McAfee Secure

Cisco 300-715 Bundle

Exam Code: 300-715

Exam Name Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE)

Certification Provider: Cisco

Corresponding Certification: CCNP Security

Cisco 300-715 Bundle $25.00
300-715 Sample 1 300-715 Sample 2 300-715 Sample 3 300-715 Sample 4 300-715 Sample 5 300-715 Sample 6 300-715 Sample 7 300-715 Sample 8 300-715 Sample 9 300-715 Sample 10

100% Cisco 300-715 Guaranteed Success With Testking Training Materials

Get Real 300-715 Exam Questions & Expert Verified Answers as Experienced on the Real Exam!

  • Questions & Answers

    300-715 Questions & Answers

    433 Questions & Answers

    The ultimate exam preparation tool, Questions & Answers mirrors the actual 300-715 exam while allowing you to hone and measure every aspect of your test-taking ability.

  • 300-715 Video Course

    300-715 Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    300-715 Video Course is developed by Cisco Professionals to help you pass the 300-715 exam.

    Description

    This course will improve your knowledge and skills required to pass Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) exam.

Implementing and Configuring Cisco Identity Services Engine (300-715 SISE) (300-715) Practice Tests

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Money Back Guarantee

Testking provides hassle-free money back guarantee with our products. That is because we have 100% trust in the abilities of our professional and experience product team, and our record is a proof of that.

99.6% PASS RATE
Total Cost: $164.98
Bundle Price: $139.98

Purchase Individually

  • Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    433 Questions

    $124.99
  • 300-715 Video Course

    Training Course

    73 Video Lectures

    $39.99

Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 50

Question 490

An ISE administrator troubleshoots the following: A corporate BYOD wireless client lands on the ISE registration portal but cannot download its supplicant configuration because the initial guest ACL blocks the required onboarding endpoints. Which governance step most directly targets the root cause?

  1. Track portal and EAP server certificates separately and verify both renewal paths.
  2. Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change.
  3. Monitor device counts and periodically prompt employees to clean up unused registrations.
  4. Run onboarding with the actual limited-access ACL and DNS view used by new devices.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Run onboarding with the actual limited-access ACL and DNS view used by new devices. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: Native supplicant provisioning depends on reachable portal and certificate services before the final 802.1X identity exists. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The pilot device completes native supplicant setup while unauthorized internal applications remain blocked during enrollment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Run onboarding with the actual limited-access ACL and DNS view used by new devices. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Renew or reprovision a valid approved certificate and verify the permitted trust chain and identity mapping before reauthorizing the device. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Run onboarding with the actual limited-access ACL and DNS view used by new devices. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Run onboarding with the actual limited-access ACL and DNS view used by new devices. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: the My Devices registration quota limits how many personal devices an employee may enroll; this is independent of general wireless capacity. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 491

A network identity engineer receives the following requirement: The ISE BYOD portal is built for Windows workstations, but personal iOS devices are sent the same incompatible supplicant configuration file and cannot install it. Which change is justified by the observed evidence?

  1. Configure a portal certificate chain and hostname that match the published onboarding FQDN.
  2. Keep CA signing keys in the supported trusted service and distribute only the necessary trust certificates or chain to relying systems.
  3. Use a supported My Devices registration workflow and restricted network role for an eligible non-supplicant personal device.
  4. Assign an appropriate native supplicant provisioning profile and supported onboarding instructions by operating system.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Assign an appropriate native supplicant provisioning profile and supported onboarding instructions by operating system. This is appropriate because iSE BYOD enrollment branches by endpoint platform; a configuration package valid for one OS need not install on another. It should be verified by this evidence: A managed Windows test and a supported iOS test each receive the appropriate platform configuration and authenticate.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure a portal certificate chain and hostname that match the published onboarding FQDN. In the case being tested, Run onboarding with the actual limited-access ACL and DNS view used by new devices. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Assign an appropriate native supplicant provisioning profile and supported onboarding instructions by operating system.

B:

Review portal-to-endpoint-group mapping whenever device portals are cloned. In the case being tested, Run onboarding with the actual limited-access ACL and DNS view used by new devices. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Assign an appropriate native supplicant provisioning profile and supported onboarding instructions by operating system.

C:

The phone completes guided enrollment and uses the required EAP-TLS connection without relying on an employee-wide MAC whitelist. In the case being tested, Run onboarding with the actual limited-access ACL and DNS view used by new devices. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Assign an appropriate native supplicant provisioning profile and supported onboarding instructions by operating system.

Question 492

An enterprise access-control incident describes: The ISE BYOD portal is built for Windows workstations, but personal iOS devices are sent the same incompatible supplicant configuration file and cannot install it. What mechanism governs this authentication or management outcome?

  1. The bootstrap credential authorizes enrollment; subsequent EAP-TLS access requires an issued device or user certificate and configured supplicant.
  2. ISE BYOD enrollment branches by endpoint platform; a configuration package valid for one OS need not install on another.
  3. The BYOD portal assigns registration and identity attributes used by downstream ISE authorization decisions.
  4. The certificate protecting a portal web session serves a different role from the client certificate used as an EAP-TLS identity.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

ISE BYOD enrollment branches by endpoint platform; a configuration package valid for one OS need not install on another. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Assign an appropriate native supplicant provisioning profile and supported onboarding instructions by operating system. The acceptance result is: A managed Windows test and a supported iOS test each receive the appropriate platform configuration and authenticate.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change. The repeat risk here is different: Run onboarding with the actual limited-access ACL and DNS view used by new devices. A directly relevant preventive control is: ISE BYOD enrollment branches by endpoint platform; a configuration package valid for one OS need not install on another.

C:

Test registered-state policy-set selection after every SSID configuration change. The repeat risk here is different: Run onboarding with the actual limited-access ACL and DNS view used by new devices. A directly relevant preventive control is: ISE BYOD enrollment branches by endpoint platform; a configuration package valid for one OS need not install on another.

D:

Configure the proper separate trust relationships for portal HTTPS identity, EAP server identity, and issued client certificates. The repeat risk here is different: Run onboarding with the actual limited-access ACL and DNS view used by new devices. A directly relevant preventive control is: ISE BYOD enrollment branches by endpoint platform; a configuration package valid for one OS need not install on another.

Question 493

In a staged Cisco ISE network access rollout, the team observes: The ISE BYOD portal is built for Windows workstations, but personal iOS devices are sent the same incompatible supplicant configuration file and cannot install it. What is the strongest evidence that this requirement is met?

  1. A managed Windows test and a supported iOS test each receive the appropriate platform configuration and authenticate.
  2. The laptop receives a certificate with the intended identity and completes a successful EAP-TLS connection.
  3. An unregistered wired laptop reaches the current BYOD portal and enrolls without being allowed unrestricted preauth traffic.
  4. The reported device is denied access and the case record identifies any required certificate remediation.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

A managed Windows test and a supported iOS test each receive the appropriate platform configuration and authenticate. The required remediation is: Assign an appropriate native supplicant provisioning profile and supported onboarding instructions by operating system. It works because iSE BYOD enrollment branches by endpoint platform; a configuration package valid for one OS need not install on another.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Test certificate issuance and policy mapping separately from initial portal login. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change. The needed response is: A managed Windows test and a supported iOS test each receive the appropriate platform configuration and authenticate.

C:

Revalidate wired redirect paths when ISE portal hostnames change. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change. The needed response is: A managed Windows test and a supported iOS test each receive the appropriate platform configuration and authenticate.

D:

Mark the device appropriately as lost or stolen and apply the supported blocked-device policy and response or certificate revocation requirements. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change. The needed response is: A managed Windows test and a supported iOS test each receive the appropriate platform configuration and authenticate.

Question 494

An identity and device-administration engineer evaluates: The ISE BYOD portal is built for Windows workstations, but personal iOS devices are sent the same incompatible supplicant configuration file and cannot install it. Which recurring operational control would reduce this risk?

  1. Prohibit export of internal CA private material to network access devices.
  2. Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change.
  3. Test certificate issuance and policy mapping separately from initial portal login.
  4. Document BYOD data access boundaries and the device attributes required for each role.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: ISE BYOD enrollment branches by endpoint platform; a configuration package valid for one OS need not install on another. The ongoing acceptance check remains: A managed Windows test and a supported iOS test each receive the appropriate platform configuration and authenticate.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Configure a portal certificate chain and hostname that match the published onboarding FQDN. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

C:

Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Test certificate issuance and policy mapping separately from initial portal login. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: a registered tablet receives the BYOD role, while a managed laptop obtains its distinct corporate authorization. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 495

An ISE administrator troubleshoots the following: A new personal laptop can authenticate by username and password during onboarding but never receives its expected employee device certificate from the ISE internal CA. Which administrative action BEST addresses this specific situation?

  1. Configure a portal certificate chain and hostname that match the published onboarding FQDN.
  2. Assign an appropriate native supplicant provisioning profile and supported onboarding instructions by operating system.
  3. Configure supported revocation validation and reachable CRL or OCSP services according to policy.
  4. Enable and validate the intended ISE internal CA certificate issuance and native supplicant provisioning flow for that BYOD policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Enable and validate the intended ISE internal CA certificate issuance and native supplicant provisioning flow for that BYOD policy. This is appropriate because the bootstrap credential authorizes enrollment; subsequent EAP-TLS access requires an issued device or user certificate and configured supplicant. It should be verified by this evidence: The laptop receives a certificate with the intended identity and completes a successful EAP-TLS connection.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure a portal certificate chain and hostname that match the published onboarding FQDN. In the case being tested, Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Enable and validate the intended ISE internal CA certificate issuance and native supplicant provisioning flow for that BYOD policy.

B:

Run onboarding with the actual limited-access ACL and DNS view used by new devices. In the case being tested, Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Enable and validate the intended ISE internal CA certificate issuance and native supplicant provisioning flow for that BYOD policy.

C:

Configure supported revocation validation and reachable CRL or OCSP services according to policy. In the case being tested, Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Enable and validate the intended ISE internal CA certificate issuance and native supplicant provisioning flow for that BYOD policy.

Question 496

An access-security change request states: A new personal laptop can authenticate by username and password during onboarding but never receives its expected employee device certificate from the ISE internal CA. Which architectural fact determines the appropriate fix?

  1. The bootstrap credential authorizes enrollment; subsequent EAP-TLS access requires an issued device or user certificate and configured supplicant.
  2. The browser's trust decision is based on TLS certificate identity and chain, independently of subsequent EAP-TLS enrollment.
  3. A certificate authority signs credentials centrally; access switches validate EAP/RADIUS outcomes and do not require possession of the CA private key.
  4. Deleting a personal device from the employee portal can disassociate it without permanently deleting the ISE endpoint inventory record.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The bootstrap credential authorizes enrollment; subsequent EAP-TLS access requires an issued device or user certificate and configured supplicant. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Enable and validate the intended ISE internal CA certificate issuance and native supplicant provisioning flow for that BYOD policy. The acceptance result is: The laptop receives a certificate with the intended identity and completes a successful EAP-TLS connection.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Configure a portal certificate chain and hostname that match the published onboarding FQDN. The repeat risk here is different: Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change. A directly relevant preventive control is: The bootstrap credential authorizes enrollment; subsequent EAP-TLS access requires an issued device or user certificate and configured supplicant.

C:

The offered option specifies “A certificate authority signs credentials centrally; access switches validate EAP/RADIUS outcomes and do not require possession of the CA private key”. The question requires “The bootstrap credential authorizes enrollment; subsequent EAP-TLS access requires an issued device or user certificate and configured supplicant”: Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change. These are not equivalent responses to the stated requirement.

D:

Reconcile its residual endpoint record and remove or reclassify it through authorized endpoint administration if permanent cleanup is required. The repeat risk here is different: Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change. A directly relevant preventive control is: The bootstrap credential authorizes enrollment; subsequent EAP-TLS access requires an issued device or user certificate and configured supplicant.

Question 497

During a Cisco ISE postchange review, the following is observed: A new personal laptop can authenticate by username and password during onboarding but never receives its expected employee device certificate from the ISE internal CA. Which postchange outcome demonstrates correct implementation?

  1. The laptop receives a certificate with the intended identity and completes a successful EAP-TLS connection.
  2. An unregistered wired laptop reaches the current BYOD portal and enrolls without being allowed unrestricted preauth traffic.
  3. The pilot device completes native supplicant setup while unauthorized internal applications remain blocked during enrollment.
  4. A BYOD test client reaches the wiki and is denied management protocols to the domain controllers.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The laptop receives a certificate with the intended identity and completes a successful EAP-TLS connection. The required remediation is: Enable and validate the intended ISE internal CA certificate issuance and native supplicant provisioning flow for that BYOD policy. It works because the bootstrap credential authorizes enrollment; subsequent EAP-TLS access requires an issued device or user certificate and configured supplicant.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Revalidate wired redirect paths when ISE portal hostnames change. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Test certificate issuance and policy mapping separately from initial portal login. The needed response is: The laptop receives a certificate with the intended identity and completes a successful EAP-TLS connection.

C:

Run onboarding with the actual limited-access ACL and DNS view used by new devices. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Test certificate issuance and policy mapping separately from initial portal login. The needed response is: The laptop receives a certificate with the intended identity and completes a successful EAP-TLS connection.

D:

Verify effective network restrictions for every personal-device authorization profile. The actual fault is governed by a different mechanism: Test certificate issuance and policy mapping separately from initial portal login. The needed response is: The laptop receives a certificate with the intended identity and completes a successful EAP-TLS connection.

Question 498

A security policy owner must resolve this specific case: A new personal laptop can authenticate by username and password during onboarding but never receives its expected employee device certificate from the ISE internal CA. What should be added to the maintenance or security review?

  1. Prohibit export of internal CA private material to network access devices.
  2. Track portal and EAP server certificates separately and verify both renewal paths.
  3. Test certificate issuance and policy mapping separately from initial portal login.
  4. Verify effective network restrictions for every personal-device authorization profile.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Test certificate issuance and policy mapping separately from initial portal login. This control addresses recurrence of the observed failure. The governing behavior is: The bootstrap credential authorizes enrollment; subsequent EAP-TLS access requires an issued device or user certificate and configured supplicant. The ongoing acceptance check remains: The laptop receives a certificate with the intended identity and completes a successful EAP-TLS connection.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Test certificate issuance and policy mapping separately from initial portal login. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Configure a portal certificate chain and hostname that match the published onboarding FQDN. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

B:

Test certificate issuance and policy mapping separately from initial portal login. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Renew or reprovision a valid approved certificate and verify the permitted trust chain and identity mapping before reauthorizing the device. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

D:

Test certificate issuance and policy mapping separately from initial portal login. The offered choice instead concerns a different principle: Verify effective network restrictions for every personal-device authorization profile. Those technical conditions are not interchangeable.

Question 499

An identity and device-administration engineer evaluates: A wired BYOD onboarding flow succeeds in the lab but fails at campus access switches because their redirect ACL points to an obsolete ISE portal FQDN. What is the most appropriate next configuration or repair?

  1. Enable and validate the intended ISE internal CA certificate issuance and native supplicant provisioning flow for that BYOD policy.
  2. Correct the switch's supported redirection attributes, DNS access, and portal identity for the current ISE BYOD PSNs.
  3. Assign an appropriate native supplicant provisioning profile and supported onboarding instructions by operating system.
  4. Design an ISE BYOD identity and device-registration flow that classifies personal devices and returns a separate restricted authorization role.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct the switch's supported redirection attributes, DNS access, and portal identity for the current ISE BYOD PSNs. This is appropriate because wired BYOD relies on NAD-mediated redirect and restricted bootstrap connectivity just as wireless onboarding does. It should be verified by this evidence: An unregistered wired laptop reaches the current BYOD portal and enrolls without being allowed unrestricted preauth traffic.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Maintain OS-specific BYOD enrollment tests as mobile versions change. In the case being tested, Test certificate issuance and policy mapping separately from initial portal login. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Correct the switch's supported redirection attributes, DNS access, and portal identity for the current ISE BYOD PSNs.

C:

Run onboarding with the actual limited-access ACL and DNS view used by new devices. In the case being tested, Test certificate issuance and policy mapping separately from initial portal login. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Correct the switch's supported redirection attributes, DNS access, and portal identity for the current ISE BYOD PSNs.

D:

Both VMs report distinct addresses and ISE assigns the correct independent endpoint records and policies. In the case being tested, Test certificate issuance and policy mapping separately from initial portal login. The necessary acceptance evidence is: Correct the switch's supported redirection attributes, DNS access, and portal identity for the current ISE BYOD PSNs.

Question 500

A campus and branch network operator reports: A wired BYOD onboarding flow succeeds in the lab but fails at campus access switches because their redirect ACL points to an obsolete ISE portal FQDN. What is the key technical principle in this situation?

  1. Wired BYOD relies on NAD-mediated redirect and restricted bootstrap connectivity just as wireless onboarding does.
  2. The browser's trust decision is based on TLS certificate identity and chain, independently of subsequent EAP-TLS enrollment.
  3. ISE BYOD enrollment branches by endpoint platform; a configuration package valid for one OS need not install on another.
  4. ISE My Devices ownership controls prevent two employees from simply attaching one endpoint identity to conflicting accounts.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Wired BYOD relies on NAD-mediated redirect and restricted bootstrap connectivity just as wireless onboarding does. This behavior directly governs the stated requirement. The recommended action is: Correct the switch's supported redirection attributes, DNS access, and portal identity for the current ISE BYOD PSNs. The acceptance result is: An unregistered wired laptop reaches the current BYOD portal and enrolls without being allowed unrestricted preauth traffic.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Configure a portal certificate chain and hostname that match the published onboarding FQDN. The repeat risk here is different: Test certificate issuance and policy mapping separately from initial portal login. A directly relevant preventive control is: Wired BYOD relies on NAD-mediated redirect and restricted bootstrap connectivity just as wireless onboarding does.

C:

Run onboarding with the actual limited-access ACL and DNS view used by new devices. The repeat risk here is different: Test certificate issuance and policy mapping separately from initial portal login. A directly relevant preventive control is: Wired BYOD relies on NAD-mediated redirect and restricted bootstrap connectivity just as wireless onboarding does.

D:

Resolve and verify the prior ownership and registration state through authorized endpoint management before allowing a new user to register it. The repeat risk here is different: Test certificate issuance and policy mapping separately from initial portal login. A directly relevant preventive control is: Wired BYOD relies on NAD-mediated redirect and restricted bootstrap connectivity just as wireless onboarding does.