McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-715 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-715

Exam Name Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Security

Cisco 300-715 Bundle $25.00
300-715 Sample 1 300-715 Sample 2 300-715 Sample 3 300-715 Sample 4 300-715 Sample 5 300-715 Sample 6 300-715 Sample 7 300-715 Sample 8 300-715 Sample 9 300-715 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-715 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-715 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-715 Questions & Answers

    433 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-715 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-715 Video Course

    300-715 Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    300-715 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-715 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) exam.

Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) (300-715) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    433 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-715 Video Course

    Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 6

Question 50

An identity and device-administration engineer evaluates: An ISE VM is migrated to an oversubscribed host and develops unpredictable RADIUS latency despite unchanged access policies. Which acceptance test would directly establish the desired state?

  1. Host contention clears and RADIUS response times return within the documented service target under the same traffic.
  2. Monitoring node retains the defined reporting period without disk threshold alerts under a realistic log-rate trial.
  3. The deployed node passes Cisco-supported installation validation and starts the intended services on approved virtual infrastructure.
  4. A permitted test-policy update reaches all registered nodes in the defined deployment and not unrelated standalone installations.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Host contention clears and RADIUS response times return within the documented service target under the same traffic. The required remediation is: Check supported hypervisor CPU, memory reservation, storage I/O, and resource contention before changing authentication rules. It works because authentication response performance depends on available compute and disk resources; high hypervisor contention can look like a policy outage.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Host contention clears and RADIUS response times return within the documented service target under the same traffic. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Monitoring node retains the defined reporting period without disk threshold alerts under a realistic log-rate trial. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Host contention clears and RADIUS response times return within the documented service target under the same traffic. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Host contention clears and RADIUS response times return within the documented service target under the same traffic. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: a permitted test-policy update reaches all registered nodes in the defined deployment and not unrelated standalone installations. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 51

A campus and branch network operator reports: An ISE VM is migrated to an oversubscribed host and develops unpredictable RADIUS latency despite unchanged access policies. Which governance step most directly targets the root cause?

  1. Reforecast MnT storage when adding network access devices or extending retention.
  2. Monitor virtualization resource contention as a separate failure domain from policy correctness.
  3. Validate VM resource reservations and version-specific sizing before deploying production PSNs.
  4. Review pxGrid service placement and client trust separately from RADIUS policy coverage.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Monitor virtualization resource contention as a separate failure domain from policy correctness. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Authentication response performance depends on available compute and disk resources; high hypervisor contention can look like a policy outage. The ongoing acceptance check remains: Host contention clears and RADIUS response times return within the documented service target under the same traffic.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Monitoring node retains the defined reporting period without disk threshold alerts under a realistic log-rate trial. In the case being tested, Host contention clears and RADIUS response times return within the documented service target under the same traffic. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Monitor virtualization resource contention as a separate failure domain from policy correctness.

C:

The VM meets the documented profile and representative authentication load remains within agreed latency and resource thresholds. In the case being tested, Host contention clears and RADIUS response times return within the documented service target under the same traffic. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Monitor virtualization resource contention as a separate failure domain from policy correctness.

D:

pxGrid publishes contextual identity and security information to integrations; the ordinary RADIUS access service is not a substitute for pxGrid messaging. In the case being tested, Host contention clears and RADIUS response times return within the documented service target under the same traffic. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Monitor virtualization resource contention as a separate failure domain from policy correctness.

Question 52

An access-security change request states: An administrator copies a VMware-focused ISE virtual template onto an unsupported platform without checking the current Cisco hypervisor support matrix. Which change is justified by the observed evidence?

  1. Choose a Cisco-supported virtual-appliance sizing profile and allocate its specified CPU, RAM, disk, and network resources.
  2. Use a hypervisor and installation method explicitly supported for the selected ISE release and appliance image.
  3. Provision Monitoring storage against Cisco's supported node-size, log-rate, and retention guidance instead of using a generic minimal disk image.
  4. Maintain a defined primary PAN and secondary PAN role, with supported administrative replication and promotion procedures.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use a hypervisor and installation method explicitly supported for the selected ISE release and appliance image. This is appropriate because virtual appliance compatibility is release and platform dependent; an OVA cannot be assumed portable across unrelated hypervisors. It should be verified by this evidence: The deployed node passes Cisco-supported installation validation and starts the intended services on approved virtual infrastructure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A permitted test-policy update reaches all registered nodes in the defined deployment and not unrelated standalone installations. The repeat risk here is different: Host contention clears and RADIUS response times return within the documented service target under the same traffic. A directly relevant preventive control is: Use a hypervisor and installation method explicitly supported for the selected ISE release and appliance image.

C:

The VM meets the documented profile and representative authentication load remains within agreed latency and resource thresholds. The repeat risk here is different: Host contention clears and RADIUS response times return within the documented service target under the same traffic. A directly relevant preventive control is: Use a hypervisor and installation method explicitly supported for the selected ISE release and appliance image.

D:

A distributed ISE deployment has explicit primary configuration ownership; multiple unsynchronized primaries do not form a valid replicated policy set. The repeat risk here is different: Host contention clears and RADIUS response times return within the documented service target under the same traffic. A directly relevant preventive control is: Use a hypervisor and installation method explicitly supported for the selected ISE release and appliance image.

Question 53

During a Cisco ISE postchange review, the following is observed: An administrator copies a VMware-focused ISE virtual template onto an unsupported platform without checking the current Cisco hypervisor support matrix. What result should be documented before closing the issue?

  1. The VM meets the documented profile and representative authentication load remains within agreed latency and resource thresholds.
  2. The deployed node passes Cisco-supported installation validation and starts the intended services on approved virtual infrastructure.
  3. Host contention clears and RADIUS response times return within the documented service target under the same traffic.
  4. A permitted test-policy update reaches all registered nodes in the defined deployment and not unrelated standalone installations.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The deployed node passes Cisco-supported installation validation and starts the intended services on approved virtual infrastructure. The required remediation is: Use a hypervisor and installation method explicitly supported for the selected ISE release and appliance image. It works because virtual appliance compatibility is release and platform dependent; an OVA cannot be assumed portable across unrelated hypervisors.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The VM meets the documented profile and representative authentication load remains within agreed latency and resource thresholds. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted. The needed response is: The deployed node passes Cisco-supported installation validation and starts the intended services on approved virtual infrastructure.

C:

Host contention clears and RADIUS response times return within the documented service target under the same traffic. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted. The needed response is: The deployed node passes Cisco-supported installation validation and starts the intended services on approved virtual infrastructure.

D:

A permitted test-policy update reaches all registered nodes in the defined deployment and not unrelated standalone installations. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted. The needed response is: The deployed node passes Cisco-supported installation validation and starts the intended services on approved virtual infrastructure.

Question 54

A security policy owner must resolve this specific case: An administrator copies a VMware-focused ISE virtual template onto an unsupported platform without checking the current Cisco hypervisor support matrix. Which durable safeguard best prevents a recurrence?

  1. Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted.
  2. Validate VM resource reservations and version-specific sizing before deploying production PSNs.
  3. Reforecast MnT storage when adding network access devices or extending retention.
  4. Separate initial-node bootstrap rights from production policy-administration privileges.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Virtual appliance compatibility is release and platform dependent; an OVA cannot be assumed portable across unrelated hypervisors. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The deployed node passes Cisco-supported installation validation and starts the intended services on approved virtual infrastructure.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the VM meets the documented profile and representative authentication load remains within agreed latency and resource thresholds. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Monitoring node retains the defined reporting period without disk threshold alerts under a realistic log-rate trial. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Separate initial-node bootstrap rights from production policy-administration privileges. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 55

A campus and branch network operator reports: A new branch ISE appliance should initialize from an approved unattended configuration, but the provisioning service cannot resolve its host or reach the onboarding endpoint. Which administrative action BEST addresses this specific situation?

  1. Restrict zero-touch provisioning to supported initial deployment operations and apply runtime policy changes through the authoritative PAN workflow.
  2. Configure the supported zero-touch provisioning prerequisites including identity, DNS, network reachability, and trusted bootstrap data.
  3. Use per-device approved bootstrap data and protect sensitive configuration material throughout zero-touch provisioning.
  4. Provide redundant reachable PSNs in the network device's RADIUS server group and test failure detection and fallback.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Configure the supported zero-touch provisioning prerequisites including identity, DNS, network reachability, and trusted bootstrap data. This is appropriate because zero-touch provisioning automates initial appliance setup only when the bootstrap environment can deliver the correct configuration to the intended appliance. It should be verified by this evidence: The appliance completes first boot with its intended hostname, management network, and registered system state without interactive setup.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Add DNS and NTP acceptance tests to the automated provisioning pipeline. In the case being tested, Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Configure the supported zero-touch provisioning prerequisites including identity, DNS, network reachability, and trusted bootstrap data.

C:

Validate bootstrap DNS, access, and device identity against a clean installation before rollout. In the case being tested, Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Configure the supported zero-touch provisioning prerequisites including identity, DNS, network reachability, and trusted bootstrap data.

D:

A distributed ISE deployment has explicit primary configuration ownership; multiple unsynchronized primaries do not form a valid replicated policy set. In the case being tested, Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Configure the supported zero-touch provisioning prerequisites including identity, DNS, network reachability, and trusted bootstrap data.

Question 56

A Cisco ISE operations team investigates this site issue: A new branch ISE appliance should initialize from an approved unattended configuration, but the provisioning service cannot resolve its host or reach the onboarding endpoint. Which architectural fact determines the appropriate fix?

  1. Distributed registration and secure authentication depend on correct name resolution, time alignment, and certificate identity after bootstrap.
  2. Reusing bootstrap secrets across appliances increases credential exposure and can bind a node to the wrong identity.
  3. Web management availability and RADIUS decision-service availability are separate health signals.
  4. Zero-touch provisioning automates initial appliance setup only when the bootstrap environment can deliver the correct configuration to the intended appliance.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Zero-touch provisioning automates initial appliance setup only when the bootstrap environment can deliver the correct configuration to the intended appliance. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Configure the supported zero-touch provisioning prerequisites including identity, DNS, network reachability, and trusted bootstrap data. The acceptance result is: The appliance completes first boot with its intended hostname, management network, and registered system state without interactive setup.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Protect provisioning files, rotate temporary secrets, and audit bootstrap access after onboarding. The repeat risk here is different: Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted. A directly relevant preventive control is: Zero-touch provisioning automates initial appliance setup only when the bootstrap environment can deliver the correct configuration to the intended appliance.

B:

Validate bootstrap DNS, access, and device identity against a clean installation before rollout. The repeat risk here is different: Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted. A directly relevant preventive control is: Zero-touch provisioning automates initial appliance setup only when the bootstrap environment can deliver the correct configuration to the intended appliance.

C:

When one PSN's AAA service is disabled in a test, fresh authentications move to a healthy node instead of timing out. The repeat risk here is different: Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted. A directly relevant preventive control is: Zero-touch provisioning automates initial appliance setup only when the bootstrap environment can deliver the correct configuration to the intended appliance.

Question 57

At a distributed Cisco ISE deployment, a security review finds: A new branch ISE appliance should initialize from an approved unattended configuration, but the provisioning service cannot resolve its host or reach the onboarding endpoint. Which postchange outcome demonstrates correct implementation?

  1. Each staged appliance receives its distinct approved identity and no shared plaintext credentials remain in the delivery workflow.
  2. The new node is bootstrapped with its intended system settings while existing authorization policies change only through approved PAN operations.
  3. The VM meets the documented profile and representative authentication load remains within agreed latency and resource thresholds.
  4. The appliance completes first boot with its intended hostname, management network, and registered system state without interactive setup.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The appliance completes first boot with its intended hostname, management network, and registered system state without interactive setup. The required remediation is: Configure the supported zero-touch provisioning prerequisites including identity, DNS, network reachability, and trusted bootstrap data. It works because zero-touch provisioning automates initial appliance setup only when the bootstrap environment can deliver the correct configuration to the intended appliance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Protect provisioning files, rotate temporary secrets, and audit bootstrap access after onboarding. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Validate bootstrap DNS, access, and device identity against a clean installation before rollout. The needed response is: The appliance completes first boot with its intended hostname, management network, and registered system state without interactive setup.

B:

Separate initial-node bootstrap rights from production policy-administration privileges. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Validate bootstrap DNS, access, and device identity against a clean installation before rollout. The needed response is: The appliance completes first boot with its intended hostname, management network, and registered system state without interactive setup.

C:

The VM meets the documented profile and representative authentication load remains within agreed latency and resource thresholds. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Validate bootstrap DNS, access, and device identity against a clean installation before rollout. The needed response is: The appliance completes first boot with its intended hostname, management network, and registered system state without interactive setup.

Question 58

An ISE administrator troubleshoots the following: A new branch ISE appliance should initialize from an approved unattended configuration, but the provisioning service cannot resolve its host or reach the onboarding endpoint. What should be added to the maintenance or security review?

  1. Validate bootstrap DNS, access, and device identity against a clean installation before rollout.
  2. Separate initial-node bootstrap rights from production policy-administration privileges.
  3. Protect provisioning files, rotate temporary secrets, and audit bootstrap access after onboarding.
  4. Include concurrency, device count, log volume, and failover capacity in deployment sizing reviews.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Validate bootstrap DNS, access, and device identity against a clean installation before rollout. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Zero-touch provisioning automates initial appliance setup only when the bootstrap environment can deliver the correct configuration to the intended appliance. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The appliance completes first boot with its intended hostname, management network, and registered system state without interactive setup.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Validate bootstrap DNS, access, and device identity against a clean installation before rollout. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Separate initial-node bootstrap rights from production policy-administration privileges. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Validate bootstrap DNS, access, and device identity against a clean installation before rollout. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Protect provisioning files, rotate temporary secrets, and audit bootstrap access after onboarding. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Validate bootstrap DNS, access, and device identity against a clean installation before rollout. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Sizing records show supported node capacities and a representative peak-load trial meets the authentication latency objective. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 59

A network identity engineer receives the following requirement: A factory staging team distributes one zero-touch provisioning file containing the same administrative credentials to several unrelated ISE appliances. What is the most appropriate next configuration or repair?

  1. Configure the supported zero-touch provisioning prerequisites including identity, DNS, network reachability, and trusted bootstrap data.
  2. Restrict zero-touch provisioning to supported initial deployment operations and apply runtime policy changes through the authoritative PAN workflow.
  3. Maintain a defined primary PAN and secondary PAN role, with supported administrative replication and promotion procedures.
  4. Use per-device approved bootstrap data and protect sensitive configuration material throughout zero-touch provisioning.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Use per-device approved bootstrap data and protect sensitive configuration material throughout zero-touch provisioning. This is appropriate because reusing bootstrap secrets across appliances increases credential exposure and can bind a node to the wrong identity. It should be verified by this evidence: Each staged appliance receives its distinct approved identity and no shared plaintext credentials remain in the delivery workflow.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Review supported hypervisors and appliance sizing every time an ISE major release is adopted. In the case being tested, Validate bootstrap DNS, access, and device identity against a clean installation before rollout. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Use per-device approved bootstrap data and protect sensitive configuration material throughout zero-touch provisioning.

B:

Add DNS and NTP acceptance tests to the automated provisioning pipeline. In the case being tested, Validate bootstrap DNS, access, and device identity against a clean installation before rollout. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Use per-device approved bootstrap data and protect sensitive configuration material throughout zero-touch provisioning.

C:

A distributed ISE deployment has explicit primary configuration ownership; multiple unsynchronized primaries do not form a valid replicated policy set. In the case being tested, Validate bootstrap DNS, access, and device identity against a clean installation before rollout. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Use per-device approved bootstrap data and protect sensitive configuration material throughout zero-touch provisioning.

Question 60

An enterprise access-control incident describes: A factory staging team distributes one zero-touch provisioning file containing the same administrative credentials to several unrelated ISE appliances. What is the key technical principle in this situation?

  1. Reusing bootstrap secrets across appliances increases credential exposure and can bind a node to the wrong identity.
  2. Provisioning bootstrap and steady-state distributed policy management solve different lifecycle tasks.
  3. Distributed registration and secure authentication depend on correct name resolution, time alignment, and certificate identity after bootstrap.
  4. Monitoring storage requirements differ with event volume and retention; free capacity may be exhausted even when RADIUS authentication still succeeds.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Reusing bootstrap secrets across appliances increases credential exposure and can bind a node to the wrong identity. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Use per-device approved bootstrap data and protect sensitive configuration material throughout zero-touch provisioning. The acceptance result is: Each staged appliance receives its distinct approved identity and no shared plaintext credentials remain in the delivery workflow.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Add DNS and NTP acceptance tests to the automated provisioning pipeline. The repeat risk here is different: Validate bootstrap DNS, access, and device identity against a clean installation before rollout. A directly relevant preventive control is: Reusing bootstrap secrets across appliances increases credential exposure and can bind a node to the wrong identity.

C:

Protect provisioning files, rotate temporary secrets, and audit bootstrap access after onboarding. The repeat risk here is different: Validate bootstrap DNS, access, and device identity against a clean installation before rollout. A directly relevant preventive control is: Reusing bootstrap secrets across appliances increases credential exposure and can bind a node to the wrong identity.

D:

Monitoring node retains the defined reporting period without disk threshold alerts under a realistic log-rate trial. The repeat risk here is different: Validate bootstrap DNS, access, and device identity against a clean installation before rollout. A directly relevant preventive control is: Reusing bootstrap secrets across appliances increases credential exposure and can bind a node to the wrong identity.