  4. Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: ISE's native AD integration depends on DNS discovery and communication with eligible domain services, not just a username and password. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The PSN joins the intended domain and a known AD test account authenticates through the correct identity source.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Monitor LDAP certificate renewal and prohibit cleartext bind exceptions. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Validate directory organizational-unit moves against ISE LDAP search filters before cutover. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Test SSID and network-device-group conditions in each wireless authorization policy set. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 75

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: A campus AD password authentication succeeds but group-based authorization never matches because the staff group was not selected for use in ISE policy. What is the most suitable solution within these constraints?

  1. Reconcile native AD join points and access to required trusted domains across participating PSNs, then test each authentication path.
  2. Correct the PSN's NTP configuration and verify time synchronization with identity infrastructure before resetting user credentials.
  3. Inspect the IBNS 2.0 event and action mapping for reauthentication and apply a supported CoA-triggered session transition.
  4. Retrieve the eligible AD groups and include the correct group in ISE's configured AD identity-source group selections and authorization conditions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Retrieve the eligible AD groups and include the correct group in ISE's configured AD identity-source group selections and authorization conditions. This is appropriate because an AD account authentication does not automatically cause every directory group to become available in ISE authorization rules. It should be verified by this evidence: A test staff user matches the intended group condition while a nonmember receives the lower-privilege policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Monitor LDAP certificate renewal and prohibit cleartext bind exceptions. In the case being tested, Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Retrieve the eligible AD groups and include the correct group in ISE's configured AD identity-source group selections and authorization conditions.

B:

Run cross-domain sign-in regression tests when adding or replacing PSNs. In the case being tested, Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Retrieve the eligible AD groups and include the correct group in ISE's configured AD identity-source group selections and authorization conditions.

C:

Inspect the IBNS 2.0 event and action mapping for reauthentication and apply a supported CoA-triggered session transition. In the case being tested, Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Retrieve the eligible AD groups and include the correct group in ISE's configured AD identity-source group selections and authorization conditions.

Question 76

An ISE administrator troubleshoots the following: A campus AD password authentication succeeds but group-based authorization never matches because the staff group was not selected for use in ISE policy. Which platform distinction is decisive in this scenario?

  1. Kerberos and certificate-related authentication paths depend on appropriate time consistency; network reachability alone does not eliminate clock-related failures.
  2. A distributed policy configuration does not guarantee that every PSN has functioning connectivity and identity-source state for all target domains.
  3. ISE can return an authorization profile with a named downloadable ACL; the NAD enforces what it actually downloads.
  4. An AD account authentication does not automatically cause every directory group to become available in ISE authorization rules.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

An AD account authentication does not automatically cause every directory group to become available in ISE authorization rules. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Retrieve the eligible AD groups and include the correct group in ISE's configured AD identity-source group selections and authorization conditions. The acceptance result is: A test staff user matches the intended group condition while a nonmember receives the lower-privilege policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Run cross-domain sign-in regression tests when adding or replacing PSNs. The repeat risk here is different: Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. A directly relevant preventive control is: An AD account authentication does not automatically cause every directory group to become available in ISE authorization rules.

B:

Monitor LDAP certificate renewal and prohibit cleartext bind exceptions. The repeat risk here is different: Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. A directly relevant preventive control is: An AD account authentication does not automatically cause every directory group to become available in ISE authorization rules.

C:

Associate the appropriate dACL result with the employee authorization profile and confirm the switch supports its application. The repeat risk here is different: Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. A directly relevant preventive control is: An AD account authentication does not automatically cause every directory group to become available in ISE authorization rules.

Question 77

An access-security change request states: A campus AD password authentication succeeds but group-based authorization never matches because the staff group was not selected for use in ISE policy. Which acceptance test would directly establish the desired state?

  1. A test staff user matches the intended group condition while a nonmember receives the lower-privilege policy.
  2. The same authorized acquired-company account authenticates through each intended PSN and maps to its correct authorization group.
  3. The affected PSN's clock offset falls within policy and the same test user authenticates reliably.
  4. The same endpoint moves to the authorized IoT policy on reauthorization without changing neighboring port sessions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A test staff user matches the intended group condition while a nonmember receives the lower-privilege policy. The required remediation is: Retrieve the eligible AD groups and include the correct group in ISE's configured AD identity-source group selections and authorization conditions. It works because an AD account authentication does not automatically cause every directory group to become available in ISE authorization rules.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Run cross-domain sign-in regression tests when adding or replacing PSNs. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Review ISE AD group mappings whenever directory groups are renamed or reorganized. The needed response is: A test staff user matches the intended group condition while a nonmember receives the lower-privilege policy.

C:

Alert on ISE node time drift and authoritative NTP reachability. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Review ISE AD group mappings whenever directory groups are renamed or reorganized. The needed response is: A test staff user matches the intended group condition while a nonmember receives the lower-privilege policy.

D:

Use a supported session reauthentication or RADIUS CoA after the endpoint identity and profile classification change. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Review ISE AD group mappings whenever directory groups are renamed or reorganized. The needed response is: A test staff user matches the intended group condition while a nonmember receives the lower-privilege policy.

Question 78

During a Cisco ISE postchange review, the following is observed: A campus AD password authentication succeeds but group-based authorization never matches because the staff group was not selected for use in ISE policy. Which governance step most directly targets the root cause?

  1. Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering.
  2. Review ISE AD group mappings whenever directory groups are renamed or reorganized.
  3. Run cross-domain sign-in regression tests when adding or replacing PSNs.
  4. Test MAC formatting from each switch family before importing large device inventories.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Review ISE AD group mappings whenever directory groups are renamed or reorganized. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: An AD account authentication does not automatically cause every directory group to become available in ISE authorization rules. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A test staff user matches the intended group condition while a nonmember receives the lower-privilege policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Review ISE AD group mappings whenever directory groups are renamed or reorganized. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Review ISE AD group mappings whenever directory groups are renamed or reorganized. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Run cross-domain sign-in regression tests when adding or replacing PSNs. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Review ISE AD group mappings whenever directory groups are renamed or reorganized. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Reduce the MAB role to least privilege and supplement admission with profiling, port context, or stronger supported controls where feasible. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 79

In a staged Cisco ISE network access rollout, the team observes: An LDAP-connected subsidiary directory has moved its user objects into a new organizational unit, and all LDAP lookups now return no results despite healthy TLS connectivity. Which change is justified by the observed evidence?

  1. Configure supported LDAP over TLS with a trusted server certificate and the correct bind identity and search configuration.
  2. Retrieve the eligible AD groups and include the correct group in ISE's configured AD identity-source group selections and authorization conditions.
  3. Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port.
  4. Update the ISE LDAP identity source search base and matching user object attributes to reflect the directory hierarchy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Update the ISE LDAP identity source search base and matching user object attributes to reflect the directory hierarchy. This is appropriate because lDAP search scope and attribute mappings determine whether an otherwise reachable directory returns eligible user records. It should be verified by this evidence: A known user is found under the new search base and an invalid identity is rejected.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Validate directory organizational-unit moves against ISE LDAP search filters before cutover. In the case being tested, Review ISE AD group mappings whenever directory groups are renamed or reorganized. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Update the ISE LDAP identity source search base and matching user object attributes to reflect the directory hierarchy.

B:

Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. In the case being tested, Review ISE AD group mappings whenever directory groups are renamed or reorganized. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Update the ISE LDAP identity source search base and matching user object attributes to reflect the directory hierarchy.

C:

Correct the NAD's supported VLAN availability and verify that ISE returns an attribute compatible with that platform and port. In the case being tested, Review ISE AD group mappings whenever directory groups are renamed or reorganized. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Update the ISE LDAP identity source search base and matching user object attributes to reflect the directory hierarchy.

Question 80

An identity and device-administration engineer evaluates: An LDAP-connected subsidiary directory has moved its user objects into a new organizational unit, and all LDAP lookups now return no results despite healthy TLS connectivity. What mechanism governs this authentication or management outcome?

  1. An AD account authentication does not automatically cause every directory group to become available in ISE authorization rules.
  2. Kerberos and certificate-related authentication paths depend on appropriate time consistency; network reachability alone does not eliminate clock-related failures.
  3. Identifying a group is not equivalent to instructing the NAD to apply its authorized VLAN or role; that policy result must be represented in RADIUS attributes.
  4. LDAP search scope and attribute mappings determine whether an otherwise reachable directory returns eligible user records.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

LDAP search scope and attribute mappings determine whether an otherwise reachable directory returns eligible user records. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Update the ISE LDAP identity source search base and matching user object attributes to reflect the directory hierarchy. The acceptance result is: A known user is found under the new search base and an invalid identity is rejected.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Include DNS locator and domain connectivity checks in ISE node renumbering. The repeat risk here is different: Review ISE AD group mappings whenever directory groups are renamed or reorganized. A directly relevant preventive control is: LDAP search scope and attribute mappings determine whether an otherwise reachable directory returns eligible user records.

B:

Run cross-domain sign-in regression tests when adding or replacing PSNs. The repeat risk here is different: Review ISE AD group mappings whenever directory groups are renamed or reorganized. A directly relevant preventive control is: LDAP search scope and attribute mappings determine whether an otherwise reachable directory returns eligible user records.

C:

Return the supported VLAN or role authorization attributes through an appropriate ISE profile selected for contractors. The repeat risk here is different: Review ISE AD group mappings whenever directory groups are renamed or reorganized. A directly relevant preventive control is: LDAP search scope and attribute mappings determine whether an otherwise reachable directory returns eligible user records.